Rod Speed
07-05-2004, 02:11 PM
Danny Rohr <danny.rohr@telstra.com> wrote in message
news:c79b44$17gqr$1@ID-198608.news.uni-berlin.de...
> MrXX® <no@no.com> wrote
>> Mr Williams would not say what percentage of the 209,000
>> digital pay-TV customers were existing or new subscribers.
> Bet virtually all of them were existing customers,
Yep.
> meaning foxtel is going under unless it reduces
> its prices to somthing more sustainable.
Wanna bet ? Monopolys dont go under very often, child.
> Perhaps they would have even more digital subscribers
> if they wern't trying to lock their existing customers into
> a new 2 years contract for simply changing an STB.
Or the existing customers dont care.
news:c79b44$17gqr$1@ID-198608.news.uni-berlin.de...
> MrXX® <no@no.com> wrote
>> Mr Williams would not say what percentage of the 209,000
>> digital pay-TV customers were existing or new subscribers.
> Bet virtually all of them were existing customers,
Yep.
> meaning foxtel is going under unless it reduces
> its prices to somthing more sustainable.
Wanna bet ? Monopolys dont go under very often, child.
> Perhaps they would have even more digital subscribers
> if they wern't trying to lock their existing customers into
> a new 2 years contract for simply changing an STB.
Or the existing customers dont care.