Re: Will Insurance payup ( Mobile Phone Driving)

[Ext User(Craig's Saab C900 Site)]

"Tim Rodgers" <timmy@yahoo.com> writes:

>If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile phone while you are
>driving, will insurance pay up ??

Why should the insurance company pay up? You are doing something illegal.
Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using a
non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.

Craig.



--
Craig's Saab C900 Page --> http://lios.apana.org.au/~c900 Sydney, NSW Australia
Craig's Saab C900 Workshop -- For all Saab C900 Enthusiasts world-wide!
http://www.saab900classic.net http://www.saab900.org c900@lios.apana.org.au
Come and explore our site, and check out our web-forums, mailing list, etc.

[Ext User(Seamus)]

On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 08:01:59 +0000, Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote:

> "Tim Rodgers" <timmy@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>>If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile phone while you
>>are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>
> Why should the insurance company pay up? You are doing something
> illegal.

So what?

> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using a
> non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.

Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing a driving
offence. But that does not mean that another person who suffers loss is
left high and dry because the insurance cover of the driver is not
effective.

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes

>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??

>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>> You are doing something illegal.

> So what?

So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.

>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using
>> a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.

> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
> cover of the driver is not effective.

The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.

Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance claim.

[Ext User(Seamus)]

On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 05:53:17 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>
>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>
>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>> You are doing something illegal.
>
>> So what?
>
> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>
>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using
>>> a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.
>
>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>> cover of the driver is not effective.
>
> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.

How do you happen to know that?

> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance claim.

That depends on the terms of the contract between the driver and their
insurer.

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes

>>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??

>>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>> You are doing something illegal.

>>> So what?

>> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.

>>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using
>>>> a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.

>>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>> cover of the driver is not effective.

>> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.

> How do you happen to know that?

Pathetic, really.

>> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance claim.

> That depends on the terms of the contract
> between the driver and their insurer.

Pathetic, really.

[Ext User(Smee R1100s)]

Rod Speed wrote:

> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>
>>Rod Speed wrote
>>
>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>
>>>>Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>
>>>>>Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>
>
>>>>>>If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>
>
>>>>>Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>You are doing something illegal.
>
>
>>>>So what?
>
>
>>>So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>
>
>>>>>Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using
>>>>>a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.
>
>
>>>>Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>cover of the driver is not effective.
>
>
>>>The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>
>
>>How do you happen to know that?
>
>
> Pathetic, really.
>
>
>>>Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance claim.
>
>
>>That depends on the terms of the contract
>>between the driver and their insurer.
>
>
> Pathetic, really.
>
>
So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand as per
usual?

[Ext User(Seamus)]

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:

> Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>
>>>Rod Speed wrote
>>>
>>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>
>>>>>Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>>Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>
>>
>>>>>>>If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>
>>
>>>>>>Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>You are doing something illegal.
>>
>>
>>>>>So what?
>>
>>
>>>>So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>
>>
>>>>>>Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using
>>>>>>a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.
>>
>>
>>>>>Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>cover of the driver is not effective.
>>
>>
>>>>The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>
>>
>>>How do you happen to know that?
>>
>>
>> Pathetic, really.
>>
>>
>>>>Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance claim.
>>
>>
>>>That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>between the driver and their insurer.
>>
>>
>> Pathetic, really.
>>
>>
> So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand as per
> usual?

It's quite happy with its head up its arse.

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>
>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>
>>>>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>
>>
>>>>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>
>>
>>>>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>> You are doing something illegal.
>>
>>
>>>>> So what?
>>
>>
>>>> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>
>>
>>>>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using
>>>>>> a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.
>>
>>
>>>>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>> cover of the driver is not effective.
>>
>>
>>>> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>
>>
>>> How do you happen to know that?
>>
>>
>> Pathetic, really.
>>
>>
>>>> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance claim.
>>
>>
>>> That depends on the terms of the contract
>>> between the driver and their insurer.
>>
>>
>> Pathetic, really.
>>
>>
> So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand as per
> usual?

Pathetic, really.

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>
>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>
>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>> You are doing something illegal.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> So what?
>>>
>>>
>>>>> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using
>>>>>>> a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they
>>>>>>> get.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>> cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>
>>>
>>>> How do you happen to know that?
>>>
>>>
>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance claim.
>>>
>>>
>>>> That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>> between the driver and their insurer.
>>>
>>>
>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>
>>>
>> So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand as
>> per usual?
>
> It's quite happy with its head up its arse.

Pathetic, really.

[Ext User(Smee R1100s)]

Rod Speed wrote:

> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>>>phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>>>You are doing something illegal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>So what?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using
>>>>>>>>a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they
>>>>>>>>get.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>>>a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>>>who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>>>cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>How do you happen to know that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Pathetic, really.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance claim.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>>>between the driver and their insurer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Pathetic, really.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand as
>>>per usual?
>>
>>It's quite happy with its head up its arse.
>
>
> Pathetic, really.
>
>
I take it by your pitiful response you can't answer the question then.
Ah well we know who the pathetic one is then don't we?

[Ext User(MrFlibble)]

Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote:
>
> Why should the insurance company pay up? You are doing something illegal.
> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're using a
> non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.

Generally coverage on all property damage other than your car would
likely be covered as it would be covered under 3rd party negligence (as
long as you have it, which is in all policies other than the compulsory
kind).

Whilst you were doing something illegal, you were still negligent. I
know my policy doesn't have illegal act exclusions on the negligence
stuff, just the policy on the car itself.

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>>>> You are doing something illegal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're
>>>>>>>>> using a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what
>>>>>>>>> they get.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>>>> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>>>> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>>>> cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> How do you happen to know that?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance
>>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>>>> between the driver and their insurer.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand as
>>>> per usual?
>>>
>>> It's quite happy with its head up its arse.
>>
>>
>> Pathetic, really.
>>
>>
> I take it by your pitiful response you can't answer the question then.
> Ah well we know who the pathetic one is then don't we?

Pathetic, really.

[Ext User(Seamus)]

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:32:42 +0000, MrFlibble wrote:

> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote:
>>
>> Why should the insurance company pay up? You are doing something
>> illegal. Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're
>> using a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what they get.
>
> Generally coverage on all property damage other than your car would
> likely be covered as it would be covered under 3rd party negligence (as
> long as you have it, which is in all policies other than the compulsory
> kind).
>
> Whilst you were doing something illegal, you were still negligent. I
> know my policy doesn't have illegal act exclusions on the negligence
> stuff, just the policy on the car itself.

You may know that, but Rod-who - the resident fuckwit - will still tell
you that you are wrong.

[Ext User(Seamus)]

On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:53:34 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

> Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>>>>> You are doing something illegal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're
>>>>>>>>>> using a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what
>>>>>>>>>> they get.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>>>>> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>>>>> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>>>>> cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How do you happen to know that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance
>>>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>>>>> between the driver and their insurer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand as
>>>>> per usual?
>>>>
>>>> It's quite happy with its head up its arse.
>>>
>>>
>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>
>>>
>> I take it by your pitiful response you can't answer the question then.
>> Ah well we know who the pathetic one is then don't we?
>
> Pathetic, really.

Still wallowing in the sewer between your ears, eh? What a fuckwit you
are.

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:53:34 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>>>>>> You are doing something illegal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're
>>>>>>>>>>> using a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves
>>>>>>>>>>> what they get.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>>>>>> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>>>>>> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>>>>>> cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you happen to know that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance
>>>>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>>>>>> between the driver and their insurer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand
>>>>>> as per usual?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's quite happy with its head up its arse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I take it by your pitiful response you can't answer the question
>>> then. Ah well we know who the pathetic one is then don't we?
>>
>> Pathetic, really.
>
> Still wallowing in the sewer between your ears, eh? What a fuckwit you
> are.

Pathetic, really.

[Ext User(Smee R1100s)]

Rod Speed wrote:

> Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
>
>>Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>>>>>You are doing something illegal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>So what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're
>>>>>>>>>>using a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves what
>>>>>>>>>>they get.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>>>>>a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>>>>>who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>>>>>cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>How do you happen to know that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance
>>>>>>>>claim.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>>>>>between the driver and their insurer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand as
>>>>>per usual?
>>>>
>>>>It's quite happy with its head up its arse.
>>>
>>>
>>>Pathetic, really.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I take it by your pitiful response you can't answer the question then.
>>Ah well we know who the pathetic one is then don't we?
>
>
> Pathetic, really.
>
>
So you gonna answer his question?
(I can play your game as well as you roddles)

[Ext User(Smee R1100s)]

Rod Speed wrote:

> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:53:34 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>>>>>>>You are doing something illegal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>So what?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're
>>>>>>>>>>>>using a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves
>>>>>>>>>>>>what they get.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>>>>>>>a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>>>>>>>who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>>>>>>>cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>How do you happen to know that?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance
>>>>>>>>>>claim.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>>>>>>>between the driver and their insurer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand
>>>>>>>as per usual?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's quite happy with its head up its arse.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Pathetic, really.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I take it by your pitiful response you can't answer the question
>>>>then. Ah well we know who the pathetic one is then don't we?
>>>
>>>Pathetic, really.
>>
>>Still wallowing in the sewer between your ears, eh? What a fuckwit you
>>are.
>
>
> Pathetic, really.
>
>
So you gonna answer his question?

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:53:34 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are doing something illegal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So what?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're
>>>>>>>>>>>>> using a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what they get.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while
>>>>>>>>>>>> committing a driving offence. But that does not mean that
>>>>>>>>>>>> another person who suffers loss is left high and dry
>>>>>>>>>>>> because the insurance cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How do you happen to know that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance
>>>>>>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>>>>>>>> between the driver and their insurer.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand
>>>>>>>> as per usual?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's quite happy with its head up its arse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I take it by your pitiful response you can't answer the question
>>>>> then. Ah well we know who the pathetic one is then don't we?
>>>>
>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>
>>> Still wallowing in the sewer between your ears, eh? What a fuckwit
>>> you are.
>>
>>
>> Pathetic, really.

> So you gonna answer his question?

Pathetic, really.

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
> Rod Speed wrote:
>
>> Smee R1100s <Me@nothere.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 17:40:23 +1000, Smee R1100s wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Seamus <drinks@eight.com.ir> wrote
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Craig's Saab C900 Site wrote
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Tim Rodgers <timmy@yahoo.com> writes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have a stack, and are illegally using a mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>> phone while you are driving, will insurance pay up ??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Why should the insurance company pay up?
>>>>>>>>>>> You are doing something illegal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So that can be a problem when making an insurance claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who has a crash while driving a vehicle and they're
>>>>>>>>>>> using a non-hands-free mobile phone at the time deserves
>>>>>>>>>>> what they get.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just like anyone else who causes an accident while committing
>>>>>>>>>> a driving offence. But that does not mean that another person
>>>>>>>>>> who suffers loss is left high and dry because the insurance
>>>>>>>>>> cover of the driver is not effective.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The OP wasnt asking about the OTHER PERSON.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you happen to know that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have a look at what happens with a drunk driver's insurance
>>>>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That depends on the terms of the contract
>>>>>>>> between the driver and their insurer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you gonna answer the question or stick your head in the sand
>>>>>> as per usual?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's quite happy with its head up its arse.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pathetic, really.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I take it by your pitiful response you can't answer the question
>>> then. Ah well we know who the pathetic one is then don't we?
>>
>>
>> Pathetic, really.

> So you gonna answer his question?
> (I can play your game as well as you roddles)

Pathetic, really.

[Ext User(MrFlibble)]

Seamus wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:32:42 +0000, MrFlibble wrote:

> You may know that, but Rod-who - the resident fuckwit - will still tell
> you that you are wrong.


And you're feeding the idiot troll why? He's on most of our killfiles
for a damn good reason. In fact his posting host is in mine so I don't
see any of his sock puppets either.