Hosted by: Eyo Technologies Pty Ltd. Sponsored by: Actiontec Pty Ltd
Dutch Analog TV Goes Off Air for Good [Archive] - Aussie Phorums

PDA

View Full Version : Dutch Analog TV Goes Off Air for Good


Ext User(UNCLE WALLY ول مح型有兴趣以مدان нлий Дуд┬п╣الاﷲ-╠۞╣.·:
12-12-2006, 11:43 PM
Gooday/Hi Peoplez !!!

Gawdangit, those Dutchies have beat us to it -- probably got a lot more
channels to choose from too !!!!

HOOROO

UNCLE WALLY

====0====


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,235917,00.html




Dutch Analog TV Goes Off Air for Good

Monday , December 11, 2006




AMSTERDAM, Netherlands — The Netherlands ended transmission of "free
to air" analog television Monday, becoming the first nation to switch
completely to digital signals.

Few Dutch consumers noticed, because the overwhelming majority get TV
via cable. Only around 74,000 households relied primarily on the
old-fashioned TV antennas in this country of 16 million, although
220,000 people had an "occasional use" set somewhere such as in a
vacation house, camper or boat, according to government figures.

The bandwidth formerly used by analog has been licensed through 2017 by
former telecommunications company Royal KPN NV (KPN), which will use it
to broadcast digital television.

• Click here to visit FOXNews.com's Home Computing Center.

Under its agreement with the government, KPN bore the cost of building
digital broadcasting masts and must continue to broadcast three
state-supported channels and several regional public broadcasters free
of charge.

In return, it can use the rest of the open bandwidth to charge around
$18.50 a month for a package of other channels that is comparable with
cable.

Whether customers opt for just the free channels or a full cable-like
package, they must first buy a tuner to decode the new "digital
terrestrial" signals, available for around $66.50.

KPN spokesman Jan Davids said the switch occurred between midnight and
2 a.m. without any reported problems.

"Then we broke out the champagne," he said.

At present, the full package of channels is available in most of the
country, with national coverage expected by early 2007, Davids said.
The government-sponsored channels were available nationally as of
Monday.

The government will save around $14 million annually from the switch,
the cost it used to pay to broadcast the "free" service that was used
by only 74,000 households — a hidden cost of roughly $200 per house.

And "when 94 percent of the market is served by cable, more competition
is healthy," said Economic Affairs ministry spokeswoman Judith
Thompson.

Cable here faces minor but growing competition from satellite and more
recently, television via high-speed Internet connections with the
service known as IPTV.

KPN's Davids declined to disclose financial details of the company's
deals with the television production companies whose shows it now
broadcasts.

On a model similar to that of cable, KPN will also offer additional
channel packages above the basic set — such as sports and film
channels — for an extra fee.

The Dutch switch to "digital terrestrial" television is a minor
milestone. Analog television was introduced in the Netherlands in 1951.

Governments around the world are gradually making the switch to
digital, with some Scandinavian countries and Belgium targeting a 2007
switch-off date. The target is 2009 in the United States, and 2011 in
Japan.

Last year, it was estimated that 21 million U.S. households do not get
cable or satellite service and rely solely on free over-the-air TV.
Consumers Union estimated an additional 20 million homes that have
cable or satellite do not have all of their TV sets hooked up to the
service and would need converter boxes, too.

Most developed countries have already begun testing or broadcasting
digital TV signals on some bandwidths.

==============================================

Ext User(cosmichobo)
13-12-2006, 08:23 PM
In article <1165912378.981498.57710@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.co m>,
"UNCLE WALLY ˉ**ÂÕå^óL–À»§“‘œ«Ê*Ñ~ Ñ|ÑyÑz
ÑDÑÖÑtѶÑÅ?«‰«?*???Æ·:*¨¨*:·. Ü•˝®™" <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca>
wrote:

> Gooday/Hi Peoplez !!!
>
> Gawdangit, those Dutchies have beat us to it -- probably got a lot more
> channels to choose from too !!!!
>
> HOOROO
>
> UNCLE WALLY


Despite writing a HD essay on DTV, I can't remember when Australia was
meant to go "offline"... but think it was 2006!?

Of course, take-up of the new technology, oddly enough, was very
stilted, still is far from saturation...

Ext User(three)
14-12-2006, 12:03 AM
"cosmichobo" <not.worth@the.spam> wrote in message
news:not.worth-CCE0C9.15060913122006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <1165912378.981498.57710@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.co m>,
> "UNCLE WALLY ˉ ÂÕå^óL–À»§“‘œ«Ê Ñ~Ñ|ÑyÑz
> ÑDÑÖÑtѶÑÅ?«‰«? ???Æ·:*¨¨*:·. Ü•˝®™"
> <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> Gooday/Hi Peoplez !!!
>>
>> Gawdangit, those Dutchies have beat us to it -- probably got a lot more
>> channels to choose from too !!!!
>>
>> HOOROO
>>
>> UNCLE WALLY
>
>
> Despite writing a HD essay on DTV, I can't remember when Australia was
> meant to go "offline"... but think it was 2006!?
>
> Of course, take-up of the new technology, oddly enough, was very
> stilted, still is far from saturation...

Thats because its still only available in capital cities... in the country
its lucky to have ABC and SBS

Ext User(Jack Thomas)
14-12-2006, 10:53 AM
"three" <fourfive@six.com> wrote in message
news:5pPfh.7369$HU.4517@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "cosmichobo" <not.worth@the.spam> wrote in message
> news:not.worth-CCE0C9.15060913122006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
>> In article <1165912378.981498.57710@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.co m>,
>> "UNCLE WALLY <?? ? ,.å^óL?"?»§?o?~,"«S? '~'|'y'z
>> 'D'-'t'¶'.?«?«?? ????·:*¨¨*:·. o?˝®""
>> <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Gooday/Hi Peoplez !!!
>>>
>>> Gawdangit, those Dutchies have beat us to it -- probably got a lot more
>>> channels to choose from too !!!!
>>>
>>> HOOROO
>>>
>>> UNCLE WALLY
>>
>>
>> Despite writing a HD essay on DTV, I can't remember when Australia was
>> meant to go "offline"... but think it was 2006!?
>>
>> Of course, take-up of the new technology, oddly enough, was very
>> stilted, still is far from saturation...
>
> Thats because its still only available in capital cities... in the country
> its lucky to have ABC and SBS

I would have put it down to the fact that FTA programs are just as crap on
digital as they are on analog.

Why spend 100's on a STB just to watch shit like Big Brother, American Idol
etc, etc...

Now TEN has Laguna Beach....fantastic!

Need I say more?

>
>

Ext User(Liron)
14-12-2006, 04:43 PM
One difference between the Netherlands and Australia is that the cable TV
penetration rate is so high. Thus the number of people who need a digital
TV/STB after the cut-off date would surely be much lower.

Liron

"Jack Thomas" <jakethepeg@rolfharris.com> wrote in message
news:457fc922$1_2@news.chariot.net.au...
>
> "three" <fourfive@six.com> wrote in message
> news:5pPfh.7369$HU.4517@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>
>> "cosmichobo" <not.worth@the.spam> wrote in message
>> news:not.worth-CCE0C9.15060913122006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
>>> In article <1165912378.981498.57710@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.co m>,
>>> "UNCLE WALLY <?? ? ,.å^óL?"?»§?o?~,"«S? '~'|'y'z
>>> 'D'-'t'¶'.?«?«?? ????·:*¨¨*:·. o?˝®""
>>> <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gooday/Hi Peoplez !!!
>>>>
>>>> Gawdangit, those Dutchies have beat us to it -- probably got a lot more
>>>> channels to choose from too !!!!
>>>>
>>>> HOOROO
>>>>
>>>> UNCLE WALLY
>>>
>>>
>>> Despite writing a HD essay on DTV, I can't remember when Australia was
>>> meant to go "offline"... but think it was 2006!?
>>>
>>> Of course, take-up of the new technology, oddly enough, was very
>>> stilted, still is far from saturation...
>>
>> Thats because its still only available in capital cities... in the
>> country its lucky to have ABC and SBS
>
> I would have put it down to the fact that FTA programs are just as crap
> on digital as they are on analog.
>
> Why spend 100's on a STB just to watch shit like Big Brother, American
> Idol etc, etc...
>
> Now TEN has Laguna Beach....fantastic!
>
> Need I say more?
>
>>
>>
>
>

Ext User(fish.)
14-12-2006, 07:13 PM
In article <1165912378.981498.57710@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.co m>,
stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca says...
> Gooday/Hi Peoplez !!!
>
> Gawdangit, those Dutchies have beat us to it -- probably got a lot more
> channels to choose from too !!!!
>
> HOOROO
>
> UNCLE WALLY
>
>
>


Wish ours would, and digital, right now...


--
"Once you black, you go deaf"

Family Guy.

Ext User(Martin Barr-David)
19-12-2006, 03:03 AM
Liron wrote:
> One difference between the Netherlands and Australia is that the cable TV
> penetration rate is so high. Thus the number of people who need a digital
> TV/STB after the cut-off date would surely be much lower.
>
> Liron
>
> "Jack Thomas" <jakethepeg@rolfharris.com> wrote in message
> news:457fc922$1_2@news.chariot.net.au...
>> "three" <fourfive@six.com> wrote in message
>> news:5pPfh.7369$HU.4517@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>> "cosmichobo" <not.worth@the.spam> wrote in message
>>> news:not.worth-CCE0C9.15060913122006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
>>>> In article <1165912378.981498.57710@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.co m>,
>>>> "UNCLE WALLY <?? ? ,.å^óL?"?»§?o?~,"«S? '~'|'y'z
>>>> 'D'-'t'¶'.?«?«?? ????·:*¨¨*:·. o?˝®""
>>>> <stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Gooday/Hi Peoplez !!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Gawdangit, those Dutchies have beat us to it -- probably got a lot more
>>>>> channels to choose from too !!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> HOOROO
>>>>>
>>>>> UNCLE WALLY
>>>>
>>>> Despite writing a HD essay on DTV, I can't remember when Australia was
>>>> meant to go "offline"... but think it was 2006!?
>>>>
>>>> Of course, take-up of the new technology, oddly enough, was very
>>>> stilted, still is far from saturation...
>>> Thats because its still only available in capital cities... in the
>>> country its lucky to have ABC and SBS
>> I would have put it down to the fact that FTA programs are just as crap
>> on digital as they are on analog.
>>
>> Why spend 100's on a STB just to watch shit like Big Brother, American
>> Idol etc, etc...
>>
>> Now TEN has Laguna Beach....fantastic!
>>
>> Need I say more?
>>
>>>
>>
>
>
4 years to go

Ext User(Martin Barr-David)
20-12-2006, 01:43 AM
fish. wrote:
> In article <1165912378.981498.57710@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.co m>,
> stargatedecember2012@yahoo.ca says...
>> Gooday/Hi Peoplez !!!
>>
>> Gawdangit, those Dutchies have beat us to it -- probably got a lot more
>> channels to choose from too !!!!
>>
>> HOOROO
>>
>> UNCLE WALLY
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Wish ours would, and digital, right now...
>
>
Go ahead spend 2 grand on digital tv on sale now