Cosima DeVito debuts at number 1??????

[Running Through The Forest]

Her single debuts at number one on the ARIA chart?

How is that possible do the record companies buy up all the singles?

[Chris Cox]

"Running Through The Forest" <MuggyBuggy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41242A92.B45B6420@hotmail.com...
> Her single debuts at number one on the ARIA chart?
>
> How is that possible do the record companies buy up all the singles?

Yes, although in this case, Cosima bought them all herself as she is the
record company.

She also bought all of Millsy's, but it wasn't enough to stop it crapping
out.

[Craig Welch]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:50:34 +0930, Running Through The Forest
<MuggyBuggy@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Her single debuts at number one on the ARIA chart?

'Debuts'? Non-word.

--
Craig

[Chris Cox]

"Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
news:4ud8i0l9puihqnbrh0ln5f85jjnllu4jqr@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:50:34 +0930, Running Through The Forest
> <MuggyBuggy@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Her single debuts at number one on the ARIA chart?
>
> 'Debuts'? Non-word.

Sentence fragment.

[red ted]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:56:06 +1000, "Chris Cox"
<cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote:

>"Craig Welch" <craig@pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
>news:4ud8i0l9puihqnbrh0ln5f85jjnllu4jqr@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:50:34 +0930, Running Through The Forest
>> <MuggyBuggy@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Her single debuts at number one on the ARIA chart?
>>
>> 'Debuts'? Non-word.

What is it with you language nazis? "Debuts" is in both the Oxford and
Webster's dictionaries. I've used it in scrabble on a few occasions
and it has never been challenged. What sort of halfwit would think
"debuts" is not a word?

It is not our fault that you morons can only comprehend 5000 of the
260000 words in the English language. The language evolves all the
time. It's not like someone drew a line in 1850 and said the language
is never allowed to change from this date forward. One of the good
things about English is no fascist ever said the the language is never
allowed to evolve (unlike French and other languages). You morons have
been picking on the Olympic commentators since the thing started.
"Medalled" is a valid verb to decribe one who has just won medal. Just
because you morons have never used it doesn't mean it's not valid.

Get a life you losers. The language evolves.

>Sentence fragment.

[John]

"Chris Cox" <cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote in message
news:2oio9sFb34asU1@uni-berlin.de...
> "Running Through The Forest" <MuggyBuggy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41242A92.B45B6420@hotmail.com...
> > Her single debuts at number one on the ARIA chart?
> >
> > How is that possible do the record companies buy up all the singles?
>
> Yes, although in this case, Cosima bought them all herself as she is the
> record company.
>
> She also bought all of Millsy's, but it wasn't enough to stop it crapping
> out.
>


It's not that impressive to get to the top of the charts these days, sales
of over a few thousand will do it.

[Craig Welch]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:39:09 +1000, "Chris Cox"
<cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote:

>> Get a life you losers. The language evolves.
>
>I was merely giving Welch a taste of his own medicine.

And *that* was certainly effective, wasn't it?

--
Craig

[Craig Welch]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 06:27:54 GMT, red ted <redted@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>What is it with you language nazis? "Debuts" is in both the Oxford and
>Webster's dictionaries. I've used it in scrabble on a few occasions
>and it has never been challenged. What sort of halfwit would think
>"debuts" is not a word?

I was thinking through a considered response, and of course a
question as to the relevance of a Websters dictionary reference
here. But I realise that the only proper course of action, as you've
called me and others 'nazis' is to invoke Godwin's law, declare you
the loser, and have done with you.

--
Craig

[Chris Cox]

"red ted" <redted@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:g5i8i0h6hrur9cc457n2qok1a289esj1e1@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:56:06 +1000, "Chris Cox"
> <cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> Get a life you losers. The language evolves.

I was merely giving Welch a taste of his own medicine.

Your apology goes here:

[red ted]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:44:26 +1000, Craig Welch <craig@pacific.net.sg>
wrote:

>On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 06:27:54 GMT, red ted <redted@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>What is it with you language nazis? "Debuts" is in both the Oxford and
>>Webster's dictionaries. I've used it in scrabble on a few occasions
>>and it has never been challenged. What sort of halfwit would think
>>"debuts" is not a word?
>
>I was thinking through a considered response, and of course a
>question as to the relevance of a Websters dictionary reference
>here. But I realise that the only proper course of action, as you've
>called me and others 'nazis' is to invoke Godwin's law, declare you
>the loser, and have done with you.

Language nazis, Godwin's law is not invoked. The word "debuts" quite
clearly exists in both the Oxford and Websters dictionairies. They are
the two dictionairies I use because they are the legal scrabble
dictionaries. I quoted both merely to underline that debuts is a valid
word not only in the Oxford but also in an American English
dictionary.

Considered response my arse. Not only do pedantic fuckwits like you
shit me up the wall, I take great pleasure in pointing out when you
morons are wrong.

The language is constantly evolving.
The word is in both an English dictionary and an American English
dictionary.
You're a pedantic fucking tosser.

Godwin's law. rofl. Loser.

[red ted]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:39:09 +1000, "Chris Cox"
<cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote:

>"red ted" <redted@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:g5i8i0h6hrur9cc457n2qok1a289esj1e1@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:56:06 +1000, "Chris Cox"
>> <cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> Get a life you losers. The language evolves.
>
>I was merely giving Welch a taste of his own medicine.
>
>Your apology goes here:

I've been using Telstra's server, it's been playing up for days, I
didn't get the original, only your follow up, so you'll excuse me for
responding to your message when I meant to respond to his. Sorry.

[Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour]

Chris Cox wrote:
>
> "red ted" <redted@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:g5i8i0h6hrur9cc457n2qok1a289esj1e1@4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:56:06 +1000, "Chris Cox"
> > <cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > Get a life you losers. The language evolves.
>
> I was merely giving Welch a taste of his own medicine.

Perhaps in future, when you are giving someone a 'taste of their own
medicine', you should tell us, because you certainly weren't clear, and
your intent was not obvious.

> Your apology goes here:

Don't hold your breath. Red Ted just likes to go around accusing people
of being Nazi's. That's how he gets his kicks, apparently. He doesn't
apologise to anyone.

[red ted]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:50:34 +1000, Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De
Jour <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote:

>Chris Cox wrote:
>>
>> Your apology goes here:
>
>Don't hold your breath. Red Ted just likes to go around accusing people
>of being Nazi's. That's how he gets his kicks, apparently. He doesn't
>apologise to anyone.

Your apoogy goes here:

[Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour]

red ted wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:39:09 +1000, "Chris Cox"
> <cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote:
>
> >"red ted" <redted@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:g5i8i0h6hrur9cc457n2qok1a289esj1e1@4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:56:06 +1000, "Chris Cox"
> >> <cjcox@bludgingatwork.optushome.com.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> Get a life you losers. The language evolves.
> >
> >I was merely giving Welch a taste of his own medicine.
> >
> >Your apology goes here:
>
> I've been using Telstra's server, it's been playing up for days, I
> didn't get the original, only your follow up, so you'll excuse me for
> responding to your message when I meant to respond to his. Sorry.

Nice back handed apology there RT. I didn't expect anything better from
the likes of you though.

[Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour]

red ted wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:50:34 +1000, Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De
> Jour <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> >Chris Cox wrote:
> >>
> >> Your apology goes here:
> >
> >Don't hold your breath. Red Ted just likes to go around accusing people
> >of being Nazi's. That's how he gets his kicks, apparently. He doesn't
> >apologise to anyone.
>
> Your apoogy goes here:

So you want me to 'apoogy' to you for you accusing me (and others) of
being Nazi's? Yeah, that makes sense, not.

[Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour]

red ted wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:44:26 +1000, Craig Welch <craig@pacific.net.sg>
> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 06:27:54 GMT, red ted <redted@hotmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>What is it with you language nazis? "Debuts" is in both the Oxford and
> >>Webster's dictionaries. I've used it in scrabble on a few occasions
> >>and it has never been challenged. What sort of halfwit would think
> >>"debuts" is not a word?
> >
> >I was thinking through a considered response, and of course a
> >question as to the relevance of a Websters dictionary reference
> >here. But I realise that the only proper course of action, as you've
> >called me and others 'nazis' is to invoke Godwin's law, declare you
> >the loser, and have done with you.
>
> Language nazis, Godwin's law is not invoked. The word "debuts" quite
> clearly exists in both the Oxford and Websters dictionairies. They are
> the two dictionairies I use because they are the legal scrabble
> dictionaries. I quoted both merely to underline that debuts is a valid
> word not only in the Oxford but also in an American English
> dictionary.
>
> Considered response my arse. Not only do pedantic fuckwits like you
> shit me up the wall, I take great pleasure in pointing out when you
> morons are wrong.
>
> The language is constantly evolving.
> The word is in both an English dictionary and an American English
> dictionary.
> You're a pedantic fucking tosser.
>
> Godwin's law. rofl. Loser.

You obviously don't know what a dictionary is. It is not a list of
words you moron.

[Craig Welch]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 07:03:06 GMT, red ted <redted@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>You're a pedantic fucking tosser.

I don't count your loss due to the invocation of Godwin's law to be
my win. However, your statement above certainly adds to my win
count.

--
Craig

[Inky Toonstein]

"Running Through The Forest" <MuggyBuggy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41242A92.B45B6420@hotmail.com...
> Her single debuts at number one on the ARIA chart?
>
> How is that possible do the record companies buy up all the singles?

The old goomba community probably helped out.

[Anthony Horan]

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:17:18 +1000, Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De Jour
wrote:

> red ted wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:50:34 +1000, Soixante Une Vieilles Viandes De
>> Jour <suvvdj@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>
>>>Chris Cox wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Your apology goes here:
>>>
>>>Don't hold your breath. Red Ted just likes to go around accusing people
>>>of being Nazi's. That's how he gets his kicks, apparently. He doesn't
>>>apologise to anyone.
>>
>> Your apoogy goes here:
>
> So you want me to 'apoogy' to you for you accusing me (and others) of
> being Nazi's? Yeah, that makes sense, not.

Maybe the fact that you've been suggesting we BELONG to the Nazis (as
opposed to suggesting a GROUP of Nazis) has something to do with it.

Come on kids. Nobody gives a flying fuck about grammar any more. SMS has
put the final nail in that particular coffin. As long as everyone
understands what's being said, it's fine. And after that, we get to make
our own judgements on someone's level of intelligence by their very public
displays of extremely bad grammar and punctuation.

[Running Through The Forest]

Running Through The Forest wrote:

> Her single debuts at number one on the ARIA chart?
>
> How is that possible do the record companies buy up all the singles?



And to mention that her song isn't exactly the most original one. It's yet
another version of "When The War Is Over"

How many people have done that song.

Even Delta Goodrem has that out as a single currently?