Hosted by: Eyo Technologies Pty Ltd. Sponsored by: Actiontec Pty Ltd
Re: Geology - True, & False [Archive] - Aussie Phorums

PDA

View Full Version : Re: Geology - True, & False


Ext User(Wally Anglesea™)
05-02-2006, 11:18 AM
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:25:20 +0100, "Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud"
<xyz@atlante.edu> wrote:

>Nice question... developing a comprehensive answer would take a bit of
>time.... let say that the True Geology both lighten the past and anticipate
>the future, but as well conduct to positive achievements ! Indeed the right
>understanding of the Earth conduct to easy to achieve mining discoveries !
>
>Of course further the True Geology is based on reality, like the UPL by
>example ( Universal Pressure Law ) , this means in clear that True Geology
>is an Approach to Universal knowledge basing its foundations of course in
>all discipline ( which are in fact and should be only one )
>
>With kindest regards
>
>PS .... as for True Medicine you will know what it is by the fact that it
>can cure Cancer, Brain Tumour, AIDS in 5 days flat .... the rest is just
>Quacks' business


Why then aren't you allowed to teach your "true geology" in *any*
educational institution in France?
--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

Ext User(Sunny)
05-02-2006, 11:27 AM
" Jean-Paul Turd" <fraud@atlante.edu> wrote in message
> Nice question... developing a comprehensive answer would take a bit of
> time.... to concoct an answer.
> Fraud Mining Pioneer
> Fraud ocean frog
> Exploration Wannabe
> Founder and sole member of the True Geology
> embarrassment to all of France
> President of Idiots_R_Us
> Quack wannabe
<snip rest of shit >

Ext User(Typhoid)
05-02-2006, 03:00 PM
Sunny wrote:
> " Jean-Paul Turd" <fraud@atlante.edu> wrote in message
> > Nice question... developing a comprehensive answer would take a bit of
> > time.... to concoct an answer.
> > Fraud Mining Pioneer
> > Fraud ocean frog
> > Exploration Wannabe
> > Founder and sole member of the True Geology
> > embarrassment to all of France
> > President of Idiots_R_Us
> > Quack wannabe
> <snip rest of shit >

Amongst all the netkook stuff, a Google search of "Jean-Paul Turcaud"
threw up this little gem from Wikipedia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk

> Jean-Paul Turcaud wrote:
> > No ramps were used to build the GP [Great Pyramid], and well as the 2 main
> > others... another technique far more developed that the one even used now.

> *plonk* and yet another killfile entry!

Immortalised!

Ext User(DogFart)
05-02-2006, 03:25 PM
On 4 Feb 2006 20:00:41 -0800, "Typhoid" <rp_typhoid@yahoo.de> wrote:

>Amongst all the netkook stuff, a Google search of "Jean-Paul Turcaud"
>threw up this little gem from Wikipedia...
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plonk

Good find!

Ext User(Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud)
05-02-2006, 07:25 PM
Nice question... developing a comprehensive answer would take a bit of
time.... let say that the True Geology both lighten the past and anticipate
the future, but as well conduct to positive achievements ! Indeed the right
understanding of the Earth conduct to easy to achieve mining discoveries !

Of course further the True Geology is based on reality, like the UPL by
example ( Universal Pressure Law ) , this means in clear that True Geology
is an Approach to Universal knowledge basing its foundations of course in
all discipline ( which are in fact and should be only one )

With kindest regards

PS .... as for True Medicine you will know what it is by the fact that it
can cure Cancer, Brain Tumour, AIDS in 5 days flat .... the rest is just
Quacks' business

--
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer

Exploration Geologist
Founder of the True Geology

~~ Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~




"Don H" <donlhumphries@bigpond.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
tBrEf.233928$V7.117762@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> How is Geology defined? Which is the true geology, and how do we
> distinguish it from impostors?
> Which is true: alchemy or chemistry? astrology or astronomy? witchdoctors
> or medical practitioners?
> Indeed, what is Science, as distinct from Quackery, and how do we tell
> the
> difference?
>
>