eyo technlogies For your PC needs
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: DNA clues kept in shipping container

  1. #1
    Ext User(Paul Nutteing) Guest

    DNA clues kept in shipping container

    "Temperature variation does not affect the integrity of the samples for DNA
    testing."

    so why otherwise keep it frozen then ?

    http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.a...,16398134%255E
    3102,00.html
    DNA clues kept in shipping container
    Tuck Thompson and Hedley Thomas
    27aug05
    SENSITIVE DNA evidence is being stored in a shipping container and a shed in
    a Queensland Health parking lot.
    The property is generally monitored for security but there is no fence
    protecting the temporary refrigerated storage facilities at the John Tonge
    forensic centre at Coopers Plains, a southern suburb of Brisbane.
    DNA evidence is vital to hundreds of criminal court cases across the state.
    Sources last night said the samples had been in the car park for between six
    and 10 weeks. Queensland Health last night admitted the evidence had been
    shifted after a refrigeration storage unit failed and said it was
    considering increasing security.
    The centre's freezer would cost $200,000 to replace, it said in a statement
    but did not provide any information about when that might happen.
    "No damage or loss occurred during the transfer. Temperatures are constantly
    monitored with data loggers and physically checked daily," the statement
    said.
    "Security measures are currently being examined with a view to strengthening
    all physical access points to the campus.
    "Due to the climate in Queensland, Queensland Health Scientific Services has
    instituted an additional but non-essential protocol that involves freezing
    exhibits to prevent the growth of mould.
    "Temperature variation does not affect the integrity of the samples for DNA
    testing."
    Moving the samples to shipping containers was part of the QHSS disaster
    management plan, the statement said.
    Magistrates and solicitors have criticised the John Tonge centre over long
    delays in testing DNA and drug samples.
    Earlier this year, a Southport magistrate angrily dismissed charges against
    three accused drug offenders because of delays of more than 12 months in
    processing drug samples.
    The State Government later announced plans to outsource up to 10,000
    scientific tests in a bid to clear the backlog at John Tonge.
    However in June, former health minister Gordon Nuttall admitted he had
    failed to meet his promise of outsourcing the DNA testing.
    He also had not started to hire international scientists for the
    overburdened centre.
    The state has opened a forensic laboratory on the Gold Coast to ease the
    workload, but scientific police say it could place more of a burden on them.
    Yesterday, there were no security guards seen patrolling the John Tonge
    parking area and the shed and shipping container remained unprotected by
    barriers.
    Forensic scientists at the centre have been threatened not to speak about
    testing problems.
    It is understood the centre's management has warned scientists who leak
    information about problems could be jailed.
    Opposition health spokesman Stuart Copeland said the situation was typical
    of Queensland Health.
    "It shows a complete lack of appreciation for the necessity of maintaining
    evidence once gathered in a safe location and places at risk potential
    prosecutions so it could allow criminals to walk free," Mr Copeland said.
    The lab's shortcomings have caused major problems for the court system.
    In one case, a Brisbane magistrate was told a scientist could not be
    assigned to a drug case until 2007. Queensland Health blamed the delay on a
    worldwide shortage of scientists with the appropriate experience.

    What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
    and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
    http://www.nutteing2.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
    or nutteingd in a search engine

    Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
    Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
    it is defunct due to spam.






  2. #2
    Ext User(Strabo) Guest

    Re: DNA clues kept in shipping container

    In DNA clues kept in shipping container on Sat, 27 Aug 2005
    08:54:59 +0100, by Paul Nutteing, we read:

    >"Temperature variation does not affect the integrity of the samples for DNA
    >testing."
    >
    >so why otherwise keep it frozen then ?
    >
    >http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.a...,16398134%255E
    >3102,00.html
    >DNA clues kept in shipping container
    >Tuck Thompson and Hedley Thomas
    >27aug05
    >SENSITIVE DNA evidence is being stored in a shipping container and a shed in
    >a Queensland Health parking lot.
    >The property is generally monitored for security but there is no fence
    >protecting the temporary refrigerated storage facilities at the John Tonge
    >forensic centre at Coopers Plains, a southern suburb of Brisbane.
    >DNA evidence is vital to hundreds of criminal court cases across the state.
    >Sources last night said the samples had been in the car park for between six
    >and 10 weeks. Queensland Health last night admitted the evidence had been
    >shifted after a refrigeration storage unit failed and said it was
    >considering increasing security.
    >The centre's freezer would cost $200,000 to replace, it said in a statement
    >but did not provide any information about when that might happen.
    >"No damage or loss occurred during the transfer. Temperatures are constantly
    >monitored with data loggers and physically checked daily," the statement
    >said.
    >"Security measures are currently being examined with a view to strengthening
    >all physical access points to the campus.
    >"Due to the climate in Queensland, Queensland Health Scientific Services has
    >instituted an additional but non-essential protocol that involves freezing
    >exhibits to prevent the growth of mould.
    >"Temperature variation does not affect the integrity of the samples for DNA
    >testing."
    >Moving the samples to shipping containers was part of the QHSS disaster
    >management plan, the statement said.
    >Magistrates and solicitors have criticised the John Tonge centre over long
    >delays in testing DNA and drug samples.
    >Earlier this year, a Southport magistrate angrily dismissed charges against
    >three accused drug offenders because of delays of more than 12 months in
    >processing drug samples.
    >The State Government later announced plans to outsource up to 10,000
    >scientific tests in a bid to clear the backlog at John Tonge.
    >However in June, former health minister Gordon Nuttall admitted he had
    >failed to meet his promise of outsourcing the DNA testing.
    >He also had not started to hire international scientists for the
    >overburdened centre.
    >The state has opened a forensic laboratory on the Gold Coast to ease the
    >workload, but scientific police say it could place more of a burden on them.
    >Yesterday, there were no security guards seen patrolling the John Tonge
    >parking area and the shed and shipping container remained unprotected by
    >barriers.
    >Forensic scientists at the centre have been threatened not to speak about
    >testing problems.
    >It is understood the centre's management has warned scientists who leak
    >information about problems could be jailed.
    >Opposition health spokesman Stuart Copeland said the situation was typical
    >of Queensland Health.
    >"It shows a complete lack of appreciation for the necessity of maintaining
    >evidence once gathered in a safe location and places at risk potential
    >prosecutions so it could allow criminals to walk free," Mr Copeland said.
    >The lab's shortcomings have caused major problems for the court system.
    >In one case, a Brisbane magistrate was told a scientist could not be
    >assigned to a drug case until 2007. Queensland Health blamed the delay on a
    >worldwide shortage of scientists with the appropriate experience.


    I suspect this issue has international considerations.

    The integrity of legal evidence must be certifiably maintained
    from collection to trial. One form of integrity is access. If
    access is possible by anyone who is not certified by law, then it
    becomes dubious.

    Another form of integrity is damage or alteration. DNA can be
    damaged or altered by heat and other types of exposure. Unless
    DNA evidence is maintained in a certified manner then it too is
    questionable.

    In the US, the use of DNA as a prosecution tool has a checkered
    history. Erroneous readings or interpretations as well as
    fraudulent testimony by laboratory technicians is not uncommon.

    Another problem is contamination of DNA material. Also,
    DNA may be easily introduced to a crime scene, either
    deliberately or incidentally.

    Caveat emptor.


    > What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
    >and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
    >http://www.nutteing2.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
    >or nutteingd in a search engine
    >
    >Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
    >Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
    >it is defunct due to spam.
    >
    >
    >
    >



    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
    ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

  3. #3
    Ext User(Paul Nutteing) Guest

    Re: DNA clues kept in shipping container

    "Strabo" <strabo@flashlight.net> wrote in message
    news:bhd1h1pgqfp8qvk0kqhnthj0p591k9nmdm@4ax.com...
    > In DNA clues kept in shipping container on Sat, 27 Aug 2005
    > 08:54:59 +0100, by Paul Nutteing, we read:
    >
    > >"Temperature variation does not affect the integrity of the samples for

    DNA
    > >testing."
    > >
    > >so why otherwise keep it frozen then ?
    > >

    >
    >http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.a...6,16398134%255

    E
    > >3102,00.html
    > >DNA clues kept in shipping container
    > >Tuck Thompson and Hedley Thomas
    > >27aug05
    > >SENSITIVE DNA evidence is being stored in a shipping container and a shed

    in
    > >a Queensland Health parking lot.
    > >The property is generally monitored for security but there is no fence
    > >protecting the temporary refrigerated storage facilities at the John

    Tonge
    > >forensic centre at Coopers Plains, a southern suburb of Brisbane.
    > >DNA evidence is vital to hundreds of criminal court cases across the

    state.
    > >Sources last night said the samples had been in the car park for between

    six
    > >and 10 weeks. Queensland Health last night admitted the evidence had been
    > >shifted after a refrigeration storage unit failed and said it was
    > >considering increasing security.
    > >The centre's freezer would cost $200,000 to replace, it said in a

    statement
    > >but did not provide any information about when that might happen.
    > >"No damage or loss occurred during the transfer. Temperatures are

    constantly
    > >monitored with data loggers and physically checked daily," the statement
    > >said.
    > >"Security measures are currently being examined with a view to

    strengthening
    > >all physical access points to the campus.
    > >"Due to the climate in Queensland, Queensland Health Scientific Services

    has
    > >instituted an additional but non-essential protocol that involves

    freezing
    > >exhibits to prevent the growth of mould.
    > >"Temperature variation does not affect the integrity of the samples for

    DNA
    > >testing."
    > >Moving the samples to shipping containers was part of the QHSS disaster
    > >management plan, the statement said.
    > >Magistrates and solicitors have criticised the John Tonge centre over

    long
    > >delays in testing DNA and drug samples.
    > >Earlier this year, a Southport magistrate angrily dismissed charges

    against
    > >three accused drug offenders because of delays of more than 12 months in
    > >processing drug samples.
    > >The State Government later announced plans to outsource up to 10,000
    > >scientific tests in a bid to clear the backlog at John Tonge.
    > >However in June, former health minister Gordon Nuttall admitted he had
    > >failed to meet his promise of outsourcing the DNA testing.
    > >He also had not started to hire international scientists for the
    > >overburdened centre.
    > >The state has opened a forensic laboratory on the Gold Coast to ease the
    > >workload, but scientific police say it could place more of a burden on

    them.
    > >Yesterday, there were no security guards seen patrolling the John Tonge
    > >parking area and the shed and shipping container remained unprotected by
    > >barriers.
    > >Forensic scientists at the centre have been threatened not to speak about
    > >testing problems.
    > >It is understood the centre's management has warned scientists who leak
    > >information about problems could be jailed.
    > >Opposition health spokesman Stuart Copeland said the situation was

    typical
    > >of Queensland Health.
    > >"It shows a complete lack of appreciation for the necessity of

    maintaining
    > >evidence once gathered in a safe location and places at risk potential
    > >prosecutions so it could allow criminals to walk free," Mr Copeland said.
    > >The lab's shortcomings have caused major problems for the court system.
    > >In one case, a Brisbane magistrate was told a scientist could not be
    > >assigned to a drug case until 2007. Queensland Health blamed the delay on

    a
    > >worldwide shortage of scientists with the appropriate experience.

    >
    > I suspect this issue has international considerations.
    >
    > The integrity of legal evidence must be certifiably maintained
    > from collection to trial. One form of integrity is access. If
    > access is possible by anyone who is not certified by law, then it
    > becomes dubious.
    >
    > Another form of integrity is damage or alteration. DNA can be
    > damaged or altered by heat and other types of exposure. Unless
    > DNA evidence is maintained in a certified manner then it too is
    > questionable.
    >
    > In the US, the use of DNA as a prosecution tool has a checkered
    > history. Erroneous readings or interpretations as well as
    > fraudulent testimony by laboratory technicians is not uncommon.
    >
    > Another problem is contamination of DNA material. Also,
    > DNA may be easily introduced to a crime scene, either
    > deliberately or incidentally.
    >
    > Caveat emptor.
    >
    >
    > > What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
    > >and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
    > >http://www.nutteing2.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
    > >or nutteingd in a search engine
    > >
    > >Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
    > >Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
    > >it is defunct due to spam.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >

    >
    >
    > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

    News==----
    > http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+

    Newsgroups
    > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption

    =----

    It is well known that the high molecular weight DNA
    fractions like FGA, D18S51 and D2S1338 fail to
    amplify after a few years stored at ambient room
    humidity and temperature. After about 15 years
    they can become forensically useless.

    There has been studies concerning DNA frozen and
    retested and comparing results but amazingly there
    has been no (published anyway) research into ambient
    stored historic DNA. Until there is, then nowhere in
    the world should historic priofiled DNA be admissible in court.
    Eg 20 or 30 yearold Guthrie cards ( blood spotted onto
    card at birth and stored un-frozen ). More easily from
    male babies so that they can be more easily traced as adults and
    blood DNA tested in adulthood and compared to
    the Guthrie card blood tested and the two results compared.

    What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
    and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
    http://www.nutteing2.50megs.com/dnapr.htm
    or nutteingd in a search engine

    Valid email nutteing@fastmail.....fm (remove 4 of the 5 dots)
    Ignore any other apparent em address used to post this message -
    it is defunct due to spam.




+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Your DNA
    By dvder in forum General Chat
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-02-2005, 04:18 PM
  2. DNA in the Dock
    By Paul Nutteing in forum aus.legal
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-01-2005, 10:23 PM
  3. DNA
    By sting in forum aus.tv
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-10-2004, 10:25 AM
  4. Staff Review - BLUES CLUES: Get To Know Joe.
    By Watcher in forum DVD News and Reviews
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 24-09-2003, 05:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts