Reverse # Check 07 4681 3446

[Rhye Best]

Could I please, if possible, get info on,
07 4681 3446 - Name, addy etc.

Thanks in advance,
Ryan.

[Rod Speed]

Rhye Best <rhye.best@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:422e91a6$0$31490$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

> Could I please, if possible, get info on,
> 07 4681 3446 - Name, addy etc.

Nothing for that one in the last DTMS.

There are 4 with the last digit different, in Stanthorpe Qld, all residential
numbers.

[Krusty]

Have the means but it's ILLEGAL to divulge this information!

[Charlie Wong]

On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:46:08 +1100, "Krusty" <news@kogarah.net> wrote:

>Have the means but it's ILLEGAL to divulge this information!

And it was probably a breach of Telstra policy for you to even look
without just cause.

[FruitLoop]

yeh good on ya * toaster boy *


"Krusty" <news@kogarah.net> wrote in message news:422eb7d3$1@news1...
> Have the means but it's ILLEGAL to divulge this information!
>
>

[Simon VK3XEM]

Can somebody tell me where this number comes up to 0398652690. Wanker
rang me and left me a message asking him to ring me back.

I rang him and spoke to him. Later I tried to ring him back and I got
someone else who did not know what was going on. I tried to ring a
third time and the number said it was not valid.


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

[The Family]

Probably a large PABX system that's dishing out outbound line numbers rather
than the central in-dial number. Try calling the Crime Dept at Victoria
Police if you reckon you're being harassed.

"Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
news:422ee254$1_2@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com. ..
> Can somebody tell me where this number comes up to 0398652690. Wanker
> rang me and left me a message asking him to ring me back.
>
> I rang him and spoke to him. Later I tried to ring him back and I got
> someone else who did not know what was going on. I tried to ring a third
> time and the number said it was not valid.
>
>
> --
> The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.
>
> 73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
> http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452
> VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

[Simon VK3XEM]

The Family wrote:
> Probably a large PABX system that's dishing out outbound line numbers rather
> than the central in-dial number. Try calling the Crime Dept at Victoria
> Police if you reckon you're being harassed.
>
> "Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
> news:422ee254$1_2@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com. ..
>
>>Can somebody tell me where this number comes up to 0398652690. Wanker
>>rang me and left me a message asking him to ring me back.
>>
>>I rang him and spoke to him. Later I tried to ring him back and I got
>>someone else who did not know what was going on. I tried to ring a third
>>time and the number said it was not valid.

Well that dosen't make much sense when this clown gave me that phone
number to ring him!


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

[Charlie Wong]

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:11:44 +1100, Simon VK3XEM <usenet@vk3xem.net>
wrote:

>Well that dosen't make much sense when this clown gave me that phone
>number to ring him!

Get a hobby.

[budgie]

On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:46:08 +1100, "Krusty" <news@kogarah.net> wrote:

>Have the means but it's ILLEGAL to divulge this information!

izzat right? and if I have a licensed DTMS database, are you telling me I can't
look at it, or I can't let you look at it, or I can't tell you what I see in it?
Crap.

[Simon VK3XEM]

Charlie Wong wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:11:44 +1100, Simon VK3XEM <usenet@vk3xem.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Well that dosen't make much sense when this clown gave me that phone
>>number to ring him!
>
>
> Get a hobby.

I have one, thank you.

--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

[Kwyjibo]

budgie <me@privacy.net> said

> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:46:08 +1100, "Krusty" <news@kogarah.net> wrote:
>
>>Have the means but it's ILLEGAL to divulge this information!
>
> izzat right? and if I have a licensed DTMS database, are you telling me
> I can't look at it, or I can't let you look at it, or I can't tell you
> what I see in it?

That's not what he said, stupid. Try reading next time.


--


Kwyj.

(Remove your panties to reply by email)


--< Save the earth. It's the only planet known to have chocolate. >--

[Simon VK3XEM]

Simon VK3XEM wrote:
> Can somebody tell me where this number comes up to 0398652690. Wanker
> rang me and left me a message asking him to ring me back.
>
> I rang him and spoke to him. Later I tried to ring him back and I got
> someone else who did not know what was going on. I tried to ring a
> third time and the number said it was not valid.

I don't need a reverse look up of this number any more. ESD are
investigating this person, he is using different names to different
people but the same phone number.

It appears that when he is not around the number either goes to other
people or says it is not a valid number, so he will have to explain to
ESD what his game is. So I don't think I will have to worry about him
again.


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

[Rod Speed]

"Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
news:422fa5c5_2@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com...
> Charlie Wong wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:11:44 +1100, Simon VK3XEM <usenet@vk3xem.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Well that dosen't make much sense when this clown gave me that phone number
>>>to ring him!
>>
>>
>> Get a hobby.
>
> I have one, thank you.

Fiddling with your dick doesnt qualify.

[Simon VK3XEM]

Rod Speed wrote:
> "Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
> news:422fa5c5_2@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com...
>
>>Charlie Wong wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:11:44 +1100, Simon VK3XEM <usenet@vk3xem.net>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Well that dosen't make much sense when this clown gave me that phone number
>>>>to ring him!
>>>
>>>
>>>Get a hobby.
>>
>>I have one, thank you.
>
>
> Fiddling with your dick doesnt qualify.

FUCK OFF Rod and stop wasting my time!


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

[Rod Speed]

"Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
news:422fbca1_3@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com...
> Rod Speed wrote:
>> "Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
>> news:422fa5c5_2@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com...
>>
>>>Charlie Wong wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:11:44 +1100, Simon VK3XEM <usenet@vk3xem.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Well that dosen't make much sense when this clown gave me that phone number
>>>>>to ring him!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Get a hobby.
>>>
>>>I have one, thank you.
>>
>>
>> Fiddling with your dick doesnt qualify.
>
> FUCK OFF Rod and stop wasting my time!

Go and fuck yourself, lying fuckwit child.

[budgie]

On 10 Mar 2005 02:40:06 GMT, Kwyjibo <Kwyjibo@YourPantiesozdebate.com> wrote:

>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>
>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:46:08 +1100, "Krusty" <news@kogarah.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Have the means but it's ILLEGAL to divulge this information!
>>
>> izzat right? and if I have a licensed DTMS database, are you telling me
>> I can't look at it, or I can't let you look at it, or I can't tell you
>> what I see in it?
>
>That's not what he said, stupid. Try reading next time.

Errrr, I did read what the twit posted. If it happened to be listed in DTMS
then I'd have the means. His post says it would be illegal to divulge the info,
period, blanket. What he might have *meant_to_say* is anybody's guess.

[The Family]

"Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
news:422f2017_1@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com...
> The Family wrote:
>> Probably a large PABX system that's dishing out outbound line numbers
>> rather than the central in-dial number. Try calling the Crime Dept at
>> Victoria Police if you reckon you're being harassed.
>>
>> "Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
>> news:422ee254$1_2@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com. ..
>>
>>>Can somebody tell me where this number comes up to 0398652690. Wanker
>>>rang me and left me a message asking him to ring me back.
>>>
>>>I rang him and spoke to him. Later I tried to ring him back and I got
>>>someone else who did not know what was going on. I tried to ring a third
>>>time and the number said it was not valid.
>
> Well that dosen't make much sense when this clown gave me that phone
> number to ring him!
>

Simon,

Sorry to be indirect but please re-read my response and you may be able to
figure out what I'm saying. For a number of reasons, I don't want to be
more specific.

[The Family]

"Simon VK3XEM" <usenet@vk3xem.net> wrote in message
news:422fb47e$1_3@news.melbourne.pipenetworks.com. ..
> Simon VK3XEM wrote:
>> Can somebody tell me where this number comes up to 0398652690. Wanker
>> rang me and left me a message asking him to ring me back.
>>
>> I rang him and spoke to him. Later I tried to ring him back and I got
>> someone else who did not know what was going on. I tried to ring a third
>> time and the number said it was not valid.
>
> I don't need a reverse look up of this number any more. ESD are
> investigating this person, he is using different names to different people
> but the same phone number.
>
> It appears that when he is not around the number either goes to other
> people or says it is not a valid number, so he will have to explain to ESD
> what his game is. So I don't think I will have to worry about him again.
>

See my response from a few minutes ago. This is not as simple as you think.

[Martin Taylor]

budgie said....

>>Have the means but it's ILLEGAL to divulge this information!
>
> izzat right? and if I have a licensed DTMS database, are you telling me
> I can't look at it, or I can't let you look at it, or I can't tell you
> what I see in it? Crap.

It's academic, anyway. That number doesn't come up. I have the last ever
published Phonedisc (July 04), and it doesn't show this number. In fact,
with a wildcard match I can only find 4 entries that have the first 5
digits of that number sequence. Somewhere called Stanthorpe, whereever
that is.


--
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.