Reverse phone lookup mobile/landline

[Davo]

Hey guys, can someone help me with a reverse lookup on a QLD landline
or mobile number? They're numbers some thief made from my phone after
he broke into my house and stole it (and everything else). Reported to
the Police but I'm not that high a priority. Also tried to buy
PhoneDisc myself but it seems they've been run out of business.

Any help would be really appreciated,

Cheers,
Davo

[Rod Speed]

Davo <davo140@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:1115602108.013089.110800@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

> Hey guys, can someone help me with a reverse
> lookup on a QLD landline or mobile number?

Yes, my email works.

> They're numbers some thief made from my phone after
> he broke into my house and stole it (and everything else).
> Reported to the Police but I'm not that high a priority.

> Also tried to buy PhoneDisc myself but
> it seems they've been run out of business.

Yep, tho you can get the last CD using emule.

[thegoons]

Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?

Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra uses
these days (Leopard?).

"Davo" <davo140@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:1115602108.013089.110800@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Hey guys, can someone help me with a reverse lookup on a QLD landline
> or mobile number? They're numbers some thief made from my phone after
> he broke into my house and stole it (and everything else). Reported to
> the Police but I'm not that high a priority. Also tried to buy
> PhoneDisc myself but it seems they've been run out of business.
>
> Any help would be really appreciated,
>
> Cheers,
> Davo
>

[Michael]

"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>
> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra uses
> these days (Leopard?).

Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
Surely you have heard of Flexcab?

[Michael]

"Davo" <davo140@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:1115602108.013089.110800@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> Hey guys, can someone help me with a reverse lookup on a QLD landline
> or mobile number? They're numbers some thief made from my phone after
> he broke into my house and stole it (and everything else). Reported to
> the Police but I'm not that high a priority. Also tried to buy
> PhoneDisc myself but it seems they've been run out of business.

The police will handle this issue

[budgie]

On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
>news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>>
>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra uses
>> these days (Leopard?).
>
>Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>Surely you have heard of Flexcab?

Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time, over-budget, bloated piece of accounting
crap that makes MicroSloth's operating systems look compact and efficient?

[Kwyjibo.]

budgie <me@privacy.net> said

> On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
>>news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
>>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>>>
>>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
>>> uses these days (Leopard?).
>>
>>Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>>Surely you have heard of Flexcab?
>
> Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,

Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.

> over-budget,

Nope.

> bloated

Nope. Very efficient considering the amount of data it contains and
calculates.

> piece of
> accounting crap that makes MicroSloth's operating systems look compact
> and efficient?

You've got no idea, have you?

--


Kwyj.

(Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email)

[Kwyjibo.]

"Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said

>
> "thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>>
>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra uses
>> these days (Leopard?).
>
> Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?

Which was ported to an IBM platform and was still running in early
2000.........



--


Kwyj.

(Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email)

[budgie]

On 15 May 2005 15:08:42 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
<Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:

>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>
>> On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
>>>news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
>>>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
>>>> uses these days (Leopard?).
>>>
>>>Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>>>Surely you have heard of Flexcab?
>>
>> Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,
>
>Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.

Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ......

>> over-budget,
>
>Nope.

Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ......

>> bloated
>
>Nope. Very efficient considering the amount of data it contains and
>calculates.

Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ......

>> piece of
>> accounting crap that makes MicroSloth's operating systems look compact
>> and efficient?
>
>You've got no idea, have you?

Chortle!

[Kwyjibo.]

budgie <me@privacy.net> said

> On 15 May 2005 15:08:42 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
> <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:
>
>>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>>
>>> On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
>>>>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
>>>>> uses these days (Leopard?).
>>>>
>>>>Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>>>>Surely you have heard of Flexcab?
>>>
>>> Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,
>>
>>Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.
>
> Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ......
>

Just double checked. Began trials in '93 - live in '94.

Keep laughing, downie.

--


Kwyj.

(Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email)

[budgie]

On 17 May 2005 02:14:19 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
<Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:

>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>
>> On 15 May 2005 15:08:42 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
>> <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:
>>
>>>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
>>>>>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
>>>>>> uses these days (Leopard?).
>>>>>
>>>>>Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>>>>>Surely you have heard of Flexcab?
>>>>
>>>> Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,
>>>
>>>Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.
>>
>> Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ......
>>
>
>Just double checked. Began trials in '93 - live in '94.
>
>Keep laughing, downie.

It wasn't "running" in 96 - it was still limping. Look up what 'running" really
means. From your apologist posting, you must have been involved in its creation
....

[Kwyjibo.]

budgie <me@privacy.net> said

> On 17 May 2005 02:14:19 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
> <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:
>
>>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>>
>>> On 15 May 2005 15:08:42 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
>>> <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
>>>>>>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system
>>>>>>> Telstra uses these days (Leopard?).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>>>>>>Surely you have heard of Flexcab?
>>>>>
>>>>> Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,
>>>>
>>>>Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.
>>>
>>> Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ......
>>>
>>
>>Just double checked. Began trials in '93 - live in '94.
>>
>>Keep laughing, downie.
>
> It wasn't "running" in 96

Wrong, dickhead.

> - it was still limping.

You call 15,000+ users and calculating 30 million call costs a day
'limping'?? ROFL.

> Look up what
> 'running" really means.

I already know what it means. Flexcab has been 'running' quite well for
over a decade.

> From your apologist posting, you must have been
> involved in its creation ...

Wrong again.

Are you going to get anything right, or should I just ignore any further
so-called 'contributions' you make to this thread?

--


Kwyj.

(Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email)

[Michael]

"budgie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2qad811e71ho83s8bcaqkg67uh633udhga@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> >news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
> >> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
> >>
> >> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
uses
> >> these days (Leopard?).
> >
> >Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
> >Surely you have heard of Flexcab?
>
> Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time, over-budget, bloated piece of
accounting
> crap that makes MicroSloth's operating systems look compact and efficient?

So good that is has been in use for 10 years now, still going strong with no
replacement plans?

Overbudget 10 years ago, long paid for by now.

[Michael]

> > Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,
>
> Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.
>
> > over-budget,
>
> Nope.

I heard it was.
>
> > bloated
>
> Nope. Very efficient considering the amount of data it contains and
> calculates.

Definately not bloated at all.
A very elegant mainframe system

[Michael]

"budgie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:2uei8198n4qjpkoigmsngl4itl4o41blfk@4ax.com...
> On 17 May 2005 02:14:19 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
> <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:
>
> >budgie <me@privacy.net> said
> >
> >> On 15 May 2005 15:08:42 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
> >> <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
> >>>
> >>>> On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
> >>>>>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
> >>>>>> uses these days (Leopard?).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
> >>>>>Surely you have heard of Flexcab?
> >>>>
> >>>> Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,
> >>>
> >>>Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.
> >>
> >> Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ......
> >>
> >
> >Just double checked. Began trials in '93 - live in '94.
> >
> >Keep laughing, downie.
>
> It wasn't "running" in 96 - it was still limping. Look up what 'running"
really
> means. From your apologist posting, you must have been involved in its
creation


Budgie, lets get it out in the open.

Have you ever used Flexcab?

[Michael]

"Kwyjibo." <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96579B47914B5dddddd@203.26.24.228...
> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said
>
> >
> > "thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> > news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
> >> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
> >>
> >> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
uses
> >> these days (Leopard?).
> >
> > Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>
> Which was ported to an IBM platform and was still running in early
> 2000.........

Yeah but its two generations ago.
Service Plus came next and then whatever they use now. Siiam?

[Michael]

> > - it was still limping.
>
> You call 15,000+ users and calculating 30 million call costs a day
> 'limping'?? ROFL.

I thought UPS calculated call costs?

> I already know what it means. Flexcab has been 'running' quite well for
> over a decade.

Yep

> > From your apologist posting, you must have been
> > involved in its creation ...
>
> Wrong again.
>
> Are you going to get anything right, or should I just ignore any further
> so-called 'contributions' you make to this thread?

He's being a wanker. Pity

[Michael]

"Kwyjibo." <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96579B47914B5dddddd@203.26.24.228...
> "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> said
>
> >
> > "thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> > news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
> >> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
> >>
> >> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
uses
> >> these days (Leopard?).
> >
> > Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>
> Which was ported to an IBM platform and was still running in early
> 2000.........

What platform was it on before? Bull?

[budgie]

On Sun, 22 May 2005 00:36:03 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>"budgie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>news:2uei8198n4qjpkoigmsngl4itl4o41blfk@4ax.com...
>> On 17 May 2005 02:14:19 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
>> <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:
>>
>> >budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>> >
>> >> On 15 May 2005 15:08:42 +1000, "Kwyjibo."
>> >> <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>budgie <me@privacy.net> said
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Sat, 14 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>"thegoons" <thegoons@bigpond.com> wrote in message
>> >>>>>news:1115637821.5e9e2e797de17f0e78bc4b1cfd806944@t eranews...
>> >>>>>> Have you tried calling the numbers yourself?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Otherwise I am sure Mikey can look it up on whatever system Telstra
>> >>>>>> uses these days (Leopard?).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Leopard? Thats the old faults system from over two generations ago?
>> >>>>>Surely you have heard of Flexcab?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,
>> >>>
>> >>>Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.
>> >>
>> >> Chortle! yeah, sure, OK, ......
>> >>
>> >
>> >Just double checked. Began trials in '93 - live in '94.
>> >
>> >Keep laughing, downie.
>>
>> It wasn't "running" in 96 - it was still limping. Look up what 'running"
>really
>> means. From your apologist posting, you must have been involved in its
>creation
>
>
>Budgie, lets get it out in the open.
>
>Have you ever used Flexcab?

Nope. A mate was a long-time victim of it until he left Tel$tra in 2001.

[budgie]

On Sun, 22 May 2005 00:31:02 GMT, "Michael" <michael@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> > Flexcab? Isn't that the over-time,
>>
>> Nope. It's been running since about 1996 IIRC.
>>
>> > over-budget,
>>
>> Nope.
>
>I heard it was.

So have others.

>> > bloated
>>
>> Nope. Very efficient considering the amount of data it contains and
>> calculates.
>
>Definately not bloated at all.
>A very elegant mainframe system
>
>