For your PC needsMatthew (Woohoo¤)
05-12-2003, 07:36 PM
Is this a weekly series? a movie?
there is no info on the net at all about it!!
there is no info on the net at all about it!!
View Full Version : Our Generation
scott
05-12-2003, 08:16 PM
"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" wrote:
> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
That's because it's called American Dreams in the US.
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0319930/
> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
That's because it's called American Dreams in the US.
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0319930/
Matthew (Woohoo¤)
06-12-2003, 06:16 AM
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 21:02:31 +1100, scott <"scott"@nospam.com> wrote:
>http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0319930/
Thanks for that.
>http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0319930/
Thanks for that.
Leon.
06-12-2003, 07:56 AM
"scott" <"scott"@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:xIYzb.172$Bb1.8058@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> "Matthew (Woohoo¤)" wrote:
>
> > Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> > there is no info on the net at all about it!!
>
> That's because it's called American Dreams in the US.
>
> http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0319930/
lets demand truth in naming here in Australia.
news:xIYzb.172$Bb1.8058@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> "Matthew (Woohoo¤)" wrote:
>
> > Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> > there is no info on the net at all about it!!
>
> That's because it's called American Dreams in the US.
>
> http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0319930/
lets demand truth in naming here in Australia.
bill
07-12-2003, 10:26 AM
"scott" <"scott"@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:xIYzb.172$Bb1.8058@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> "Matthew (Woohoo¤)" wrote:
>
> > Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> > there is no info on the net at all about it!!
>
> That's because it's called American Dreams in the US.
>
> http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0319930/
>
Wondering if the intro song was changed too.
It seemed to be called Our Generation. Or maybe
that's where they got the new title from.
The title shouldn't have been changed.
Being in America, the dreams are American.
jj
news:xIYzb.172$Bb1.8058@nnrp1.ozemail.com.au...
> "Matthew (Woohoo¤)" wrote:
>
> > Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> > there is no info on the net at all about it!!
>
> That's because it's called American Dreams in the US.
>
> http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0319930/
>
Wondering if the intro song was changed too.
It seemed to be called Our Generation. Or maybe
that's where they got the new title from.
The title shouldn't have been changed.
Being in America, the dreams are American.
jj
bill
07-12-2003, 10:56 AM
"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:s3k0tvg07t85pfi6km1iavuild7mistpsp@4ax.com...
> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
A couple of idle thoughts
I was reminded of Home and Away watching the
girls having differences and one called another a cow.
This show is slightly reminiscent of The Waltons, just
the feel of it. The Waltons was made in the 70s based in the
30s. This is made in the 00s and based in the 60s, a similar
time difference.
You can see the set up for much of the 60s to come.
A major concern, and someone mentioned it on the IMDB
web site, it's annoying if songs are played in the wrong timeline.
A song from 1966 for 1964 for example. I was mindful of this
watching the show. The tv movie, The 60s was particularly bad at this.
It seemed okay here for now. The thought, wouldn't a song from 1966
make 1964 seem more interesting, I don't like.
jj
news:s3k0tvg07t85pfi6km1iavuild7mistpsp@4ax.com...
> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
A couple of idle thoughts
I was reminded of Home and Away watching the
girls having differences and one called another a cow.
This show is slightly reminiscent of The Waltons, just
the feel of it. The Waltons was made in the 70s based in the
30s. This is made in the 00s and based in the 60s, a similar
time difference.
You can see the set up for much of the 60s to come.
A major concern, and someone mentioned it on the IMDB
web site, it's annoying if songs are played in the wrong timeline.
A song from 1966 for 1964 for example. I was mindful of this
watching the show. The tv movie, The 60s was particularly bad at this.
It seemed okay here for now. The thought, wouldn't a song from 1966
make 1964 seem more interesting, I don't like.
jj
Matthew (Woohoo¤)
07-12-2003, 12:46 PM
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:45:35 +1100, "bill"
<fredj@labyrinth.NOnet.SPAMau> wrote:
>
>"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:s3k0tvg07t85pfi6km1iavuild7mistpsp@4ax.com...
>> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
>> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
>
>A couple of idle thoughts
>
>I was reminded of Home and Away watching the
>girls having differences and one called another a cow.
>
>This show is slightly reminiscent of The Waltons, just
>the feel of it. The Waltons was made in the 70s based in the
>30s. This is made in the 00s and based in the 60s, a similar
>time difference.
>
>You can see the set up for much of the 60s to come.
>A major concern, and someone mentioned it on the IMDB
>web site, it's annoying if songs are played in the wrong timeline.
>A song from 1966 for 1964 for example. I was mindful of this
>watching the show. The tv movie, The 60s was particularly bad at this.
>It seemed okay here for now. The thought, wouldn't a song from 1966
>make 1964 seem more interesting, I don't like.
>
>jj
>
>
Well, it is far more interesting than The WOnder years anyways :-)
I've notices sometihng,....the two younger kids seem more mature and
smarter than the two older kids.
<fredj@labyrinth.NOnet.SPAMau> wrote:
>
>"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:s3k0tvg07t85pfi6km1iavuild7mistpsp@4ax.com...
>> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
>> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
>
>A couple of idle thoughts
>
>I was reminded of Home and Away watching the
>girls having differences and one called another a cow.
>
>This show is slightly reminiscent of The Waltons, just
>the feel of it. The Waltons was made in the 70s based in the
>30s. This is made in the 00s and based in the 60s, a similar
>time difference.
>
>You can see the set up for much of the 60s to come.
>A major concern, and someone mentioned it on the IMDB
>web site, it's annoying if songs are played in the wrong timeline.
>A song from 1966 for 1964 for example. I was mindful of this
>watching the show. The tv movie, The 60s was particularly bad at this.
>It seemed okay here for now. The thought, wouldn't a song from 1966
>make 1964 seem more interesting, I don't like.
>
>jj
>
>
Well, it is far more interesting than The WOnder years anyways :-)
I've notices sometihng,....the two younger kids seem more mature and
smarter than the two older kids.
bill
07-12-2003, 03:36 PM
"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sj45tv491m39eukbs8d3ho09ci45per22b@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:45:35 +1100, "bill"
> <fredj@labyrinth.NOnet.SPAMau> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:s3k0tvg07t85pfi6km1iavuild7mistpsp@4ax.com...
> >> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> >> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
> >
> >A couple of idle thoughts
> >
> >I was reminded of Home and Away watching the
> >girls having differences and one called another a cow.
> >
> >This show is slightly reminiscent of The Waltons, just
> >the feel of it. The Waltons was made in the 70s based in the
> >30s. This is made in the 00s and based in the 60s, a similar
> >time difference.
> >
> >You can see the set up for much of the 60s to come.
> >A major concern, and someone mentioned it on the IMDB
> >web site, it's annoying if songs are played in the wrong timeline.
> >A song from 1966 for 1964 for example. I was mindful of this
> >watching the show. The tv movie, The 60s was particularly bad at this.
> >It seemed okay here for now. The thought, wouldn't a song from 1966
> >make 1964 seem more interesting, I don't like.
> >
> >jj
> >
> >
>
>
> Well, it is far more interesting than The WOnder years anyways :-)
>
> I've notices sometihng,....the two younger kids seem more mature and
> smarter than the two older kids.
The older ones make their mistakes sooner. The younger ones get made
to feel they should stay at home.
jj
news:sj45tv491m39eukbs8d3ho09ci45per22b@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:45:35 +1100, "bill"
> <fredj@labyrinth.NOnet.SPAMau> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:s3k0tvg07t85pfi6km1iavuild7mistpsp@4ax.com...
> >> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
> >> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
> >
> >A couple of idle thoughts
> >
> >I was reminded of Home and Away watching the
> >girls having differences and one called another a cow.
> >
> >This show is slightly reminiscent of The Waltons, just
> >the feel of it. The Waltons was made in the 70s based in the
> >30s. This is made in the 00s and based in the 60s, a similar
> >time difference.
> >
> >You can see the set up for much of the 60s to come.
> >A major concern, and someone mentioned it on the IMDB
> >web site, it's annoying if songs are played in the wrong timeline.
> >A song from 1966 for 1964 for example. I was mindful of this
> >watching the show. The tv movie, The 60s was particularly bad at this.
> >It seemed okay here for now. The thought, wouldn't a song from 1966
> >make 1964 seem more interesting, I don't like.
> >
> >jj
> >
> >
>
>
> Well, it is far more interesting than The WOnder years anyways :-)
>
> I've notices sometihng,....the two younger kids seem more mature and
> smarter than the two older kids.
The older ones make their mistakes sooner. The younger ones get made
to feel they should stay at home.
jj
Malcolm Taylor
08-12-2003, 03:06 PM
"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sj45tv491m39eukbs8d3ho09ci45per22b@4ax.com...
| On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:45:35 +1100, "bill"
| <fredj@labyrinth.NOnet.SPAMau> wrote:
|
| >
| >"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| >news:s3k0tvg07t85pfi6km1iavuild7mistpsp@4ax.com...
| >> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
| >> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
| >
| >A couple of idle thoughts
| >
| >I was reminded of Home and Away watching the
| >girls having differences and one called another a cow.
| >
| >This show is slightly reminiscent of The Waltons, just
| >the feel of it. The Waltons was made in the 70s based in the
| >30s. This is made in the 00s and based in the 60s, a similar
| >time difference.
| >
| >You can see the set up for much of the 60s to come.
| >A major concern, and someone mentioned it on the IMDB
| >web site, it's annoying if songs are played in the wrong timeline.
| >A song from 1966 for 1964 for example. I was mindful of this
| >watching the show. The tv movie, The 60s was particularly bad at
this.
| >It seemed okay here for now. The thought, wouldn't a song from
1966
| >make 1964 seem more interesting, I don't like.
| >
| >jj
| >
| >
|
|
| Well, it is far more interesting than The WOnder years anyways :-)
|
| I've notices sometihng,....the two younger kids seem more mature
and
| smarter than the two older kids.
The younger daughter reminded me of a young Thora Birch and looks much
cuter than the older daughter.
news:sj45tv491m39eukbs8d3ho09ci45per22b@4ax.com...
| On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 11:45:35 +1100, "bill"
| <fredj@labyrinth.NOnet.SPAMau> wrote:
|
| >
| >"Matthew (Woohoo¤)" <biteme@hotmail.com> wrote in message
| >news:s3k0tvg07t85pfi6km1iavuild7mistpsp@4ax.com...
| >> Is this a weekly series? a movie?
| >> there is no info on the net at all about it!!
| >
| >A couple of idle thoughts
| >
| >I was reminded of Home and Away watching the
| >girls having differences and one called another a cow.
| >
| >This show is slightly reminiscent of The Waltons, just
| >the feel of it. The Waltons was made in the 70s based in the
| >30s. This is made in the 00s and based in the 60s, a similar
| >time difference.
| >
| >You can see the set up for much of the 60s to come.
| >A major concern, and someone mentioned it on the IMDB
| >web site, it's annoying if songs are played in the wrong timeline.
| >A song from 1966 for 1964 for example. I was mindful of this
| >watching the show. The tv movie, The 60s was particularly bad at
this.
| >It seemed okay here for now. The thought, wouldn't a song from
1966
| >make 1964 seem more interesting, I don't like.
| >
| >jj
| >
| >
|
|
| Well, it is far more interesting than The WOnder years anyways :-)
|
| I've notices sometihng,....the two younger kids seem more mature
and
| smarter than the two older kids.
The younger daughter reminded me of a young Thora Birch and looks much
cuter than the older daughter.
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd