Re: Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup

[Ext User(Mosley Jones III)]

"« Dont Bite My Finger, Look Where I Am Pointing »"
<Orwellian.1984-speak@propaganda.liberals.org.au> wrote in message
news:435499c6@news.comindico.com.au...
> Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup: report
> Senator Siewert, 15th October 2005

really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the ALP?

[Ext User(Mr.T)]

"Mosley Jones III" <administrator@info.gov.mars> wrote in message
news:4354cbe3$1@funnel.arach.net.au...
> "« Dont Bite My Finger, Look Where I Am Pointing »"
> <Orwellian.1984-speak@propaganda.liberals.org.au> wrote in message
> news:435499c6@news.comindico.com.au...
> > Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup: report
> > Senator Siewert, 15th October 2005
>
> really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the ALP?

Worse, they'll probably have an unemployment rate like they did when Howard
was treasurer.

MrT.

[Ext User(Kwyjibo.)]

"Mosley Jones III" <administrator@info.gov.mars> said

>
> "« Dont Bite My Finger, Look Where I Am Pointing »"
> <Orwellian.1984-speak@propaganda.liberals.org.au> wrote in message
> news:435499c6@news.comindico.com.au...
>> Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup: report
>> Senator Siewert, 15th October 2005
>
> really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the ALP?
>

Mope. We'll have a new class - the Working Poor, just like Johnny's idol, the
US of A.


--


Kwyj.

(Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email)

[Ext User(feral)]

Mosley Jones III wrote:
> "« Dont Bite My Finger, Look Where I Am Pointing »"
> <Orwellian.1984-speak@propaganda.liberals.org.au> wrote in message
> news:435499c6@news.comindico.com.au...
>
>>Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup: report
>>Senator Siewert, 15th October 2005
>
>
> really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the ALP?
>
>
<quote>
Since the last recession in the early 1990s the unemployment rate has
gradually declined. However, since the early 1980s the unemployment rate
has been higher than was common in the 1960s and 1970s.
</quote>

Go figure, I can't.

--
Take Care.
Feral

[Ext User(Mr.T)]

"Kwyjibo." <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96F3D81E39820dddddd@203.26.24.228...
> Mope. We'll have a new class - the Working Poor, just like Johnny's idol,
the
> US of A.

We already have that! If you mean it will increase, then I agree.
However that *IS* JWH's only policy, to increase the gap between rich and
poor. He has done a brilliant job so far.

MrT.

[Ext User(atec)]

Kwyjibo. wrote:

>"Mosley Jones III" <administrator@info.gov.mars> said
>
>
>
>>"« Dont Bite My Finger, Look Where I Am Pointing »"
>><Orwellian.1984-speak@propaganda.liberals.org.au> wrote in message
>>news:435499c6@news.comindico.com.au...
>>
>>
>>>Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup: report
>>>Senator Siewert, 15th October 2005
>>>
>>>
>>really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the ALP?
>>
>>
>>
>
>Mope. We'll have a new class - the Working Poor, just like Johnny's idol, the
>US of A.
>
>
>
>
Put simply the minimum wage will be retained as it is now and the
normally cpi will apply , the us minimum is not indexed to cpi and has
not risend since 1997 or so
our minumum does every year and will continue to do so

[Ext User(Kev)]

feral wrote:
>
> Mosley Jones III wrote:
> > "« Dont Bite My Finger, Look Where I Am Pointing »"
> > <Orwellian.1984-speak@propaganda.liberals.org.au> wrote in message
> > news:435499c6@news.comindico.com.au...
> >
> >>Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup: report
> >>Senator Siewert, 15th October 2005
> >
> >
> > really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the ALP?
> >
> >
> <quote>
> Since the last recession in the early 1990s the unemployment rate has
> gradually declined. However, since the early 1980s the unemployment rate
> has been higher than was common in the 1960s and 1970s.
> </quote>
>
> Go figure, I can't.
>
> --
> Take Care.
> Feral


Might have something to do with population growing too fast for the
countries infrastructure
automation and of course the increase in working hours per worker, thus
negating the use of extra shifts

and now Howard wants all those non working spouses of low income
earners, pensioners(invalid) to get out and find a job or they will be
penalised

just in time for lil Johnny's "take it or leave it(be sacked)" workplace
initiatives


welcome to 1955 people, Lil Johnny's utopia


Kev

[Ext User(DalienX)]

Mosley Jones III wrote:


>
> really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the
> ALP?

The current unemployment rates are all bullshit anyway.
Anyone on "work for the dole" is not counted as unemployed, and thats a
LOT of people.

[Ext User(Jollyrodgers)]

"Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote in message
news:4354de28$0$24514$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>
> "Kwyjibo." <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns96F3D81E39820dddddd@203.26.24.228...
>> Mope. We'll have a new class - the Working Poor, just like Johnny's idol,
> the
>> US of A.
>
> We already have that! If you mean it will increase, then I agree.
> However that *IS* JWH's only policy, to increase the gap between rich and
> poor. He has done a brilliant job so far.

This country is full of opportunities it is the individuals choice weather
the take advantage of these or not.
If you are in a dead end job earning a pissy $600 a week that is your
choice.

[Ext User(DalienX)]

Kev wrote:

>
>
> Might have something to do with population growing too fast for the
> countries infrastructure
> automation and of course the increase in working hours per worker,
> thus negating the use of extra shifts

Not to mention the female population joining the workforce. *not that i
have anything against that..... ducks..

>
> and now Howard wants all those non working spouses of low income
> earners, pensioners(invalid) to get out and find a job or they will be
> penalised

Yep he wants everyone to stop claiming the dole and start working 60+
hours a week and pay taxes instead.

>
> just in time for lil Johnny's "take it or leave it(be sacked)"
> workplace initiatives
>
>
But "no worker will be worse off" Yeah right, just like he was gunna
scrap income tax when he sold the country on the gst.

> welcome to 1955 people, Lil Johnny's utopia
>
>
> Kev

Might have to have ourselves a good old fasioned assasination i think...

[Ext User(Spankalogical Protocol)]

"DalienX" <somewhere@earth.com> wrote in message
news:_E65f.21539$U51.17420@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Kev wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Might have something to do with population growing too fast for the
> > countries infrastructure
> > automation and of course the increase in working hours per worker,
> > thus negating the use of extra shifts
>
> Not to mention the female population joining the workforce. *not that i
> have anything against that..... ducks..
>
> >
> > and now Howard wants all those non working spouses of low income
> > earners, pensioners(invalid) to get out and find a job or they will be
> > penalised
>
> Yep he wants everyone to stop claiming the dole and start working 60+
> hours a week and pay taxes instead.
>
> >
> > just in time for lil Johnny's "take it or leave it(be sacked)"
> > workplace initiatives
> >
> >
> But "no worker will be worse off" Yeah right, just like he was gunna
> scrap income tax when he sold the country on the gst.
>
> > welcome to 1955 people, Lil Johnny's utopia
> >
> >
> > Kev
>
> Might have to have ourselves a good old fasioned assasination i think...

forwarded to investigations@asio.gov.au

[Ext User(Toby Ponsenby)]

On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:29:25 +1000, Spankalogical Protocol wrote:

> "DalienX" <somewhere@earth.com> wrote in message
> news:_E65f.21539$U51.17420@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> Kev wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Might have something to do with population growing too fast for the
>>> countries infrastructure
>>> automation and of course the increase in working hours per worker,
>>> thus negating the use of extra shifts
>>
>> Not to mention the female population joining the workforce. *not that i
>> have anything against that..... ducks..
>>
>>>
>>> and now Howard wants all those non working spouses of low income
>>> earners, pensioners(invalid) to get out and find a job or they will be
>>> penalised
>>
>> Yep he wants everyone to stop claiming the dole and start working 60+
>> hours a week and pay taxes instead.
>>
>>>
>>> just in time for lil Johnny's "take it or leave it(be sacked)"
>>> workplace initiatives
>>>
>>>
>> But "no worker will be worse off" Yeah right, just like he was gunna
>> scrap income tax when he sold the country on the gst.
>>
>>> welcome to 1955 people, Lil Johnny's utopia
>>>
>>>
>>> Kev
>>
>> Might have to have ourselves a good old fasioned assasination i think...
>
> forwarded to investigations@asio.gov.au

They want the job?

--
Toby.
quidquid latine dictum
sit, altum viditur

[Ext User(Spankalogical Protocol)]

"Toby Ponsenby" <toby@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:gyq9885dek8d.1cej5i5qjnwj2.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:29:25 +1000, Spankalogical Protocol wrote:
>
> > "DalienX" <somewhere@earth.com> wrote in message
> > news:_E65f.21539$U51.17420@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >> Kev wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Might have something to do with population growing too fast for the
> >>> countries infrastructure
> >>> automation and of course the increase in working hours per worker,
> >>> thus negating the use of extra shifts
> >>
> >> Not to mention the female population joining the workforce. *not that i
> >> have anything against that..... ducks..
> >>
> >>>
> >>> and now Howard wants all those non working spouses of low income
> >>> earners, pensioners(invalid) to get out and find a job or they will be
> >>> penalised
> >>
> >> Yep he wants everyone to stop claiming the dole and start working 60+
> >> hours a week and pay taxes instead.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> just in time for lil Johnny's "take it or leave it(be sacked)"
> >>> workplace initiatives
> >>>
> >>>
> >> But "no worker will be worse off" Yeah right, just like he was gunna
> >> scrap income tax when he sold the country on the gst.
> >>
> >>> welcome to 1955 people, Lil Johnny's utopia
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Kev
> >>
> >> Might have to have ourselves a good old fasioned assasination i
think...
> >
> > forwarded to investigations@asio.gov.au
>
> They want the job?
>
>

Yes, of bringing DalienX in for questioning ;)

Be alert, not alarmed.

[Ext User(DalienX)]

Spankalogical Protocol wrote:


> >
> > Might have to have ourselves a good old fasioned assasination i
> > think...
>
> forwarded to investigations@asio.gov.au

Ahh but who was i talking about? no names there, might have been
refering to you...

[Ext User(Spankalogical Protocol)]

"DalienX" <somewhere@earth.com> wrote in message
news:o275f.21553$U51.9475@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Spankalogical Protocol wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > Might have to have ourselves a good old fasioned assasination i
> > > think...
> >
> > forwarded to investigations@asio.gov.au
>
> Ahh but who was i talking about? no names there, might have been
> refering to you...

Thats for the courts to decide :p

[Ext User(Kev)]

> Be alert, not alarmed.


people keep telling me to be alert

but what is a lert?
sounds like a medieval peeping tom

Even a sign on the Bruce HWY asking the passenger if the driver was a
lert



Kev

[Ext User(Sandgroper)]

"Mosley Jones III" <administrator@info.gov.mars> wrote in message
news:4354cbe3$1@funnel.arach.net.au...
>
> "« Dont Bite My Finger, Look Where I Am Pointing »"
> <Orwellian.1984-speak@propaganda.liberals.org.au> wrote in message
> news:435499c6@news.comindico.com.au...
> > Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup: report
> > Senator Siewert, 15th October 2005
>
> really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the ALP?

Oh crap , NOW we has the fuckwit Muttley crossposting his liberal bullshit
to aus.computers.

So what's it like being just about the only blackfella in Aust that licks
little Johnny Howard The Industrial Terrorist's arse.


--
------------------------------------
True Multitasking is having three computers and a chair with wheels.


Sandgroper
------------------------------------
Remove KNICKERS to Email
steveray@KNICKERSiinet.net.au

[Ext User(Jason James)]

"Kev" <kevcat@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:43550781.53180CE1@optusnet.com.au...
>
>
>
> > Be alert, not alarmed.
>
>
> people keep telling me to be alert
>
> but what is a lert?
> sounds like a medieval peeping tom
>
> Even a sign on the Bruce HWY asking the passenger if the driver was a
> lert

Yeah,..it's like when my teacher used to say "you'd better watch
yourself",...I found it very tiring staring down at myself,..used to run
into things.

Jason

[Ext User(Stephen Oakes)]

"DalienX" <somewhere@earth.com> wrote...
>> really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the
>> ALP?
>
> The current unemployment rates are all bullshit anyway.

'Tis true...they have changed the nmethod for calculating the unemployment
rate so much that...it's really odd that the so-called opposition doesn't
make some sort of objection about it. I guess they're happy just collecting
their pay and tagging along with the most deceitful, money-grubbing
government Australia has ever had...after all, they're all part of the
rich-greedy-stealing class.

--
Stephen Oakes

[Ext User(Mosley Jones III)]

"Kwyjibo." <Kwyjibo@YourFingerFromThatDykeozdebate.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96F3D81E39820dddddd@203.26.24.228...
> "Mosley Jones III" <administrator@info.gov.mars> said
>
>>
>> "« Dont Bite My Finger, Look Where I Am Pointing »"
>> <Orwellian.1984-speak@propaganda.liberals.org.au> wrote in message
>> news:435499c6@news.comindico.com.au...
>>> Young Australians to be the first casualties of IR shakeup: report
>>> Senator Siewert, 15th October 2005
>>
>> really, will they have a unemployment rate like they had under the ALP?
>>
>
> Mope. We'll have a new class - the Working Poor, just like Johnny's idol,
> the
> US of A.


any evidence to back that up? or are you one to claim thing you don't know
to be true?




>
>
> --
>
>
> Kwyj.
>
> (Remove your finger from that dyke to reply by email)
>