View Full Version : Nigel Howe - ISP deadbeat operator - Information Wanted
NIGEL HOWE OF HYPEROZ IS A PEDOFILEVŠ
02-11-2004, 06:23 PM
We seek more information on one Nigel Howe. This sleazebag has shafted
several good businesses by not paying his ongoing bills-often citing the
most ludicrous of reasons. he has a pattern of this behaviour. he moves from
the services of one company to another once they have had enough of him.
This is Howe he runs Hyperoz, a flaky ISP that caters to the more
questionable elements of society.
All information greatfully appreciated-thank you!
another waste of bandwidth to add to my killfile
I propose a separate DataStream for immature people,
call it LEARNnet, say IQ of 70 or under must do 2 years before they
can use the mainstream internet
kind of like a learners permit for drivers
back to reality....
one day AI will be advanced enough to detect these posters
here's hoping...
"NIGEL HOWE OF HYPEROZ IS A PEDOFILEVŠ" <support@hyperoz.com.au> wrote in
message news:2uoqg1F2c2edbU1@uni-berlin.de...
> We seek more information on one Nigel Howe. This sleazebag has shafted
> several good businesses by not paying his ongoing bills-often citing the
> most ludicrous of reasons. he has a pattern of this behaviour. he moves
> from
> the services of one company to another once they have had enough of him.
> This is Howe he runs Hyperoz, a flaky ISP that caters to the more
> questionable elements of society.
> All information greatfully appreciated-thank you!
>
>
Colonel_Flagg
02-11-2004, 07:43 PM
In article <iiHhd.7506$K7.5414@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
pbsoft_labs@yahoo.com says...
> call it LEARNnet, say IQ of 70 or under must do 2 years before they
> can use the mainstream internet
> kind of like a learners permit for drivers
>
isn't that AOL?
--
Colonel Flagg
http://www.internetwarzone.org/
Privacy at a click:
http://www.cotse.net
Q: How many Bill Gates does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: None, he just defines Darkness? as the new industry standard..."
"...I see stupid people."
Andrew Staker
02-11-2004, 09:43 PM
Yes, I believe it is!
>
>
> isn't that AOL?
>
>
>
>
William J. Wolfe
03-11-2004, 05:43 PM
"PBSL" <pbsoft_labs@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<iiHhd.7506$K7.5414@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> another waste of bandwidth to add to my killfile
>
> I propose a separate DataStream for immature people,
>
> call it LEARNnet, say IQ of 70 or under must do 2 years before they
> can use the mainstream internet
> kind of like a learners permit for drivers
>
> back to reality....
>
> one day AI will be advanced enough to detect these posters
> here's hoping...
Yeah, top idea!
It would also be a great place to put the nutless wankers who are
unable to punctuate.
"William J. Wolfe" <w_j_wolfe20o3@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5f846e6b.0411022237.43a43a09@posting.google.c om...
> "PBSL" <pbsoft_labs@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:<iiHhd.7506$K7.5414@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
>> another waste of bandwidth to add to my killfile
>>
>> I propose a separate DataStream for immature people,
>>
>> call it LEARNnet, say IQ of 70 or under must do 2 years before they
>> can use the mainstream internet
>> kind of like a learners permit for drivers
>>
>> back to reality....
>>
>> one day AI will be advanced enough to detect these posters
>> here's hoping...
>
> Yeah, top idea!
>
> It would also be a great place to put the nutless wankers who are
> unable to punctuate.
1)a nutless wanker is a contradiction in terms
2)when did you have your hands down in my pvt parts to know this?
or are you in the habit of making blind assumptions?
If I'm correct that would be closer to the meaning of the term Wanker
here's some free advice-
when attempting to put someone down in order to
feel good about ones-self , the least you could do is to NOT contradict
oneself.
Also from my many years of participating in email based discussion venues ,
I have found that usually the
most insecure people are the ones who make fun of people for their spelling
and/or punctuation mistakes
esp. persons who's primary language is not English
rather than contribute intelligent rebuttal about the content of the post
I believe that is called ad-hominem
good day to you, Sir
Kwyjibo.
03-11-2004, 08:53 PM
"PBSL" <pbsoft_labs@yahoo.com> said
>> It would also be a great place to put the nutless wankers who are
>> unable to punctuate.
>
> 1)a nutless wanker is a contradiction in terms
>
Since when do people pull their balls, stupid?
No wonder you can't get a root. You can't even wank properly, so how
shithouse would you be at fucking?
--
Kwyj.
(Remove your panties to reply by email)
"Kwyjibo." <KwyjiboYourPanties@ozdebate.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9596D3822CACAssss@130.133.1.4...
> "PBSL" <pbsoft_labs@yahoo.com> said
>
>
>>> It would also be a great place to put the nutless wankers who are
>>> unable to punctuate.
>>
>> 1)a nutless wanker is a contradiction in terms
>>
>
> Since when do people pull their balls, stupid?
if I have to explain why there is no point in "wanking" if one has no "nuts"
, then you
really do fit the bill
> No wonder you can't get a root.
more blind assumptions
>You can't even wank properly, so how
ditto
> shithouse would you be at fucking?
>
> --
>
> Kwyj
plonk
..
>
> (Remove your panties to reply by email)
Kwyjibo.
04-11-2004, 07:43 PM
"PBSL" <pbsoft_labs@yahoo.com> said
>
> "Kwyjibo." <KwyjiboYourPanties@ozdebate.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9596D3822CACAssss@130.133.1.4...
>> "PBSL" <pbsoft_labs@yahoo.com> said
>>
>>
>>>> It would also be a great place to put the nutless wankers who are
>>>> unable to punctuate.
>>>
>>> 1)a nutless wanker is a contradiction in terms
>>>
>>
>> Since when do people pull their balls, stupid?
>
> if I have to explain why there is no point in "wanking" if one has no
> "nuts" , then you
> really do fit the bill
You didn't say 'no point', fuckwit. What you said was 'contradiction in
terms' which is utter bullshit.
Try posting what you mean next time.
>
>> No wonder you can't get a root.
>
> more blind assumptions
>
You're the one fixated on wanking, so I'd say it's you that's going blind.
> >You can't even wank properly, so how
>
> ditto
>
>> shithouse would you be at fucking?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kwyj
>
> plonk
Is that the noise it makes as it dribbles down your knob and hits the
floor?
--
Kwyj.
(Remove your panties to reply by email)
Yes and the wankers who have a limited vocabulooooory
"William J. Wolfe" <w_j_wolfe20o3@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5f846e6b.0411022237.43a43a09@posting.google.c om...
> "PBSL" <pbsoft_labs@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<iiHhd.7506$K7.5414@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> > another waste of bandwidth to add to my killfile
> >
> > I propose a separate DataStream for immature people,
> >
> > call it LEARNnet, say IQ of 70 or under must do 2 years before they
> > can use the mainstream internet
> > kind of like a learners permit for drivers
> >
> > back to reality....
> >
> > one day AI will be advanced enough to detect these posters
> > here's hoping...
>
> Yeah, top idea!
>
> It would also be a great place to put the nutless wankers who are
> unable to punctuate.
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd