Re: Sylvia Else should be raped

[Ext User(Pete)]

On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:00:15 +0200, George Orwell wrote:

> discuss

Well, George - who would be mentally ill enough to do the deed?

[Ext User(kant69)]

this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
confirmed.

[Ext User(DAvid)]

"kant69" <idol_wild@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177151434.755489.312650@q75g2000hsh.googlegr oups.com...
>
>
> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
> confirmed.
>
Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news and needs
to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of information act"
this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the boundaries.

DAVO

[Ext User(Craig Welch)]

DAvid wrote:

> "kant69" <idol_wild@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
>> confirmed.
>>
> Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news and needs
> to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of information act"
> this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the boundaries.

Please advise just how the 'freedom on information act' [sic.] applies
in this instance ...

--
Craig

[Ext User(TG'sFM)]

On Apr 23, 6:20 pm, Craig Welch <c...@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
> DAvid wrote:
> > "kant69" <idol_w...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
> >> confirmed.
>
> > Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news and needs
> > to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of information act"
> > this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the boundaries.
>
> Please advise just how the 'freedom on information act' [sic.] applies
> in this instance ...
>


Just look at who wrote it. IT's DAVO, the moronic fool from aus.tv.
Just killfile him.

[Ext User(Nathan)]

"TG'sFM" <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
news:1177320111.312532.139150@b58g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
> On Apr 23, 6:20 pm, Craig Welch <c...@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
>> DAvid wrote:
>> > "kant69" <idol_w...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
>> >> confirmed.
>>
>> > Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news and
>> > needs
>> > to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of information
>> > act"
>> > this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the
>> > boundaries.
>>
>> Please advise just how the 'freedom on information act' [sic.] applies
>> in this instance ...
>>
>
>
> Just look at who wrote it. IT's DAVO, the moronic fool from aus.tv.
> Just killfile him.
>

Why can't all you crackpots get out of aus.rail

[Ext User(Craig Welch)]

Nathan wrote:

>>>>> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
>>>>> confirmed.
>>>> Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news and
>>>> needs
>>>> to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of information
>>>> act"
>>>> this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the
>>>> boundaries.
>>> Please advise just how the 'freedom on information act' [sic.] applies
>>> in this instance ...
>>>
>>
>> Just look at who wrote it. IT's DAVO, the moronic fool from aus.tv.
>> Just killfile him.
>>
>
> Why can't all you crackpots get out of aus.rail

Hmmm. Speaking of crackpots ... there are about 8 posts in this thread,
and you are still reading it.

Why, pray, did you not kill the thread the moment you saw it?

--
Craig

[Ext User(john)]

"Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
news:6WcXh.18493$M.704@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Nathan wrote:> Why, pray, did you not kill the thread the moment you saw
> it?
>
> --
> Craig

Your use of medieval english is poor, as I doubt you have any true concern
of the poster.

[Ext User(Colonel Postwhore)]

On Apr 24, 6:22 am, "Nathan" <signall...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>
> news:1177320111.312532.139150@b58g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Apr 23, 6:20 pm, Craig Welch <c...@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
> >> DAvid wrote:
> >> > "kant69" <idol_w...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
> >> >> confirmed.
>
> >> > Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news and
> >> > needs
> >> > to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of information
> >> > act"
> >> > this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the
> >> > boundaries.
>
> >> Please advise just how the 'freedom on information act' [sic.] applies
> >> in this instance ...
>
> > Just look at who wrote it. IT's DAVO, the moronic fool from aus.tv.
> > Just killfile him.
>
> Why can't all you crackpots get out of aus.rail

You first, fuckwit.

Colonel Postwhore

[Ext User(Colonel Postwhore)]

On Apr 24, 11:18 am, Craig Welch <c...@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
> Nathan wrote:
> >>>>> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
> >>>>> confirmed.
> >>>> Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news and
> >>>> needs
> >>>> to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of information
> >>>> act"
> >>>> this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the
> >>>> boundaries.
> >>> Please advise just how the 'freedom on information act' [sic.] applies
> >>> in this instance ...
>
> >> Just look at who wrote it. IT's DAVO, the moronic fool from aus.tv.
> >> Just killfile him.
>
> > Why can't all you crackpots get out of aus.rail
>
> Hmmm. Speaking of crackpots ... there are about 8 posts in this thread,
> and you are still reading it.
>
> Why, pray, did you not kill the thread the moment you saw it?
>
> --
> Craig

Because he's a fuckwit.

Colonel Postwhore

[Ext User(Craig Welch)]

john wrote:

> "Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message

>> Nathan wrote:> Why, pray, did you not kill the thread the moment you saw
>> it?
>>
>> --
>> Craig
>
> Your use of medieval english is poor, as I doubt you have any true concern
> of the poster.

My use of the word 'pray' in this context is not mediaeval. Nor does it
express any concern for (not 'of') the poster. It is simply a polite form.

Your use of Usenet is poor, as you (or the news client that seems to
control your actions) did not snip my properly delineated signature.

Ah, I see you're using Microsoft Outlook Express. Enough said.

--
Craig

[Ext User(john)]

'Pray' has not been common english for some years. Just shows you think you
know its usage.

"Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
news:uwfXh.18575$M.2675@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> john wrote:
>
>> "Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
>
>>> Nathan wrote:> Why, pray, did you not kill the thread the moment you saw
>>> it?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Craig
>>
>> Your use of medieval english is poor, as I doubt you have any true
>> concern of the poster.
>
> My use of the word 'pray' in this context is not mediaeval. Nor does it
> express any concern for (not 'of') the poster. It is simply a polite form.
>
> Your use of Usenet is poor, as you (or the news client that seems to
> control your actions) did not snip my properly delineated signature.
>
> Ah, I see you're using Microsoft Outlook Express. Enough said.
>
> --
> Craig

[Ext User(TB)]

"john" <sorry not today darling> wrote in message
news:462d92b0@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> 'Pray' has not been common english for some years. Just shows you think
> you know its usage.
>
> "Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
> news:uwfXh.18575$M.2675@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>> john wrote:
>>
>>> "Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
>>
>>>> Nathan wrote:> Why, pray, did you not kill the thread the moment you
>>>> saw it?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Craig
>>>
>>> Your use of medieval english is poor, as I doubt you have any true
>>> concern of the poster.
>>
>> My use of the word 'pray' in this context is not mediaeval. Nor does it
>> express any concern for (not 'of') the poster. It is simply a polite
>> form.
>>
>> Your use of Usenet is poor, as you (or the news client that seems to
>> control your actions) did not snip my properly delineated signature.
>>
>> Ah, I see you're using Microsoft Outlook Express. Enough said.
>>
>> --
>> Craig
>
>

[Ext User(TB)]

"Colonel Postwhore" <colonelpostwhore@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:1177381203.624743.46580@q75g2000hsh.googlegro ups.com...
> On Apr 24, 6:22 am, "Nathan" <signall...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1177320111.312532.139150@b58g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 23, 6:20 pm, Craig Welch <c...@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
>> >> DAvid wrote:
>> >> > "kant69" <idol_w...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your identity
>> >> >> confirmed.
>>
>> >> > Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news
>> >> > and
>> >> > needs
>> >> > to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of information
>> >> > act"
>> >> > this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the
>> >> > boundaries.
>>
>> >> Please advise just how the 'freedom on information act' [sic.] applies
>> >> in this instance ...
>>
>> > Just look at who wrote it. IT's DAVO, the moronic fool from aus.tv.
>> > Just killfile him.
>>
>> Why can't all you crackpots get out of aus.rail
>
> You first, fuckwit.
>
> Colonel Postwhore
>

[Ext User(sean)]

"TB" <t@b.com> wrote in message
news:_8CdnQ1A7quDNbDbnZ2dnUVZ8t-nnZ2d@bt.com...
>
> "john" <sorry not today darling> wrote in message
> news:462d92b0@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
>> 'Pray' has not been common english for some years. Just shows you think
>> you know its usage.
>>
>> "Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
>> news:uwfXh.18575$M.2675@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>> john wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
>>>
>>>>> Nathan wrote:> Why, pray, did you not kill the thread the moment you
>>>>> saw it?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>> Your use of medieval english is poor, as I doubt you have any true
>>>> concern of the poster.
>>>
>>> My use of the word 'pray' in this context is not mediaeval. Nor does it
>>> express any concern for (not 'of') the poster. It is simply a polite
>>> form.
>>>
>>> Your use of Usenet is poor, as you (or the news client that seems to
>>> control your actions) did not snip my properly delineated signature.
>>>
>>> Ah, I see you're using Microsoft Outlook Express. Enough said.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Craig
>>
>>
>
>

[Ext User(sean)]

"TB" <t@b.com> wrote in message
news:x56dnRWxiLmxNbDbnZ2dnUVZ8taknZ2d@bt.com...
>

>> On Apr 24, 6:22 am, "Nathan" <signall...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>> "TG'sFM" <suv...@yahoo.fr> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:1177320111.312532.139150@b58g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Apr 23, 6:20 pm, Craig Welch <c...@pacific.net.sg> wrote:
>>> >> DAvid wrote:
>>> >> > "kant69" <idol_w...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> >> >> this is stalking. your ip address has been logged and your
>>> >> >> identity
>>> >> >> confirmed.
>>>
>>> >> > Well do us all a favour and publish it here. This grub is bad news
>>> >> > and
>>> >> > needs
>>> >> > to be sorted out once and for all. Under the "freedom of
>>> >> > information
>>> >> > act"
>>> >> > this should be made public as the vermin has gone beyond the
>>> >> > boundaries.
>>>
>>> >> Please advise just how the 'freedom on information act' [sic.]
>>> >> applies
>>> >> in this instance ...
>>>
>>> > Just look at who wrote it. IT's DAVO, the moronic fool from aus.tv.
>>> > Just killfile him.
>>>
>>> Why can't all you crackpots get out of aus.rail
>>
>>
>>
>
>

[Ext User(kant69)]

Sylvia must have made quite the impression around these parts.

Are many of you losers so intimidated by intelligent women that you
feel the need to single one out for harassment? Or are you so
unaccustomed to having a woman in your midst that you can only feel
like a man when threatening rape?

At least her posts are thoughtful and considered - which is more than
can be said for the castration anxiety typically encountered in
response. And now we have to dedicate abusive threads to her as a
preemptive strike.

Consider yourselves warned - I have made a copy of many of the
offending posts, and noted the corresponding posters. I have also
discussed the online behavior with the Australian Broadcasting
Authority http://www.aba.gov.au/contentreg/complaints/internet.shtml

Another instance of harassment will result in a formal complaint,
including punitive actions.

[Ext User(David Barnett)]

"kant69" <idol_wild@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1177446168.349554.46900@c18g2000prb.googlegro ups.com...
> Sylvia must have made quite the impression around these parts.
>
> Are many of you losers so intimidated by intelligent women that you
> feel the need to single one out for harassment? Or are you so
> unaccustomed to having a woman in your midst that you can only feel
> like a man when threatening rape?
>
> At least her posts are thoughtful and considered - which is more than
> can be said for the castration anxiety typically encountered in
> response. And now we have to dedicate abusive threads to her as a
> preemptive strike.
>
> Consider yourselves warned - I have made a copy of many of the
> offending posts, and noted the corresponding posters. I have also
> discussed the online behavior with the Australian Broadcasting
> Authority http://www.aba.gov.au/contentreg/complaints/internet.shtml
>
> Another instance of harassment will result in a formal complaint,
> including punitive actions.

Well I did post something similar in some respects a little while back.
However, I applaud you if you do proceed with these actions.
--
David Barnett

[Ext User(Fish Womper)]

On 24 Apr 2007 13:22:48 -0700, kant69 <idol_wild@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Sylvia must have made quite the impression around these parts.
>
>Are many of you losers so intimidated by intelligent women that you
>feel the need to single one out for harassment? Or are you so
>unaccustomed to having a woman in your midst that you can only feel
>like a man when threatening rape?
>
>At least her posts are thoughtful and considered - which is more than
>can be said for the castration anxiety typically encountered in
>response. And now we have to dedicate abusive threads to her as a
>preemptive strike.
>
>Consider yourselves warned - I have made a copy of many of the
>offending posts, and noted the corresponding posters. I have also
>discussed the online behavior with the Australian Broadcasting
>Authority http://www.aba.gov.au/contentreg/complaints/internet.shtml
>
>Another instance of harassment will result in a formal complaint,
>including punitive actions.
>
Unfortunately the anonymity or perceived anonymity of the internet,
and of Usenet in particular, brings out the very worst in some people.

By the way, if you are talking discrimination law here, any complaint
must be made by the aggrieved person, not a third party. So unless you
are in fact the person being harassed, I don't think you can make a
complaint. Reason being you are not in a position to judge how the
person concerned perceives what is being said.

fish

[Ext User(imorf)]

kant69 wrote:
> Sylvia must have made quite the impression around these parts.
>
> Are many of you losers so intimidated by intelligent women that you
> feel the need to single one out for harassment? Or are you so
> unaccustomed to having a woman in your midst that you can only feel
> like a man when threatening rape?
>
> At least her posts are thoughtful and considered - which is more than
> can be said for the castration anxiety typically encountered in
> response. And now we have to dedicate abusive threads to her as a
> preemptive strike.
>
> Consider yourselves warned - I have made a copy of many of the
> offending posts, and noted the corresponding posters. I have also
> discussed the online behavior with the Australian Broadcasting
> Authority http://www.aba.gov.au/contentreg/complaints/internet.shtml
>
> Another instance of harassment will result in a formal complaint,
> including punitive actions.

I'm not one of the persons you are referring to, however any formal
complaints are a waste of time for technical reasons. In fact you would
be giving the "losers" exactly what they want. Attention.