aria chart

[see you later]

ARIA says:

"After bursting onto the music scene with their track Going Under (#14 Aug.
'03), Evanescence has gone from strength to strength."

Don't know about bursting onto the scene with Going Under. Perhaps the
2xPlatinum #1 single Bring Me to Life released a few months earlier may be more
like what they used to burst onto the scene.

ARIA also says:

"How To Dismantle… is U2's 8th consecutive #1 album debut, following Best Of
1990-2000 (Nov. '99), All That You Can't Leave Behind (Nov. '00), Best Of
1980-1990 (Nov. '98), Pop (Mar. '97)"...

Did Best of 1990-2000 spend three years near the bottom of the charts? Maybe I'm
mistaken, but I thought it was released in 2002.

[Shadowking]

"see you later" <s4054444@student.uq.edu.au> wrote in
news:coh7cs$oru$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au:

> ARIA says:
>
> "After bursting onto the music scene with their track Going Under (#14
> Aug. '03), Evanescence has gone from strength to strength."
>
> Don't know about bursting onto the scene with Going Under. Perhaps the
> 2xPlatinum #1 single Bring Me to Life released a few months earlier
> may be more like what they used to burst onto the scene.
>
>

Shadowking says:

"After their 2000 debut 'origin'
, Evanescence has gone from strength to less strength.

[Sarch]

On 30 Nov 2004 07:27:24 GMT, see you later wrote:

> ARIA says:

[snip]

Surely by now you would've worked out that the ARIA chart commentary is a
crock of shit?

Sarch
--
Spamblock in action: Remove NOTREAL from email address to reply via email.

"Look, if that's where those poor children are, of course I'll go
to Somalia." - Amanda Keller, "The Hub"

[Greg Martin]

"Sarch" <aa@zip.notreal.com.au> wrote in message
news:10qomi1f8u3n9b0@news20.forteinc.com...
> On 30 Nov 2004 07:27:24 GMT, see you later wrote:
>
>> ARIA says:
>
> [snip]
>
> Surely by now you would've worked out that the ARIA chart commentary is a
> crock of shit?
>
> Sarch
> --


Surely, you would also have worked out by now that the ARIA chart is a crock
of shit.

Greg.

[goodbye]

>
>"Sarch" <aa@zip.notreal.com.au> wrote in message
>news:10qomi1f8u3n9b0@news20.forteinc.com...
>> On 30 Nov 2004 07:27:24 GMT, see you later wrote:
>>
>>> ARIA says:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Surely by now you would've worked out that the ARIA chart commentary is a
>> crock of shit?
>>
>> Sarch
>> --
>
>
>Surely, you would also have worked out by now that the ARIA chart is a crock
>of shit.
>
>Greg.
>
>
>
>

True.

[Sarch]

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:58:50 +1100, Greg Martin wrote:

> Surely, you would also have worked out by now that the ARIA chart is a crock
> of shit.

It a crock of shit: yes and no.

Sarch

[Greg Martin]

"Sarch" <sarch_usenet@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3148jeF359ltpU1@individual.net...
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:58:50 +1100, Greg Martin wrote:
>
>> Surely, you would also have worked out by now that the ARIA chart is a
>> crock
>> of shit.
>
> It a crock of shit: yes and no.
>
> Sarch

Some nice fence-sitting, Sarch.

[Sarch]

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 00:30:47 +1100, Greg Martin wrote:

> "Sarch" <sarch_usenet@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3148jeF359ltpU1@individual.net...
>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:58:50 +1100, Greg Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Surely, you would also have worked out by now that the ARIA chart is a
>>> crock
>>> of shit.
>>
>> It a crock of shit: yes and no.
>>
>> Sarch
>
> Some nice fence-sitting, Sarch.

You're welcome.

Sarch