380 recalled :) :) :)

[Ext User(mark jb)]

http://www.recalls.gov.au/view_recall_detail.php?Recall_ID_Auto=13736

Oh looky me-a fuel hose problem.

-mark

[Ext User(Noddy)]

"mark jb" <nukeleer at internode dot on dot net> wrote in message
news:12j6vond9t9208d@corp.supernews.com...
> http://www.recalls.gov.au/view_recall_detail.php?Recall_ID_Auto=13736
>
> Oh looky me-a fuel hose problem.

Lol :)

Now, that's funny :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.

[Ext User(Clockmeister)]

"Noddy" <dg4163@(nospam)dodo.com.au> wrote in message
news:453388e4@news.comindico.com.au...
>
> "mark jb" <nukeleer at internode dot on dot net> wrote in message
> news:12j6vond9t9208d@corp.supernews.com...
>> http://www.recalls.gov.au/view_recall_detail.php?Recall_ID_Auto=13736
>>
>> Oh looky me-a fuel hose problem.
>
> Lol :)
>
> Now, that's funny :)
>

It is, also check out the consumer action... Mitsubishi wants the consumer
to contact them putting the onus on the consumer whilst Holden contacts the
consumer by letter.

[Ext User(Marco)]

Clockmeister wrote:
>
> It is, also check out the consumer action... Mitsubishi wants the consumer
> to contact them putting the onus on the consumer whilst Holden contacts the
> consumer by letter.

Still, it's an improvement on past practice where the consumer needed
an order from a court in Japan to go rifling through the lockers of
Mitsubishi execs to uncover secret details of hushed-up faults, no?
Kudos to them, I say.

Marco

[Ext User(Dan---)]

"Clockmeister" <whowhere@andwhy.com> wrote in message
news:12j7r94i0gd0p22@corp.supernews.com...

>>
>
> It is, also check out the consumer action... Mitsubishi wants the consumer
> to contact them putting the onus on the consumer whilst Holden contacts
> the consumer by letter.

Maybe they cannot afford posting the letters to the consumers now.

Awaits for the Mitsu can't do no wrong bullshit to start again.:-)


--
Regards
Dan