Re: In all seriousness about the abortion "debate"

[EnjoyDialup]

"Sleepy" <sleepy_mcgovern@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cmmbin$qp0$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au...
> Have people even recognise the need for adoption in this country? It seems
> that the alternative of adopting out children has been forgotten. I know
a
> few couples who can't have children who are looking at paying exhorbedent
> amounts to adopt overseas children.
>
> Why cant this money be used to support a pregnancy to term with the view
> that the child be adopted at the end? Or even some of Howards baby bonus
> money if Abbott is so serious about it!
>
> While I admit i am an anti-abortionist, it just pisses me off to hear
people
> say "im not ready to have a child" as a justification for abortion without
> even cnsidering adopting the child when there are many australians who
would
> be delighted to have them.



Selling babys is wrong. It is not in the best interest of the baby as
people with money do not nessisarily make the best parents. The current
system of interviewing the people with no fees paid to the mother is far
better than a baby auction.

As for forcing women to have babys so they can be adopted. I say no! Only
the woman can choose the path for her own body. if having a baby is not her
path then dont make her go through it just because your not confetable with
the idea. perhaps one day they will be able to transplant a fetus, and
everyone will be happy. Until then we have to work with an inperfect system.
(and i am uniquely quolifyed to make that statment)


--
EnjoyDialup - You know you want to...
mail=valid required when replying
http://www.EnjoyDialup.info
http://www.NigelHowe.info truth about Nigel Howe
http://www.HyperOz.com all about HyperOz

[Sleepy]

"EnjoyDialup" <EnjoyDialup_spam@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:41938b96@news.ausics.net...
> "Sleepy" <sleepy_mcgovern@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cmmbin$qp0$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au...
> > Have people even recognise the need for adoption in this country? It
seems
> > that the alternative of adopting out children has been forgotten. I
know
> a
> > few couples who can't have children who are looking at paying
exhorbedent
> > amounts to adopt overseas children.
> >
> > Why cant this money be used to support a pregnancy to term with the view
> > that the child be adopted at the end? Or even some of Howards baby
bonus
> > money if Abbott is so serious about it!
> >
> > While I admit i am an anti-abortionist, it just pisses me off to hear
> people
> > say "im not ready to have a child" as a justification for abortion
without
> > even cnsidering adopting the child when there are many australians who
> would
> > be delighted to have them.
>
>
>
> Selling babys is wrong. It is not in the best interest of the baby as
> people with money do not nessisarily make the best parents. The current
> system of interviewing the people with no fees paid to the mother is far
> better than a baby auction.
>
> As for forcing women to have babys so they can be adopted. I say no!
Only
> the woman can choose the path for her own body. if having a baby is not
her
> path then dont make her go through it just because your not confetable
with
> the idea. perhaps one day they will be able to transplant a fetus, and
> everyone will be happy. Until then we have to work with an inperfect
system.
> (and i am uniquely quolifyed to make that statment)

Who said anything about forcing women to have babys for adoption. Everyone
seems to be missing the point. We are not arguing against abortion. We are
aguing for adoption. It is still the womens choice afterall, but there is
no reason why we can't offer more support to a young prospective mother
willing to adopt a child in the event of an unwanted pregnancy.