Rush on as customers switch to new network

[Ext User(Michael)]

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5v7c4tF1lbhtcU1@mid.individual.net...
> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
>
>>>>>> From January 29 existing CDMA mobile numbers will be quarantined by
>>>>>> Telstra.
>
>>>>> What's the purpose of that? Why can't Telstra simply hold those
>>>>> customers' numbers for them til they make up their minds within
>>>>> that 30 day period. Call it a "cooling off period" if you will.
>
>>>> As at network closure, all remaining CDMA services not in the process
>>>> of migration, will be disconnect.
>
>>>> For 28 days (not 30), you will be able to be reconnected for the
>>>> express purpose of doing a migration
>
>>> So much for your bare faced pig ignorant lie that if the number wasnt in
>>> the
>>> process of being ported on the 28-Jan, it wouldnt be possible to keep
>>> it.
>
>> Never made the claim,
>
> Lying, as always.
>
>> I said they would be disconnected, which they will be.
>
> They clearly wont be on that date, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning
> fuckwit child.

Which is why I specifically wrote "As at network closure, all remaining CDMA
services not in the process of migration, will be disconnect"

Is network closure here yet? Nooooo . . .

>>> That was always are bare faced telstra lie that flouts the MNP law.
>
>> It's not an MNP "law".
>
> Yes it is.
>
>> I also stated Telstra will not be disconnecting any services currently
>> undergoing MNP action
>
> Because even telstra aint actually stupid enough to try doing what
> is illegal, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning fuckwit child.
>
> And you clearly lied about what would happen with number which werent
> currently
> undergoing MNP action on that date, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning
> fuckwit child.

See above

[Ext User(Rod Speed)]

Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Michael <michael@yahoo.com> wrote

>>>>>>> From January 29 existing CDMA mobile numbers will be quarantined by Telstra.

>>>>>> What's the purpose of that? Why can't Telstra simply hold those
>>>>>> customers' numbers for them til they make up their minds within
>>>>>> that 30 day period. Call it a "cooling off period" if you will.

>>>>> As at network closure, all remaining CDMA services not in the
>>>>> process of migration, will be disconnect.

>>>>> For 28 days (not 30), you will be able to be reconnected for the
>>>>> express purpose of doing a migration

>>>> So much for your bare faced pig ignorant lie that if the number wasnt in the
>>>> process of being ported on the 28-Jan, it wouldnt be possible to keep it.

>>> Never made the claim,

>> Lying, as always.

>>> I said they would be disconnected, which they will be.

>> They clearly wont be on that date, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning fuckwit child.

> Which is why I specifically wrote "As at network closure, all remaining CDMA services not in the process of migration,
> will be disconnect"

Pity about the lie right at the top.

Which you had said plenty of times before yourself without the line about network closure, liar.

> Is network closure here yet? Nooooo . . .

In spite of your stupid claim that it would be on that date.

>>>> That was always are bare faced telstra lie that flouts the MNP law.

>>> It's not an MNP "law".

>> Yes it is.

>>> I also stated Telstra will not be disconnecting any services currently undergoing MNP action

>> Because even telstra aint actually stupid enough to try doing what
>> is illegal, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning fuckwit child.

>> And you clearly lied about what would happen with number which werent currently
>> undergoing MNP action on that date, you stupid pig ignorant dunny cleaning fuckwit child.

> See above

Completely useless, as always with your lies.