Samual
17-04-2005, 12:02 PM
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 05:27:29 +0800, "Clockmeister"
<no-one@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Well it was on the last model and on the new one too.
>
>The new one has a chain.
Really?
Now if that needs changing before 160-200K they should be shot.
<snip>
>> It is unforgiveable to have to change pads and rotors at 40,000k in
>> normal usage.
>>
>
>Not when you have excellent stopping power for 40,000km (usually more
>anyway, that is an extreme) compared to the brake problems that have plagued
>Commodores and Falcon's since EA/VN.
I only drive those cars occasionally at work, brakes seem fine, more
then fine. They cop heaps of abuse believe me and hold up fine.
>Like I said, rotors are a service item in Europe, did I stutter? Won't be
>long before Australia catches up...
You keep saying that.
What does that mean?
They did it on purpose? They want us to have to change pads AND discs
at the first change?
Believe it or not I am a Mechanical Engineer by training. Why the fuck
would you have two primary wearable components in the brake system?
Why not have hard discs and large soft pads? Why would you want to
throw away such a big component such a rotor so often? Sounds
ecologically irresponsible to me. Call me old fashioned, but I almost
think rotors should last the life of the car.
I also doubt very much that Europeans pay less then us for these
items. Do you have figures?
Sam
<no-one@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> Well it was on the last model and on the new one too.
>
>The new one has a chain.
Really?
Now if that needs changing before 160-200K they should be shot.
<snip>
>> It is unforgiveable to have to change pads and rotors at 40,000k in
>> normal usage.
>>
>
>Not when you have excellent stopping power for 40,000km (usually more
>anyway, that is an extreme) compared to the brake problems that have plagued
>Commodores and Falcon's since EA/VN.
I only drive those cars occasionally at work, brakes seem fine, more
then fine. They cop heaps of abuse believe me and hold up fine.
>Like I said, rotors are a service item in Europe, did I stutter? Won't be
>long before Australia catches up...
You keep saying that.
What does that mean?
They did it on purpose? They want us to have to change pads AND discs
at the first change?
Believe it or not I am a Mechanical Engineer by training. Why the fuck
would you have two primary wearable components in the brake system?
Why not have hard discs and large soft pads? Why would you want to
throw away such a big component such a rotor so often? Sounds
ecologically irresponsible to me. Call me old fashioned, but I almost
think rotors should last the life of the car.
I also doubt very much that Europeans pay less then us for these
items. Do you have figures?
Sam