Re: Telstra launches SMS from fixed lines

[Brendon]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3aj4l8F6830d9U1@individual.net...
>
> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>
news:4243def7$2$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:3ai0pbF6bve58U1@individual.net...
> >>
> >> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
> >>
> >
news:4243a521$1$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> >> > Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
> >> >> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote
> >> >>> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
> >>
> >> >>>> The customer's shit is completely irrelevant to what needs
> >> >>>> to be charged to make those payphones viable, fuckwit.
> >>
> >> >>> A payphone wont be viable if no-one uses
> >> >>> it due to the cost of using it being high.
> >>
> >> >> Wont happen with 30c, fool.
> >>
> >> > Whatever you think Rod
> >>
> >> Whatever I know, fool.
>
> > Nope
>
> Yep.

Nope

>
> >> They're already paying 40c for a voice call, fuckwit.
>
> > Voice calls aint SMS
>
> Duh. You get the same effect with voice calls, fuckwit.

Then why is SMS so popular, fuckwit.
People use SMS and most will do it from a mobile, not a payphone.

> The pathetic povs that dont have a landline or a mobile
> pay 40c for a voice call from a payphone BECAUSE THEY
> DONT HAVE A LANDLINE OR A MOBILE, FUCKWIT.

Most people have a mobile or a landline.
Anyway, we're talking about SMS from a payphone not voice.
SMS from a payphone will be used much less than voice from a payphone.

> They'll do the same thing with SMS too, cretin wanker.

Nope

>
> >> >> Thats already about the cost of a voice
> >> >> call and plenty obviously use them.
> >>
> >> > Comparing apples and oranges
> >>
> >> Even you should be able to manage better than that pathetically hoary
old
> > line,
> >> fuckwit.
>
> > This from the person that is the queen of hoary old lines
>
> Even you should be able to manage better than that pathetically hoary old
line,
> fuckwit.

This from the person that is the queen of hoary old lines

[Brendon]

"Kwyjibo." <Kwyjibo@MySmellyJocksozdebate.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9625A5605E70dddddd@130.133.1.18...
> "Brendon" <no@way.man> said
>
> > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:_lP0e.11147$C7.10874@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >> Payphones arent designed to be used by mobile customers. Completely
> >> different customer segment
> >
> > Fact: Most people in Australia have mobiles
>
> Fact: Most people in Australia have a fixed line phone and have had for
> years. That hasn't stopped people using payphones for voice calls.

You use a payphone when your out and about, not at home.
We are talking about SMS from a payphone, not voice calls.

In many cases you can do a local call cheaper from a payphone than a mobile,
but that's not SMS. I'm not talking about payphones in general, just these
new SMS jobs.

> > Fact: That is what these SMS payphones will be competing with
>
> Wrong. They are to coexist, not compete.

With mobile use so high Australia, thats what they WILL have to compete
with, no matter what Telstra or anyone else thinks.

> > Fact: SMS from a mobile is cheaper
>
> Fact: Phone calls from your home phone have been always been cheaper than
> payphones. That hasn't stopped the market for payphones.

See above.

[Brendon]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3aj4prF6bcdqhU1@individual.net...
>
> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
>
news:4243def8$0$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> > Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>
> >> Payphones arent designed to be used by mobile
> >> customers. Completely different customer segment
>
> > Fact: Most people in Australia have mobiles
>
> Irrelevant to WHO USES PAYPHONES, fuckwit.

Talking about SMS from payphones here, not voice calls.

> > Fact: That is what these SMS payphones will be competing with
>
> Nothing like a fact.

Wrong

> > Fact: SMS from a mobile is cheaper
>
> Fact: local calls from a landline are cheaper than from a
> payphone too, AND THE PATHETIC POVS THAT DONT HAVE
> A LANDLINE OR A MOBILE USE A PAYPHONE ANYWAY.

Taling about SMS you dumb shit, not voice calls.

> Presumably you actually are that stupid.

If your going to argue something, keep in on subject, and that's SMS from
payphones, not voice calls. How many times to I need to say it before your
empty head will get it?

[Brendon]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3aj4tiF6dfscmU1@individual.net...
>
> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>
news:4243def8$1$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:3ai0u5F6920hlU1@individual.net...
> >>
> >> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
> >>
> >
news:4243a521$2$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> >> > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:S5w0e.9873$C7.9115@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
> >> >>
> >> >
> >
news:42426bb6$1$27631$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> >> >> > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:OGp0e.9454$C7.6843@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >> >> > > So they get to pay the 30c and use the SMS facility, or they get
to
> >> > buy
> >> >> a
> >> >> > > mobile and pay 25c per SMS.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Easy to get a mobile plan where SMS is less than 25c, which makes
the
> >> > 30c
> >> >> > charge look even worse.
> >> >>
> >> >> Telstra would be more than happy for all to get mobile phones,
better
> >> >> revenue for them and they can get rid of a few more loss-making
> > payphones
> >> >
> >> > Which is what these SMS jobs will be
> >> >
> >> >> > > Their choice.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yep, and it dosnt take much to work out what the popular choice
will
> > be.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yep, the SMS-enabled payphones will do nicely
> >> >
> >> > Nope - the popular choice will be for people to use their mobiles
> >>
> >> Payphones aint for those who have mobiles, fuckwit.
>
> > Most people have mobiles.
>
> MOST PEOPLE WHO USE PAYPHONES DONT,
> THATS WHY THEY USE PAYPHONES, FUCKWIT.

And the number of people who dont have a mobile is decreasing all the time.
The point is that mobile use is increasing and payphone use is decreasing,
therefore SMS from payphones will be a small part of a shrinking market,
fighting to compete with SMS from mobiles, which is a growing market.

>
> > It's widely known that payphone use is decreasing
> > due to the increase in mobile phone use
>
> Irrelevant to whether payphone are still used BY
> THOSE WHO DONT HAVE MOBILE PHONES.

See above

>
> >> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof
> >> that you've never ever had a fucking clue.
>
> > Whatever
>
> Pathetic, really.

Another old line from the queen of old lines.

[Brendon]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3aj515F6b45p5U1@individual.net...
>
> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>
news:4243def8$3$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:3ai14lF699t76U1@individual.net...
> >>
> >> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
> >>
> >
news:4243a521$3$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> >> > Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
> >>
> >> >> I hardly think anyone will baulk at 30c
> >>
> >> > 30c from a payphone or 5-25c from a mobile - easy choice really.
> >>
> >> Payphones aint for those who have mobiles, fuckwit.
>
> > Give up Rod.
>
> No need, fuckwit.

Your choice - go on looking stupid - no problem for me.

> > You know as well as anyone that most people in Oz have mobiles
>
> I know that THOSE WHO USE PAYPHONES DONT HAVE MOBILES, fuckwit.

I never said that everyone had mobiles, just most people, and increasing all
the time.

> > and payphone use in going down due to them.
>
> BECAUSE THOSE WHO HAVE MOBILES DONT USE PAYPHONES, fuckwit.

Thank You for admitting that payphone use is decreasing. Thank you for
admitting that SMS payphones will be competing in a shrinking payphone
matket.
All of which, I have been saying all along.

> >> >> do you see people refusing to use payphones at 40c
> >> >> per local call when the standard local call cost is 22c?
> >>
> >> > Apples and oranges, comparing SMS costs here, not voice calls.
> >>
> >> Pathetic, really.
>
> > Another old line from the queen of old lines.
>
> Pathetic, really.

Another old line from the queen of old lines.

You can give up and stop looking stupid now.

[Brendon]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3aj52cF6cp3ofU1@individual.net...

> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed fantasyland, child.

Yet another old line from the queen of them

[Brendon]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3aj54iF68pqr8U1@individual.net...
> Yep. Plenty will use a 30c SMS instead of a 40c voice call, fuckwit.

Nope.
Fuck all will compared to doing it from one of the ever increasing number of
mobiles in Aus.

[Brendon]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3aj5asF6b08ctU1@individual.net...
>
> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>
news:4243def9$2$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:%lP0e.11151$C7.950@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >>
> >> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
> >>
> >
news:4243a522$1$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> >> > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:Baw0e.9883$C7.4853@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >> > > Melbourne has peak taxis, they are only licensed to operate in peak
> >> hours,
> >> > > like 12am-6am fri/sat/sun nights, or something like that, and the
> > charge
> >> > is
> >> > > a 20% premium on normal costs
> >> > >
> >> > > do people use them? of course they do
> >> >
> >> > When there is no alternative, same as these SMS payphones.
> >>
> >> So you admit that they are used to cater for a different customer
segment,
> >> thus rendering your stupid "people will use their mobiles" argument
invalid?
>
> > Nope
>
> You clearly are that stupid.

Nope

>
> > - people will use mobiles wherever possible for SMS over these payphones
>
> PEOPLE WHO USE PAYPHONES DONT HAVE MOBILES, fuckwit.

Fuck your slow.
Never said people wont use payphones at all, I said the payphone market in
general is increasing (which you agreed wth in a previous post) and SMS from
payphones will be competing with the ever increasing mobile usage. And it's
checper to send an SMS from a mobile than one of these SMS payphones - not
hard to work out what most people will do.

All this makes these SMS payphones less likely to be viable for Telstra.

>
> > - been saying that from the start.
>
> Yep, been flaunting your terminal stupidity all along. Nothing new there.

squirm squirm squirm

> > It's widely known that mobile use is going
> > up and payphone use is going down.
>
> BECAUSE THOSE WHO HAVE MOBILES DONT USE PAYPHONES, fuckwit.

Duh.
And most people have mobiles and growing all the time, which means less
people will use payphones at all let alone for SMS, which less usage of
these SMS jobs.

>
> > Any normal person would use a standard fare cab over one of these peak
times
> > ones if a standard one was available. Peak one = last resort, just as an
SMS
> > payphone will be over a mobile.
>
> Pathetic, really.

Cant rebut it? Didnt think so.


> >> > > you pay a bit more for convenience.
> >> >
> >> > Having to stand at a payphone and type an SMS vs doing it anywhere
(inc
> >> > while walking along) on a mobile? Hardly makes the payphone the
> > convenient
> >> > choice.
> >>
> >> Youve just said the exact opposite of your above argument. Idiot
> >> tap dancing away from the story, fooling no one at all
>
> > Ummm, you on drugs?
>
> Nope, you are, and suffering from ear to ear dog shit as well.

Nope

> > I clearly stated another reason to use a mobile for SMS over a payphone.
>
> Pity THOSE WHO USE PAYPHONES DONT HAVE MOBILES, fuckwit.

Pity I never said they did, fuckwit.

> > Being tied to a payphone is less convenient
> > than using a mobile - not that hard to understand.
>
> Pity THOSE WHO USE PAYPHONES DONT HAVE MOBILES, fuckwit.

Pity I never said they did, fuckwit.

[Brendon]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3aj5d3F6bpctfU1@individual.net...
>
> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>
news:4243def9$4$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:3ai19fF6ae324U1@individual.net...
> >>
> >> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
> >>
> >
news:4243a522$0$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> >> > Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
> >>
> >> >>> And the customer wont give a shit how much the
> >> >>> phone costs, just how much it's costs them to use.
> >>
> >> >> And they keep paying 40c for local calls from payphones, fuckwit.
> >>
> >> > Apples and oranges - comparing SMS costs here, not voice calls.
> >>
> >> Pathetic, really.
>
> > That's right - cant rebut it.
>
> Pathetic, really.

Go on, bet you can't

> >> >>> Would people pay a higher cab fare because they were in a new
falcon
> >> >>> instead of a 5 year old one? Dont think so, but by your logic they
> > would.
> >>
> >> >> Presumably you actually are that stupid.
> >>
> >> > Didnt think you could rebut it.
> >>
> >> Pathetic, really.
>
> > That's right - cant rebut it
>
> Pathetic, really.

More old lines from the queen of them.

[Kwyjibo.]

"Brendon" <no@way.man> said


> Duh.
> And most people have mobiles and growing all the time, which means less
> people will use payphones at all let alone for SMS, which less usage of
> these SMS jobs.
>

When was the last time you saw a payphone with a flat battery?

--


Kwyj.

(Remove my smelly jocks to reply by email)

[Rod Speed]

Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
news:4244d14f$0$31169$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote

>> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof
>> that you've never ever had a fucking clue.

> Nope

Yep.

>> Payphones are used BY THOSE WHO
>> DONT HAVE MOBILE PHONES, FUCKWIT.

> Most people have mobiles and increasing, payphone use is going down.

BECAUSE PAYPHONES ARE USED BY THOSE WHO
DONT HAVE A WORKING MOBILE PHONE, FUCKWIT.

>> Even someone as stupid as you should have noticed that even tho
>> it costs 40c to make a local call on a payphone, compared with
>> 25c or so on a landline, the pathetic povs use payphones.

> Comparing SMS here, not voice.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you've never ever
had a fucking clue and couldnt bullshit your way out of a wet paper
bag even if your pathetic excuse for a 'life' depended on it.

>> Anyone with a clue can make a short call on their mobile
>> for a lot less the 40c it costs on a payphone too.

> Comparing SMS here, not voice.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you've never ever
had a fucking clue and couldnt bullshit your way out of a wet paper
bag even if your pathetic excuse for a 'life' depended on it.

[Charlie Wong]

On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:34:07 +1100, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>BECAUSE PAYPHONES ARE USED BY THOSE WHO
>DONT HAVE A WORKING MOBILE PHONE, FUCKWIT.

Wrong.

[Rod Speed]

Charlie Wong <willwasteyou@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bpda4150r4rgjsnldev503nkuin5129hi6@4ax.com...
> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote

>>BECAUSE PAYPHONES ARE USED BY THOSE WHO
>>DONT HAVE A WORKING MOBILE PHONE, FUCKWIT.

> Wrong.

Right. The fools you see with a mobile in hand using
a payphone are just the pathetic povs and kids that
have run out of credit on their prepaid pov-phones
and the druggys who dont want to be traceable, fuckwit.

And there are fuck all of those doing that anyway.

[Rod Speed]

"Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
news:4244d14f$1$31169$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3aj4hgF6c78r8U1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>>
> news:4243def7$0$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:3ai0knF6bjdacU1@individual.net...
>> >>
>> >> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
>> >>
>> >
> news:4243a521$0$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> >> > Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>> >>
>> >> >> I hardly think that those who need to send SMS are going to baulk at
>> > 30c
>> >>
>> >> > They will when they can do it from their mobile for less.
>> >>
>> >> Pity SMS from payphones aint for those that have a mobile, fuckwit.
>> >
>> > Pity most people have a mobile, fuckwit.
>>
>> Pity SMS from payphones aint for those that have a mobile, fuckwit.
>
> Pity most people have a mobile, fuckwit.

Pity SMS from payphones aint for those that have a mobile, fuckwit.

[Rod Speed]

"Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
news:4244d14f$2$31169$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3aj4l8F6830d9U1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>>
> news:4243def7$2$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:3ai0pbF6bve58U1@individual.net...
>> >>
>> >> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
>> >>
>> >
> news:4243a521$1$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> >> > Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>> >> >> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote
>> >> >>> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>> >>
>> >> >>>> The customer's shit is completely irrelevant to what needs
>> >> >>>> to be charged to make those payphones viable, fuckwit.
>> >>
>> >> >>> A payphone wont be viable if no-one uses
>> >> >>> it due to the cost of using it being high.
>> >>
>> >> >> Wont happen with 30c, fool.
>> >>
>> >> > Whatever you think Rod
>> >>
>> >> Whatever I know, fool.
>>
>> > Nope
>>
>> Yep.
>
> Nope

Yep.

>>>> They're already paying 40c for a voice call, fuckwit.

>>> Voice calls aint SMS

>> Duh. You get the same effect with voice calls, fuckwit.

> Then why is SMS so popular, fuckwit.

Because those that send them have a mobile, fuckwit.

> People use SMS and most will do it from a mobile, not a payphone.

Even someone as stupid as you should have noticed
that its a tad hard to send an SMS from a mobile if
you dont actually have a working mobile, fuckwit.

>> The pathetic povs that dont have a landline or a mobile
>> pay 40c for a voice call from a payphone BECAUSE THEY
>> DONT HAVE A LANDLINE OR A MOBILE, FUCKWIT.

> Most people have a mobile or a landline.

The pathetic povs that dont have a landline or a mobile
pay 40c for a voice call from a payphone BECAUSE THEY
DONT HAVE A LANDLINE OR A MOBILE, FUCKWIT.

> Anyway, we're talking about SMS from a payphone not voice.

Wrong again.

> SMS from a payphone will be used much
> less than voice from a payphone.

Duh. Its not as convenient, fuckwit.

Doesnt mean that 30c SMS from payphones wont
get used by some who dont have a mobile, fuckwit.

>> They'll do the same thing with SMS too, cretin wanker.

> Nope

Yep.

>> >> >> Thats already about the cost of a voice
>> >> >> call and plenty obviously use them.
>> >>
>> >> > Comparing apples and oranges
>> >>
>> >> Even you should be able to manage better than that pathetically hoary
> old
>> > line,
>> >> fuckwit.
>>
>> > This from the person that is the queen of hoary old lines
>>
>> Even you should be able to manage better than that pathetically hoary old
> line,
>> fuckwit.
>
> This from the person that is the queen of hoary old lines

Even you should be able to manage better than that pathetically hoary old line,
fuckwit.

[Rod Speed]

"Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
news:4244d150$0$31169$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> "Kwyjibo." <Kwyjibo@MySmellyJocksozdebate.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9625A5605E70dddddd@130.133.1.18...
>> "Brendon" <no@way.man> said
>>
>> > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:_lP0e.11147$C7.10874@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> >> Payphones arent designed to be used by mobile customers. Completely
>> >> different customer segment
>> >
>> > Fact: Most people in Australia have mobiles
>>
>> Fact: Most people in Australia have a fixed line phone and have had for
>> years. That hasn't stopped people using payphones for voice calls.

> You use a payphone when your out and about, not at home.

Not if you have a mobile, fuckwit.

> We are talking about SMS from a payphone, not voice calls.

Wrong.

> In many cases you can do a local call cheaper from a payphone than a mobile,

That aint why payphones are used, fuckwit.

And anyone with a clue can make a local call from their
mobile for less than the 40c it costs with a payphone, fool.

> but that's not SMS.

Must be one of those rocket scientist terminal fuckwits.

> I'm not talking about payphones in general, just these new SMS jobs.

SMS can be sent from most payphones, fuckwit.

Some who want to send an SMS from a payphone BECAUSE THEY DONT
HAVE A MOBILE, will prefer to pay 30c it costs with one of the newer SMS
capable payphones because its easier to enter the SMS, fuckwit.

It remains to be seen if there are enough of those WHO DONT HAVE A
MOBILE to make it viable, but those payphones dont just do SMS, fuckwit.

>>> Fact: That is what these SMS payphones will be competing with

>> Wrong. They are to coexist, not compete.

> With mobile use so high Australia, thats what they WILL have
> to compete with, no matter what Telstra or anyone else thinks.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you've never
ever had a fucking clue. Its NEVER GOING TO BE POSSIBLE
FOR PAYPHONES TO COMPETE WITH MOBILES, and they
aint even been attempting to do that when they charge 40c for
a local call and anyone with a clue can make a call from a
mobile for less than that. It isnt even viable competition for
longer calls, because anyone with a clue uses a landline
instead or a mobile with free longer calls etc.

>> > Fact: SMS from a mobile is cheaper

>> Fact: Phone calls from your home phone have been always been
>> cheaper than payphones. That hasn't stopped the market for payphones.

> See above.

Completely useless, as always with your steaming turds.

[Rod Speed]

"Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
news:4244d150$1$31169$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3aj4prF6bcdqhU1@individual.net...
>>
>> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
>>
> news:4243def8$0$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> > Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>>
>> >> Payphones arent designed to be used by mobile
>> >> customers. Completely different customer segment
>>
>> > Fact: Most people in Australia have mobiles
>>
>> Irrelevant to WHO USES PAYPHONES, fuckwit.

> Talking about SMS from payphones here, not voice calls.

Wrong.

>>> Fact: That is what these SMS payphones will be competing with

>> Nothing like a fact.

> Wrong

Right.

>>> Fact: SMS from a mobile is cheaper

>> Fact: local calls from a landline are cheaper than from a
>> payphone too, AND THE PATHETIC POVS THAT DONT HAVE
>> A LANDLINE OR A MOBILE USE A PAYPHONE ANYWAY.

> Taling about SMS you dumb shit, not voice calls.

Wrong, fuckwit.

>> Presumably you actually are that stupid.

> If your going to argue something, keep in on subject,

Go and fuck yourself.

> and that's SMS from payphones, not voice calls.

Wrong.

> How many times to I need to say it before your empty head will get it?

Nothing to 'get' you stupid fuckwit.

[Rod Speed]

"Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
news:4244d150$2$31169$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3aj4tiF6dfscmU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>>
> news:4243def8$1$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:3ai0u5F6920hlU1@individual.net...
>> >>
>> >> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>> >>
>> >
> news:4243a521$2$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> >> > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >> > news:S5w0e.9873$C7.9115@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >
> news:42426bb6$1$27631$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> >> >> > "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> > news:OGp0e.9454$C7.6843@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> >> >> > > So they get to pay the 30c and use the SMS facility, or they get
> to
>> >> > buy
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> > > mobile and pay 25c per SMS.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Easy to get a mobile plan where SMS is less than 25c, which makes
> the
>> >> > 30c
>> >> >> > charge look even worse.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Telstra would be more than happy for all to get mobile phones,
> better
>> >> >> revenue for them and they can get rid of a few more loss-making
>> > payphones
>> >> >
>> >> > Which is what these SMS jobs will be
>> >> >
>> >> >> > > Their choice.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Yep, and it dosnt take much to work out what the popular choice
> will
>> > be.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yep, the SMS-enabled payphones will do nicely
>> >> >
>> >> > Nope - the popular choice will be for people to use their mobiles
>> >>
>> >> Payphones aint for those who have mobiles, fuckwit.
>>
>> > Most people have mobiles.
>>
>> MOST PEOPLE WHO USE PAYPHONES DONT,
>> THATS WHY THEY USE PAYPHONES, FUCKWIT.

> And the number of people who dont have a mobile is decreasing all the time.

Irrelevant to who payphones are used by fuckwit.

> The point is that mobile use is increasing and payphone use is decreasing,

Irrelevant to who payphones are used by fuckwit.

> therefore SMS from payphones will be a small part of a shrinking market,

Must be one of those rocket scientist fuckwits.

> fighting to compete with SMS from mobiles,

Nope, it doesnt compete WHEN THOSE WHO SEND SMS
FROM PAYPHONES DONT HAVE MOBILES, FUCKWIT.

> which is a growing market.

Must be one of those rocket scientist fuckwits.

>>> It's widely known that payphone use is decreasing
>>> due to the increase in mobile phone use

>> Irrelevant to whether payphone are still used BY
>> THOSE WHO DONT HAVE MOBILE PHONES.

> See above

Completely useless, as always with your steaming turds.

>>>> Thanks for that completely superfluous proof
>>>> that you've never ever had a fucking clue.

>>> Whatever

>> Pathetic, really.

> Another old line from the queen of old lines.

Pathetic, really.

[Rod Speed]

"Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
news:4244d150$3$31169$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3aj515F6b45p5U1@individual.net...
>>
>> "Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
>>
> news:4243def8$3$27858$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> > news:3ai14lF699t76U1@individual.net...
>> >>
>> >> Brendon <no@way.man> wrote in message
>> >>
>> >
> news:4243a521$3$27625$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> >> > Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>> >>
>> >> >> I hardly think anyone will baulk at 30c
>> >>
>> >> > 30c from a payphone or 5-25c from a mobile - easy choice really.
>> >>
>> >> Payphones aint for those who have mobiles, fuckwit.
>>
>> > Give up Rod.
>>
>> No need, fuckwit.
>
> Your choice - go on looking stupid - no problem for me.
>
>> > You know as well as anyone that most people in Oz have mobiles
>>
>> I know that THOSE WHO USE PAYPHONES DONT HAVE MOBILES, fuckwit.

> I never said that everyone had mobiles, just
> most people, and increasing all the time.

Completely irrelevant TO WHO USES PAYPHONES, fuckwit.

>>> and payphone use in going down due to them.

>> BECAUSE THOSE WHO HAVE MOBILES DONT USE PAYPHONES, fuckwit.

> Thank You for admitting that payphone use is decreasing.

That aint rocket science, you stupid little fuckwit.

> Thank you for admitting that SMS payphones
> will be competing in a shrinking payphone matket.

That aint rocket science, you stupid little fuckwit.

> All of which, I have been saying all along.

That aint rocket science, you stupid little fuckwit.

And it STILL is completely irrelevant to how many OF THOSE WHO USE PAYPHONES
WILL CHOOSE TO SEND AN SMS INSTEAD OF A 40c VOICE CALL, fuckwit.

>> >> >> do you see people refusing to use payphones at 40c
>> >> >> per local call when the standard local call cost is 22c?
>> >>
>> >> > Apples and oranges, comparing SMS costs here, not voice calls.
>> >>
>> >> Pathetic, really.
>>
>> > Another old line from the queen of old lines.
>>
>> Pathetic, really.

> Another old line from the queen of old lines.

Pathetic, really.

> You can give up and stop looking stupid now.

Pathetic, really.

[Rod Speed]

"Brendon" <no@way.man> wrote in message
news:4244d150$4$31169$61c65585@un-2park-reader-02.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3aj52cF6cp3ofU1@individual.net...
>
>> Only in your pathetic little drug crazed fantasyland, child.
>
> Yet another old line from the queen of them

Pathetic, really.