What is the go with these prices?

[David James]

There is a Canon EOS Digital REBEL 6.3MP at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2969670474&category=43454

for $14,769 US$.............2 bids

or

Canon EOS Digital Rebel also 6.2 MP at
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2969677387&category=43454

for $610 US $.............22 bids

I dont get it, there must be a huge difference

Thx
Dave

[Luke Welling]

> There is a Canon EOS Digital REBEL 6.3MP at
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2969670474&category=43454
>
> for $14,769 US$.............2 bids

Read the names of the two bidders.

I guess somebody does not like the seller.

[David James]

I see, Thanks for pointing it out. I didn't look at that because both
sellers have good ratings.

Dave
"Luke Welling" <luke@tangledweb.com.au> wrote in message
news:3fcdeeed$0$13498$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u...
>
> > There is a Canon EOS Digital REBEL 6.3MP at
> >
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2969670474&category=43454
> >
> > for $14,769 US$.............2 bids
>
> Read the names of the two bidders.
>
> I guess somebody does not like the seller.
>
>

[[BnH]]

If you watch closely .. the seller with $14000+ EOS 300D is a bit dodgy.
Buy always then suddenly sell expensive stuff ... I bet the seller account
was hijacked.

=bob=

"David James" <djis@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:ECszb.336$AC6.11610@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> I see, Thanks for pointing it out. I didn't look at that because both
> sellers have good ratings.

[Miro]

"David James" <djis@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:%7kzb.247$AC6.8600@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> There is a Canon EOS Digital REBEL 6.3MP at
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2969670474&category=43454
>
> for $14,769 US$.............2 bids
>
> or
>
> Canon EOS Digital Rebel also 6.2 MP at
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2969677387&category=43454
>
> for $610 US $.............22 bids
>
> I dont get it, there must be a huge difference
>
> Thx
> Dave

In the first auction the first bid was a fake bid. Then they compete to go
over the fake bid and it is something silly. At the close the seller offers
it to the under-bidder.

In the second one it is just normal bidding.