Why is beeg bruther uncut called UNCUT when.....

[Patrick Young]

Scott Hillard wrote:

> The mental scars from your circumcision are there for all to see....

You truely are an idiot. I'd half guessed it, hoowever you
have proved it. I feel better now.

Oh, and GAGF idiot.

[rmcgrice]

"Scott Hillard" <shillard@_nospam_ozemail.com.au> wrote in
news:3CTle.731$ii7.9096@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au:

> After you have read all the cited medical journals, feel free to
> respond.

Boy you sure study dicks :-)
I agree with most of that.
I got fixed as a baby and also had our boy done.
During my 30 years in the Military I heard of some dreadful things
happening to uncirc guys that I knew, mainly due to poor hygiene (lack of
water) on long exercises in the bush.
Those who were cut had no problems.

Regards,
Ron

[Mr.T]

"Scott Hillard" <shillard@_nospam_ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:ueUle.742$ii7.9701@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...

> > You can GAGF on this issue. I'm DEADLY serious about
> > it and would bring in lifetime jail sentences for
> > "doctors" performing it on infants.
>
> The mental scars from your circumcision are there for all to see....

Well that makes his point perfectly valid then doesn't it!

I am amused that female circumcision is called mutilation and made illegal,
whilst male circumcision is considered normal.
Ban both or neither IMO. I hate all the double standards.

MrT.

[rmcgrice]

Patrick Young <patrick@hilux.ace.unsw.EDU.AU> wrote in news:JWTle.4006
$BR4.1494@news-server.bigpond.net.au:

> It is *RAPE*, however far worse, because the scars are
> physical *AND* mental.

What a load of *CRAP*!
Who is the one in a million with *MENTAL* scars ??

Regards,
Ron

[T.T.]

snip>
> I am amused that female circumcision is called mutilation and made
> illegal,
> whilst male circumcision is considered normal.
> Ban both or neither IMO. I hate all the double standards.
>
> MrT.
>
They have almost nothing in common.

[d]

On Sat, 28 May 2005 18:05:03 +1000, Mr.T wrote:

> "Scott Hillard" <shillard@_nospam_ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> news:ueUle.742$ii7.9701@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
>
>>> You can GAGF on this issue. I'm DEADLY serious about
>>> it and would bring in lifetime jail sentences for
>>> "doctors" performing it on infants.
>>
>> The mental scars from your circumcision are there for all to see....
>
> Well that makes his point perfectly valid then doesn't it!
>
> I am amused that female circumcision is called mutilation and made illegal,
> whilst male circumcision is considered normal.
> Ban both or neither IMO. I hate all the double standards.
>
> MrT.

http://www.circumstitions.com/AAP.html

Interesting side by side comparison.

[Mr.T]

"T.T." <tonyt92@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:GYVle.4153$BR4.2325@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> snip>
> > Ban both or neither IMO. I hate all the double standards.

> They have almost nothing in common.

Other than being similar bits, similarly unnecessary ops, and similar
religious justifications you mean?

MrT.

[Mr.T]

"d" <d_usenet@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1mw09pqcfr65q.96njbm71rwuc$.dlg@40tude.net...
>
> http://www.circumstitions.com/AAP.html
>
> Interesting side by side comparison.

Yes indeed. I wonder how many of those "women's diseases" that are so
prevalent, could be avoided by female circumcision?

(no I'm not really serious, but they seem to be when using the same argument
for MGM.)

MrT.

[Serialpest]

On 28/5/05 6:37 PM, in article 1mw09pqcfr65q.96njbm71rwuc$.dlg@40tude.net,
"d" <d_usenet@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 28 May 2005 18:05:03 +1000, Mr.T wrote:
>
>> "Scott Hillard" <shillard@_nospam_ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:ueUle.742$ii7.9701@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
>>
>>>> You can GAGF on this issue. I'm DEADLY serious about
>>>> it and would bring in lifetime jail sentences for
>>>> "doctors" performing it on infants.
>>>
>>> The mental scars from your circumcision are there for all to see....
>>
>> Well that makes his point perfectly valid then doesn't it!
>>
>> I am amused that female circumcision is called mutilation and made illegal,
>> whilst male circumcision is considered normal.
>> Ban both or neither IMO. I hate all the double standards.
>>
>> MrT.
>
> http://www.circumstitions.com/AAP.html
>
> Interesting side by side comparison.

Oh yes, if it isn't Hugh Young's foreskin fetish website. For those of you
that don't knowI used to give Hugh plenty of shit over in alt.circumcision
for being nothing more than a smegma sniffing shit puncher with a fetish for
men's cheesy doodles. Of course it came as no surprise to find that Hugh is
just an old kiwi poofter that enjoys putting his tongue under the foreskins
of other men to clean them out. His supporters there included a mentally
disturbed man in a wheelchair that had a chronic masturbation problem and
kept illegal reptiles in his caravan home, another man who had silicon
testicles, a teenager that played with guns and admitted to being suicidal
and numerous other loonies, all of which you guessed it were queers. The man
in the wheelchair later made a goodby post before committing suicide!

[Firefly]

"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:42983235$0$5176$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
>
> "T.T." <tonyt92@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:GYVle.4153$BR4.2325@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> snip>
>> > Ban both or neither IMO. I hate all the double standards.
>
>> They have almost nothing in common.
>
> Other than being similar bits, similarly unnecessary ops, and similar
> religious justifications you mean?

You really need to study biology.

[Patrick Young]

Serialpest wrote:

{weirdness deleted}

I personally don't give a flying **** if someone chooses
to remove their own foreskin.

To inflict it on someone without their consent is
worse than rape. That simple.

You and Ron renting a room?

[Serialpest]

On 28/5/05 8:04 PM, in article
zmXle.4235$BR4.2146@news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Patrick Young"
<patrick@hilux.ace.unsw.EDU.AU> wrote:

> Serialpest wrote:
>
> {weirdness deleted}
>
> I personally don't give a flying **** if someone chooses
> to remove their own foreskin.
>
> To inflict it on someone without their consent is
> worse than rape. That simple.
>
> You and Ron renting a room?
>
Worse than rape! Hahaha. When are you coming out Patrick? Been immunised
Patrick? Hahahaha

[Patrick Young]

Serialpest wrote:

> Worse than rape! Hahaha. When are you coming out Patrick? Been immunised
> Patrick? Hahahaha

Not actually had sex since I was 21 (17 years). I Find 99% of the male
and female population very unattractive.

And your story is?

[Serialpest]

On 28/5/05 8:33 PM, in article
%NXle.4289$BR4.492@news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Patrick Young"
<patrick@hilux.ace.unsw.EDU.AU> wrote:

> Serialpest wrote:
>
>> Worse than rape! Hahaha. When are you coming out Patrick? Been immunised
>> Patrick? Hahahaha
>
> Not actually had sex since I was 21 (17 years). I Find 99% of the male
> and female population very unattractive.
>
> And your story is?
>
>

That¹s very sad Patrick. Is that why you spend so much time masturbating?

[Roy Wilke]

Neville Interesting wrote:
> clearly most of the guys in the house are circumcised?

That has nothing to do with it. It's called "Uncut" because the show's
so bloody boring that even the editor has fallen asleep.

[Bill_h]

On Sat, 28 May 2005 19:03:24 +1000, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote:

>
>"d" <d_usenet@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1mw09pqcfr65q.96njbm71rwuc$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>
>> http://www.circumstitions.com/AAP.html
>>
>> Interesting side by side comparison.
>
>Yes indeed. I wonder how many of those "women's diseases" that are so
>prevalent, could be avoided by female circumcision?
>
>(no I'm not really serious, but they seem to be when using the same argument
>for MGM.)
>
>MrT.
>

The article seem quite clear in suggesting there are no comparitive
risks whatsoever.

[Damien McBain]

"Serialpest" <HSVSUX@ihatecommodores.com> wrote in message
news:BEBE8A8B.31678%HSVSUX@ihatecommodores.com...
> On 28/5/05 8:33 PM, in article
> %NXle.4289$BR4.492@news-server.bigpond.net.au, "Patrick Young"
> <patrick@hilux.ace.unsw.EDU.AU> wrote:
>
>> Serialpest wrote:
>>
>>> Worse than rape! Hahaha. When are you coming out Patrick? Been immunised
>>> Patrick? Hahahaha
>>
>> Not actually had sex since I was 21 (17 years). I Find 99% of the male
>> and female population very unattractive.
>>
>> And your story is?
>>
>>
>
> That¹s very sad Patrick. Is that why you spend so much time masturbating?

Maybe he prefers something other than men and women? Like borgs or klingons?

[T.T.]

"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:42983235$0$5176$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
>
> "T.T." <tonyt92@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:GYVle.4153$BR4.2325@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> snip>
>> > Ban both or neither IMO. I hate all the double standards.
>
>> They have almost nothing in common.
>
> Other than being similar bits, similarly unnecessary ops, and similar
> religious justifications you mean?
>
> MrT.
>
They are as similar to each other as a manicure is to the amputation of a
finger.

[Scott Hillard]

"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:4298262f$0$19676$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>
> "Scott Hillard" <shillard@_nospam_ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
> news:ueUle.742$ii7.9701@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
>
> > > You can GAGF on this issue. I'm DEADLY serious about
> > > it and would bring in lifetime jail sentences for
> > > "doctors" performing it on infants.
> >
> > The mental scars from your circumcision are there for all to see....
>
> Well that makes his point perfectly valid then doesn't it!
>
> I am amused that female circumcision is called mutilation and made
illegal,
> whilst male circumcision is considered normal.
> Ban both or neither IMO. I hate all the double standards.

So says the fat black bloke with the Gold chains.

Pity he hasn't got the smarts to work out that there's a hell of a
difference between trimming back a foreskin, and excising a clitoris.

[ant]

Roy Wilke wrote:

> That has nothing to do with it. It's called "Uncut" because the show's
> so bloody boring that even the editor has fallen asleep.

We have a winner!