Australian government-Restricted Air Space

[Ext User(CyBorg 0091)]

Any Land or Building owned or held by the Crown carries restricted air
space,to 100miles in any direction.

This is a Legal Document

[Ext User(Craig Welch)]

CyBorg 0091 <jjbruce@gmail.com> said:

>
>Any Land or Building owned or held by the Crown carries restricted air
>space,to 100miles in any direction.
>
>This is a Legal Document

No it's not, it's a nonsensical Usenet post.

--
Craig http://www.wazu.jp/
1,239 Unicode fonts for 82 written language groups:
Price your own web plan: http://www.wazu.jp/hosting/

[Ext User(johnB)]

Who's crown?


"CyBorg 0091" <jjbruce@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e220b599-47c8-43ea-bdc5-ec8c62a89fc8@n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> Any Land or Building owned or held by the Crown carries restricted air
> space,to 100miles in any direction.
>
> This is a Legal Document
>
>

[Ext User(Stealth Pilot)]

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:29:19 GMT, Craig Welch <craig@pacific.net.sg>
wrote:

>CyBorg 0091 <jjbruce@gmail.com> said:
>
>>
>>Any Land or Building owned or held by the Crown carries restricted air
>>space,to 100miles in any direction.
>>
>>This is a Legal Document
>

the claim is utter rubbish. in fact on a very regular occasion I fly
over three military bases and take photographs.
the only restricted airspace is airspace under gunnery ranges and I
fly through a few of those when they are not active on a regular
basis. the only other restrictions are related to giving passenger
aircraft a trouble free access to airports.

heavens I even fly over an active ammunition store on a regular basis.

in fact I'm going to go and fly over all of them again tomorrow.

Stealth Pilot


>No it's not, it's a nonsensical Usenet post.

totally agree.

[Ext User(Mil80C)]

"Stealth Pilot" <notransponder@aeroplanes.com.au> wrote in message
news:9nkjp3p79ipde88rg9m9qmmil0f4jt1fra@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:29:19 GMT, Craig Welch <craig@pacific.net.sg>
> wrote:
>
>>CyBorg 0091 <jjbruce@gmail.com> said:
>>
>>>
>>>Any Land or Building owned or held by the Crown carries restricted air
>>>space,to 100miles in any direction.
>>>
>>>This is a Legal Document
>>
>
> the claim is utter rubbish. in fact on a very regular occasion I fly
> over three military bases and take photographs.
> the only restricted airspace is airspace under gunnery ranges and I
> fly through a few of those when they are not active on a regular
> basis. the only other restrictions are related to giving passenger
> aircraft a trouble free access to airports.
>
> heavens I even fly over an active ammunition store on a regular basis.
>
> in fact I'm going to go and fly over all of them again tomorrow.
>
> Stealth Pilot
>
Quite right Stealth, but I will make a teensy correction to your post, not
all military restricted areas are firing ranges, some are used for pilot
training and other stuff (no I won't elaborate).

Now Stealth, you know that taking photos is actually quite naughty but I've
never been big rules that are unenforceable so snap away mate, you won't
capture anything that is not already known to the spooks of some of our near
northern neighbours. I will say that I am allways pleased to see that we in
this country can still have major military bases being legally overflown by
a private aircraft at whatever level he chooses.

[Ext User(Stealth Pilot)]

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:38:14 +1000, "Mil80C"
<deanoNOSPAM4598@hotmail.com> wrote:

>

>>
>Quite right Stealth, but I will make a teensy correction to your post, not
>all military restricted areas are firing ranges, some are used for pilot
>training and other stuff (no I won't elaborate).
>
of course.
and with wall to wall labor the poor old RAAF will be stripped of new
aircraft at every turn and will end up doing less and less flying.
I can see the day approaching that every pilot will need rotating
through the politician's flight (private airline) just to maintain
minimum flying hours.


>Now Stealth, you know that taking photos is actually quite naughty but I've
>never been big rules that are unenforceable so snap away mate, you won't
>capture anything that is not already known to the spooks of some of our near
>northern neighbours. I will say that I am allways pleased to see that we in
>this country can still have major military bases being legally overflown by
>a private aircraft at whatever level he chooses.
>
>
amazes me!