Sylvia Else
11-11-2004, 09:17 AM
AbsolutelyCertain wrote:
> "Bertie the Bunyip" <XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX> wrote in message
> news:Xns9599A75FB9727ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ@216.128. 74.13...
>
>>"AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in
>>news:cmikv6$9r6$0@pita.alt.net:
>>
>>
>>>"Bertie the Bunyip" <XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX> wrote in message
>>>news:Xns95997C4ACF17DZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ@216.128. 74.13...
>>>
>>>>Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in
>>>>news:418ca8f2$0$32541$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Galimatias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>The standard of proof required does not have to be absolutely
>>>>>>certain. There may be doubts, and there usually are, even in direct
>>>>>>eye-witness situations. The question is whether those doubts are
>>>>>>reasonable.
>>>>>
>>>>>I have taken the expression "beyond reasonable doubt" to indeed
>>>>>indicate
>>>>> an approximation to certainty. The use of the word "reasonable" in
>>>>> my
>>>>>view is to avoid the situation where people might hold doubt even
>>>>>though that doubt is not rationally based.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Bwahwahwhahwhahhwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhhahwhahwhhahwha hwhhahwhahwhahhw!
>>>>
>>>>How can you reasonably get tough grass stains out?
>>>
>>>By using an all-purpose bleach? I knew this would come full-circle
>>>..........
>>>
>>
>>OK, you've lost me, unless you're talking about the role of Clorox in the
>>australian legal system.
>
>
> I've been asking her about using all-purpose bleach all week.
Slow learner, huh?
>The grass
> stain thing was a straight line ......
>
>
> "Bertie the Bunyip" <XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX> wrote in message
> news:Xns9599A75FB9727ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ@216.128. 74.13...
>
>>"AbsolutelyCertain" <easily@entertained.net> wrote in
>>news:cmikv6$9r6$0@pita.alt.net:
>>
>>
>>>"Bertie the Bunyip" <XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX> wrote in message
>>>news:Xns95997C4ACF17DZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ@216.128. 74.13...
>>>
>>>>Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in
>>>>news:418ca8f2$0$32541$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.a u:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Galimatias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>The standard of proof required does not have to be absolutely
>>>>>>certain. There may be doubts, and there usually are, even in direct
>>>>>>eye-witness situations. The question is whether those doubts are
>>>>>>reasonable.
>>>>>
>>>>>I have taken the expression "beyond reasonable doubt" to indeed
>>>>>indicate
>>>>> an approximation to certainty. The use of the word "reasonable" in
>>>>> my
>>>>>view is to avoid the situation where people might hold doubt even
>>>>>though that doubt is not rationally based.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Bwahwahwhahwhahhwhahwhahwhhahwhahwhhahwhahwhhahwha hwhhahwhahwhahhw!
>>>>
>>>>How can you reasonably get tough grass stains out?
>>>
>>>By using an all-purpose bleach? I knew this would come full-circle
>>>..........
>>>
>>
>>OK, you've lost me, unless you're talking about the role of Clorox in the
>>australian legal system.
>
>
> I've been asking her about using all-purpose bleach all week.
Slow learner, huh?
>The grass
> stain thing was a straight line ......
>
>