Canon Digital

[me]

You can find the new Canon Digital Rebel/300D and 10D
pages at:

http://www.UltimateSLR.com

The site contains links to reviews, tips, manuals,
firmware upgrades, and digital editing software and
image management tools. Any feedback is appreciated.

[Carsten Bauer]

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:08:54 +1100, me <me@me.com> wrote:

>You can find the new Canon Digital Rebel/300D and 10D
>pages at:
>
> http://www.UltimateSLR.com
>
>The site contains links to reviews, tips, manuals,
>firmware upgrades, and digital editing software and
>image management tools. Any feedback is appreciated.
>

You do realise that your friendly posting is now turning into
spamming?

[me]

Carsten Bauer wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:08:54 +1100, me <me@me.com> wrote:
>
>
>>You can find the new Canon Digital Rebel/300D and 10D
>>pages at:
>>
>> http://www.UltimateSLR.com
>>
>>The site contains links to reviews, tips, manuals,
>>firmware upgrades, and digital editing software and
>>image management tools. Any feedback is appreciated.
>>
>
>
> You do realise that your friendly posting is now turning into
> spamming?
>


Bullshit

[M i c C u l l e n]

me <me@me.com>, far, far away from here, appears to have written:

[snips]

> >>The site contains links to reviews, tips, manuals,
> >>firmware upgrades, and digital editing software and
> >>image management tools. Any feedback is appreciated.

We already know...

> > You do realise that your friendly posting is now turning into
> > spamming?

> Bullshit

Good attitude to go with the spamming.
--

cheers, Mic (Reply address works...)

"Never let the fear of striking out get in your way." - George Herman "Babe" Ruth

[VH-CBR]

"me" <me@me.com> wrote in message
news:3fc6bddc$0$31748$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net...
>
> Bullshit
>

Because you say so?

[Daran]

"me" <me@me.com> wrote in message
news:3fc6bddc$0$31748$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net...
>
> Bullshit
>

Because you say so?

No.. I agree with me..what he is posting is not "spam" and anyway there is
far too much paranoia about it

[max morrison]

dictionary.reference.com defines "spam" as --

"Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature,
sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups;
junk e-mail"

The original posting from "me" doesn't seem to be commercial,
and definitely wasn't sent indiscriminately to multiple newsgroups.
As for "unsolicited", that applies to many, if not most, postings in this
newsgroup.
As for "junk", I've found his 300D site useful, and there may be others
who'd find it useful but wouldn't know about it if he hadn't posted the
link.
Besides, just about every response to his post (including this) has been
unnecessary and could be regarded as junk (but not spam!).

mm



"Daran" <daran@takemeoutbigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:SyDxb.30534$aT.2159@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> "me" <me@me.com> wrote in message
> news:3fc6bddc$0$31748$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net...
> >
> > Bullshit
> >
>
> Because you say so?
>
> No.. I agree with me..what he is posting is not "spam" and anyway there is
> far too much paranoia about it
>
>

[VH-CBR]

"max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
news:3fc708e4$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> dictionary.reference.com defines "spam" as --
>
> "Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature,
> sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or
newsgroups;
> junk e-mail"
>
> The original posting from "me" doesn't seem to be commercial,
> and definitely wasn't sent indiscriminately to multiple newsgroups.
> As for "unsolicited", that applies to many, if not most, postings in this
> newsgroup.
> As for "junk", I've found his 300D site useful, and there may be others
> who'd find it useful but wouldn't know about it if he hadn't posted the
> link.
> Besides, just about every response to his post (including this) has been
> unnecessary and could be regarded as junk (but not spam!).
>

So we're almost all spamming the newsgroup? :o)

[max morrison]

"VH-CBR" <fake@address.com> wrote in message
news:3fc71133@news.comindico.com.au...
>
> "max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
> news:3fc708e4$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> > dictionary.reference.com defines "spam" as --
> >
> > "Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature,
> > sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or
> newsgroups;
> > junk e-mail"
> >
> > The original posting from "me" doesn't seem to be commercial,
> > and definitely wasn't sent indiscriminately to multiple newsgroups.
> > As for "unsolicited", that applies to many, if not most, postings in
this
> > newsgroup.
> > As for "junk", I've found his 300D site useful, and there may be others
> > who'd find it useful but wouldn't know about it if he hadn't posted the
> > link.
> > Besides, just about every response to his post (including this) has been
> > unnecessary and could be regarded as junk (but not spam!).
> >
>
> So we're almost all spamming the newsgroup? :o)

Not according to the definition above, particularly the
"sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists ...etc" bit.

Besides, one person's spam is another person's spicy ham.

[VH-CBR]

"max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
news:3fc71598$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
>
>
> Not according to the definition above, particularly the
> "sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists ...etc" bit.
>
> Besides, one person's spam is another person's spicy ham.

Well, seems to me that he wasn't "indiscriminate" nor did he send it it
multiple mailing lists (unless I missed something) so his posts appear to be
pretty much what we all post (including the gratuitous rudeness :o)

So I guess in the big scheme of things, many of us post ham in a can ... ;o)

[max morrison]

"VH-CBR" <fake@address.com> wrote in message
news:3fc7247d@news.comindico.com.au...
>
> "max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
> news:3fc71598$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> >
> >
> > Not according to the definition above, particularly the
> > "sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists ...etc" bit.
> >
> > Besides, one person's spam is another person's spicy ham.
>
> Well, seems to me that he wasn't "indiscriminate" nor did he send it it
> multiple mailing lists (unless I missed something) so his posts appear to
be
> pretty much what we all post (including the gratuitous rudeness :o)

Yep, my point exactly. Tell it to Carsten.

> So I guess in the big scheme of things, many of us post ham in a can ...
;o)

Vikings: Lovely spam, wonderful spam....etc

Waitress: Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Bloody vikings. You can't have egg,
bacon, spam and sausage without the spam.

Mrs. Bun: I don't like spam!

Mr. Bun: Shh dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your spam. I love it. I'm
having spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, spam, spam,
spam and spam. (starts Vikings off again)

[AU Digital Photo Of The Day]

"max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
news:3fc7274e$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
>
> "VH-CBR" <fake@address.com> wrote in message
> news:3fc7247d@news.comindico.com.au...
> >
> > "max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
> > news:3fc71598$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> > >
> > >
> > > Not according to the definition above, particularly the
> > > "sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists ...etc" bit.
> > >
> > > Besides, one person's spam is another person's spicy ham.
> >
> > Well, seems to me that he wasn't "indiscriminate" nor did he send it it
> > multiple mailing lists (unless I missed something) so his posts appear
to
> be
> > pretty much what we all post (including the gratuitous rudeness :o)
>
> Yep, my point exactly. Tell it to Carsten.
>
> > So I guess in the big scheme of things, many of us post ham in a can ...
> ;o)
>
> Vikings: Lovely spam, wonderful spam....etc
>
> Waitress: Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Bloody vikings. You can't have egg,
> bacon, spam and sausage without the spam.
>
> Mrs. Bun: I don't like spam!
>
> Mr. Bun: Shh dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your spam. I love it. I'm
> having spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, spam, spam,
> spam and spam. (starts Vikings off again)
>
>

I love a bit of Python! :-)

[me]

VH-CBR wrote:
> "me" <me@me.com> wrote in message
> news:3fc6bddc$0$31748$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net...
>
>>Bullshit
>>
>
>
> Because you say so?
>
>

Your just pissed off because you and someone there has a Nikon and that
look-a-like thingo that takes nikon lenses. Jealous that nobody will
trade these in on a brace of 300D's Canons, therefore this site has no
relevance to you. :)

Now lets find a Nikon site for you ah .... found - www.maxwell.com.au :)

[VH-CBR]

"me" <me@me.com> wrote in message
news:3fc733c7$0$31749$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net...
>
>
> Your just pissed off because you and someone there has a Nikon and that
> look-a-like thingo that takes nikon lenses. Jealous that nobody will
> trade these in on a brace of 300D's Canons, therefore this site has no
> relevance to you. :)
>
> Now lets find a Nikon site for you ah .... found - www.maxwell.com.au :)
>

ROFL .. I'm not pissed off at all .. I felt your response was very immature
indeed .. and thanks for proving it.

Clearly Nikon clearly doesn't need a site to keep track of it's incessant
changes to it's technology as you seem to be inferring Canon does

*chuckle*

[max morrison]

"AU Digital Photo Of The Day" <adpotd@pixelpix.com.au> wrote in message
news:bq7ae6$8cv$1@austar-news.austar.net.au...
>
> "max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
> news:3fc7274e$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> >
> > "VH-CBR" <fake@address.com> wrote in message
> > news:3fc7247d@news.comindico.com.au...
> > >
> > > "max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
> > > news:3fc71598$1@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Not according to the definition above, particularly the
> > > > "sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists ...etc" bit.
> > > >
> > > > Besides, one person's spam is another person's spicy ham.
> > >
> > > Well, seems to me that he wasn't "indiscriminate" nor did he send it
it
> > > multiple mailing lists (unless I missed something) so his posts appear
> to
> > be
> > > pretty much what we all post (including the gratuitous rudeness :o)
> >
> > Yep, my point exactly. Tell it to Carsten.
> >
> > > So I guess in the big scheme of things, many of us post ham in a can
....
> > ;o)
> >
> > Vikings: Lovely spam, wonderful spam....etc
> >
> > Waitress: Shut up! Shut up! Shut up! Bloody vikings. You can't have egg,
> > bacon, spam and sausage without the spam.
> >
> > Mrs. Bun: I don't like spam!
> >
> > Mr. Bun: Shh dear, don't cause a fuss. I'll have your spam. I love it.
I'm
> > having spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, spam,
spam,
> > spam and spam. (starts Vikings off again)
> >
> >
>
> I love a bit of Python! :-)

You can't have Python without the spam.

[VH-CBR]

"max morrison" <someone@nospam.net.au> wrote in message
news:3fc7c667$3@duster.adelaide.on.net...
>
> > I love a bit of Python! :-)
>
> You can't have Python without the spam.

Spam .. Python in a can ...... :o)