GEN V11 // 05' HiLux prices....

[megalla@ozemail.com.au]

FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly as
a $100k Holden

2005 HiLux pricing:
4x2:
2.7 petrol single-cab Work Mate cab/chassis $20,990
2.7 petrol double-cab Work Mate $26,490
4.0 petrol single-cab SR cab/chassis $24,990
4.0 petrol single-cab SR cab/chassis (a) $27,030
4.0 petrol single-cab SR pick-up $25,990
4.0 petrol single-cab SR pick-up (a) $28,030
4.0 petrol Xtra-cab SR pick-up (a) $29,990
4.0 petrol Xtra-cab SR5 pick-up (a) $37,420
4.0 petrol double-cab SR pick-up $31,990
4.0 petrol double-cab SR pick-up (a) $34,030
4.0 petrol double-cab SR5 pick-up $38,720
4.0 petrol double-cab SR5 pick-up (a) $41,150
3.0 turbo-diesel single-cab SR cab/chassis $29,290
3.0 turbo-diesel double-cab SR pick-up $35,290

4x4:
4.0 petrol single-cab SR cab/chassis $32,390
4.0 petrol single-cab SR cab/chassis (a) $34,430
4.0 petrol Xtra-cab SR5 pick-up $45,920
4.0 petrol double-cab SR pick-up $38,490
4.0 petrol double-cab SR pick-up (a) $40,530
4.0 petrol double-cab SR5 pick-up $47,420
4.0 petrol double-cab SR5 pick-up (a) $49,850
3.0 turbo-diesel single-cab SR cab/chassis $34,590
3.0 turbo-diesel single-cab SR cab/chassis (a) $36,130
3.0 turbo-diesel Xtra-cab SR cab/chassis $39,490
3.0 turbo-diesel Xtra-cab SR5 pick-up $47,920
3.0 turbo-diesel double-cab SR cab/chassis $40,490
3.0 turbo-diesel double-cab SR pick-up $41,490
3.0 turbo-diesel double-cab SR pick-up (a) $43,030
3.0 turbo-diesel double-cab SR5 pick-up $49,920
3.0 turbo-diesel double-cab SR5 pick-up (a) $51,850

Regards

G/B

[Toby Ponsenby]

On 24 Mar 2005 03:22:54 -0800, megalla@ozemail.com.au wrote:

> FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly as
> a $100k Holden
>

Blah blah blah,
>
> Regards
>
> G/B

So, what's an (a) and why the fuck does it cost a shitload more?


--
Toby
quidquid latine dictum
sit, altum viditur

[Scotty]

Automatic?


"Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:qneu7kxx9szl.17afqjhyhjvxg$.dlg@40tude.net...
> On 24 Mar 2005 03:22:54 -0800, megalla@ozemail.com.au wrote:
>
>> FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly as
>> a $100k Holden
>>
>
> Blah blah blah,
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> G/B
>
> So, what's an (a) and why the fuck does it cost a shitload more?
>
>
> --
> Toby
> quidquid latine dictum
> sit, altum viditur

[Toby Ponsenby]

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:21:24 +1000, Scotty wrote:

> Automatic?
>
>
> "Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:qneu7kxx9szl.17afqjhyhjvxg$.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On 24 Mar 2005 03:22:54 -0800, megalla@ozemail.com.au wrote:
>>
>>> FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly as
>>> a $100k Holden
>>>
>>
>> Blah blah blah,
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> G/B
>>
>> So, what's an (a) and why the fuck does it cost a shitload more?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Toby
>> quidquid latine dictum
>> sit, altum viditur

Duh.

Sorry for the lateness of this apology;-)
--
Toby
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?

[Scotty]

Why is top posting frowned upon?

"Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:1h9wjshrg3nzz$.9rki18oy00i.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:21:24 +1000, Scotty wrote:
>
>> Automatic?
>>
>>
>> "Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:qneu7kxx9szl.17afqjhyhjvxg$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>> On 24 Mar 2005 03:22:54 -0800, megalla@ozemail.com.au wrote:
>>>
>>>> FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly as
>>>> a $100k Holden
>>>>
>>>
>>> Blah blah blah,
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> G/B
>>>
>>> So, what's an (a) and why the fuck does it cost a shitload more?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Toby
>>> quidquid latine dictum
>>> sit, altum viditur
>
> Duh.
>
> Sorry for the lateness of this apology;-)
> --
> Toby
> Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> A: Why is top posting frowned upon?

[Toby Ponsenby]

Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.


On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:24:27 +1000, Scotty wrote:


> "Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:1h9wjshrg3nzz$.9rki18oy00i.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:21:24 +1000, Scotty wrote:
>>
>>> Automatic?
>>>
>>>
>>> "Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>> news:qneu7kxx9szl.17afqjhyhjvxg$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>> On 24 Mar 2005 03:22:54 -0800, megalla@ozemail.com.au wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly as
>>>>> a $100k Holden
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blah blah blah,
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> G/B
>>>>
>>>> So, what's an (a) and why the fuck does it cost a shitload more?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Toby
>>>> quidquid latine dictum
>>>> sit, altum viditur
>>
>> Duh.
>>
>> Sorry for the lateness of this apology;-)
>> --
>> Toby
>> Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>> A: Why is top posting frowned upon?

> Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
--
Toby.
quidquid latine dictum
sit, altum viditur

[Scotty]

Top posting saves you scrolling to the bottom of the page.


"Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:6sxgmkqa1bm3$.1qdsnt5dc5m1b$.dlg@40tude.net.. .
>
> Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:24:27 +1000, Scotty wrote:
>
>
>> "Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:1h9wjshrg3nzz$.9rki18oy00i.dlg@40tude.net...
>>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:21:24 +1000, Scotty wrote:
>>>
>>>> Automatic?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:qneu7kxx9szl.17afqjhyhjvxg$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>>> On 24 Mar 2005 03:22:54 -0800, megalla@ozemail.com.au wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> a $100k Holden
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blah blah blah,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> G/B
>>>>>
>>>>> So, what's an (a) and why the fuck does it cost a shitload more?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Toby
>>>>> quidquid latine dictum
>>>>> sit, altum viditur
>>>
>>> Duh.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the lateness of this apology;-)
>>> --
>>> Toby
>>> Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
>> Why is top posting frowned upon?
>>
> --
> Toby.
> quidquid latine dictum
> sit, altum viditur

[atec]

Toby Ponsenby wrote:
> Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
no it doesn't , only an anal fool would suggest top posting is bad ,
sometimes it IS the sensible thing to do
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:24:27 +1000, Scotty wrote:
>
>
>
>>"Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>news:1h9wjshrg3nzz$.9rki18oy00i.dlg@40tude.net...
>>
>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:21:24 +1000, Scotty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Automatic?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:qneu7kxx9szl.17afqjhyhjvxg$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>>
>>>>>On 24 Mar 2005 03:22:54 -0800, megalla@ozemail.com.au wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly as
>>>>>>a $100k Holden
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Blah blah blah,
>>>>>
>>>>>>Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>G/B
>>>>>
>>>>>So, what's an (a) and why the fuck does it cost a shitload more?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Toby
>>>>>quidquid latine dictum
>>>>>sit, altum viditur
>>>
>>>Duh.
>>>
>>>Sorry for the lateness of this apology;-)
>>>--
>>>Toby
>>>Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
>
>>Why is top posting frowned upon?
>>

[Toby Ponsenby]

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:47:10 +1000, atec wrote:

> Toby Ponsenby wrote:
>> Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> no it doesn't , only an anal fool would suggest top posting is bad ,
> sometimes it IS the sensible thing to do
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:24:27 +1000, Scotty wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>news:1h9wjshrg3nzz$.9rki18oy00i.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:21:24 +1000, Scotty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Automatic?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:qneu7kxx9szl.17afqjhyhjvxg$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 24 Mar 2005 03:22:54 -0800, megalla@ozemail.com.au wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>FFS,good but not that good.$52k for HiLux! pffft....nearly as silly as
>>>>>>>a $100k Holden
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Blah blah blah,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>G/B
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So, what's an (a) and why the fuck does it cost a shitload more?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--
>>>>>>Toby
>>>>>>quidquid latine dictum
>>>>>>sit, altum viditur
>>>>
>>>>Duh.
>>>>
>>>>Sorry for the lateness of this apology;-)
>>>>--
>>>>Toby
>>>>Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>>A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>>
>>
>>>Why is top posting frowned upon?
>>>

Undoubtedly, there are times when sticking your head up your own arse
would appear to be the sensible thing to do.
It is indeed fortunate that,like top-postingthese situations occur
extraordinarily rarely;-)

--
Toby.
quidquid latine dictum
sit, altum viditur

[atec]

Toby Ponsenby wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:47:10 +1000, atec wrote:
>
So am I to take it poncy you another anal pricl about top posting ..
think about the question before answering it .. you know what I'm likely
to do...
>
>>Toby Ponsenby wrote:
>

[Toby Ponsenby]

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:55:37 +1000, atec wrote:

> Toby Ponsenby wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:47:10 +1000, atec wrote:
>>
> So am I to take it poncy you another anal pricl about top posting ..
> think about the question before answering it .. you know what I'm likely
> to do...
>>
>>>Toby Ponsenby wrote:
>>

The k is just to the left of the l.

--
Toby.
quidquid latine dictum
sit, altum viditur

[atec]

Toby Ponsenby wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:55:37 +1000, atec wrote:
>
>
>>Toby Ponsenby wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:47:10 +1000, atec wrote:
>>>
>>
>> So am I to take it poncy you another anal pricl about top posting ..
>>think about the question before answering it .. you know what I'm likely
>>to do...
>>
>>>>Toby Ponsenby wrote:
>>>
>
> The k is just to the left of the l.
>
have you been told today ?