Re: Senior HWP cop loses licence for speeding in Police car?

[Mot Adv-NSW]

"Mad-Biker" <madbiker666@Geemail.com> wrote in message
news:3afj6sF69j0krU1@individual.net...
> If your going to try and stir the shit pot atleast get it right
>
> Highway Seargent from Wagga Wagga, off duty in hsi own private SS
> commodore got pinged for 160 in a 110 zone.
>
> The ticket was 45kph over which carries a 6 month suspention
>
> yes 50kph over the limit
>
> its a standard ticket, however he appealed it at court and LOST..
>
> He is now suspended.

> His job was to monitor and manage teh Highway patrol, the ones that caught
> him.
>
> They caught their boss..

Not the first.

Was he at a dangerous speed 'at POINT of operation' on that 110km/h
designated road?

I'll say 'no'.

JP

[feral]

Mot Adv-NSW wrote:

> Not the first.
>
> Was he at a dangerous speed 'at POINT of operation' on that 110km/h
> designated road?
>
> I'll say 'no'.

My opinion (if wanted), is that if he was a "safety"
hypocrit and considered himself to be that "good" that
he did not pose a threat to other road users by driving
at such a speed in traffic (like some aus.car posters
also profess); he got what he deserved.


--

Take care,
Feral

[Mot Adv-NSW]

"feral" <plonked@home.ru> wrote in message
news:42434cf1$0$27867$61c65585@un-2park-reader-01.sydney.pipenetworks.com.au...
> Mot Adv-NSW wrote:
>
>> Not the first.
>>
>> Was he at a dangerous speed 'at POINT of operation' on that 110km/h
>> designated road?
>>
>> I'll say 'no'.
>
> My opinion (if wanted), is that if he was a "safety" hypocrit and
> considered himself to be that "good" that he did not pose a threat to
> other road users by driving at such a speed in traffic

In traffic?? This is Wagga Wagga rural zone. The road he was on use to be
derestricted and in poorer physical shape 28 years ago! Hell, he was legal
back then and likely in a shittier car.

A better length of the overall run (and his colleague knows it) so is higher
in speed for the length.

(like some aus.car posters
> also profess); he got what he deserved.

No argument, he broke the rules and is appropriately actioned.

Never monkey with another monkey's monkey.

J.

> --
>
> Take care,
> Feral

[D Walford]

feral wrote:
>
> Mot Adv-NSW wrote:
>
> > Not the first.
> >
> > Was he at a dangerous speed 'at POINT of operation' on that 110km/h
> > designated road?
> >
> > I'll say 'no'.
>
> My opinion (if wanted), is that if he was a "safety"
> hypocrit and considered himself to be that "good" that
> he did not pose a threat to other road users by driving
> at such a speed in traffic (like some aus.car posters
> also profess); he got what he deserved.
>

Just as well he wasn't driving all that fast, you would be asking for
the death penalty if he had got out of second gear:-)




Daryl

[athol]

feral <plonked@home.ru> wrote:

> You're joshing me. He was doing the "ton" in
> "second"????? Shoot him. ;-)

I managed about 160MPH in 2nd. What's the problem? :-)

--
Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000
The state of Australia's infrastructure is a national disgrace.
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.

[feral]

athol wrote:
> feral <plonked@home.ru> wrote:
>
>
>>You're joshing me. He was doing the "ton" in
>>"second"????? Shoot him. ;-)
>
>
> I managed about 160MPH in 2nd. What's the problem? :-)
>
You're still here. :-P

--

Take care,
Feral

[athol]

atec <"atec77(atec)"@hotmail.com> wrote:

> but the glide may be tuff but torque spread suffers..

Err... I changed to a T350 with stock convertor after blowing up
a tricked up glide with dominator 2200 highstall about 4 or 5
times. I really don't think that it liked the 2.47 diff - the
gearset died twice.

If or when the T350 dies, the T700 that's now in the back of the
garage will get rebuilt and go in instead.

--
Athol
<http://cust.idl.com.au/athol> Linux Registered User # 254000
The state of Australia's infrastructure is a national disgrace.
I'm a Libran Engineer. I don't argue, I discuss.