OT: Hey Dawggie

[Ext User(Diesel Damo)]

<http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message495026/pg1>

Don't let the name of the site scare you - it's not a religious site.
It's a thread to do with one of your pet hates and I thought you might
like the legal twist on it :-)

[Ext User(jackbadger56)]

On Jan 29, 3:31 pm, Diesel Damo <Diesel_...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> <http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message495026/pg1>
>
> Don't let the name of the site scare you - it's not a religious site.
> It's a thread to do with one of your pet hates and I thought you might
> like the legal twist on it :-)

"SORRY - YOUR IP ADDRESS HAS BEEN BANNED -




Thank you for not stalking!"

...............right......ok!

[Ext User(the_dawggie)]

On Jan 29, 3:31 pm, Diesel Damo <Diesel_...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> <http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message495026/pg1>

> Don't let the name of the site scare you - it's not a religious site.
> It's a thread to do with one of your pet hates and I thought you might
> like the legal twist on it :-)

I liked the first response:

> The father would appear to be a dangerous psychopath.
> That kid should run for the hills while he still has his equipment intact.

Circumcision is seriously sick. Once someone is born and everything
is working, not in need of adjustment, then it's not up to any one
else
but the owner of the various bits to make their own choice.

Not parents, the church, or anyone else.

So, the father needs to take his hands off his son's dick and
keep them to his self. Oh, and be given a GAGF.

I can't believe the court would even have to think about
this - they should impose an order against the father ever
seeing his son again.

[Ext User(Doug Jewell)]

jackbadger56 wrote:
> On Jan 29, 3:31 pm, Diesel Damo <Diesel_...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> <http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message495026/pg1>
>>
>> Don't let the name of the site scare you - it's not a religious site.
>> It's a thread to do with one of your pet hates and I thought you might
>> like the legal twist on it :-)
>
> "SORRY - YOUR IP ADDRESS HAS BEEN BANNED -
>
>
>
>
> Thank you for not stalking!"
>
> ..............right......ok!
I get the same

[Ext User(the_dawggie)]

On Jan 31, 12:38 am, Doug Jewell <a...@and.maybe.ill.tell.you> wrote:
> jackbadger56 wrote:
> > On Jan 29, 3:31 pm, Diesel Damo <Diesel_...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> >> <http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message495026/pg1>
>
> >> Don't let the name of the site scare you - it's not a religious site.
> >> It's a thread to do with one of your pet hates and I thought you might
> >> like the legal twist on it :-)
>
> > "SORRY - YOUR IP ADDRESS HAS BEEN BANNED -
>
> > Thank you for not stalking!"
>
> > ..............right......ok!
>
> I get the same

Displays OK for me, using Hel$tra BogPong.

I don't like religion (of any type, it has caused so many wars
and problems), or the subject material though.

Damo, how did you find this?

[Ext User(Diesel Damo)]

On Jan 29, 3:59*pm, jackbadger56 <castl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 29, 3:31 pm, Diesel Damo <Diesel_...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
> > <http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message495026/pg1>
>
> > Don't let the name of the site scare you - it's not a religious site.
> > It's a thread to do with one of your pet hates and I thought you might
> > like the legal twist on it :-)
>
> "SORRY - YOUR IP ADDRESS HAS BEEN BANNED -
>
> Thank you for not stalking!"
>
> ..............right......ok!

The nut case that runs the place is a bit "ban happy". And when he
bans someone, he doesn't just ban their IP address, he bans a whole
range of IP addresses. So I'd say you just happened to be in a naughty
range.

Pretty stupid, but yeah, that's him.

[Ext User(Diesel Damo)]

On Jan 31, 2:12*am, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Damo, how did you find this?

Because I hang out there. The place gets over 30,000 hits a day so
it's quite impressive how quickly you can get current events news.