Can't get the gold card to work after moving

[an]

"Tallulah Blanket" <beulah@peelmeagrape.com> wrote in message
news:yb8yb.32484$aT.21316@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> an wrote:
> > "Tallulah Blanket" <beulah@peelmeagrape.com> wrote in message
> > news:fYPxb.31285$aT.1044@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >
> >>Sliceman wrote:
> >>
> >>>both boxes work at mates place on his dish. How do I fix the problem?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Buy another gold card or call 131 999 and upgrade. You're going to need
> >>to do this come March anyway when the hacked encryption technology is
> >>switched off.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I didn't realise "hacked encryption technology" had a switch.
> >
> >
> You thought wrong.
>
As I said irdeto is irdeto

Its hardly a switch, by being unable to extract the HMK from a version 4 its
will mean
for now, it will not be possible decrypt the EMK, meaning it will not be
possible to sell cards in bulk.
And the current lot of gold cards will slowly die out as legit 1.x cards get
replaced.

They don't have a switch at all, there will just be a shortage HMKs, if they
had a switch why haven't they switched it?

But the minute some gets a memory map from V4 card and extract the HMK, its
game over version 4 cards.

Many people hack these things for a hobby and aren't even interested in the
television channels, they treat it as a challenge so its won't be long
before its hacked. Why would they be interested, there is fuck all on that
sad range and channels worth watching.

On the other hand, if the providers had stuck with 1.1 cards, to start
with, they probably wouldn't have had the problems they have
now with piracy.

[Ernie Blackmore]

Who care what anyone's name is. It is still a free country and anyone can
use any nick they like. It's the value of anonymity.

"Wayne349" <apollo345@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3fc87891$0$1744$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.a u...
>
> "Fuzz Bucket" <FuzzBucket@NoSetEmailAddress.com> wrote in message
> news:3fc8782e@news.leadingedgeinternet.net.au...
> >
> > On 29-Nov-2003, "Simmo" <blahblahblah@figpond.com> wrote:
> >
> > > who are you?
> > >
> > > "foxtel employee" <foxtel.employee.xnegx@no-mx.forums.eyo.com.au>
wrote
> in
> > > message news:foxtel.employee.xnegx@no-mx.forums.eyo.com.au...
> >
> > He could be anyone hiding behind a "Foxtel Employee" Nick Name
>
> Just like every other fake on this NG ?
> No one has any reason to discredit him so give him a chance to post freely
> before the slander sets in
>
>