I am speachless over this one.

[Ext User(atec 77)]

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

[Ext User(David Z)]

It's actually speechless. This is usually a word a 10 year old can spell
without problems.

"atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

[Ext User(the_dawggie)]

On Mar 15, 12:39 am, atec 77 <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote:
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

That's fairly special.

I only feel that way when I wake up to early in the morning
though.

[Ext User(veritas)]

He seems to be struggling with it on the wheelbarrow. He needs to invent an antigravity device
to lighten his load!

atec 77 > wrote:
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

--
..
..
..
..
..
..

READ CAREFULLY. By reading this article, you agree solely, and/or on behalf of your employer, to
release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements,
licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure,
non-compete and acceptable use policies ("BOGUS AGREEMENTS") that I have entered into with your
employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my
ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me
from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of yourself and/or your employer.

[Ext User(a9x5l)]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:39:56 +1000, atec 77 wrote:

> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

The poor bugger's obviously mentally ill, but being a Victorian, he can't
access the care he needs. The reporter should be ashamed too, (obviously)
using him for laughs is pretty low IMHO.

--
a9x5l

[Ext User(Biteme)]

a9x5l wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:39:56 +1000, atec 77 wrote:
>
>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>
> The poor bugger's obviously mentally ill, but being a Victorian, he can't
> access the care he needs. The reporter should be ashamed too, (obviously)
> using him for laughs is pretty low IMHO.
>

you need to "lighten up" a bit :) boom-boom

[Ext User(David Springthorpe)]

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:39:56 +1000, atec 77 <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote:

>http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

The poor guy has obviously been left a bit up in the air by everyone.....

[Ext User(Daffyd)]

"atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

He was interviewed on talkback radio very recently and made very litlle
sense.

[Ext User(Jack)]

David Springthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 23:39:56 +1000, atec 77 <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote:
>
>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>
> The poor guy has obviously been left a bit up in the air by everyone.....

A lot of people are like this guy.
They think they've got something others haven't.





















I bet this guy has. A malfunctioning anti gravity machine

[Ext User(RainbowWarrior)]

"atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

Damn good way to retire, convince the missus you are a froot loop, sit in
the shed all day watching telly pretending to work on an antigravity machine
:)

[Ext User(the_dawggie)]

RainbowWarrior wrote:
> "atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
> news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>
>>http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>
>
> Damn good way to retire, convince the missus you are a froot loop, sit in
> the shed all day watching telly pretending to work on an antigravity machine
> :)

I already am a froot loop, and my mind is an antigravity machine,
so I'm good.

[Ext User(ReSiN8oR)]

David Z wrote:
> It's actually speechless. This is usually a word a 10 year old can spell
> without problems.
>
> "atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
> news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>
>>http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>
>
>
Bwahahahahah at least the man knows something about cars unlike you...
You fucking twit.

[Ext User(ReSiN8oR)]

atec 77 > wrote:
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

I am too

[Ext User(Michael C)]

"atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html

If this guy really had invented an antigravity machine he wouldn't be
ignored. The internet is full of ideas like this that are simply impossible
because they break the laws of physics. An anti-gravity machine is probably
possible but it would require a constant stream of energy, so any energy
harnessed from it would just be gained from the energy supplied to it. Most
likely it wouldn't be 100% efficient so there would be some loss of energy.
So instead of being a machine that made energy it would be a machine that
used energy.

Energy cannot be created, it has to come from somewhere. Petrol has energy
that can be release by burning it, uranium has energy that can be released
by breaking it's bonds, a mass at the top of a mountain (eg water) has
energy that can be released by reducing it's height. A machine cannot simply
make energy.

The only patent I can find by this guy is "Sound Emitting Device for
Beverage Containers" which seems more along his line of invention, although
the site I used to search wasn't too good:
http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/ols/searching/patsearch/search_section.jsp?keyNo=2003100072&sectionCode=DTL&type=I

Michael

[Ext User(atec 77)]

Michael C wrote:
> "atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
> news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>
> If this guy really had invented an antigravity machine he wouldn't be
> ignored.
you think ?

[Ext User(RainbowWarrior)]

"Michael C" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:45fa026c$0$9773$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
> "atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
> news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>
> If this guy really had invented an antigravity machine he wouldn't be
> ignored. The internet is full of ideas like this that are simply
> impossible because they break the laws of physics. An anti-gravity machine
> is probably possible but it would require a constant stream of energy, so
> any energy harnessed from it would just be gained from the energy supplied
> to it. Most likely it wouldn't be 100% efficient so there would be some
> loss of energy. So instead of being a machine that made energy it would be
> a machine that used energy.

You can't blame a wacky senile old fart for having a go anyway
..............................
Hey he made the internet! If he knows what it is......... :)


>
> Energy cannot be created, it has to come from somewhere. Petrol has energy
> that can be release by burning it, uranium has energy that can be released
> by breaking it's bonds, a mass at the top of a mountain (eg water) has
> energy that can be released by reducing it's height. A machine cannot
> simply make energy.
>
> The only patent I can find by this guy is "Sound Emitting Device for
> Beverage Containers" which seems more along his line of invention,
> although the site I used to search wasn't too good:
> http://pericles.ipaustralia.gov.au/ols/searching/patsearch/search_section.jsp?keyNo=2003100072&sectionCode=DTL&type=I
>
> Michael
>

[Ext User(the_dawggie)]

On Mar 16, 4:07 pm, atec 77 <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote:
> Michael C wrote:
> > "atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
> >news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> >>http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>
> > If this guy really had invented an antigravity machine he wouldn't be
> > ignored.
>
> you think ?

He'd be wearing concrete footware at a deep puddle
of water. There would be someone else taking the
credit for the invention, lots of meetings, a company
being created, then a product being marketed
that no one really knows how to use or even actually
sees. It was not reliable anyway - all good though because
the investors poured money into it, and the ATO,
who then got the shites when they realized.....

[Ext User(Michael C)]

"atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
news:45fa262e$0$1154$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> Michael C wrote:
>> "atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
>> news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>>
>> If this guy really had invented an antigravity machine he wouldn't be
>> ignored.

> you think ?

Yes. I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but going by your initial
response you seem to believe him.

[Ext User(atec 77)]

Michael C wrote:
> "atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
> news:45fa262e$0$1154$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>> Michael C wrote:
>>> "atec 77" <""atec77 \"@ hotmail.com"> wrote in message
>>> news:45f7fb2c$0$1153$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
>>>> http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,21377185-2862,00.html
>>> If this guy really had invented an antigravity machine he wouldn't be
>>> ignored.
>
>> you think ?
>
> Yes. I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not but going by your initial
> response you seem to believe him.
>
>
You think ?


do ya hear the sound ?

[Ext User(Diesel Damo)]

On Mar 16, 1:34 pm, "Michael C" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
> If this guy really had invented an antigravity machine he wouldn't be
> ignored. The internet is full of ideas like this that are simply impossible
> because they break the laws of physics. An anti-gravity machine is probably
> possible but it would require a constant stream of energy,

Can you tell me where all the energy comes from that "powers" gravity
in the first place? Why a rock continues to endlessly exert pressure
on the ground beneath it forever?

While we're on the subject of breaking the laws of physics, why is it
that gravity is allowed to break the speed of light? Sounds to me like
gravity is very naughty indeed :-)