Re: ABC pro terrorist??

[Warren_w@hotmail.com]

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:06:37 +1000, Persifor wrote:

> Stephen Oakes <soakes1@XXXbigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>> "Persifor" <persifor@pyramid.com> wrote...
>> >> >> Now do you have ANY information that he actually is a terrorist?
>> >>
>> >> >If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and hangs out with
>> >> >ducks ....
>> >>
>> >> Then it's a duck! My God! How was I so blind!
>> > Not blind. Just very poorly educated.
>>
>> ha ha.
>>
>> Now. What evidence do you have that he walked and talked like a duck?
>> (Apart from politicians crapping on and our ever-vigilant media lapping
>> it all up.)
>>
>> --
>> Stephen Oakes
>
> Oh dear!
> Another one.

Another one what?

You can't keep calling people names every time they call you on how
wrong you are.

It's like this. You are protected by the rule of law. The rule of law
and its attendant lack of arbitrariness make it possible for you to
live under the relative freedom to make the kind of glib, ignorant
statements that you do. Clearly it was bequeathed to you by people
with greater vision and a better understanding of what's important
than you posess. The rule of law applies to everyone, not just people
you approve of. If that were not the case, it would not be the rule of
law, it would just be the abtitrariness of those in power helping
their friends and punishing their enemies like they've been doing for
thousands of years. You want to go back to that? (Rhetorical
question.)

[Persifor]

<Warren_w@hotmail.com> wrote:


> It's like this. You are protected by the rule of law. The rule of law
> and its attendant lack of arbitrariness make it possible for you to
> live under the relative freedom to make the kind of glib, ignorant
> statements that you do. Clearly it was bequeathed to you by people
> with greater vision and a better understanding of what's important
> than you posess. The rule of law applies to everyone, not just people
> you approve of. If that were not the case, it would not be the rule of
> law, it would just be the abtitrariness of those in power helping
> their friends and punishing their enemies like they've been doing for
> thousands of years. You want to go back to that? (Rhetorical
> question.)

My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact that he
was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.

[Warren]

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:35:07 +1000, persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
wrote:

><Warren_w@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> It's like this. You are protected by the rule of law. The rule of law
>> and its attendant lack of arbitrariness make it possible for you to
>> live under the relative freedom to make the kind of glib, ignorant
>> statements that you do. Clearly it was bequeathed to you by people
>> with greater vision and a better understanding of what's important
>> than you posess. The rule of law applies to everyone, not just people
>> you approve of. If that were not the case, it would not be the rule of
>> law, it would just be the abtitrariness of those in power helping
>> their friends and punishing their enemies like they've been doing for
>> thousands of years. You want to go back to that? (Rhetorical
>> question.)
>
>My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact that he
>was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.

I thought he was serving with the Taliban.

[Persifor]

Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:


> >
> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact that he
> >was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
>
> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.

[Bertie the Bunyip]

persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
sednews:1go6jmt.3zfo4zduhpliN%persifor@pyramid.com :

> Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> >
>> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact
>> >that he was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
>>
>> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
> Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
> If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.

Do you know what the word means, fjukwit?


Bertie

[Warren_w@hotmail.com]

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 18:59:42 +1000, persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
wrote:

>Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> >
>> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact that he
>> >was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
>>
>> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
>Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
>If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.

They weren't nice guys but I don't believe they themselves were
terrorists. As I understand it, he was attending a madrasa in Lahore
in Pakistan and as part of his course he went on some patrols with
Taliban militia. That's when he was picked up.

[Persifor]

Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:

> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
> sednews:1go6jmt.3zfo4zduhpliN%persifor@pyramid.com :
>
> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact
> >> >that he was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
> >>
> >> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
>
> Do you know what the word means, fjukwit?
>
>
> Bertie
yes, it is an alternate name for Bertie.

[Bertie the Bunyip]

persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
sednews:1go6xty.1688kbw5d134cN%persifor@pyramid.co m:

> Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:
>
>> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
>> sednews:1go6jmt.3zfo4zduhpliN%persifor@pyramid.com :
>>
>> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact
>> >> >that he was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
>> >>
>> >> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
>> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
>> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
>>
>> Do you know what the word means, fjukwit?
>>
>>
>> Bertie
> yes, it is an alternate name for Bertie.
>

Well, I have been called that. The word Taliban means scholar..

Do you know what fjukwit means?


Bertie

[theguyonthebike]

Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX> wrote in message news:<conajk$6ma$11@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>...
> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
> sednews:1go6xty.1688kbw5d134cN%persifor@pyramid.co m:
>
> > Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:
> >
> >> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
> >> sednews:1go6jmt.3zfo4zduhpliN%persifor@pyramid.com :
> >>
> >> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact
> >> >> >that he was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
> >> >>
> >> >> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
> >> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
> >> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
> >>
> >> Do you know what the word means, fjukwit?
> >>
> >>
> >> Bertie
> > yes, it is an alternate name for Bertie.
> >
>
> Well, I have been called that. The word Taliban means scholar..
>
> Do you know what fjukwit means?

You're an asshole, Bertie. Do you know what that means?
>
>
> Bertie

[Bertie the Bunyip]

theguyonthebike@veryfast.biz (theguyonthebike)
sednews:7071f97e.0412021648.59aaf6a6@posting.googl e.com:

> Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX> wrote in message
> news:<conajk$6ma$11@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>...
>> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
>> sednews:1go6xty.1688kbw5d134cN%persifor@pyramid.co m:
>>
>> > Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:
>> >
>> >> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
>> >> sednews:1go6jmt.3zfo4zduhpliN%persifor@pyramid.com :
>> >>
>> >> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the
>> >> >> >fact that he was serving with, and taken in the company of,
>> >> >> >terrorists.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
>> >> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
>> >> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
>> >>
>> >> Do you know what the word means, fjukwit?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bertie
>> > yes, it is an alternate name for Bertie.
>> >
>>
>> Well, I have been called that. The word Taliban means scholar..
>>
>> Do you know what fjukwit means?
>
> You're an asshole, Bertie. Do you know what that means?

Yes, it means i produce shit like you

Kay?

Bertie

[Lady Chatterly]

In article <7071f97e.0412021648.59aaf6a6@posting.google.com> chucklyshat <theguyonthebike@veryfast.biz> wrote:
>
>Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.,XZXZX> wrote in message news:<conajk$6ma$11@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>...
>> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
>> sednews:1go6xty.1688kbw5d134cN%persifor@pyramid.co m:
>>
>> > Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:
>> >
>> >> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
>> >> sednews:1go6jmt.3zfo4zduhpliN%persifor@pyramid.com :
>> >>
>> >> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact
>> >> >> >that he was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
>> >> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
>> >> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
>> >>
>> >> Do you know what the word means, fjukwit?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bertie
>> > yes, it is an alternate name for Bertie.
>> >
>>
>> Well, I have been called that. The word Taliban means scholar..
>>
>> Do you know what fjukwit means?
>
>You're an asshole, Bertie. Do you know what that means?
>>
>>
>> Bertie

Does it look to you like they do know what that means?

--
Lady Chatterly

"Getting your ass kicked again I see. Lady C is quickly becomeing my
hero." -- Yomamma bin Crawdaddin

[Barbara's Cat]

In article <7071f97e.0412021648.59aaf6a6@posting.google.com>,
theguyonthebike <theguyonthebike@veryfast.biz> said:

> asshole

--
Cm~

[Persifor]

Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:

> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
> sednews:1go6xty.1688kbw5d134cN%persifor@pyramid.co m:
>
> > Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:
> >
> >> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
> >> sednews:1go6jmt.3zfo4zduhpliN%persifor@pyramid.com :
> >>
> >> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact
> >> >> >that he was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
> >> >>
> >> >> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
> >> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
> >> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
> >>
> >> Do you know what the word means, fjukwit?
> >>
> >>
> >> Bertie
> > yes, it is an alternate name for Bertie.
> >
>
> Well, I have been called that. The word Taliban means scholar..
>
> Do you know what fjukwit means?
>
>
> Bertie
Sorry, i was reading it phonetically. thought it was ****wit, your
middle name.

[Bertie the Bunyip]

persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
sednews:1go7uyo.1b0499ynzetqgN%persifor@pyramid.co m:

> Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:
>
>> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
>> sednews:1go6xty.1688kbw5d134cN%persifor@pyramid.co m:
>>
>> > Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:
>> >
>> >> persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
>> >> sednews:1go6jmt.3zfo4zduhpliN%persifor@pyramid.com :
>> >>
>> >> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the
>> >> >> >fact that he was serving with, and taken in the company of,
>> >> >> >terrorists.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
>> >> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
>> >> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
>> >>
>> >> Do you know what the word means, fjukwit?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Bertie
>> > yes, it is an alternate name for Bertie.
>> >
>>
>> Well, I have been called that. The word Taliban means scholar..
>>
>> Do you know what fjukwit means?
>>
>>
>> Bertie
> Sorry, i was reading it phonetically. thought it was ****wit, your
> middle name.
>

No, it's fjukwit. If you need a guide as to it's meaning, reply.



Bertie

[Benny Cemoli]

Persifor wrote:
> Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact that he
>>>was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
>>
>>I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
>
> Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
> If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.

What has the UN ever said about the Taliban and terrorism, Percy? Can
you give us some links to statements?

....and which MSF are you talking about here Percy? The Motorcycle Safety
Foundation? Medecins Sans Frontieres? What _did_ they say about the
Talibs and terrorism? Please explain.

What about the USA? you don't mention them, but they _are_ the ones
actually holding Australian citizens without trial, and they _are_ the
same country which gave $43 million to the Taliban in November 2000.

Shouldn't we be condemning them for doing that? How about a bit more
info Percy.

You're making a fair few accusations here, but I'm not seeing a lot of
evidence backing it up...

[Persifor]

Benny Cemoli <citizen@world.orb> wrote:

> Persifor wrote:
> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact that he
> >>>was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
> >>
> >>I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
> >
> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
>
> What has the UN ever said about the Taliban and terrorism, Percy? Can
> you give us some links to statements?
>
> ...and which MSF are you talking about here Percy? The Motorcycle Safety
> Foundation? Medecins Sans Frontieres? What _did_ they say about the
> Talibs and terrorism? Please explain.
>
> What about the USA? you don't mention them, but they _are_ the ones
> actually holding Australian citizens without trial, and they _are_ the
> same country which gave $43 million to the Taliban in November 2000.
>
> Shouldn't we be condemning them for doing that? How about a bit more
> info Percy.
>
> You're making a fair few accusations here, but I'm not seeing a lot of
> evidence backing it up...
hey, It's not Bertie, it's you who are the fujkwit. Plonk, Plonk.

[Bertie the Bunyip]

persifor@pyramid.com (Persifor)
sednews:1godheq.3p1p701ujj0wcN%persifor@pyramid.co m:

> Benny Cemoli <citizen@world.orb> wrote:
>
>> Persifor wrote:
>> > Warren <warren_s@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>>My oh my - such eloquence. But it stll does not gainsay the fact
>> >>>that he was serving with, and taken in the company of, terrorists.
>> >>
>> >>I thought he was serving with the Taliban.
>> >
>> > Are you saying that the Taliban are not terrorists???
>> > If uncertain, ask the UN or MSF.
>>
>> What has the UN ever said about the Taliban and terrorism, Percy? Can
>> you give us some links to statements?
>>
>> ...and which MSF are you talking about here Percy? The Motorcycle
>> Safety Foundation? Medecins Sans Frontieres? What _did_ they say
>> about the Talibs and terrorism? Please explain.
>>
>> What about the USA? you don't mention them, but they _are_ the ones
>> actually holding Australian citizens without trial, and they _are_
>> the same country which gave $43 million to the Taliban in November
>> 2000.
>>
>> Shouldn't we be condemning them for doing that? How about a bit more
>> info Percy.
>>
>> You're making a fair few accusations here, but I'm not seeing a lot
>> of evidence backing it up...
> hey, It's not Bertie, it's you who are the fujkwit. Plonk, Plonk.

I am not now nor have I ever been a fjukwit...



Bertie

[Benny Cemoli]

Persifor wrote:
> Benny Cemoli <citizen@world.orb> wrote:
Snipped...
>>You're making a fair few accusations here, but I'm not seeing a lot of
>>evidence backing it up...
>
> hey, It's not Bertie, it's you who are the fujkwit. Plonk, Plonk.

Actually, I'm glad Percy's killfiled both us both. That means we can
discuss him here without hurting his feelings. After all, it'd take a
real scummy hypocrite to actually read postings you've claimed to have
plonked.

So what do you reckon Percy's really doing here? Frankly, I've been a
bit hesitant to contradict him, you know the Dilbert thing "Never argue
with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with
experience."

He posts stuff which is just so dumb, he's got to know he's going to be
slapped down, then waits a week or two and does it all again. I can
understand why a conservative'd be happy about being spanked for free,
but you'd reckon he'd get sick of it eventually.

I'd thought that maybe he was astroturfing, a paid shill fot the Libs,
given that most of his accusations are right out of the Alston/Williams
paranoia mill.
His technique's right out of their book too - make a bunch of
unsubstantiated accusations about people who aren't there to defend
themselves and hope some mud sticks, but you'd reckon even Howard's mob
could afford better than this...

Anyway, what do you reckon? Shill? Idiot? Masochist? All of the above?

[Persifor]

Bertie the Bunyip <XZXZ@XZXZ.> wrote:

> > hey, It's not Bertie, it's you who are the fujkwit. Plonk, Plonk.
>
> I am not now nor have I ever been a fjukwit...
>
>
>
> Bertie
Sorry, I meant ****wit.

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Benny Cemoli <citizen@world.orb> sednews:41b4414b$0$25769$5a62ac22@per-qv1-
newsreader-01.iinet.net.au:

> Persifor wrote:
>> Benny Cemoli <citizen@world.orb> wrote:
> Snipped...
>>>You're making a fair few accusations here, but I'm not seeing a lot of
>>>evidence backing it up...
>>
>> hey, It's not Bertie, it's you who are the fujkwit. Plonk, Plonk.
>
> Actually, I'm glad Percy's killfiled both us both. That means we can
> discuss him here without hurting his feelings. After all, it'd take a
> real scummy hypocrite to actually read postings you've claimed to have
> plonked.

Like Sylvia does?


bertie