Hosted by: Eyo Technologies Pty Ltd. Sponsored by: Actiontec Pty Ltd
Insurance fraud [Archive] - Aussie Phorums

PDA

View Full Version : Insurance fraud


Kerrimy Joots
21-11-2004, 02:33 AM
I think this is a victimless crime and a good way to make money.
I've done it many times and I'm not even Lebanese!

Sylvia Else
21-11-2004, 09:53 AM
Kerrimy Joots wrote:
> I think this is a victimless crime and a good way to make money.
> I've done it many times and I'm not even Lebanese!
>
>

If you're going to troll, you'll have to do better than that.

What a pathetic effort!

Sylvia.

Peter
21-11-2004, 10:13 AM
In article <419FC8D0.8070107@not.at.this.address>, Sylvia Else
<sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote:


>
> If you're going to troll, you'll have to do better than that.
>
> What a pathetic effort!

Agreed. Where is the artform in trolling these days. I remember 10
years ago in rec.arts.comics.marvel.universe with the likes of
Christian Viola. Ahhh those were the days.

Even Rod's losing his touch.

Vaughan Williams
21-11-2004, 10:23 AM
Sylvia. Stop feeding the trolls.

Bertie and Seppo and Rod are all in my kill file. So I only get to see you
and Tony feeding them. If you stopped, I'd miss their drivel entirely.

"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote in message
news:419FC8D0.8070107@not.at.this.address...
>
>
> Kerrimy Joots wrote:
> > I think this is a victimless crime and a good way to make money.
> > I've done it many times and I'm not even Lebanese!
> >
> >
>
> If you're going to troll, you'll have to do better than that.
>
> What a pathetic effort!
>
> Sylvia.
>

Sylvia Else
21-11-2004, 11:33 AM
Vaughan Williams wrote:
> Sylvia. Stop feeding the trolls.

Not sure that that counted as feeding. Still, the truth is that I failed
to recognise that this was a Rod Speed troll. It really looked like a
beginner. So do I give Rod 10/10 for double bluff subtlety, or 0/10 for
being a pratt?

Sylvia.

Sylvia Else
21-11-2004, 07:13 PM
Martin Taylor wrote:
> Sylvia said....
>
>
>>beginner. So do I give Rod 10/10 for double bluff subtlety, or 0/10 for
>>being a pratt?
>
>
> If you gave him 0/10 for being a pratt, wouldn't that mean that he's
> failed at being a pratt?
>

You're right - my point allocation scheme is fundamentally flawed,
because the criteria for success are based on a scale that is falsely
dichotomous.

Sounds like the social security and taxation system actually.

Sylvia.