Foxtel Digital + Dialup

[E-T]

"Jeremy Quirke" <jquirke@noiprimusspam.com.au> wrote in message
news:40624ed7$0$16585$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net. au...
>
> "E-T" <thisaddressgets@nospamatall.com> wrote in message
> news:5Dl8c.123203$Wa.51447@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >
> > "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:c3sgs8$2b6l51$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > Some silly little fuckwit child desperately cowering behind
> > > Ry <ryanbirkin@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
> > > news:406142ac$1_1@news.iprimus.com.au...
> > > just the puerile shit thats always pouring from the back of it.
> > >
> > Why is it that everybody except Rood the pedophile is a silly little
> fuckwit
> > child?
> >
> > Is there anybody here who actually likes Rood?
> >
> Michael J, of aus.comms.mobile
>
That isn't one of the NGs in the header so he's not "here"

[nang3]

hahahhahaa thanks guys for a good laugh to start my day...

im getting my digital service installed next week so il post here if it affects my bandwidth at all

[B Forbes]

"matt" <git@msn.com> wrote in message
news:9Ly7c.119658$Wa.94428@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c3m853$28nu4k$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > Nick W <post-on-ng@foremail.com> wrote in message
> > news:c3ltpi$mip$1@mws-stat-syd.cdn.telstra.com.au...
> > > Rod Speed wrote
> > >> Nick W <post-on-ng@foremail.com> wrote
> > >>> Rod Speed wrote
> > >>>> Nick W <post-on-ng@foremail.com> wrote
> >
> > >>>>> A friend did some testing over the weekend, via the net
> (speedchecks)
> > >>>>> and direct modem to modem transfers, and found that the effect of
> > >>>>> having the return path phone line connector on the new Foxtel
> Digital
> > >>>>> STU across the line, affects line speed by 6-8kbs.
> >
> > >>>> You'd wanna do a lot more than just claim that, boy.
> >
> > >>> Excuse me?
> >
> > >> Not possible, you're completely inexcusible, child.
> >
> > >>>>> Tested on 3 different phone lines in different locations...
> >
> > >> You need to test with more than just one dialup modem, child.
> >
> > > Sorry, I should have been a little clearer, 3 different
> > > modems, 3 different lines, 3 different locations.
> >
> > All with the same result, line speed by 6-8kbs.
> >
> > Soorree, dont believe it.
> >
> > Someone's got his dick in his hand.
> >
> >
>
> That would be Forbes. And he's not shy about admitting it.
>

Bows.

[B Forbes]

"Nick W" <post-on-ng@foremail.com> wrote in message
news:c3ltpi$mip$1@mws-stat-syd.cdn.telstra.com.au...
> Rod Speed wrote in message ...
> >
> >Nick W <post-on-ng@foremail.com> wrote in message
> >news:c3lqnl$l5i$1@mws-stat-syd.cdn.telstra.com.au...
> >> Rod Speed wrote
> >>> Nick W <post-on-ng@foremail.com> wrote
> >
> >>>> A friend did some testing over the weekend, via the net (speedchecks)
> >>>> and direct modem to modem transfers, and found that the effect of
> >>>> having the return path phone line connector on the new Foxtel Digital
> >>>> STU across the line, affects line speed by 6-8kbs.
> >
> >>> You'd wanna do a lot more than just claim that, boy.
> >
> >> Excuse me?
> >
> >Not possible, you're completely inexcusible, child.
> >
> >>>> Tested on 3 different phone lines in different locations...
> >
> >You need to test with more than just one dialup modem, child.
> >
>
> Sorry, I should have been a little clearer, 3 different modems, 3
different
> lines, 3 different locations.
>

Warning - you are attacking the love of Rod's life - Telstra

Kooky but true!

[B Forbes]

"Paul Wright" <wrightp(nospam)@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:c3m37p$2drt$1@otis.netspace.net.au...
> Sounds more like the decrease in speed is due to the extra socket on your
> existing phone line creating more copper and resistance, the set top box
for
> foxtel just has an inbuilt 56k modem and dials in to foxtel, nothing
more..
>

Whatever it is, it's a widespread complaint in aus.tv.pay