Google Groups is not updating.

[Ext User(Andy)]

messages are several hours old.

[Ext User(Shill #312)]

On 13 Mar 2007 04:01:40 -0700, "Andy" <pandoraandypandy@hotmail.com> wrote:

>messages are several hours old.

Yeah I noticed that this afternoon. Nothing from around 1330 till 1700 (when I
stopped checking). Probably a Zionist plot, or UFOs, or chemtrails, or
something...

Shill #312
--
The biggest conspiracy has always been the
fact that there is no conspiracy.
Nobody's out to get you.
Nobody gives a shit whether you live or die.
There, you feel better now?
-- Dennis Miller

[Ext User(TG'sFM)]

On Mar 13, 9:01 pm, "Andy" <pandoraandypa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> messages are several hours old.


You were told that this was going to happen last week. This was to
prove to the non-believers and thin-skins that the 'bypass filter'
really does exist. But I'm certain there will be doubters who will
come up with some other theory.

[Ext User(TG'sFM)]

On Mar 14, 10:20 am, "the_dawggie" <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 13, 10:01 pm, "Andy" <pandoraandypa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > messages are several hours old.
>
> Since they changed to the new interface, it's quite
> frankly fucked. Usable, but fucked.
>
> Some newsgroups will update, others won't.
>
> About the only new feature I see is posting
> stats - that seems to work, even if you
> post under the same handle from somewhere
> else.
>
> The posting limit thing totally sucks.
>
> More often than not, need to click "Send" twice,
> because "sorry an error, try again".


It seems that you may need to invest in a decent newsreader. I have
no problem with mine, and nobody else I know is having problems, so
perhaps the problem is with your newsreader. Worth checking into
maybe?

[Ext User(the_dawggie)]

On Mar 13, 10:01 pm, "Andy" <pandoraandypa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> messages are several hours old.


Since they changed to the new interface, it's quite
frankly fucked. Usable, but fucked.

Some newsgroups will update, others won't.

About the only new feature I see is posting
stats - that seems to work, even if you
post under the same handle from somewhere
else.

The posting limit thing totally sucks.

More often than not, need to click "Send" twice,
because "sorry an error, try again".

[Ext User(the_dawggie)]

On Mar 14, 11:22 am, "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> On Mar 14, 10:20 am, "the_dawggie" <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 13, 10:01 pm, "Andy" <pandoraandypa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > messages are several hours old.
>
> > Since they changed to the new interface, it's quite
> > frankly fucked. Usable, but fucked.
>
> > Some newsgroups will update, others won't.
>
> > About the only new feature I see is posting
> > stats - that seems to work, even if you
> > post under the same handle from somewhere
> > else.
>
> > The posting limit thing totally sucks.
>
> > More often than not, need to click "Send" twice,
> > because "sorry an error, try again".
>
> It seems that you may need to invest in a decent newsreader. I have
> no problem with mine, and nobody else I know is having problems, so
> perhaps the problem is with your newsreader. Worth checking into
> maybe?


It's Mozilla. Web based, my internet connection is fine. If I click on
Window, Mail and newsgroups, all works fine though my ISP.

Nup, their new stuff is certainly broken in a number of ways.

I've had to go to my ISP to sometimes post, or read
messages/replies to posts, rather than Google Groups.

[Ext User(Craig Welch)]

Andy wrote:

> messages are several hours old.

Err, so what?

Usenet is not Google Groups.

--
Craig

[Ext User(Craig Welch)]

Shill #312 wrote:

> Yeah I noticed that this afternoon. Nothing from around 1330 till 1700 (when I
> stopped checking).

Of course not. Dejanews, the antecedent of Google Groups, didn't
start until 1995, so how could it have posts from the 14th century?

--

Craig

[Ext User(Shill #312)]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:45:21 GMT, Craig Welch <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote:

>Shill #312 wrote:
>
>> Yeah I noticed that this afternoon. Nothing from around 1330 till 1700 (when I
>> stopped checking).
>
>Of course not. Dejanews, the antecedent of Google Groups, didn't
>start until 1995, so how could it have posts from the 14th century?

ah ha ha ha oh...

Shill #312
--
Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance
to those of us who do.
Isaac Asimov

[Ext User(David Springthorpe)]

On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:45:21 GMT, Craig Welch <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote:

>Of course not. Dejanews, the antecedent of Google Groups, didn't
>start until 1995, so how could it have posts from the 14th century?

Craig,

Your so called "jokes" are worse than mine.....

[Ext User(Craig Welch)]

David Springthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:45:21 GMT, Craig Welch <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
>
>> Of course not. Dejanews, the antecedent of Google Groups, didn't
>> start until 1995, so how could it have posts from the 14th century?
>
> Craig,
>
> Your so called "jokes" are worse than mine.....

David,

If they were, they would not be 'so called'.

--
Craig

[Ext User(the_dawggie)]

On Mar 13, 10:12 pm, Shill #312 <govshill...@REMOVEoptusnet.com.au>
wrote:
> On 13 Mar 2007 04:01:40 -0700, "Andy" <pandoraandypa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >messages are several hours old.
>
> Yeah I noticed that this afternoon. Nothing from around 1330 till 1700 (when I
> stopped checking). Probably a Zionist plot, or UFOs, or chemtrails, or
> something...

Industrial Disease ... DIRE STRAITS ?