For your PC needsnoon
18-11-2004, 01:23 PM
"noon" <nobody@nowhere.org> wrote in message news:...
>
> "noon" <nobody@nowhere.org> wrote in message news:...
>>
>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
>> news:419BD850.7030703@not.at.this.address...
>>>
>>>
>>> Galimatias wrote:
>>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Seppo Renfors wrote:
>>>>>
>>
>>> Going back the Child Support Assement Act for a moment, it seemed to me
>>> that there were places where the complexity, or straight forward
>>> incomprehensibility, arose at times because an attempt was made to
>>> express in words something that in fact should properly have been
>>> expressed in algebra!
>>>
>>
>> Algebra? YES - half each minus all they had before marriage and stay with
>> the owner. Just my dream...
> I.E. assets & children divided by two AFTER subtracting what was brought
> to marriage.
>
> It is too fair and too simple for lawyers.
Especially women.
>
> "noon" <nobody@nowhere.org> wrote in message news:...
>>
>> "Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
>> news:419BD850.7030703@not.at.this.address...
>>>
>>>
>>> Galimatias wrote:
>>>> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Seppo Renfors wrote:
>>>>>
>>
>>> Going back the Child Support Assement Act for a moment, it seemed to me
>>> that there were places where the complexity, or straight forward
>>> incomprehensibility, arose at times because an attempt was made to
>>> express in words something that in fact should properly have been
>>> expressed in algebra!
>>>
>>
>> Algebra? YES - half each minus all they had before marriage and stay with
>> the owner. Just my dream...
> I.E. assets & children divided by two AFTER subtracting what was brought
> to marriage.
>
> It is too fair and too simple for lawyers.
Especially women.