I just dropped in to see.......

[Ext User(Andy)]

..........if Rod speed was still alive.

[Ext User(alx)]

He's about, but the pills are working it seems.

"Andy" <pandoraandypandy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159880746.164011.292440@m7g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
> .........if Rod speed was still alive.
>

[Ext User(Michael)]

"Andy" <pandoraandypandy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159880746.164011.292440@m7g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
> .........if Rod speed was still alive.
>

you wont be disappointed :-)

[Ext User(James Bell)]

"Andy" <pandoraandypandy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159880746.164011.292440@m7g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
> .........if Rod speed was still alive.
>

Unfortunately yes.. Although at his age, its more 'Rod Slow' that the old
Rod Speed..

You do know they call him 'speedy' in an ironic sense..

[Ext User(Intel Inside)]

Grow up loser.
He's got more brains than you.


"James Bell" <bellj@telstra.com> wrote in message
news:452640d7$0$11974$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>
> "Andy" <pandoraandypandy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1159880746.164011.292440@m7g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
>> .........if Rod speed was still alive.
>>
>
> Unfortunately yes.. Although at his age, its more 'Rod Slow' that the old
> Rod Speed..
>
> You do know they call him 'speedy' in an ironic sense..
>
>

[Ext User(James Bell)]

"Intel Inside" <Intel_Inside@thespamfactory.com> wrote in message
news:HGtVg.42544$rP1.15790@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Grow up loser.
> He's got more brains than you.


If you had a brain, you would know that it is "He HAS more brains than you."

Which is also incorrect as zero is not greater than one. There are no
plurals of brains, either.

[Ext User(Intel Inside)]

Shows how much you don't know.

The noun 'brain', when used in the "INTELLIGENCE" context is "often used in
plural <eg. plenty of brains in that family>"
source: www.m-w.com



"James Bell" <bellj@telstra.com> wrote in message
news:4526fa63$0$17214$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>
> "Intel Inside" <Intel_Inside@thespamfactory.com> wrote in message
> news:HGtVg.42544$rP1.15790@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> Grow up loser.
>> He's got more brains than you.
>
>
> If you had a brain, you would know that it is "He HAS more brains than
> you."
>
> Which is also incorrect as zero is not greater than one. There are no
> plurals of brains, either.
>

[Ext User(Emjaye)]

James Bell wrote:

> Which is also incorrect as zero is not greater than one. There are no
> plurals of brains, either.

Yes there is. For example, you get Rod Speed's brain and Michael's
brain. That makes two.. er, hang on. You're right in this instance.

Sorry, that was a bad example. Between them that only makes up half a
brain....