Re: Question regarding wills, property & stamp duty in Victoria

[Seppo Renfors]

Matt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When a property is obtained in Victoria through being a beneficiary of a
> will, is stamp duty payable by the beneficiary? If so, is it calculated
> the same way as if the property was purchased (i.e. with the same rates
> & at market value as there is no "purchase price")?


How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are
the big mouths now? Hiding eh - not DARING to open their yapper and
embarrass themselves? Perhaps they are waiting for someone INTELLIGENT
to respond so they can distort it, and resort to mindlessly abuse
people again, while remaining pig-ignorant (that's about their level
of competence after all)!!

BUT for Matt who is, wanting an answer - it is "NO" - no stamp duty
payable by the beneficiary.

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[John Smith]

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:52:46 +0000, Seppo Renfors wrote:


>
> Matt wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When a property is obtained in Victoria through being a beneficiary of
>> a will, is stamp duty payable by the beneficiary? If so, is it
>> calculated the same way as if the property was purchased (i.e. with the
>> same rates & at market value as there is no "purchase price")?
>
>
> How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
> pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are the
> big mouths now? Hiding eh - not DARING to open their yapper and
> embarrass themselves? Perhaps they are waiting for someone INTELLIGENT
> to respond so they can distort it, and resort to mindlessly abuse people
> again, while remaining pig-ignorant (that's about their level of
> competence after all)!!
>
> BUT for Matt who is, wanting an answer - it is "NO" - no stamp duty
> payable by the beneficiary.

The resident village idiot demonstrates, yet again, what a moron it is.

It would have been interesting to ask it for the legal basis of its claim,
but that's not an option. That answer has already been provided.

[Roberta Davies]

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:52:46 +0000, Seppo Renfors wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> How odd

You certainly are, Ollie!

What about your waddling up to answer Roamin' Polanski's question, hmmm?
Show the world how it's done. You scrofulous cretin.

[Roger Nuttall]

Seppo Renfors wrote:
>
> Matt wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>When a property is obtained in Victoria through being a beneficiary of a
>>will, is stamp duty payable by the beneficiary? If so, is it calculated
>>the same way as if the property was purchased (i.e. with the same rates
>>& at market value as there is no "purchase price")?
>
>
>
> How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
> pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are
> the big mouths now? Hiding eh - not DARING to open their yapper and
> embarrass themselves? Perhaps they are waiting for someone INTELLIGENT
> to respond so they can distort it, and resort to mindlessly abuse
> people again, while remaining pig-ignorant (that's about their level
> of competence after all)!!
>
> BUT for Matt who is, wanting an answer - it is "NO" - no stamp duty
> payable by the beneficiary.
>
It does seem that you have made something of a faux pas, Seppo. An
answer was provided earlier this morning. What do you say to that?

[Hyperoglyphe]

"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> wrote in message
news:424271B7.16AE1F24@not.com.au...
>
>
> Matt wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> When a property is obtained in Victoria through being a beneficiary of a
>> will, is stamp duty payable by the beneficiary? If so, is it calculated
>> the same way as if the property was purchased (i.e. with the same rates
>> & at market value as there is no "purchase price")?
>
>
> How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
> pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are

Will I? Wont I? Well, he DOES keep taking my name in vain,,,

Oh, What the hay!
the good book says it's gotta be that way! (with the usual apologies...)

Pop Quiz... Name the deceased scribe of the above line.

Seepo doesn't realise that the INTERNET is in fact, a WORLD WIDE FORUM.
Some people live in different TIME ZONES. LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!

(To the sarcasm impaired, my CAPITALISATION is a PARODY.)

So if an intelligent response is provided to an enquiry, why fix something
that isn't broken?

Many people make a living dealing with matters exactly like that posed by
the OP. Why would they WASTE TIME listening to a, and I qoute, "failed
furniture stuffing meat slapper", that posts hours after the correct
response.

> the big mouths now? Hiding eh - not DARING to open their yapper and
> embarrass themselves? Perhaps they are waiting for someone INTELLIGENT
> to respond so they can distort it, and resort to mindlessly abuse

Yes, yes. I see what it is saying. He doesn't really suffer from
Narcissistic Personality Disorder. It is in fact, ATTENTION SEEKING
BEHAVIOUR.

> people again, while remaining pig-ignorant (that's about their level
> of competence after all)!!
>
> BUT for Matt who is, wanting an answer - it is "NO" - no stamp duty

err.... Matt got his answer a loooong time before Seepo started slapping it
against that old xga he calls a monitor.

> payable by the beneficiary.

But he can't escape! In fact, one of the diagnostic characteristics of
Narcissistic Personality Disorder, is in fact, ATTENTION SEEKING BEHAVIOUR.
>
> --
> SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The o is ducted frong boots
> misled.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

[Seppo Renfors]

Roger Nuttall wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors wrote:
> >
> > Matt wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>When a property is obtained in Victoria through being a beneficiary of a
> >>will, is stamp duty payable by the beneficiary? If so, is it calculated
> >>the same way as if the property was purchased (i.e. with the same rates
> >>& at market value as there is no "purchase price")?
> >
> >
> >
> > How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
> > pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are
> > the big mouths now? Hiding eh - not DARING to open their yapper and
> > embarrass themselves? Perhaps they are waiting for someone INTELLIGENT
> > to respond so they can distort it, and resort to mindlessly abuse
> > people again, while remaining pig-ignorant (that's about their level
> > of competence after all)!!
> >
> > BUT for Matt who is, wanting an answer - it is "NO" - no stamp duty
> > payable by the beneficiary.
> >
> It does seem that you have made something of a faux pas, Seppo. An
> answer was provided earlier this morning. What do you say to that?


There are certain abusive morons, who are none too bright either,
being dealt with by my Idiot filter - they are irrelevant! However,
the hyperNazi I referred to is not one of them - for the moment at
least.

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[Seppo Renfors]

John Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:52:46 +0000, Seppo Renfors wrote:
>
Jeeeezzz..... another morphing of the kill file evading abuser
"heretic" alias... alias.. alias...! It cannot help itself - it is
just begging for a kick in the arse the stupid masochist!

Back into the IDIOT filter you go!

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[Seppo Renfors]

Hyperoglyphe wrote:
>
> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> wrote in message
> news:424271B7.16AE1F24@not.com.au...
> >
[..]
> >
> > How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
> > pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are
>
> Will I? Wont I? Well, he DOES keep taking my name in vain,,,

Ahhhh... and here we see an acknowledgement that the aborigine hating
racist twit does acknowledge "hyperNazi" to be a correct terminology
of itself!

[snip dribble]
>
> Seepo doesn't realise that the INTERNET is in fact, a WORLD WIDE FORUM.
> Some people live in different TIME ZONES. LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!

Like DUH! There was no answer from the hyperNazi at all - and this
remains the ONLY response from the hyperNazi! Ignorant abuse, nothing
else.... oh and FORGERY (as we see below)

[snip more dribble]

> > --
> > SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The o is ducted frong boots
> > misled.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------

THIS is FORGERY by the hyperNazi - but then its racist propaganda it
perpetrates (when it isn't abusing people) is no less "honest"!!

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[Roger Nuttall]

Seppo Renfors wrote:
>
> Roger Nuttall wrote:
>
>>Seppo Renfors wrote:
>>
>>>Matt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>When a property is obtained in Victoria through being a beneficiary of a
>>>>will, is stamp duty payable by the beneficiary? If so, is it calculated
>>>>the same way as if the property was purchased (i.e. with the same rates
>>>>& at market value as there is no "purchase price")?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
>>>pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are
>>>the big mouths now? Hiding eh - not DARING to open their yapper and
>>>embarrass themselves? Perhaps they are waiting for someone INTELLIGENT
>>>to respond so they can distort it, and resort to mindlessly abuse
>>>people again, while remaining pig-ignorant (that's about their level
>>>of competence after all)!!
>>>
>>>BUT for Matt who is, wanting an answer - it is "NO" - no stamp duty
>>>payable by the beneficiary.
>>>
>>
>>It does seem that you have made something of a faux pas, Seppo. An
>>answer was provided earlier this morning. What do you say to that?
>
>
>
> There are certain abusive morons, who are none too bright either,
> being dealt with by my Idiot filter - they are irrelevant! However,
> the hyperNazi I referred to is not one of them - for the moment at
> least.

That may or may not be correct, but it does not answer my question to
you. There was a timely response to the OP, which seems to be correct
and verifiable as to its accuracy.

Your complaint that there was not a timely answer offered seems
incorrect, as does the implication that any answer would have been
incorrect. What do you say to that?

[Hyperoglyphe]

More squink from the "Village Idiot" as coined by some wag.

Sidetracking the issues as to whether I had a "sock", then the following
claptrap.


"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> wrote in message
news:424911FC.51AFC497@not.com.au...
>
>
> Hyperoglyphe wrote:
>>
>> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:424271B7.16AE1F24@not.com.au...
>> >
> [..]
>> >
>> > How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
>> > pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are
>>
>> Will I? Wont I? Well, he DOES keep taking my name in vain,,,
>
> Ahhhh... and here we see an acknowledgement that the aborigine hating
> racist twit does acknowledge "hyperNazi" to be a correct terminology
> of itself!

Fich! I fell for the Trap!

>
> [snip dribble]
>>
>> Seepo doesn't realise that the INTERNET is in fact, a WORLD WIDE FORUM.
>> Some people live in different TIME ZONES. LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!
>
> Like DUH! There was no answer from the hyperNazi at all - and this
> remains the ONLY response from the hyperNazi! Ignorant abuse, nothing
> else.... oh and FORGERY (as we see below)
>
> [snip more dribble]
>
>> > --
>> > SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > The o is ducted frong boots
>> > misled.
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> THIS is FORGERY by the hyperNazi - but then its racist propaganda it
> perpetrates (when it isn't abusing people) is no less "honest"!!

Then how about this supposed forgery?
>
> --
> SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The wang is not educated, he is
> misled.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

Some dipsticks have never heard of PARODY!!!!

Dave

[Tony Smith]

Hyperoglyphe wrote:

> > --
> > SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The wang is not educated, he is
> > misled.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Some dipsticks have never heard of PARODY!!!!
>

Well, the village idiot in question isn't the steam off a philosopher's
piss anyway. What do you expect?



Tony Smith

[Seppo Renfors]

Hyperoglyphe wrote:
>
> More squink from the "Village Idiot" as coined by some wag.
>
> Sidetracking the issues as to whether I had a "sock", then the following
> claptrap.

Deleted (and now misrepresented) is the hyperNazi's reference to it
being a GOD in its own tiny mind!
>
> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> wrote in message
> news:424911FC.51AFC497@not.com.au...
> >
> >
> > Hyperoglyphe wrote:
> >>
> >> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.com.au> wrote in message
> >> news:424271B7.16AE1F24@not.com.au...
> >> >
> > [..]
> >> >
> >> > How odd, I can't see the "expert" (as in "a has been drip under
> >> > pressure"), hyperNazi or other sockpuppets reply here - so where are
> >>
> >> Will I? Wont I? Well, he DOES keep taking my name in vain,,,
> >
> > Ahhhh... and here we see an acknowledgement that the aborigine hating
> > racist twit does acknowledge "hyperNazi" to be a correct terminology
> > of itself!
>
> Fich! I fell for the Trap!

No trap at all - nor was the acknowledgement in error.

> > [snip dribble]
> >>
> >> Seepo doesn't realise that the INTERNET is in fact, a WORLD WIDE FORUM.
> >> Some people live in different TIME ZONES. LIKE ME!!!!!!!!!
> >
> > Like DUH! There was no answer from the hyperNazi at all - and this
> > remains the ONLY response from the hyperNazi! Ignorant abuse, nothing
> > else.... oh and FORGERY (as we see below)
> >
> > [snip more dribble]
> >
> >> > --
> >> > SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> >> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > The o is ducted frong boots
> >> > misled.
> >> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > THIS is FORGERY by the hyperNazi - but then its racist propaganda it
> > perpetrates (when it isn't abusing people) is no less "honest"!!
>
> Then how about this supposed forgery?

I ask, is forgery EVER "Honest", hmmm.... but then what would a RACIST
know about such moral things like Honesty?

> > --
> > SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The wang is not educated, he is
> > misled.
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Some dipsticks have never heard of PARODY!!!!

You misspelled "FORGERY" once more.

Oh, and you had better watch out for the crim sniffing under your
tail, as it has stated:

"I do enjoy reaming out racists." - Tony Smith

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------