View Full Version : Foxtel - No Signal - Easy Sydney - NE1 Else?
Ext User(Justern)
18-09-2005, 08:23 AM
Ext User(Justern)
18-09-2005, 05:13 PM
Service Was Out 3am - 1030am...
Ext User(Justern)
19-09-2005, 01:23 PM
Ext User(F ir e f l ie)
19-09-2005, 11:33 PM
"Justern" <justernNOSPAMPLEASE@NOSPAMPLEASEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dgl9sk$14k$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au...
>
Care to elaborate?
Ext User(The Family)
20-09-2005, 02:33 AM
"F ir e f l ie" <!-!*`)-+|\|> wrote in message
news:432ebc59$0$89807$c30e37c6@ken-reader.news.telstra.net...
>
> "Justern" <justernNOSPAMPLEASE@NOSPAMPLEASEhotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dgl9sk$14k$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au...
>>
> Care to elaborate?
>
Fireflie complains about Foxtel but at the Cust Service end it probably goes
like this:
Foxtel: Hi, can we help?
Fireflie: ITS OUT! (slams down the phone)
Foxtel: well huh?
What a dork.
Ext User(hottie)
20-09-2005, 06:13 AM
The Family wrote:
> "F ir e f l ie" <!-!*`)-+|\|> wrote in message
> news:432ebc59$0$89807$c30e37c6@ken-reader.news.telstra.net...
>
>>"Justern" <justernNOSPAMPLEASE@NOSPAMPLEASEhotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:dgl9sk$14k$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au...
>>
>>Care to elaborate?
>>
>
>
> Fireflie complains about Foxtel but at the Cust Service end it probably goes
> like this:
>
> Foxtel: Hi, can we help?
> Fireflie: ITS OUT! (slams down the phone)
> Foxtel: well huh?
>
> What a dork.
>
>
Justern is the one you should be calling a dork. F ir e f l ie asked
for elaboration on his posting.
Ext User(F ir e f l ie)
20-09-2005, 06:03 PM
"The Family" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:432ee62d$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> "F ir e f l ie" <!-!*`)-+|\|> wrote in message
> news:432ebc59$0$89807$c30e37c6@ken-reader.news.telstra.net...
>>
>> "Justern" <justernNOSPAMPLEASE@NOSPAMPLEASEhotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dgl9sk$14k$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au...
>>>
>> Care to elaborate?
>>
>
> Fireflie complains about Foxtel but at the Cust Service end it probably
> goes like this:
>
> Foxtel: Hi, can we help?
> Fireflie: ITS OUT! (slams down the phone)
> Foxtel: well huh?
>
> What a dork.
Maybe you should decrease the dose of whatever you're on. Your post made as
little sense as Justern's did.
Ext User(Justern)
21-09-2005, 08:43 AM
The Signal Is Out = Their Is No Siganl = Their Is No Foxtel.
I Didnt Realise You needed the same training as the foxtel staff to
understand something that lay.
Ext User(Justin)
21-09-2005, 11:33 AM
"Justern" <justernNOSPAMPLEASE@NOSPAMPLEASEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dgq29g$t84$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au...
> The Signal Is Out = Their Is No Siganl = Their Is No Foxtel.
>
Perhaps "YET ANOTHER OUTAGE" would have been a better subject?
Ext User(anonymous coward)
21-09-2005, 03:03 PM
"Justern" <justernNOSPAMPLEASE@NOSPAMPLEASEhotmail.com> wrote in
news:dgq29g$t84$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au:
My grammar-parser and spell-checker just exploded after that posting!
> The Signal Is Out = Their Is No Siganl = Their Is No Foxtel.
Sheesh. There != Their. "There is no spoon."
> I Didnt Realise You needed the same training as the foxtel staff to
> understand something that lay.
That sense of "Lay" is an adjective. Lay person, lay preacher etc.
They might need training but you need to stay in school. And stop posting
on USENET until you can spell.
Ext User(F ir e f l ie)
21-09-2005, 05:33 PM
"Justern" <justernNOSPAMPLEASE@NOSPAMPLEASEhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dgq29g$t84$1@nnrp.waia.asn.au...
> The Signal Is Out = Their Is No Siganl = Their Is No Foxtel.
>
> I Didnt Realise You needed the same training as the foxtel staff to
> understand something that lay.
The problem is, you didn't mention anything about signal. You just said
"ITS", which could mean anything.
And by the way, it's "there", not "their".
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd