Now this is a projector

[Ext User(DAvid)]

http://www.jvcpro-australia.com:80/JVCPROstores/_templates/April%202007

I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to buy one
of these beauties.

DAVO

[Ext User(TG'sFM)]

On Apr 5, 2:21 pm, "DAvid" <davi...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> http://www.jvcpro-australia.com:80/JVCPROstores/_templates/April%202007
>
> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to buy one
> of these beauties.
>
> DAVO


I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else has. It must
be really embarrassing when you continually start new threads, and
nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me replying to
them to make you feel better, you'd probably top yourself. What a
waste.

[Ext User(DAvid)]

"TG'sFM" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:1175749627.798230.96270@y80g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
> On Apr 5, 2:21 pm, "DAvid" <davi...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> http://www.jvcpro-australia.com:80/JVCPROstores/_templates/April%202007
>>
>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to buy
>> one
>> of these beauties.
>>
>> DAVO
>
>
> I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else has. It must
> be really embarrassing when you continually start new threads, and
> nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me replying to
> them to make you feel better, you'd probably top yourself. What a
> waste.
>
Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now full of deadbeats and
troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine used to get many
interesting discussions going but now most of those who read them are just
more satisfied to email me and keep their comments confidential for fear of
being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I think you should feel very proud
of yourself you idiotic moron, because through your rubbish you go on with,
newsgroups are becoming a place for wankers.

DAVO

[Ext User(Franky)]

>>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to buy
>>> one
>>> of these beauties.
>>>
>>> DAVO
>>
>>
>> I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else has. It must
>> be really embarrassing when you continually start new threads, and
>> nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me replying to
>> them to make you feel better, you'd probably top yourself. What a
>> waste.
>>
> Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now full of deadbeats and
> troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine used to get many
> interesting discussions going but now most of those who read them are just
> more satisfied to email me and keep their comments confidential for fear
> of being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I think you should feel very
> proud of yourself you idiotic moron, because through your rubbish you go
> on with, newsgroups are becoming a place for wankers.
>
> DAVO

bravo!

[Ext User(TG'sFM)]

On Apr 5, 3:33 pm, "DAvid" <davi...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>
> news:1175749627.798230.96270@y80g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com...
>
> > On Apr 5, 2:21 pm, "DAvid" <davi...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >>http://www.jvcpro-australia.com:80/JVCPROstores/_templates/April%202007
>
> >> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to buy
> >> one
> >> of these beauties.
>
> >> DAVO
>
> > I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else has. It must
> > be really embarrassing when you continually start new threads, and
> > nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me replying to
> > them to make you feel better, you'd probably top yourself. What a
> > waste.
>
> Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now full of deadbeats and
> troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine used to get many
> interesting discussions going but now most of those who read them are just
> more satisfied to email me and keep their comments confidential for fear of
> being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I think you should feel very proud
> of yourself you idiotic moron, because through your rubbish you go on with,
> newsgroups are becoming a place for wankers.
>
> DAVO


So that explains why you're still here then.

[Ext User(MJH)]

one problem, its rated at only 700 lumens, getting 16 foot lamberts on a
postage stamp sized screen will be difiicult




"DAvid" <davideo@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:gP_Qh.9551$M.8173@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> http://www.jvcpro-australia.com:80/JVCPROstores/_templates/April%202007
>
> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to buy
> one of these beauties.
>
> DAVO
>

[Ext User(Richard Bolt)]

It's also known as the DLA-RS1 in the UK
It just received their Editor's Choice award - you can read their review
here

http://www.projectorcentral.com/jvc_dla-rs1.htm


"DAvid" <davideo@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:gP_Qh.9551$M.8173@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> http://www.jvcpro-australia.com:80/JVCPROstores/_templates/April%202007
>
> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to buy
> one of these beauties.
>
> DAVO
>

[Ext User(John)]

HD1 is an excellent projector but projectorcentral's review were exactly
the best on the web.
"Richard Bolt" <ozdick@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4615ea81$0$9770$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au ...
> It's also known as the DLA-RS1 in the UK
> It just received their Editor's Choice award - you can read their review
> here
>
> http://www.projectorcentral.com/jvc_dla-rs1.htm
>
>
> "DAvid" <davideo@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:gP_Qh.9551$M.8173@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> http://www.jvcpro-australia.com:80/JVCPROstores/_templates/April%202007
>>
>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to buy
>> one of these beauties.
>>
>> DAVO
>>
>
>

[Ext User(Richard Bolt)]

Also
http://www.projectorreviews.com/jvc/DLA-RS1/index.asp

[Ext User(Alan Rutlidge)]

"Franky" <m@m.net> wrote in message
news:46149d8e$0$15013$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
>>>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty softdrink bottles to
>>>> buy
>>>> one
>>>> of these beauties.
>>>>
>>>> DAVO
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else has. It must
>>> be really embarrassing when you continually start new threads, and
>>> nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me replying to
>>> them to make you feel better, you'd probably top yourself. What a
>>> waste.
>>>
>> Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now full of deadbeats and
>> troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine used to get many
>> interesting discussions going but now most of those who read them are
>> just more satisfied to email me and keep their comments confidential for
>> fear of being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I think you should feel
>> very proud of yourself you idiotic moron, because through your rubbish
>> you go on with, newsgroups are becoming a place for wankers.
>>
>> DAVO
>
> bravo!
>
>

Had a pretty extended viewing session with one of these on Saturday arvo.
http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
Very film like picture with beautiful rendering of the colours with solid
blacks and tonal range.
Well set up in the venue by someone who obviously knew what they were doing.
Pretty impressive and so, so quiet too. :-)

Cheers,
Alan

[Ext User(TT)]

"Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote
in message
news:4619ac99$0$13117$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
:
: "Franky" <m@m.net> wrote in message
:
news:46149d8e$0$15013$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
: >
: >>>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty
softdrink bottles to
: >>>> buy
: >>>> one
: >>>> of these beauties.
: >>>>
: >>>> DAVO
: >>>
: >>>
: >>> I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else
has. It must
: >>> be really embarrassing when you continually start new
threads, and
: >>> nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me
replying to
: >>> them to make you feel better, you'd probably top
yourself. What a
: >>> waste.
: >>>
: >> Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now
full of deadbeats and
: >> troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine used
to get many
: >> interesting discussions going but now most of those who
read them are
: >> just more satisfied to email me and keep their comments
confidential for
: >> fear of being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I think
you should feel
: >> very proud of yourself you idiotic moron, because
through your rubbish
: >> you go on with, newsgroups are becoming a place for
wankers.
: >>
: >> DAVO
: >
: > bravo!
: >
: >
:
: Had a pretty extended viewing session with one of these on
Saturday arvo.
:
http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
: Very film like picture with beautiful rendering of the
colours with solid
: blacks and tonal range.
: Well set up in the venue by someone who obviously knew
what they were doing.
: Pretty impressive and so, so quiet too. :-)
:
: Cheers,
: Alan
:
:
:
http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
????????

Mmmmmm................. interesting, the link *should* be
for a VPLVW100 (Top of the range) but it goes to VPLHS60
which is just a cheap average projector. Alan was looking
at the VPLVW100. And how do I know that? Well I bought the
receiver it was connected to ;-)

BTW I concur with Alan's opinion that this is really a very
good projector and the JVC will have to be something very
special indeed. So hopefully for us, the consumers, this
should start a price war ;-)

Cheers TT

[Ext User(DAvid)]

"TT" <TTencerNOmorespam@westnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:461aef3c$1@quokka.wn.com.au...
>
> "Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote
> in message
> news:4619ac99$0$13117$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> :
> : "Franky" <m@m.net> wrote in message
> :
> news:46149d8e$0$15013$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> : >
> : >>>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty
> softdrink bottles to
> : >>>> buy
> : >>>> one
> : >>>> of these beauties.
> : >>>>
> : >>>> DAVO
> : >>>
> : >>>
> : >>> I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else
> has. It must
> : >>> be really embarrassing when you continually start new
> threads, and
> : >>> nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me
> replying to
> : >>> them to make you feel better, you'd probably top
> yourself. What a
> : >>> waste.
> : >>>
> : >> Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now
> full of deadbeats and
> : >> troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine used
> to get many
> : >> interesting discussions going but now most of those who
> read them are
> : >> just more satisfied to email me and keep their comments
> confidential for
> : >> fear of being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I think
> you should feel
> : >> very proud of yourself you idiotic moron, because
> through your rubbish
> : >> you go on with, newsgroups are becoming a place for
> wankers.
> : >>
> : >> DAVO
> : >
> : > bravo!
> : >
> : >
> :
> : Had a pretty extended viewing session with one of these on
> Saturday arvo.
> :
> http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
> : Very film like picture with beautiful rendering of the
> colours with solid
> : blacks and tonal range.
> : Well set up in the venue by someone who obviously knew
> what they were doing.
> : Pretty impressive and so, so quiet too. :-)
> :
> : Cheers,
> : Alan
> :
> :
> :
> http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
> ????????
>
> Mmmmmm................. interesting, the link *should* be
> for a VPLVW100 (Top of the range) but it goes to VPLHS60
> which is just a cheap average projector. Alan was looking
> at the VPLVW100. And how do I know that? Well I bought the
> receiver it was connected to ;-)
>
> BTW I concur with Alan's opinion that this is really a very
> good projector and the JVC will have to be something very
> special indeed. So hopefully for us, the consumers, this
> should start a price war ;-)
>
> Cheers TT

I agree, the prices will only get better for us. The JVC is only 700 Lumens
which probably helps it's Black levels and in the average HT, it should be
ample. I am currently running a Panasonic W700 or some model name like that
and it is only 1,000 lumens. This is ample for my local watering hole to
fill a 20ft screen on the last 2 series of State of Origins. I have received
many favourable comments from the patrons about the brilliant quality and it
cost me less than $3,500 3 years ago.

DAVO

[Ext User(TG'sFM)]

On Apr 10, 3:17 pm, "DAvid" <davi...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> "TT" <TTencerNOmores...@westnet.com.au> wrote in message
>
> news:461aef3c$1@quokka.wn.com.au...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutli...@iinet.net.au> wrote
> > in message
> >news:4619ac99$0$13117$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> > :
> > : "Franky" <m...@m.net> wrote in message
> > :
> >news:46149d8e$0$15013$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> > : >
> > : >>>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty
> > softdrink bottles to
> > : >>>> buy
> > : >>>> one
> > : >>>> of these beauties.
> > : >>>>
> > : >>>> DAVO
> > : >>>
> > : >>>
> > : >>> I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else
> > has. It must
> > : >>> be really embarrassing when you continually start new
> > threads, and
> > : >>> nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me
> > replying to
> > : >>> them to make you feel better, you'd probably top
> > yourself. What a
> > : >>> waste.
> > : >>>
> > : >> Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now
> > full of deadbeats and
> > : >> troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine used
> > to get many
> > : >> interesting discussions going but now most of those who
> > read them are
> > : >> just more satisfied to email me and keep their comments
> > confidential for
> > : >> fear of being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I think
> > you should feel
> > : >> very proud of yourself you idiotic moron, because
> > through your rubbish
> > : >> you go on with, newsgroups are becoming a place for
> > wankers.
> > : >>
> > : >> DAVO
> > : >
> > : > bravo!
> > : >
> > : >
> > :
> > : Had a pretty extended viewing session with one of these on
> > Saturday arvo.
> > :
> >http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
> > : Very film like picture with beautiful rendering of the
> > colours with solid
> > : blacks and tonal range.
> > : Well set up in the venue by someone who obviously knew
> > what they were doing.
> > : Pretty impressive and so, so quiet too. :-)
> > :
> > : Cheers,
> > : Alan
> > :
> > :
> > :
> >http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
> > ????????
>
> > Mmmmmm................. interesting, the link *should* be
> > for a VPLVW100 (Top of the range) but it goes to VPLHS60
> > which is just a cheap average projector. Alan was looking
> > at the VPLVW100. And how do I know that? Well I bought the
> > receiver it was connected to ;-)
>
> > BTW I concur with Alan's opinion that this is really a very
> > good projector and the JVC will have to be something very
> > special indeed. So hopefully for us, the consumers, this
> > should start a price war ;-)
>
> > Cheers TT
>
> I agree, the prices will only get better for us. The JVC is only 700 Lumens
> which probably helps it's Black levels and in the average HT, it should be
> ample. I am currently running a Panasonic W700 or some model name like that
> and it is only 1,000 lumens. This is ample for my local watering hole to
> fill a 20ft screen on the last 2 series of State of Origins. I have received
> many favourable comments from the patrons about the brilliant quality and it
> cost me less than $3,500 3 years ago.

Did you buy that at the same time as you bought the battery charger
for your steady-cam? It's just that if you did, perhaps you need to
re-calculate what each item cost. You MAY have paid too (2) much for
one item, and not enough for the other. This may be important once
tax time comes around. Oh that's right, you didn't earn enough last
year to justify paying tax, did you DAVO?

[Ext User(DAvid)]

"TG'sFM" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:1176186149.394413.267470@p77g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...

>SNIP

> tax time comes around. Oh that's right, you didn't earn enough last
> year to justify paying tax, did you DAVO?


I wish

DAVO

[Ext User(TG'sFM)]

On Apr 10, 4:47 pm, "DAvid" <davi...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>
> news:1176186149.394413.267470@p77g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
>
> >SNIP
> > tax time comes around. Oh that's right, you didn't earn enough last
> > year to justify paying tax, did you DAVO?
>
> I wish

Keep wishing moron, but perhaps instead of JUST wishing that you
earned enough to pay tax, it'd be better if you actually DID something
about it. Perhaps you could start by getting a job and stop relying
on Carmel's income to subsidise your 'business' that we both know is
never going to get off the ground and be profitable.

[Ext User(atec77')]

TG'sFM wrote:
> On Apr 10, 4:47 pm, "DAvid" <davi...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1176186149.394413.267470@p77g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
>>
>>> SNIP
>>> tax time comes around. Oh that's right, you didn't earn enough last
>>> year to justify paying tax, did you DAVO?
>> I wish
>
> Keep wishing moron, but perhaps instead of JUST wishing that you
> earned enough to pay tax, it'd be better if you actually DID something
> about it. Perhaps you could start by getting a job and stop relying
> on Carmel's income to subsidise your 'business' that we both know is
> never going to get off the ground and be profitable.


Obviously bitch you find the objections other have to your trolling a
distraction , either learn to live with a majority opinion of " tg is a
deadshite" or kill your self .
>

[Ext User(Patric)]

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:58:59 +0800, "TT"
<TTencerNOmorespam@westnet.com.au> wrote:

>
>"Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au> wrote
>in message
>news:4619ac99$0$13117$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>:
>: "Franky" <m@m.net> wrote in message
>:
>news:46149d8e$0$15013$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>: >
>: >>>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty
>softdrink bottles to
>: >>>> buy
>: >>>> one
>: >>>> of these beauties.
>: >>>>
>: >>>> DAVO
>: >>>
>: >>>
>: >>> I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody else
>has. It must
>: >>> be really embarrassing when you continually start new
>threads, and
>: >>> nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for me
>replying to
>: >>> them to make you feel better, you'd probably top
>yourself. What a
>: >>> waste.
>: >>>
>: >> Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now
>full of deadbeats and
>: >> troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine used
>to get many
>: >> interesting discussions going but now most of those who
>read them are
>: >> just more satisfied to email me and keep their comments
>confidential for
>: >> fear of being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I think
>you should feel
>: >> very proud of yourself you idiotic moron, because
>through your rubbish
>: >> you go on with, newsgroups are becoming a place for
>wankers.
>: >>
>: >> DAVO
>: >
>: > bravo!
>: >
>: >
>:
>: Had a pretty extended viewing session with one of these on
>Saturday arvo.
>:
>http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
>: Very film like picture with beautiful rendering of the
>colours with solid
>: blacks and tonal range.
>: Well set up in the venue by someone who obviously knew
>what they were doing.
>: Pretty impressive and so, so quiet too. :-)
>:
>: Cheers,
>: Alan
>:
>:
>:
>http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
>????????
>
>Mmmmmm................. interesting, the link *should* be
>for a VPLVW100 (Top of the range) but it goes to VPLHS60
>which is just a cheap average projector. Alan was looking
>at the VPLVW100. And how do I know that? Well I bought the
>receiver it was connected to ;-)
>
>BTW I concur with Alan's opinion that this is really a very
>good projector and the JVC will have to be something very
>special indeed. So hopefully for us, the consumers, this
>should start a price war ;-)
>
>Cheers TT

D'ya think??
ComparingThe two projectors to which you refer,above is hardly a very
useful exercise, as the RRP of one is AU$ 3,499 the VPLHS60, whereas
the VPLVW100 is AU$14,999! So one would, reasonably expect the more
expensive unit to out perform the cheaper one significantly and you
might consider that it does, but in my experience it is not really as
far ahead as would justify the large price difference.

Some months ago I experienced a side-by-side comparison of the
SONYVPLVW100 and the Panasonic PT AX100 projectors and I considered
that the Panasonic performed quite a bit better than the Sony , and
given that The recommended price of the Panasonic was $3,299, and it
can be had for somewhat less than this with some negotiation it would
seem that the Panasonic offers far better value with the added bonus
that it is NOT a SONY!
As usual, anyone planning the purchase of an HT projector should do
the search and comparison thing diligently.
Kind Regards
Dr Patric Scully

[Ext User(fish.)]

In article <461b929a$0$4605$61c65585@un-2park-reader-
01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au>, atec77' <""atec77 \"@ HoTMaIl.COM">
says...
> TG'sFM wrote:
> > On Apr 10, 4:47 pm, "DAvid" <davi...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >> "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
> >>
> >> news:1176186149.394413.267470@p77g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
> >>
> >>> SNIP
> >>> tax time comes around. Oh that's right, you didn't earn enough last
> >>> year to justify paying tax, did you DAVO?
> >> I wish
> >
> > Keep wishing moron, but perhaps instead of JUST wishing that you
> > earned enough to pay tax, it'd be better if you actually DID something
> > about it. Perhaps you could start by getting a job and stop relying
> > on Carmel's income to subsidise your 'business' that we both know is
> > never going to get off the ground and be profitable.
>
>
> Obviously bitch you find the objections other have to your trolling a
> distraction , either learn to live with a majority opinion of " tg is a
> deadshite" or kill your self .
> >
>


..."AND" not "OR"

--
"Go away! 'Batin!"

Idiocracy.

[Ext User(TT)]

"Patric" <PatricS@theMcEwen.com.au> wrote in message
news:aifn13tidkkn5efn8er8meo53n2okep7i3@4ax.com...
: On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:58:59 +0800, "TT"
: <TTencerNOmorespam@westnet.com.au> wrote:
:
: >
: >"Alan Rutlidge" <don't_spam_me_rutlidge@iinet.net.au>
wrote
: >in message
:
>news:4619ac99$0$13117$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
: >:
: >: "Franky" <m@m.net> wrote in message
: >:
:
>news:46149d8e$0$15013$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
: >: >
: >: >>>> I might have to take a trip to SA with my empty
: >softdrink bottles to
: >: >>>> buy
: >: >>>> one
: >: >>>> of these beauties.
: >: >>>>
: >: >>>> DAVO
: >: >>>
: >: >>>
: >: >>> I thought I'd better reply to this because nobody
else
: >has. It must
: >: >>> be really embarrassing when you continually start
new
: >threads, and
: >: >>> nobody replies to them, hey DAVO? If it wasn't for
me
: >replying to
: >: >>> them to make you feel better, you'd probably top
: >yourself. What a
: >: >>> waste.
: >: >>>
: >: >> Not at all, it just simply shows this place is now
: >full of deadbeats and
: >: >> troublemakers like yourself. Once, posts like mine
used
: >to get many
: >: >> interesting discussions going but now most of those
who
: >read them are
: >: >> just more satisfied to email me and keep their
comments
: >confidential for
: >: >> fear of being blasted by arseholes of your ilk. I
think
: >you should feel
: >: >> very proud of yourself you idiotic moron, because
: >through your rubbish
: >: >> you go on with, newsgroups are becoming a place for
: >wankers.
: >: >>
: >: >> DAVO
: >: >
: >: > bravo!
: >: >
: >: >
: >:
: >: Had a pretty extended viewing session with one of these
on
: >Saturday arvo.
: >:
:
>http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
: >: Very film like picture with beautiful rendering of the
: >colours with solid
: >: blacks and tonal range.
: >: Well set up in the venue by someone who obviously knew
: >what they were doing.
: >: Pretty impressive and so, so quiet too. :-)
: >:
: >: Cheers,
: >: Alan
: >:
: >:
: >:
:
>http://www.sony.com.au/homecinema/catalog/product.jsp?categoryId=22033
: >????????
: >
: >Mmmmmm................. interesting, the link *should* be
: >for a VPLVW100 (Top of the range) but it goes to VPLHS60
: >which is just a cheap average projector. Alan was
looking
: >at the VPLVW100. And how do I know that? Well I bought
the
: >receiver it was connected to ;-)
: >
: >BTW I concur with Alan's opinion that this is really a
very
: >good projector and the JVC will have to be something very
: >special indeed. So hopefully for us, the consumers, this
: >should start a price war ;-)
: >
: >Cheers TT
:
: D'ya think??

Yes, I think the VPLVW100 is a very good projector and
absolutely sh**s all over my VPLVW11

: ComparingThe two projectors to which you refer,above is
hardly a very
: useful exercise,

Sorry Patric but we never compared the projectors at all. I
went to buy a Sony STRDA5200ES receiver and the VPLVW100 was
connected to it and the receiver's upscaling was demoed on
this. That's all. My comments were in regards to the JVC's
specs and price point.

as the RRP of one is AU$ 3,499 the VPLHS60, whereas
: the VPLVW100 is AU$14,999! So one would, reasonably expect
the more
: expensive unit to out perform the cheaper one
significantly and you
: might consider that it does, but in my experience it is
not really as
: far ahead as would justify the large price difference.
:
The JVC is $9995 and being their flagship model a comparison
is justified. I will now have to go and find one to demo
;-)

: Some months ago I experienced a side-by-side comparison of
the
: SONYVPLVW100 and the Panasonic PT AX100 projectors and I
considered
: that the Panasonic performed quite a bit better than the
Sony ,

Mmmmm..... the Panny is only a 780 native pixel resolution
and you are saying it is/was better than a native 1080 pixel
resolution? I wish to call into doubt the methods used for
comparison? ;-)

and
: given that The recommended price of the Panasonic was
$3,299, and it
: can be had for somewhat less than this with some
negotiation it would
: seem that the Panasonic offers far better value with the
added bonus
: that it is NOT a SONY!

Ahhhhh..... Now you've hit the nail on the head. I dislike
Sony intensely *BUT* I seem to be accumulating more of their
products of late. I just hope I never have to use the
warranty ;-)

: As usual, anyone planning the purchase of an HT projector
should do
: the search and comparison thing diligently.

Absolutely, 110% agree and recommend that also. I have been
waiting for flat panel displays to reach 80"+ with 1080p
capabilities before taking another plunge into projectors
BUT this Sony VPLVW100 blew me away and I am now
reconsidering.

: Kind Regards
: Dr Patric Scully
:
Cheers TT

[Ext User(TT)]

"DAvid" <davideo@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:86FSh.11748$M.10312@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
:
: I am currently running a Panasonic W700 or some model
name like that
: and it is only 1,000 lumens. This is ample for my local
watering hole to
: fill a 20ft screen on the last 2 series of State of
Origins. I have received
: many favourable comments from the patrons about the
brilliant quality and it
: cost me less than $3,500 3 years ago.
:
: DAVO
:
I am still running a Sony VPLVW11 that was bought on special
at $9,200 about 5 years ago. It is very dated now :-(

BTW the next $1,000 bulb it blows it will be retired.

Cheers TT