MRR 2005 Spoiler on who lost their restaurant

[Albert]

MRR 2005 Spoiler on who lost their restaurant.

Time to hand back the keys.
Drum roll please.
Melbourne.

MRR 2004 Melb gets to the end without been nominated.
Then gets voted out.

MRR 2005 First vote between Perth and Melb and Melb lose out.
Melb get a second chance with Nathan.

MRR 2005 Perth vs Melb Vs Bris. 3 out of 3 that Melb have been voted
off. Get the feeling Melb are not loved by the other states:)

[pharro]

"Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:m68i61d5l3f5f573811ivuj37phpv30smr@4ax.com...
>
> MRR 2005 Spoiler on who lost their restaurant.
>
> Time to hand back the keys.
> Drum roll please.
> XXXXX
>
>

PLONK.

Just so that you know, I'm plonking you not because you have spoilt a result
but because you are a wanker who thinks he knows something. It may well come
to pass that later today, the results will go against Melbourne. However
that doesn't lessen the fact that you are a total tool.

pharro

[Matthew(GO THE GREEDY GOOSE!)]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:10:42 GMT, Albert <Albert@nospam.net> wrote:


bbzzzttt...Melbourne were still open at 11pm last night
>
>MRR 2005 Spoiler on who lost their restaurant.
>
>Time to hand back the keys.
>Drum roll please.
>Melbourne.
>
>MRR 2004 Melb gets to the end without been nominated.
>Then gets voted out.
>
>MRR 2005 First vote between Perth and Melb and Melb lose out.
>Melb get a second chance with Nathan.
>
>MRR 2005 Perth vs Melb Vs Bris. 3 out of 3 that Melb have been voted
>off. Get the feeling Melb are not loved by the other states:)

[Andy]

"Matthew(GO THE GREEDY GOOSE!)" <music@night.com> wrote in message
news:3iri619q7b1b48set2fdb84cj09ivkaas3@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:10:42 GMT, Albert <Albert@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
> bbzzzttt...Melbourne were still open at 11pm last night

You got fiends there? Or did you go for the foot-a-ball?

[Albert]

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:36:30 +1000, "Matthew(GO THE GREEDY GOOSE!)"
<music@night.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:10:42 GMT, Albert <Albert@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>bbzzzttt...Melbourne were still open at 11pm last night

Yes but channel 7 places the plasma screens in each restaurant tonight
and you will find that Melb are out.

I know this because I know who voted for which state. Perth had the
highest phone polling by a mile. they romped it in. Then Bris were
just over double Melb tally of votes.

>>
>>MRR 2005 Spoiler on who lost their restaurant.
>>
>>Time to hand back the keys.
>>Drum roll please.
>>Melbourne.
>>
>>MRR 2004 Melb gets to the end without been nominated.
>>Then gets voted out.
>>
>>MRR 2005 First vote between Perth and Melb and Melb lose out.
>>Melb get a second chance with Nathan.
>>
>>MRR 2005 Perth vs Melb Vs Bris. 3 out of 3 that Melb have been voted
>>off. Get the feeling Melb are not loved by the other states:)

[Albert]

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:37:20 +1000, "pharro" <nospam> wrote:

>
>"Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
>news:m68i61d5l3f5f573811ivuj37phpv30smr@4ax.com...
>>
>> MRR 2005 Spoiler on who lost their restaurant.
>>
>> Time to hand back the keys.
>> Drum roll please.
>> XXXXX
>>
>>
>
>PLONK.
>
>Just so that you know, I'm plonking you not because you have spoilt a result
>but because you are a wanker who thinks he knows something. It may well come
>to pass that later today, the results will go against Melbourne. However
>that doesn't lessen the fact that you are a total tool.
>
>pharro

Shit for brains. Why do you think I placed SPOILER in the subject
line. You could have chosen to ignore it but you didn't. Says more
about you. Quite a few want to know who lost their restaurants.

I will continue to post the tallys of the votes before each Saturday
when channel 7 film for Sunday episode.

[Brissie]

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:36:30 +1000, "Matthew(GO THE GREEDY GOOSE!)"
<music@night.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:10:42 GMT, Albert <Albert@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>bbzzzttt...Melbourne were still open at 11pm last night

That's because the eviction doesn't happen until tonight

[Soixante Un Vieille Viande De Jour°º·._._.·º°`°º·.]

Albert wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:37:20 +1000, "pharro" <nospam> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
> >news:m68i61d5l3f5f573811ivuj37phpv30smr@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> MRR 2005 Spoiler on who lost their restaurant.
> >>
> >> Time to hand back the keys.
> >> Drum roll please.
> >> XXXXX
> >>
> >>
> >
> >PLONK.
> >
> >Just so that you know, I'm plonking you not because you have spoilt a result
> >but because you are a wanker who thinks he knows something. It may well come
> >to pass that later today, the results will go against Melbourne. However
> >that doesn't lessen the fact that you are a total tool.
> >
> >pharro
>
> Shit for brains. Why do you think I placed SPOILER in the subject
> line.

Hey shit for brains! Read what he typed again. He said he WASN'T
plonking you because of the spoiler. It was because of your 'know it
all' attitude, and I can't blame him for plonking you. I bet you're
also Lebanese? PLONK

[Kevin Hendrikssen]

"Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:1olj619d2ofgpot56o9hb6mka7ankmtpfl@4ax.com...

> I know this because I know who voted for which state. Perth had the
> highest phone polling by a mile. they romped it in. Then Bris were
> just over double Melb tally of votes.

Total tally of votes means squat. Go and reads the FAQ on how it works,
troll.

[pharro]

"Kevin Hendrikssen" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
news:4269e412$0$838$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> "Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:1olj619d2ofgpot56o9hb6mka7ankmtpfl@4ax.com...
>
> > I know this because I know who voted for which state. Perth had the
> > highest phone polling by a mile. they romped it in. Then Bris were
> > just over double Melb tally of votes.
>
> Total tally of votes means squat. Go and reads the FAQ on how it works,
> troll.
>
>

Yes I actually spoke with a friend who loses his job on Monday if the vote
goes the wrong way and he was adamant that only a very small number of
executives is privy to the results before they are announced at the Saturday
evening pre-record. So the chances of this "Albert" clown having inside
information is incredibly remote.

pharro

[Matthew(GO THE GREEDY GOOSE!)]

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:35:42 +1000, "pharro" <nospam> wrote:

>
>"Kevin Hendrikssen" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
>news:4269e412$0$838$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>> "Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
>> news:1olj619d2ofgpot56o9hb6mka7ankmtpfl@4ax.com...
>>
>> > I know this because I know who voted for which state. Perth had the
>> > highest phone polling by a mile. they romped it in. Then Bris were
>> > just over double Melb tally of votes.
>>
>> Total tally of votes means squat. Go and reads the FAQ on how it works,
>> troll.
>>
>>
>
>Yes I actually spoke with a friend who loses his job on Monday if the vote
>goes the wrong way and he was adamant that only a very small number of
>executives is privy to the results before they are announced at the Saturday
>evening pre-record. So the chances of this "Albert" clown having inside
>information is incredibly remote.
>
>pharro
>

Unless he of course works for legion.


But i'll let you know the real result very soon :)

[Kevin Hendrikssen]

"Matthew(GO THE GREEDY GOOSE!)" <music@night.com> wrote in message
news:669k61tvq119iqaqtkcg0cfhd0pcqqmdjm@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:35:42 +1000, "pharro" <nospam> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Kevin Hendrikssen" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
>>news:4269e412$0$838$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>> "Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
>>> news:1olj619d2ofgpot56o9hb6mka7ankmtpfl@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> > I know this because I know who voted for which state. Perth had the
>>> > highest phone polling by a mile. they romped it in. Then Bris were
>>> > just over double Melb tally of votes.
>>>
>>> Total tally of votes means squat. Go and reads the FAQ on how it works,
>>> troll.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Yes I actually spoke with a friend who loses his job on Monday if the vote
>>goes the wrong way and he was adamant that only a very small number of
>>executives is privy to the results before they are announced at the
>>Saturday
>>evening pre-record. So the chances of this "Albert" clown having inside
>>information is incredibly remote.
>>
>>pharro
>>
>
> Unless he of course works for legion.

Makes no difference, they don't add up the national totals to decide who
gets shut down.

[Jason Cornelius]

"pharro" <nospam> wrote in message
news:42696d8d$0$4658$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
>
> Just so that you know, I'm plonking you not because you have spoilt a
> result
> but because you are a wanker who thinks he knows something. It may well
> come
> to pass that later today, the results will go against Melbourne. However
> that doesn't lessen the fact that you are a total tool.

Gee. Do you often lose the plot so easily over nothing?
Dono what the hell you're on about. He may actually know something you
don't. Does that dent your ego so much that you can't bear to see it
anymore?
Then again, he may be talking out of his ass.. But regardless, nothing in
his post was arrogant or worded in such a way that required such a rambling
response from you.

Jason.

[Soixante Un Vieille Viande De Jour°º·._._.·º°`°º·.]

Jason Cornelius wrote:
>
> "pharro" <nospam> wrote in message
> news:42696d8d$0$4658$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
> >
> > Just so that you know, I'm plonking you not because you have spoilt a
> > result
> > but because you are a wanker who thinks he knows something. It may well
> > come
> > to pass that later today, the results will go against Melbourne. However
> > that doesn't lessen the fact that you are a total tool.
>
> Gee. Do you often lose the plot so easily over nothing?
> Dono what the hell you're on about. He may actually know something you
> don't. Does that dent your ego so much that you can't bear to see it
> anymore?
> Then again, he may be talking out of his ass.. But regardless, nothing in
> his post was arrogant or worded in such a way that required such a rambling
> response from you.
>
> Jason.

I agree.

[Soixante Un Vieille Viande De Jour°º·._._.·º°`°º·.]

"Matthew(GO THE GREEDY GOOSE!)" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:35:42 +1000, "pharro" <nospam> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Kevin Hendrikssen" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
> >news:4269e412$0$838$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> >> "Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
> >> news:1olj619d2ofgpot56o9hb6mka7ankmtpfl@4ax.com...
> >>
> >> > I know this because I know who voted for which state. Perth had the
> >> > highest phone polling by a mile. they romped it in. Then Bris were
> >> > just over double Melb tally of votes.
> >>
> >> Total tally of votes means squat. Go and reads the FAQ on how it works,
> >> troll.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Yes I actually spoke with a friend who loses his job on Monday if the vote
> >goes the wrong way and he was adamant that only a very small number of
> >executives is privy to the results before they are announced at the Saturday
> >evening pre-record. So the chances of this "Albert" clown having inside
> >information is incredibly remote.
> >
> >pharro
> >
>
> Unless he of course works for legion.

If he does, he won't be working there for long.

[jasper]

Well its official, you are a wanker, and wrong as well


"Albert" <Albert@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:m68i61d5l3f5f573811ivuj37phpv30smr@4ax.com...
>
> MRR 2005 Spoiler on who lost their restaurant.
>
> Time to hand back the keys.
> Drum roll please.
> Melbourne.
>
> MRR 2004 Melb gets to the end without been nominated.
> Then gets voted out.
>
> MRR 2005 First vote between Perth and Melb and Melb lose out.
> Melb get a second chance with Nathan.
>
> MRR 2005 Perth vs Melb Vs Bris. 3 out of 3 that Melb have been voted
> off. Get the feeling Melb are not loved by the other states:)
>