Re: What Direct Democracy Might Look Like

[Ned Latham]

"DRS" wrote in <cmntv1$20d$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>:
> "Ned Latham" wrote:
> > "DRS" wrote:
> > > Ned Latham wrote:

----snip----

> * > > First, your statement in <ck0igf$gip$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>:
> * > >
> * > > > * Um, if you want Noddy to see your message you need to put
> * > > > * aus.culture.true-blue back in the headers
> * > >
> * > > That is an implicit statement that you know I don't read any of the
> * > > groups into which I'd posted the message "Jackeroo" followed up.
> * > >
> * > > Second, your statement in <ckedka$5ov$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>:
> * > >
> * > > > * I have no idea which particular groups you're currently reading
> * > > > * in apart from act-b.
> * > >
> * > > That contradicts your first statement.
> * > >
> * > > And since both are statements about your own knowledge, one of them
> * > > therefore has to be a lie.
> * >
> * > There is contradiction
> *
> * Yes. Which means that at least one of those two statements is false.
> * And since both are statements about your own personal knowledge, you
> * have knowingly uttered them.
> *
> * A knowingly uttered falsehood is a lie.
> *
> > You are a liar.
>
> Nope.

Wrong again, liar.

> You're so easy to beat

ROTFL! In your dreams, moron.

> I don't need to.

If you had what it takes to face reality, you wouldn't need to.

----snip----

Ned
--
True Blue FAQ: <slrncp5852.l7.ned@arthur.valhalla.oz>
Public key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://www.keyserver.net/en/
Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7