Canon 5D anyone ? :)

[Ext User([BnH])]

http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf

Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)

=bob=

[Ext User(FuTAnT)]

"[BnH]" <b18@nsw.gov.au> wrote in message
news:5phKe.78168$oJ.11281@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>
> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>
> =bob=
>
>

*salivates* ... finally ... a full frame sensor! (on something other than
the top of the line!)

[Ext User(POTD.com.au)]

"[BnH]" <b18@nsw.gov.au> wrote in message
news:5phKe.78168$oJ.11281@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>
> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>
> =bob=
>
>

Could be vapourware, as one of the most recent posts on DPReview claims to
show the original images that it was created from.

Unfortunately, the bandwidth has maxed out on the site with these images so
we can't get a look at the moment. :-(

[Ext User(MD)]

"[BnH]" <b18@nsw.gov.au> wrote in message
news:5phKe.78168$oJ.11281@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>
> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)

Images in the spec do not quite match the following
http://www.cymediadesign.com/lenses/eos5d.jpg

[Ext User(POTD.com.au)]

"MD" <mpd000nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:A5lKe.78410$oJ.75354@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "[BnH]" <b18@nsw.gov.au> wrote in message
> news:5phKe.78168$oJ.11281@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>>
>> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>
> Images in the spec do not quite match the following
> http://www.cymediadesign.com/lenses/eos5d.jpg
>
>

[Ext User(pixby)]

Never going to happen.
Nice article, blending the 1D and 20D together like that is very good.
Pity because this is the camera we all actually want as opposed to what
Canon give us.

--
Douglas...
"You finally make it on the Internet
when you get your own personal Troll".
Mine's called Chrlz. Don't pat him, he bites!
"[BnH]" <b18@nsw.gov.au> wrote in message
news:5phKe.78168$oJ.11281@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>
> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>
> =bob=
>
>

[Ext User(Dunco)]

"[BnH]" <b18@nsw.gov.au> wrote in message
news:5phKe.78168$oJ.11281@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>
> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>
> =bob=
>

I don't think so :)

[Ext User(khangu@gmail.com)]

[BnH] wrote:
> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>
> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)

On one of the chat sites, someone did track down the author of the PDF,
and confirmed that it was all legit.

They just looked at the info data embedded in the PDF and googled the
name there, which led back to Canon's main European PR company.

[Ext User(Dunco)]

<khangu@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1123726250.533327.169930@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>
> [BnH] wrote:
>> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>>
>> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>
> On one of the chat sites, someone did track down the author of the PDF,
> and confirmed that it was all legit.
>
> They just looked at the info data embedded in the PDF and googled the
> name there, which led back to Canon's main European PR company.
>

Rubbish !!

[Ext User(khangu@gmail.com)]

Dunco wrote:
> <khangu@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1123726250.533327.169930@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
> >
> > [BnH] wrote:
> >> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
> >>
> >> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
> >
> > On one of the chat sites, someone did track down the author of the PDF,
> > and confirmed that it was all legit.
> >
> > They just looked at the info data embedded in the PDF and googled the
> > name there, which led back to Canon's main European PR company.
> >
>
> Rubbish !!

No, it's true. It's on the web!

[Ext User(Dunco)]

<khangu@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1123811617.145526.55540@g43g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...
>
> Dunco wrote:
>> <khangu@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1123726250.533327.169930@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>> >
>> > [BnH] wrote:
>> >> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>> >>
>> >> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>> >
>> > On one of the chat sites, someone did track down the author of the PDF,
>> > and confirmed that it was all legit.
>> >
>> > They just looked at the info data embedded in the PDF and googled the
>> > name there, which led back to Canon's main European PR company.
>> >
>>
>> Rubbish !!
>
> No, it's true. It's on the web!
>

Well, it must be then :)

[Ext User(FuTAnT)]

"Dunco" <garyduncan@nospam.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
news:42fbd971$0$32219$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> <khangu@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1123726250.533327.169930@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>>
>> [BnH] wrote:
>>> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>>>
>>> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>>
>> On one of the chat sites, someone did track down the author of the PDF,
>> and confirmed that it was all legit.
>>
>> They just looked at the info data embedded in the PDF and googled the
>> name there, which led back to Canon's main European PR company.
>>
>
> Rubbish !!
>

Crop factor = rubbish ... bring back full frame and stuff all this EF-S
shite!

[Ext User(k)]

"FuTAnT" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
news:42fc699a$0$22557$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
|
| "Dunco" <garyduncan@nospam.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
| news:42fbd971$0$32219$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
| >




| Crop factor = rubbish ... bring back full frame and stuff all this EF-S
| shite!


aww, wots wrong with the 110 and half frame formats?

;-)

k

[Ext User(M i c C u l l e n)]

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:19:30 +1000, FuTAnT wrote:

> Crop factor = rubbish ... bring back full frame and stuff all this EF-S
> shite!

Agreed, the real world, with its economics, wafer yields, etc is WAY
overrated. Just demand what you want. (Never mind that its available
already.)

--

cheers, mic (yes, the email address works)

[Ext User(FuTAnT)]

"M i c C u l l e n" <nospam@cross.com.au> wrote in message
news:1xh8je2ff72is$.5cqek02mbtvy$.dlg@40tude.net.. .
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:19:30 +1000, FuTAnT wrote:
>
>> Crop factor = rubbish ... bring back full frame and stuff all this EF-S
>> shite!
>
> Agreed, the real world, with its economics, wafer yields, etc is WAY
> overrated. Just demand what you want. (Never mind that its available
> already.)
>
> --
>
> cheers, mic (yes, the email address works)

If you want to pay big $$$$ yes.

[Ext User(M i c C u l l e n)]

On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:38:56 +1000, FuTAnT wrote:

>>> Crop factor = rubbish ... bring back full frame and stuff all this EF-S
>>> shite!
>>
>> Agreed, the real world, with its economics, wafer yields, etc is WAY
>> overrated. Just demand what you want. (Never mind that its available
>> already.)

> If you want to pay big $$$$ yes.

Yes, that's EXACTLY the point.

--

cheers, mic (yes, the email address works)

[Ext User(Marli)]

I like the crop. I will never buy a FF DSLR



"FuTAnT" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
news:42fc699a$0$22557$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>
> "Dunco" <garyduncan@nospam.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
> news:42fbd971$0$32219$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>> <khangu@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1123726250.533327.169930@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>>>
>>> [BnH] wrote:
>>>> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>>>
>>> On one of the chat sites, someone did track down the author of the PDF,
>>> and confirmed that it was all legit.
>>>
>>> They just looked at the info data embedded in the PDF and googled the
>>> name there, which led back to Canon's main European PR company.
>>>
>>
>> Rubbish !!
>>
>
> Crop factor = rubbish ... bring back full frame and stuff all this EF-S
> shite!
>

[Ext User(FuTAnT)]

It's good if you want more zoom ....

no use in hell if you want wide angle though. Plus, we get lumped with these
substandard EF-S lenses.

"Marli" <xxxx@xxxx.xx> wrote in message news:42fe04cb$1@quokka.wn.com.au...
>I like the crop. I will never buy a FF DSLR
>
>
>
> "FuTAnT" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
> news:42fc699a$0$22557$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>>
>> "Dunco" <garyduncan@nospam.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
>> news:42fbd971$0$32219$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>>
>>> <khangu@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1123726250.533327.169930@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>>>>
>>>> [BnH] wrote:
>>>>> http://alex.netfun.ro/Canon5D-specs.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Quite a good PS work if it is a vaporware :)
>>>>
>>>> On one of the chat sites, someone did track down the author of the PDF,
>>>> and confirmed that it was all legit.
>>>>
>>>> They just looked at the info data embedded in the PDF and googled the
>>>> name there, which led back to Canon's main European PR company.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Rubbish !!
>>>
>>
>> Crop factor = rubbish ... bring back full frame and stuff all this EF-S
>> shite!
>>
>
>

[Ext User(Ken Chandler)]

"pixby" wrote:

> Never going to happen.
> Nice article, blending the 1D and 20D together like that is very good.
> Pity because this is the camera we all actually want as opposed to what
> Canon give us.

<http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&fcategoryid=
139&modelid=11933>

[Ext User(khangu@gmail.com)]

Ken Chandler (at) wrote:

> <http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=ModelDetailAct&fcategoryid=
> 139&modelid=11933>

There you go, though at that price, it's still out of reach of most
amateur photgraphers.