Ext User(Arthur Brain)
10-05-2007, 05:43 PM
Ördög dogmatised leftoidedly:
> Arthur Brain dumped verbal vomit over aus.politics:
> > About bloody time we in the West stopped pissing about and instituted
> > a similar program:
>
> So are you saying that is it about bloody time to suspend human rights
> and democracy and introduce the thought police, Big Brother, etc. (not
> the TV show, but the real one from Orwell).
No, I am talking about *IMPROVING* human rights by protecting women
and the rest of society from a freedom-hating bunch of violent
cultists.
> > Security forces ban, burn Muslim veils
> Do you honestly believe that you can eradicate a religion or even
> reform it by the application of brute force without having a very
> adverse impact on the whole of society?
It's an impact, for sure, but a *positive* impact, not an averse one.
no longer will women be forced by their freedom-hating imams and
freedom-hating fathers and husbands to don a Burqa and live as 2nd-
class citizens.
But *YOU* think that's a bad thing - is it because you hate women, or
do you just hate freedom?
Do you also suggest we tolerate female genital mutilation?
Logically, if you are against freeing women from the Burqa, you will
be a supporter of female genital mutilation.
After all, if you try to ban female genital mutilation, it will have
an "adverse impact" on society, drive the practice underground, and
create civil unrest....
Hoisted on your own petard, I'd say.....
> Arthur Brain dumped verbal vomit over aus.politics:
> > About bloody time we in the West stopped pissing about and instituted
> > a similar program:
>
> So are you saying that is it about bloody time to suspend human rights
> and democracy and introduce the thought police, Big Brother, etc. (not
> the TV show, but the real one from Orwell).
No, I am talking about *IMPROVING* human rights by protecting women
and the rest of society from a freedom-hating bunch of violent
cultists.
> > Security forces ban, burn Muslim veils
> Do you honestly believe that you can eradicate a religion or even
> reform it by the application of brute force without having a very
> adverse impact on the whole of society?
It's an impact, for sure, but a *positive* impact, not an averse one.
no longer will women be forced by their freedom-hating imams and
freedom-hating fathers and husbands to don a Burqa and live as 2nd-
class citizens.
But *YOU* think that's a bad thing - is it because you hate women, or
do you just hate freedom?
Do you also suggest we tolerate female genital mutilation?
Logically, if you are against freeing women from the Burqa, you will
be a supporter of female genital mutilation.
After all, if you try to ban female genital mutilation, it will have
an "adverse impact" on society, drive the practice underground, and
create civil unrest....
Hoisted on your own petard, I'd say.....