Mr Spokesman <spokesman_for_the_fbi@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4289f112$0$2591$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>> Mr Spokesman <spokesman_for_the_fbi@hotmail.com> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>> ant <ant_kNUKE@geocities.com> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> I dont bother myself, the volume isnt high enough to
>>>>>> be more than a bit a nuisance when say you are in the
>>>>>> middle of cooking dinner and some stupid telemarketing
>>>>>> operation chooses to ring at the most inappropriate time.
>>> My tips from the earlier post come from experience as a telemarketer.
>> Pity you dont have a clue about what the law actually says.
>> Hardly surprising given that only brain dead apes
>> would be stupid enough to get involved in telemarketing.
>>> We were given a lecture in September before our group went
>>> online, about the new laws that were put into place in August.
>> Pity there are no such 'new laws'
>>> It concerned an update on calling hours and call handling
>>> procedure related to the new laws, which apply NATIONWIDE.
>> Easy to claim. Pity you cant actually list the
>> law that says anything like you claim they do.
>>> So if you get a telemarketer calling you outside hours and not taking
>>> notice of your request for privacy, you can get them prosecute -
>> Easy to claim. Cite the law that says anything
>> like that. You cant, it doesnt exist.
>>> but get the name of the call centre first
>>> if you can before the caller hangs up.
>>> i wouldn't be surpised if an outgoing calls list is on file
>>> for reference in case there is a dispute of some sort.
>> Unlikely they bother with calls that go nowhere.
> Gee Rod, it's a shame that you were not at the meeting that day.
Never been stupid enough to need such a shit of a 'job', thanks.
> You would've learnt something.
Nope, I would have pinned that fool to the wall and demanded
it list the 'new laws' that say anything like what it claimed.
> We were told at the time it was about new laws
> being brought in nationwide from the end of August.
And you were so stupid that you didnt even
ask for evidence that that claim was correct.
> More likely it was new regulations
Nope, that hasnt happened either.
> and codes of practice to be followed in line with the
> various state and federal laws related to telemarketing.
Nothing like you originally claimed, fool.
And its far from clear if whoever was attempting to educate
you apes actually said anything like you claim was said.
Bet it actually said that thats what that particular telemarketing
operation chooses to do and you completely mangled some
other comment about laws into what you pig ignorantly claimed.
> What we were told about particular calling hours applied to our office
> (or even section) and that that the same call conduct rules was going
> nationwide (all telemarketing heeding consumers' requests for privacy, etc)
Pity you cant actually list any 'new law' that says
anything like what you pig ignorantly claimed on that
"heeding consumers' requests for privacy" particularly.
> National Regulations stipulate hours of calling between 8am and
> 9pm except Sundays and Public Holidays (www.consumer.gov.au).
Lie. Thats not a 'national regulations' and thats
a completely useless url on that particular claim too.
And the hours are only a tiny subset of your original pig ignorant claim
anyway and those hours aint anything new, and didnt start in August either.
And a MODEL CODE is nothing even remotely
resembling anything like NATIONAL LAWS.
No surprise that the best you can manage is telemarketing ape.
> However, depending on the target of the campaign
> itself, these may change to suit local conditions ie,
> NSW 9am-8pm 7 days, QLD, 9am-9pm everyday
> and so on.
Soorree, nothing even remotely resembling
anything like NATIONAL LAWS, ape.
> At the lecture we were not given the various
> Fair Trading Acts from every State to read,
Pity they dont say anything like you claim and even someone
as stupid as you should be able to grasp that they aint
NATIONAL LAWS anyway if someone was actually stupid
enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.
> that would impossible for us, being the brain dead apes of telemarketing.
> Some of us with masters degrees in various disciplines just
> wouldn't understand it all. We only had to know the basics.
Clearly cant even manage those. THERE ARE
NO NATIONAL LAWS STARTING IN AUGUST
THAT SAY ANYTHING LIKE WHAT YOU CLAIM.
> The major points in the lecture centred round: hours, 9am-8pm m-f ,
> 10am-3pm sat. no sundays and public holidays(other places will differ
> for sure), and what consumer rights that must be adhered to within a call.
PITY THERE ARE NO NATIONAL LAWS STARTING IN
AUGUST THAT SAY ANYTHING LIKE WHAT YOU CLAIM.