Ext User(Princeandy)
12-07-2007, 09:14 PM
WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany;
Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined,imprisoned or both for
discussing the topics set forth in this article.
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
Jews and Palestinians genetically similar.
http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts.html
War without end
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=39590
You will find innumerable sites supporting this humbug about jews being
gassed but not one iota of evidence that has not been obtained by torture to
the Germans involved or by avccepting on;ly stories which support these
unsudstantiated stories supported only by certain jews who had a lot to gain
monetarily.
And in fact the jews who were experimented on and died in camps were
unfortunate sacrifiv\ces to support the rich and powerful jews ambition for
a land grab.
"Ken McVay" <kmcvay@nizkor.org.no-spam> wrote in message
news:139ba3d2rfa83c6@corp.supernews.com...
> [Follow-ups set]
>
> 1941
"The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list of
priorities of the ruling class. It was the foundation of the State which was
primordial in their eyes."
http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/miscelleneous/the-founding-myths-of-is
raeli-politics/part3.htm
"The masses of Jews from Hungary's ghettos obediently boarded the
deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
confidence in the false information that they were being transferred to
Kenyermeze.
The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
they not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and others
used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the Jews.
They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help of
Jewish leaders.
The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local leaders
of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were spreading
such false information and did not protest.
Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local 'rescue work'.
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary
in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily.
She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of "gas
chambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing
stories only later. [15]
Inmates Released
More than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to other camps,
and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Soviet forces. In
addition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentences were
released, and returned to their home countries. [16] If Auschwitz had
actually been a top secret extermination center, would the Germans have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening there?
Himmler Orders Death Rate Reduced
The Jewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of "throwing off
their uniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,
a leader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made in his memoir.
http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139
Without Jewish co operation through the zionists the Germans would never
have had the resources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And the
zionists made it impossible for the underground to trust the jews.
Like elsewhere, the only people who had the information and the ear of the
frightened Jewish population were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenrat
comprised mainly the Zionist Federation members. Without their help the SS,
with 19 officers and less than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police,
could not have collected and controlled a million Jews, when they did not
even know their whereabouts.
http://www.geocities.com/chabaan_2000/safad.HTM
Is The same authors also describe co-operation between Zionist leaders and
Eichmann. It is interesting to note that the extreme right-wing revisionists
only chose wealthy Jews for emigration, whereas other Zionists insisted on
taking only young and healthy Jews. Eichmann helped them to carry out these
plans, in return for which the Zionist Organization paid large sums to the
Nazis. As Kimche says about the Zionist delegates in Germany: They had not
come to Germany to save Jews. That was not their job. When the Nazis began
the systematic murder of Jews in 1941, the Zionists decided neither to
support Jewish resistance in Europe, nor to attack the Nazis, nor to say
anything about the mass liquidation of their fellow Jews. Their sole purpose
was to save certain selected Jews as future settlers in Palestine. They were
not interested in Jews who wished to stay in their home countries and fight
the Nazis.
http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol01.html
The first point to note regarding the appropriation of the history of the
Holocaust by Zionist propaganda is that Zionism without anti-Semitism is
impossible. Zionism agrees with the basic tenet of anti-Semitism, namely
that Jews cannot live with non-Jews.
"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:p19593lbsfi7dq03hcglpos9oo8pab56re@4ax.com...
> By Faurisson
>
> The Unraveling of the Witnesses at the First Zündel Trial (1985)
>
> The important victory won by revisionism in France on April 26, 1983,
> would go on to confirm itself in 1985 with the first Zündel trial in
> Toronto. I would like to dwell a moment on this trial in order to
> underscore the impact on one's point of view, and especially as far as
> the testimonies on the Auschwitz gas chambers are concerned: for the
> first time since the war, Jewish witnesses were subjected to a regular
> cross-examination. Moreover, without wanting to minimize the
> importance of the second Zündel trial (that of 1988), I should like it
> to be understood that the 1985 trial already contained the seeds for
> all that was attained in the 1988 trial, including the report by
> Leuchter and all the scientific reports which, in the aftermath, would
> proliferate in the wake of the Leuchter Report.
>
> In 1985, as also afterwards in 1988, I served as advisor to Ernst
> Zündel and his lawyer, Douglas Christie. I accepted this heavy
> responsibility only under condition that all the Jewish witnesses
> would, for the first time, be cross-examined on the material nature of
> the reported facts, bluntly and without discretion. I had noted, in
> effect, that from 1945 to 1985, Jewish witnesses had been granted
> virtual immunity. Never had any defense lawyer thought or dared to ask
> them for material explanations about the gas chambers (exact location,
> physical appearance, dimensions, internal and external structure), or
> about the homicidal gassing (the operational procedure from beginning
> to end, the tools employed, the precautions taken by the executioners
> before, during and after execution).
>
> On rare occasions, as at the trial of Tesch, Drosihn and
> Weinbacher,[5] lawyers formulated some unusual questions of a material
> nature, hardly troublesome for the witness, but these always found
> themselves on the fringes of the more fundamental questions which
> should have been asked. No lawyer ever demanded clarifications on a
> weapon which, indeed, he had never seen and that no one had ever shown
> him. At the major Nuremberg Trial of 1945-46, the German lawyers had
> manifested total discretion on this point. At the proceedings against
> Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961, the lawyer Dr. Robert Servatius had not
> wanted to raise the question; in a letter on this subject dated June
> 21, 1974, he wrote me: "Eichmann hat selbst keine Gaskammer gesehen;
> die Frage wurde nicht diskutiert; er hat sich aber auch nicht gegen
> deren Existenz gewandt" [Eichmann himself had not seen any gas
> chamber; the question was not discussed; but neither did he raise the
> issue of their existence].[6]
>
> At the Frankfurt Trial of 1963-65, the lawyers showed themselves to be
> particularly timid. I should mention that the atmosphere was rather
> inhospitable for the defense and the accused. This show trial will
> remain as a blot on the honor of German justice as on the person of
> Hans Hofmeyer, initially Landgerichtsdirektor, then Senatspräsident.
> During more than 180 sessions, the judges and juries, the public
> prosecutors and the private parties, the accused and their attorneys,
> as well as the journalists who had come from around the world,
> accepted as a complete physical representation of the 'crime weapon' a
> mere map of the camp of Auschwitz and a map of the camp of Birkenau,
> whereupon five minuscule geometric figures were inscribed for the
> location of each of the alleged homicidal gas chambers, with the
> words, for Auschwitz: "Altes Krematorium", and for Birkenau:
> "Krematorium II", "Krematorium III", "Krematorium IV", and
> "Krematorium V"! These maps[7] were displayed in the courtroom.
>
> The Revisionists have often compared the Frankfurt trial with the
> 1450-1650 trials against witchcraft. Nevertheless, at least during
> those trials, someone sometimes bothered to describe or depict the
> witches' sabbath. At the Frankfurt trial, even among the lawyers who
> made difficulties for a witness like Filip Müller, not one asked of a
> Jewish witness or a repentant German defendant to describe for him in
> greater detail what he was purported to have seen. Despite two
> judicial visits to the scene of the crime at Auschwitz, accompanied by
> some German lawyers, it seems not one of the latter insisted on any
> technical explanations or criminological expertise regarding the
> murder weapon. To the contrary, one of them, Anton Reiners, a
> Frankfurt lawyer, pushed complacency to the point of having himself
> photographed by the press while raising the chute cover by which the
> SS supposedly sprinkled Zyklon B granules into the alleged Auschwitz
> gas chamber.
>
> And so at Toronto in 1985, I had fully decided to do away with these
> anomalies, to break the taboo and, for starters, pose, or rather have
> Douglas Christie pose, questions to the experts and Jewish witnesses
> as one normally poses in every trial where one is supposed to
> establish whether a crime has been committed and, if so, by whom, how
> and when.
>
> Fortunately for me, Ernst Zündel accepted my conditions and Douglas
> Christie consented to adopt this course of action and to pose to the
> experts and witnesses the questions that I would prepare for him. I
> was convinced that, in this manner, all might change, and the veil
> woven by so many false testimonies could be torn away. While I was not
> counting on Ernst Zündel's acquittal and we were all resigned to
> paying the price for our audacity, I nevertheless had hope that with
> the aid of this far-sighted man of character, and thanks to his
> intrepid lawyer, history, if not justice, would at last carry him into
> historical prominence.
>
> From the moment of the first cross-examination, a tremor of panic
> began to creep its way amid the ranks of the prosecution. Every
> evening and throughout most of the night, I would prepare the
> questions to ask. In the morning, I would turn over these questions,
> accompanied by the necessary documents, to lawyer Doug Christie who,
> for his part and with the aid of his female collaborator, conducted
> the essentially legal aspects of the effort. During the
> cross-examinations, I maintained a position close to the lawyer's
> podium and unremittingly furnished, on yellow notepads, supplementary
> and improvisational questions according to the experts' and witnesses'
> responses.
>
> The expert cited by the prosecution was Dr. Raul Hilberg, author of
> The Destruction of European Jews. Day after day, he was subjected to
> such humiliation that, when solicited in 1988 by a new prosecutor for
> a new trial against Ernst Zündel, Prof. Hilberg refused to return to
> give witness; he explained the motive for his refusal in a
> confidential letter wherein he acknowledged his fear of having to once
> again confront the questions of Douglas Christie. From the
> cross-examination of Dr. Raul Hilberg, it was definitively brought out
> that no one possessed any proof for the existence either of an order,
> a plan, an instruction, or a budget for the presumed physical
> extermination of the Jews. Furthermore, no one possessed either an
> expertise of the murder weapon (whether gas chamber or gas van), or an
> autopsy report establishing the murder of a detainee by poison gas.
> However, in the absence of evidence regarding the weapon and victim,
> did there exist witnesses of the crime?
>
> A testimony must always be verified. The usual first means of
> proceeding to this verification is to confront the assertions of the
> witness with the results of investigations or expert opinion regarding
> the material nature of the crime. In the case at hand, there were
> neither investigations, nor expertise relative to the alleged
> Auschwitz gas chambers. Here is what made any cross-examination
> difficult. Yet, this difficulty should not serve as an excuse, and one
> might even say that a cross-examination becomes ever more
> indispensable because, without it, there no longer remains any way of
> knowing whether the witness is telling the truth or not.
>
> Jewish Witnesses Finally Cross-Examined:
> Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba
>
> For those persons interested in the technical and documentary means by
> which we were nevertheless in a position to severely cross-examine the
> two principal Jewish witnesses, Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba, I
> can do no better than to recommend a reading of the trial
> transcript.[8] Pages 304-371 cover the questioning and
> cross-examination of Arnold Friedman; the latter breaks down on pages
> 445-446 when he ends by acknowledging that he in fact saw nothing,
> that he had spoken from hearsay because, according to him, he had met
> persons who were convincing; perhaps, he added, he would have adopted
> the position of Mr. Christie rather than that of these other persons
> if only Mr. Christie had been able to tell him back then what he was
> telling him now!
>
> Dr. Vrba was a witness of exceptional importance. One might even say
> about this trial in Toronto that the prosecution had found the means
> of recruiting 'Holocaust' expert number one in the person of Dr. Raul
> Hilberg, and witness number one in the person of Dr. Rudolf Vrba. The
> testimony of this latter gentleman had been one of the principal
> sources of the famous War Refugee Board Report on the German
> Extermination Camps - Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in November
> 1944 by the Executive Office of President Roosevelt. Dr. R. Vrba was
> also the author of I Cannot Forgive,[9] written in collaboration with
> Alan Bestic who, in his preface, declares with regard to him:
>
> "Indeed I would like to pay tribute to him for the immense trouble he
> took over every detail; for the meticulous, almost fanatical respect
> he revealed for accuracy." (p.2).
>
> ,Never perhaps, had a court of justice seen a witness express himself
> with more assurance on the Auschwitz gas chambers. Yet, by the end of
> the cross-examination, the situation had reversed itself to the point
> where Dr. R. Vrba was left with only one explanation for his errors
> and his lies: in his book he had, he confessed, resorted to "poetic
> license" or, as he was wont to say in Latin, to "licentia poetarum"!
>
> In the end, a bit of drama unfolded: Mr. Griffiths, the prosecutor who
> had himself solicited the presence of this witness numero uno and yet
> now apparently exasperated by Dr. Vrba's lies, fired off the following
> question:
>
> "You told Mr. Christie several times in discussing your book I Cannot
> Forgive that you used poetic license in writing that book. Have you
> used poetic license in your testimony?" (p. 1636).
>
> The false witness tried to parry the blow but prosecutor Griffiths hit
> him with a second question equally treacherous, this time concerning
> the number of gassing victims which Vrba had given; the witness
> responded with garrulous nonsense; Griffiths was getting ready to ask
> him a third and final question when suddenly, the matter was cut short
> and one heard the prosecutor say to the judge:
>
> "I have no further questions for Dr. Vrba" (p. 1643).
>
> Crestfallen, the witness left the dock. Dr. Vrba's initial
> questioning, cross-examination and final questioning filled 400 pages
> of transcripts (pp. 1244-1643). These pages could readily be used in
> an encyclopedia of law under a chapter on the detection of false
> witnesses.
>
> The Prosecution Gives up on Calling Witnesses
>
> Three years later, in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst
> Zündel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any
> recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the
> lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the
> existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'.
>
> Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this
> same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there
> was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any
> witnesses who could properly speak about them.[10] The attorney
> Jacques Vergès, courageous yet not foolhardy, preferred to avoid the
> subject. This was a stroke of luck for the Jewish lawyers who feared
> nothing so much as to see me appearing at the side of Mr. Vergès. If
> this gentleman had accepted my offer to counsel him, we in France
> might have been able to strike a tremendous blow against the myth of
> the gas chambers.
>
> All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish
> witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them
> testified before the court as to having seen one or having
> participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the 'gas
> chambers'.
>
> Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce
> and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how
> much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the
> suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively
> questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented
> themselves as "living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz",
> showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to
> look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that
> inevitably they retorted:
>
> "How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I
> would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been
> gassed also."
>
> This brings us back, as one can see, to Simone Veil and her
> declaration of May 7, 1983, about which we already know what we should
> think.
>
> http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
>
> http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
>
> http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Rassinier seems to wrap it up.
http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.html
During World WarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the French
Resistance. In October of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo for various
activities including the smuggling of Jewish refugees over the Franco-Swiss
border. http://www.codoh.com/thoughtcrimes/PORT1RAS.HTML
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2_Letters.html
On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS - KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years
http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/lindbergh3.html
BODY DISPOSAL AUS -
http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/body-disposal/
http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.html
I, Raquel Baranow am a Grad Student of Holocaust Denial. There are persons
with PhD's in various fields who
also deny the 6 million canard. The best evidence is forensic. Until
recently, there was never a forensic
examination of the alleged murder weapon (gas chambers). Demographic figures
are incomplete. After the fall
of East Europe to communism, many of the millions of Jews who fled Poland
into the Soviet Union or ended up
behind the Iron Curtain changed their names to assimilate, many civilians
died in the war, many died in the
concentration camps of louse-born typhus. During World War One, two million
civilians in the Soviet Union died
of typhus. Many died in Stalin's gulags.
Yad Vashem,( http://www.yadvashem.org/wps/portal/IY_HON_Welcome)a Holocaust
Documentation Center in Israel has a database of 3,000,000 alleged victims
of Nazi
extermination. But as you can see HERE
(http://666ismoney.com/YadVashem.html) (my maiden name, Friedemann), nearly
every name is listed at least
twice, some as many as five times!
http://www.yadvashem.org/lwp/workplace/IY_HON_Welcome
Yad Vashem's 3,000,000 "Holocaust victims" database lists nearly
everyone twice. Some as many at five times. Anyone, including
you can submit a "Page of Testimony".
And of course we have lists duplicated, unconfirmed, but 3m according to our
usual jewish/Zionist sources.
Put your name in, you might be missing out on reparations.
Has been improvements since this, numbers still very dicey.
Name Town District Region
Country Bday Source
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1879 list of victims from Germany
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1879 list of deportation from Berlin
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1905 list of deportation from Berlin
It is forensically impractical or impossible to exterminate millions with
louse disinfestant (hydrogen cyanide gas)
or diesel exhaust as alleged by malicious "witnesses" or tortured
confessors. There are no written orders for
extermination. Aerial reconnaissance photographs of the concentration camps
show no smoke and flames
belching from the crematoria and pyres as alleged. The photos and records
show there was not enough coke or
crematoria to cremate millions of corpses. The "witnesses" and confessors
lied about how many minutes it takes
to cremate a corpse. Diesel exhaust does not contain significant amount of
carbon monoxide to kill a human. If
the Nazis wanted to kill millions they could have driven the coal fired
train into a tunnel or quonset hut and gassed
'em with the exhaust from the locomotive or used the exhaust from the
crematoria. At Auschwitz, during a typhus
epidemic, up to 300 people died per day, hence the crematoria, shaving of
heads and requisitions for tons of
Zyklon B louse disinfestant. HCN is a very dangerous, impractical, messy
method for extermination.
http://www.vho.org/
The Holocaust Controversy A Case for open Debate
The Gas Chambers are a fraud, a tourist attraction, slander, demonizing,
impractical/impossible, malicious
atrocity propaganda spread by the communists, who hated Hitler and
perpetrated by Jews, who were always
looking for ways to get to the lands of milk and money. The Jews have
extorted billions from the US Treasury,
Germany, Swiss banks and insurance companies on account of the Holohoax
fraud. The Holohoax also makes
those who fought Hitler feel like they did something good fighting the
demon, Hitler instead of letting Hitler take
on Stalin alone.
A "liberal" person has an open mind. A bigot is irrational and obstinate.
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews
avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued
throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey.
Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied
territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the
Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. "The Jews
from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to
the United States were held to be American citizens by the German
occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of
about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of
South American countries" (Vol. I, p. 645).
As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in
southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews
from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the
German authorities. "Until March 1944," says the. Red Cross Report,
"Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave
Hungary" (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy
Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet
Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the
emigration of Jews continued.
His attorney, Ludwig Bock, said he would appeal.
"What is notable is the iron-hard refusal of the court to allow
consideration of new scientific findings or expert opinions," Bock said.
http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2007/02/15/570024-holocaust-denier-gets-prison
-in-germany
sentenced to the maximum five years in prison Thursday for anti-Semitic
activities, including contributing to a Web site dedicated to Holocaust
denial.
> In a dramatic and unprecedented videotaped interview, Dr. Franciszek
> Piper, senior curator and director of archives of the Auschwitz State
> Museum admitted on camera that 'Krema 1,' the alleged 'homicidal gas
> chamber' shown off to hundreds of thousands of tourists every year at
> the Auschwitz main camp, was, in fact, fabricated after the war by
> the Soviet Union -apparently on the direct orders of Josef Stalin.
>
> What Piper said - in effect and on camera - was that the explosive
> 1988 Leuchter Report was correct: no homicidal gassings took place in
> the buildings designated as 'homicidal gas chambers' at Auschwitz.
>
> With this admission by none other than the respected head of the
> Auschwitz State Museum, one of the most sacred 'facts' of history has
> been destroyed. This 'gas chamber' is the major historical 'fact' on
> which much of the foreign and domestic policies of all Western
> nations since WWII are based.
>
> It is the basis for the $100+ billion in foreign aid the United
> States has poured into the state of Israel since its inception in
> 1948 - amounting to $16,500 for every man, woman and child in the
> Jewish state and billions more paid by Germany in 'reparations' - not
> to mention the constructing of Israel's national telephone,
> electrical and rail systems...all gifts of the German people. It is
> the basis for the $10 billion 'loan' (read 'gift') made to Israel for
> housing its immigrants in the occupied territories...while Americans
> sleep on the streets and businesses are bankrupted by the thousands.
> (Note - As of 2004, not a single 'loan' of US tax money made to the
> state of Israel by Washington has ever been paid back. -ed)
>
> Germany is paying 'reparations' - the United States is making major
> contributions - to atone for the 'gassings at Auschwitz' and
> elsewhere. If the 'homicidal gas chambers' were postwar creations of
> the Soviets, in which no one was gassed regardless of race, creed,
> color or country of national origin, then these 'reparations' were
> unnecessary, and were based on fraud.
>
> The videotape on which Dr. Piper makes his revelations was made in
> mid-1992 by a young Jewish investigator, David Cole and follows 12
> years of intensive investigation by dozens of historians, journalists
> and scientists who have tried to get to the bottom of what really
> happened at Auschwitz.
>
> Like most Americans, since his youth, Cole had been instructed in the
> 'irrefutable fact' that mass homicidal gassings had taken place at
> Auschwitz. The number of those executed - also declared irrefutable -
> was 4.1 million.
>
> Then came the Leuchter Report in 1988 which was followed with an
> official 're-evaluation' of the total deaths at Auschwitz (down to
> 1.1 million). As a budding historian - and a Jew - Cole was intrigued.
>
> Previous to 1992, anyone who publicly doubted or questioned the
> official 4.1 million 'gassing' deaths at Auschwitz was labeled an
> anti-semite, neo-nazi skinhead at the very least. Quietly, because of
> revisionist findings, the official figure was lowered to 1.1 million.
> No mention was made of the missing 3 million.
>
> The Cole videotape interview proves that the people who run the
> Auschwitz State Museum had made a practice of fabricating 'proofs' of
> homicidal gassings. Keep in mind that over the years millions of
> tourists have been told that 'Krema 1' is in its original state,
> while officials knew that 'original state' is a lie.
>
> The political, religious, financial and historical ramifications of
> this proof of no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz cannot be
> measured. Coupled with the Leuchter Report, the Cole interview with
> Dr. Piper on videotape proves that what Western governments have
> taught about the Auschwitz gas chamber since WWII is a lie. It proves
> that what televangelists such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson have
> been telling their flocks is simply not true.
>
> No one, regardless of race, creed, color or country of national
> origin was gassed to death in any building so designated at
> Auschwitz. And without 'homicidal gas chambers' at Auschwitz, where
> is the reasoning for the special treatment of the state of Israel?
>
> Troops from Police Battalions 316 and 322
> participate in the execution of Jews in Bialystok. An
> estimated 3000 were later estimated (by German courts) to
> have been shot and killed. (Browning, 14)
>
> 1944
>
> The chief secretary's office of the Government of Palestine
> sends a letter, stamped "Secret," to David Ben-Gurion. The
> letter outlined what the Allies knew of the Nazi
> extermination program, noting that half of Hungary's 800,000
> Jews had been deported to Birkenau, and that 1.5 million
> European Jews had already been killed. (LeBor, 7)
>
> Work Cited
>
> LeBor, Adam. Hitler's Secret Bankers: The Myth of Swiss
> Neutrality During the Holocaust. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol
> Publishing Group, 1997.
>
> Browning, Christopher R. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police
> Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York:
> HarperCollins, 1992
>
>
> --
> "But I was not diagnosed as 'morbidly obese' you evil
> kike and you are perpetuating a lie started by your
> fellow filthy kike hook nosed vermin named ..."
> (Scott Bradbury, Bellville's Leading Revisionist Scholar)
Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined,imprisoned or both for
discussing the topics set forth in this article.
Israeli stats
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/
Jews and Palestinians genetically similar.
http://www.khazaria.com/genetics/abstracts.html
War without end
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=39590
You will find innumerable sites supporting this humbug about jews being
gassed but not one iota of evidence that has not been obtained by torture to
the Germans involved or by avccepting on;ly stories which support these
unsudstantiated stories supported only by certain jews who had a lot to gain
monetarily.
And in fact the jews who were experimented on and died in camps were
unfortunate sacrifiv\ces to support the rich and powerful jews ambition for
a land grab.
"Ken McVay" <kmcvay@nizkor.org.no-spam> wrote in message
news:139ba3d2rfa83c6@corp.supernews.com...
> [Follow-ups set]
>
> 1941
"The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list of
priorities of the ruling class. It was the foundation of the State which was
primordial in their eyes."
http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/books/miscelleneous/the-founding-myths-of-is
raeli-politics/part3.htm
"The masses of Jews from Hungary's ghettos obediently boarded the
deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of
confidence in the false information that they were being transferred to
Kenyermeze.
The Nazis could not have misled the masses of Jews so conclusively had
they not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian
rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and others
used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the Jews.
They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help of
Jewish leaders.
The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local leaders
of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were spreading
such false information and did not protest.
Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were
persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local 'rescue work'.
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary
in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily.
She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of "gas
chambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing
stories only later. [15]
Inmates Released
More than 200,000 prisoners were transferred from Auschwitz to other camps,
and about 8,000 were in the camp when it was liberated by Soviet forces. In
addition, about 1,500 prisoners who had served their sentences were
released, and returned to their home countries. [16] If Auschwitz had
actually been a top secret extermination center, would the Germans have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening there?
Himmler Orders Death Rate Reduced
The Jewish ghetto police always had the option, she said, of "throwing off
their uniforms and joining the rest of us" - a point that Yitzak Zuckerman,
a leader of the Warsaw ghetto uprising, made in his memoir.
http://www.theexperiment.org/articles.php?news_id=2139
Without Jewish co operation through the zionists the Germans would never
have had the resources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And the
zionists made it impossible for the underground to trust the jews.
Like elsewhere, the only people who had the information and the ear of the
frightened Jewish population were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenrat
comprised mainly the Zionist Federation members. Without their help the SS,
with 19 officers and less than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police,
could not have collected and controlled a million Jews, when they did not
even know their whereabouts.
http://www.geocities.com/chabaan_2000/safad.HTM
Is The same authors also describe co-operation between Zionist leaders and
Eichmann. It is interesting to note that the extreme right-wing revisionists
only chose wealthy Jews for emigration, whereas other Zionists insisted on
taking only young and healthy Jews. Eichmann helped them to carry out these
plans, in return for which the Zionist Organization paid large sums to the
Nazis. As Kimche says about the Zionist delegates in Germany: They had not
come to Germany to save Jews. That was not their job. When the Nazis began
the systematic murder of Jews in 1941, the Zionists decided neither to
support Jewish resistance in Europe, nor to attack the Nazis, nor to say
anything about the mass liquidation of their fellow Jews. Their sole purpose
was to save certain selected Jews as future settlers in Palestine. They were
not interested in Jews who wished to stay in their home countries and fight
the Nazis.
http://www.aldeilis.net/zion/zionhol01.html
The first point to note regarding the appropriation of the history of the
Holocaust by Zionist propaganda is that Zionism without anti-Semitism is
impossible. Zionism agrees with the basic tenet of anti-Semitism, namely
that Jews cannot live with non-Jews.
"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:p19593lbsfi7dq03hcglpos9oo8pab56re@4ax.com...
> By Faurisson
>
> The Unraveling of the Witnesses at the First Zündel Trial (1985)
>
> The important victory won by revisionism in France on April 26, 1983,
> would go on to confirm itself in 1985 with the first Zündel trial in
> Toronto. I would like to dwell a moment on this trial in order to
> underscore the impact on one's point of view, and especially as far as
> the testimonies on the Auschwitz gas chambers are concerned: for the
> first time since the war, Jewish witnesses were subjected to a regular
> cross-examination. Moreover, without wanting to minimize the
> importance of the second Zündel trial (that of 1988), I should like it
> to be understood that the 1985 trial already contained the seeds for
> all that was attained in the 1988 trial, including the report by
> Leuchter and all the scientific reports which, in the aftermath, would
> proliferate in the wake of the Leuchter Report.
>
> In 1985, as also afterwards in 1988, I served as advisor to Ernst
> Zündel and his lawyer, Douglas Christie. I accepted this heavy
> responsibility only under condition that all the Jewish witnesses
> would, for the first time, be cross-examined on the material nature of
> the reported facts, bluntly and without discretion. I had noted, in
> effect, that from 1945 to 1985, Jewish witnesses had been granted
> virtual immunity. Never had any defense lawyer thought or dared to ask
> them for material explanations about the gas chambers (exact location,
> physical appearance, dimensions, internal and external structure), or
> about the homicidal gassing (the operational procedure from beginning
> to end, the tools employed, the precautions taken by the executioners
> before, during and after execution).
>
> On rare occasions, as at the trial of Tesch, Drosihn and
> Weinbacher,[5] lawyers formulated some unusual questions of a material
> nature, hardly troublesome for the witness, but these always found
> themselves on the fringes of the more fundamental questions which
> should have been asked. No lawyer ever demanded clarifications on a
> weapon which, indeed, he had never seen and that no one had ever shown
> him. At the major Nuremberg Trial of 1945-46, the German lawyers had
> manifested total discretion on this point. At the proceedings against
> Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961, the lawyer Dr. Robert Servatius had not
> wanted to raise the question; in a letter on this subject dated June
> 21, 1974, he wrote me: "Eichmann hat selbst keine Gaskammer gesehen;
> die Frage wurde nicht diskutiert; er hat sich aber auch nicht gegen
> deren Existenz gewandt" [Eichmann himself had not seen any gas
> chamber; the question was not discussed; but neither did he raise the
> issue of their existence].[6]
>
> At the Frankfurt Trial of 1963-65, the lawyers showed themselves to be
> particularly timid. I should mention that the atmosphere was rather
> inhospitable for the defense and the accused. This show trial will
> remain as a blot on the honor of German justice as on the person of
> Hans Hofmeyer, initially Landgerichtsdirektor, then Senatspräsident.
> During more than 180 sessions, the judges and juries, the public
> prosecutors and the private parties, the accused and their attorneys,
> as well as the journalists who had come from around the world,
> accepted as a complete physical representation of the 'crime weapon' a
> mere map of the camp of Auschwitz and a map of the camp of Birkenau,
> whereupon five minuscule geometric figures were inscribed for the
> location of each of the alleged homicidal gas chambers, with the
> words, for Auschwitz: "Altes Krematorium", and for Birkenau:
> "Krematorium II", "Krematorium III", "Krematorium IV", and
> "Krematorium V"! These maps[7] were displayed in the courtroom.
>
> The Revisionists have often compared the Frankfurt trial with the
> 1450-1650 trials against witchcraft. Nevertheless, at least during
> those trials, someone sometimes bothered to describe or depict the
> witches' sabbath. At the Frankfurt trial, even among the lawyers who
> made difficulties for a witness like Filip Müller, not one asked of a
> Jewish witness or a repentant German defendant to describe for him in
> greater detail what he was purported to have seen. Despite two
> judicial visits to the scene of the crime at Auschwitz, accompanied by
> some German lawyers, it seems not one of the latter insisted on any
> technical explanations or criminological expertise regarding the
> murder weapon. To the contrary, one of them, Anton Reiners, a
> Frankfurt lawyer, pushed complacency to the point of having himself
> photographed by the press while raising the chute cover by which the
> SS supposedly sprinkled Zyklon B granules into the alleged Auschwitz
> gas chamber.
>
> And so at Toronto in 1985, I had fully decided to do away with these
> anomalies, to break the taboo and, for starters, pose, or rather have
> Douglas Christie pose, questions to the experts and Jewish witnesses
> as one normally poses in every trial where one is supposed to
> establish whether a crime has been committed and, if so, by whom, how
> and when.
>
> Fortunately for me, Ernst Zündel accepted my conditions and Douglas
> Christie consented to adopt this course of action and to pose to the
> experts and witnesses the questions that I would prepare for him. I
> was convinced that, in this manner, all might change, and the veil
> woven by so many false testimonies could be torn away. While I was not
> counting on Ernst Zündel's acquittal and we were all resigned to
> paying the price for our audacity, I nevertheless had hope that with
> the aid of this far-sighted man of character, and thanks to his
> intrepid lawyer, history, if not justice, would at last carry him into
> historical prominence.
>
> From the moment of the first cross-examination, a tremor of panic
> began to creep its way amid the ranks of the prosecution. Every
> evening and throughout most of the night, I would prepare the
> questions to ask. In the morning, I would turn over these questions,
> accompanied by the necessary documents, to lawyer Doug Christie who,
> for his part and with the aid of his female collaborator, conducted
> the essentially legal aspects of the effort. During the
> cross-examinations, I maintained a position close to the lawyer's
> podium and unremittingly furnished, on yellow notepads, supplementary
> and improvisational questions according to the experts' and witnesses'
> responses.
>
> The expert cited by the prosecution was Dr. Raul Hilberg, author of
> The Destruction of European Jews. Day after day, he was subjected to
> such humiliation that, when solicited in 1988 by a new prosecutor for
> a new trial against Ernst Zündel, Prof. Hilberg refused to return to
> give witness; he explained the motive for his refusal in a
> confidential letter wherein he acknowledged his fear of having to once
> again confront the questions of Douglas Christie. From the
> cross-examination of Dr. Raul Hilberg, it was definitively brought out
> that no one possessed any proof for the existence either of an order,
> a plan, an instruction, or a budget for the presumed physical
> extermination of the Jews. Furthermore, no one possessed either an
> expertise of the murder weapon (whether gas chamber or gas van), or an
> autopsy report establishing the murder of a detainee by poison gas.
> However, in the absence of evidence regarding the weapon and victim,
> did there exist witnesses of the crime?
>
> A testimony must always be verified. The usual first means of
> proceeding to this verification is to confront the assertions of the
> witness with the results of investigations or expert opinion regarding
> the material nature of the crime. In the case at hand, there were
> neither investigations, nor expertise relative to the alleged
> Auschwitz gas chambers. Here is what made any cross-examination
> difficult. Yet, this difficulty should not serve as an excuse, and one
> might even say that a cross-examination becomes ever more
> indispensable because, without it, there no longer remains any way of
> knowing whether the witness is telling the truth or not.
>
> Jewish Witnesses Finally Cross-Examined:
> Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba
>
> For those persons interested in the technical and documentary means by
> which we were nevertheless in a position to severely cross-examine the
> two principal Jewish witnesses, Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba, I
> can do no better than to recommend a reading of the trial
> transcript.[8] Pages 304-371 cover the questioning and
> cross-examination of Arnold Friedman; the latter breaks down on pages
> 445-446 when he ends by acknowledging that he in fact saw nothing,
> that he had spoken from hearsay because, according to him, he had met
> persons who were convincing; perhaps, he added, he would have adopted
> the position of Mr. Christie rather than that of these other persons
> if only Mr. Christie had been able to tell him back then what he was
> telling him now!
>
> Dr. Vrba was a witness of exceptional importance. One might even say
> about this trial in Toronto that the prosecution had found the means
> of recruiting 'Holocaust' expert number one in the person of Dr. Raul
> Hilberg, and witness number one in the person of Dr. Rudolf Vrba. The
> testimony of this latter gentleman had been one of the principal
> sources of the famous War Refugee Board Report on the German
> Extermination Camps - Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in November
> 1944 by the Executive Office of President Roosevelt. Dr. R. Vrba was
> also the author of I Cannot Forgive,[9] written in collaboration with
> Alan Bestic who, in his preface, declares with regard to him:
>
> "Indeed I would like to pay tribute to him for the immense trouble he
> took over every detail; for the meticulous, almost fanatical respect
> he revealed for accuracy." (p.2).
>
> ,Never perhaps, had a court of justice seen a witness express himself
> with more assurance on the Auschwitz gas chambers. Yet, by the end of
> the cross-examination, the situation had reversed itself to the point
> where Dr. R. Vrba was left with only one explanation for his errors
> and his lies: in his book he had, he confessed, resorted to "poetic
> license" or, as he was wont to say in Latin, to "licentia poetarum"!
>
> In the end, a bit of drama unfolded: Mr. Griffiths, the prosecutor who
> had himself solicited the presence of this witness numero uno and yet
> now apparently exasperated by Dr. Vrba's lies, fired off the following
> question:
>
> "You told Mr. Christie several times in discussing your book I Cannot
> Forgive that you used poetic license in writing that book. Have you
> used poetic license in your testimony?" (p. 1636).
>
> The false witness tried to parry the blow but prosecutor Griffiths hit
> him with a second question equally treacherous, this time concerning
> the number of gassing victims which Vrba had given; the witness
> responded with garrulous nonsense; Griffiths was getting ready to ask
> him a third and final question when suddenly, the matter was cut short
> and one heard the prosecutor say to the judge:
>
> "I have no further questions for Dr. Vrba" (p. 1643).
>
> Crestfallen, the witness left the dock. Dr. Vrba's initial
> questioning, cross-examination and final questioning filled 400 pages
> of transcripts (pp. 1244-1643). These pages could readily be used in
> an encyclopedia of law under a chapter on the detection of false
> witnesses.
>
> The Prosecution Gives up on Calling Witnesses
>
> Three years later, in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst
> Zündel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any
> recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the
> lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the
> existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'.
>
> Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this
> same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there
> was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any
> witnesses who could properly speak about them.[10] The attorney
> Jacques Vergès, courageous yet not foolhardy, preferred to avoid the
> subject. This was a stroke of luck for the Jewish lawyers who feared
> nothing so much as to see me appearing at the side of Mr. Vergès. If
> this gentleman had accepted my offer to counsel him, we in France
> might have been able to strike a tremendous blow against the myth of
> the gas chambers.
>
> All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish
> witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them
> testified before the court as to having seen one or having
> participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the 'gas
> chambers'.
>
> Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce
> and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how
> much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the
> suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively
> questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented
> themselves as "living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz",
> showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to
> look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that
> inevitably they retorted:
>
> "How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I
> would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been
> gassed also."
>
> This brings us back, as one can see, to Simone Veil and her
> declaration of May 7, 1983, about which we already know what we should
> think.
>
> http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
>
> http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.com/
>
> http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
Rassinier seems to wrap it up.
http://www.ihr.org/books/rassinier/debunking1-0.html
During World WarII, Rassinier was a highly decorated member of the French
Resistance. In October of 1943 he was arrested by the Gestapo for various
activities including the smuggling of Jewish refugees over the Franco-Swiss
border. http://www.codoh.com/thoughtcrimes/PORT1RAS.HTML
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n2_Letters.html
On July 13, 1994, a documentary on the life of Charles A. Lindbergh
broadcast on the Public Broadcast System (PBS - KENW-TV) said that when
Lindbergh visited one of these few camps in Germany following WW2, he was
told that 25,000 died in 1-1/2 years
http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/lindbergh3.html
BODY DISPOSAL AUS -
http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/body-disposal/
http://666ismoney.com/HolocaustAds.html
I, Raquel Baranow am a Grad Student of Holocaust Denial. There are persons
with PhD's in various fields who
also deny the 6 million canard. The best evidence is forensic. Until
recently, there was never a forensic
examination of the alleged murder weapon (gas chambers). Demographic figures
are incomplete. After the fall
of East Europe to communism, many of the millions of Jews who fled Poland
into the Soviet Union or ended up
behind the Iron Curtain changed their names to assimilate, many civilians
died in the war, many died in the
concentration camps of louse-born typhus. During World War One, two million
civilians in the Soviet Union died
of typhus. Many died in Stalin's gulags.
Yad Vashem,( http://www.yadvashem.org/wps/portal/IY_HON_Welcome)a Holocaust
Documentation Center in Israel has a database of 3,000,000 alleged victims
of Nazi
extermination. But as you can see HERE
(http://666ismoney.com/YadVashem.html) (my maiden name, Friedemann), nearly
every name is listed at least
twice, some as many as five times!
http://www.yadvashem.org/lwp/workplace/IY_HON_Welcome
Yad Vashem's 3,000,000 "Holocaust victims" database lists nearly
everyone twice. Some as many at five times. Anyone, including
you can submit a "Page of Testimony".
And of course we have lists duplicated, unconfirmed, but 3m according to our
usual jewish/Zionist sources.
Put your name in, you might be missing out on reparations.
Has been improvements since this, numbers still very dicey.
Name Town District Region
Country Bday Source
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1879 list of victims from Germany
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1879 list of deportation from Berlin
Friedemann Adolf Berlin Berlin Berlin Germany
1905 list of deportation from Berlin
It is forensically impractical or impossible to exterminate millions with
louse disinfestant (hydrogen cyanide gas)
or diesel exhaust as alleged by malicious "witnesses" or tortured
confessors. There are no written orders for
extermination. Aerial reconnaissance photographs of the concentration camps
show no smoke and flames
belching from the crematoria and pyres as alleged. The photos and records
show there was not enough coke or
crematoria to cremate millions of corpses. The "witnesses" and confessors
lied about how many minutes it takes
to cremate a corpse. Diesel exhaust does not contain significant amount of
carbon monoxide to kill a human. If
the Nazis wanted to kill millions they could have driven the coal fired
train into a tunnel or quonset hut and gassed
'em with the exhaust from the locomotive or used the exhaust from the
crematoria. At Auschwitz, during a typhus
epidemic, up to 300 people died per day, hence the crematoria, shaving of
heads and requisitions for tons of
Zyklon B louse disinfestant. HCN is a very dangerous, impractical, messy
method for extermination.
http://www.vho.org/
The Holocaust Controversy A Case for open Debate
The Gas Chambers are a fraud, a tourist attraction, slander, demonizing,
impractical/impossible, malicious
atrocity propaganda spread by the communists, who hated Hitler and
perpetrated by Jews, who were always
looking for ways to get to the lands of milk and money. The Jews have
extorted billions from the US Treasury,
Germany, Swiss banks and insurance companies on account of the Holohoax
fraud. The Holohoax also makes
those who fought Hitler feel like they did something good fighting the
demon, Hitler instead of letting Hitler take
on Stalin alone.
A "liberal" person has an open mind. A bigot is irrational and obstinate.
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews
avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued
throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey.
Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied
territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the
Polish Jews who had escaped to France before its occupation. "The Jews
from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to
the United States were held to be American citizens by the German
occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognize the validity of
about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of
South American countries" (Vol. I, p. 645).
As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel camp in
southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews
from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the
German authorities. "Until March 1944," says the. Red Cross Report,
"Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave
Hungary" (Vol. I, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy
Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet
Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the
emigration of Jews continued.
His attorney, Ludwig Bock, said he would appeal.
"What is notable is the iron-hard refusal of the court to allow
consideration of new scientific findings or expert opinions," Bock said.
http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2007/02/15/570024-holocaust-denier-gets-prison
-in-germany
sentenced to the maximum five years in prison Thursday for anti-Semitic
activities, including contributing to a Web site dedicated to Holocaust
denial.
> In a dramatic and unprecedented videotaped interview, Dr. Franciszek
> Piper, senior curator and director of archives of the Auschwitz State
> Museum admitted on camera that 'Krema 1,' the alleged 'homicidal gas
> chamber' shown off to hundreds of thousands of tourists every year at
> the Auschwitz main camp, was, in fact, fabricated after the war by
> the Soviet Union -apparently on the direct orders of Josef Stalin.
>
> What Piper said - in effect and on camera - was that the explosive
> 1988 Leuchter Report was correct: no homicidal gassings took place in
> the buildings designated as 'homicidal gas chambers' at Auschwitz.
>
> With this admission by none other than the respected head of the
> Auschwitz State Museum, one of the most sacred 'facts' of history has
> been destroyed. This 'gas chamber' is the major historical 'fact' on
> which much of the foreign and domestic policies of all Western
> nations since WWII are based.
>
> It is the basis for the $100+ billion in foreign aid the United
> States has poured into the state of Israel since its inception in
> 1948 - amounting to $16,500 for every man, woman and child in the
> Jewish state and billions more paid by Germany in 'reparations' - not
> to mention the constructing of Israel's national telephone,
> electrical and rail systems...all gifts of the German people. It is
> the basis for the $10 billion 'loan' (read 'gift') made to Israel for
> housing its immigrants in the occupied territories...while Americans
> sleep on the streets and businesses are bankrupted by the thousands.
> (Note - As of 2004, not a single 'loan' of US tax money made to the
> state of Israel by Washington has ever been paid back. -ed)
>
> Germany is paying 'reparations' - the United States is making major
> contributions - to atone for the 'gassings at Auschwitz' and
> elsewhere. If the 'homicidal gas chambers' were postwar creations of
> the Soviets, in which no one was gassed regardless of race, creed,
> color or country of national origin, then these 'reparations' were
> unnecessary, and were based on fraud.
>
> The videotape on which Dr. Piper makes his revelations was made in
> mid-1992 by a young Jewish investigator, David Cole and follows 12
> years of intensive investigation by dozens of historians, journalists
> and scientists who have tried to get to the bottom of what really
> happened at Auschwitz.
>
> Like most Americans, since his youth, Cole had been instructed in the
> 'irrefutable fact' that mass homicidal gassings had taken place at
> Auschwitz. The number of those executed - also declared irrefutable -
> was 4.1 million.
>
> Then came the Leuchter Report in 1988 which was followed with an
> official 're-evaluation' of the total deaths at Auschwitz (down to
> 1.1 million). As a budding historian - and a Jew - Cole was intrigued.
>
> Previous to 1992, anyone who publicly doubted or questioned the
> official 4.1 million 'gassing' deaths at Auschwitz was labeled an
> anti-semite, neo-nazi skinhead at the very least. Quietly, because of
> revisionist findings, the official figure was lowered to 1.1 million.
> No mention was made of the missing 3 million.
>
> The Cole videotape interview proves that the people who run the
> Auschwitz State Museum had made a practice of fabricating 'proofs' of
> homicidal gassings. Keep in mind that over the years millions of
> tourists have been told that 'Krema 1' is in its original state,
> while officials knew that 'original state' is a lie.
>
> The political, religious, financial and historical ramifications of
> this proof of no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz cannot be
> measured. Coupled with the Leuchter Report, the Cole interview with
> Dr. Piper on videotape proves that what Western governments have
> taught about the Auschwitz gas chamber since WWII is a lie. It proves
> that what televangelists such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson have
> been telling their flocks is simply not true.
>
> No one, regardless of race, creed, color or country of national
> origin was gassed to death in any building so designated at
> Auschwitz. And without 'homicidal gas chambers' at Auschwitz, where
> is the reasoning for the special treatment of the state of Israel?
>
> Troops from Police Battalions 316 and 322
> participate in the execution of Jews in Bialystok. An
> estimated 3000 were later estimated (by German courts) to
> have been shot and killed. (Browning, 14)
>
> 1944
>
> The chief secretary's office of the Government of Palestine
> sends a letter, stamped "Secret," to David Ben-Gurion. The
> letter outlined what the Allies knew of the Nazi
> extermination program, noting that half of Hungary's 800,000
> Jews had been deported to Birkenau, and that 1.5 million
> European Jews had already been killed. (LeBor, 7)
>
> Work Cited
>
> LeBor, Adam. Hitler's Secret Bankers: The Myth of Swiss
> Neutrality During the Holocaust. Secaucus, N.J.: Carol
> Publishing Group, 1997.
>
> Browning, Christopher R. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police
> Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York:
> HarperCollins, 1992
>
>
> --
> "But I was not diagnosed as 'morbidly obese' you evil
> kike and you are perpetuating a lie started by your
> fellow filthy kike hook nosed vermin named ..."
> (Scott Bradbury, Bellville's Leading Revisionist Scholar)