eyo technlogies For your PC needs
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Prehistoric Park

  1. #1
    Ext User(cosmichobo) Guest

    Prehistoric Park

    Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...

  2. #2
    Ext User(Pox Doctor) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    "cosmichobo" <not.worth@the.spam> wrote in message
    news:not.worth-628378.19400420082006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
    > Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...


    You're better off watching Peggy Bunter on all star BBQ showdown on digital
    channel 116



  3. #3
    Ext User(Martin Dunne) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    cosmichobo wrote:
    > Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...


    I'd say so.
    Remember Negus' emotive VO replacing Robert Powell's straight reading on
    Great Crimes and Trials of the Twentieth Century?
    Hmmm.

    --
    http://sfsa.org.au/, the South Australian Doctor Who Fan Club, Inc.

  4. #4
    Ext User(Deltic) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    In article <not.worth-628378.19400420082006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
    cosmichobo <not.worth@the.spam> wrote:

    > Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...


    I found Charles Wooley's narration strange and very annoying as well.
    The original is narrated by David Jason from Frost.

    The meteorite striking earth was very cool, but the show is so dumbed
    down I won't be continuing. It was a perfect lead-in to 42 Minutes.

  5. #5
    Ext User(David Springthorpe) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:37:24 +1000, Deltic <nospam@nospam.com.au>
    wrote:
    Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...
    >
    >I found Charles Wooley's narration strange and very annoying as well.
    >The original is narrated by David Jason from Frost.
    >
    >The meteorite striking earth was very cool, but the show is so dumbed
    >down I won't be continuing. It was a perfect lead-in to 42 Minutes.


    What, you didn't believe the "time-portal" ? The SMH TV guide mentions
    the David Jason version. The following T-Rex show on SBS (part of a
    series) was better.....

  6. #6
    Ext User(Ian Galbraith) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:37:24 +1000, Deltic wrote:

    > In article <not.worth-628378.19400420082006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
    > cosmichobo <not.worth@the.spam> wrote:
    >
    >> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    >> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    >> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    >> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...

    >
    > I found Charles Wooley's narration strange and very annoying as well.
    > The original is narrated by David Jason from Frost.
    >
    > The meteorite striking earth was very cool, but the show is so dumbed
    > down I won't be continuing. It was a perfect lead-in to 42 Minutes.


    It was far too cute. I'd rather a straight documentary than this too cute
    faux documentary style.

    --
    "Read less, more TV" - House

  7. #7
    Ext User(snot) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    cosmichobo wrote:
    > Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...


    I enjoyed the other one much better on the other channel (what ever it was called).
    They actually showed how they come to those conclusions rather than
    just saying, well there is is and that's how it lived.


  8. #8
    Ext User(TG'sFM) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park


    snot wrote:
    > cosmichobo wrote:
    > > Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > > have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > > Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > > screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...

    >
    > I enjoyed the other one much better on the other channel (what ever it was called).
    > They actually showed how they come to those conclusions rather than
    > just saying, well there is is and that's how it lived.


    The channel 9 version assumed that the viewers possess a basic
    education level of a five year of age or higher, so they didn't feel
    the need to spell out the basics. Obviously they didn't take YOU into
    account. Sad really.


  9. #9
    Ext User(snot) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    TG'sFM wrote:
    > snot wrote:
    >> cosmichobo wrote:
    >>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    >>> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    >>> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    >>> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...

    >> I enjoyed the other one much better on the other channel (what ever it was called).
    >> They actually showed how they come to those conclusions rather than
    >> just saying, well there is is and that's how it lived.

    >
    > The channel 9 version assumed that the viewers possess a basic
    > education level of a five year of age or higher, so they didn't feel
    > the need to spell out the basics. Obviously they didn't take YOU into
    > account. Sad really.
    >


    unlike you and just accepts everything put in front of you, now that sad.

  10. #10
    Ext User(TG'sFM) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park


    snot wrote:
    > TG'sFM wrote:
    > > snot wrote:
    > >> cosmichobo wrote:
    > >>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > >>> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > >>> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > >>> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...
    > >> I enjoyed the other one much better on the other channel (what ever it was called).
    > >> They actually showed how they come to those conclusions rather than
    > >> just saying, well there is is and that's how it lived.

    > >
    > > The channel 9 version assumed that the viewers possess a basic
    > > education level of a five year of age or higher, so they didn't feel
    > > the need to spell out the basics. Obviously they didn't take YOU into
    > > account. Sad really.
    > >

    >
    > unlike you and just accepts everything put in front of you, now that sad.


    Like most people, I have a high level of understanding of these
    animals, and so I don't have to accept what is put in front of me.
    That's the advantage of having an education. You should try it
    sometime.


  11. #11
    Ext User(snot) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    TG'sFM wrote:
    > snot wrote:
    >> TG'sFM wrote:
    >>> snot wrote:
    >>>> cosmichobo wrote:
    >>>>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    >>>>> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    >>>>> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    >>>>> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...
    >>>> I enjoyed the other one much better on the other channel (what ever it was called).
    >>>> They actually showed how they come to those conclusions rather than
    >>>> just saying, well there is is and that's how it lived.
    >>> The channel 9 version assumed that the viewers possess a basic
    >>> education level of a five year of age or higher, so they didn't feel
    >>> the need to spell out the basics. Obviously they didn't take YOU into
    >>> account. Sad really.
    >>>

    >> unlike you and just accepts everything put in front of you, now that sad.

    >
    > Like most people, I have a high level of understanding of these
    > animals, and so I don't have to accept what is put in front of me.
    > That's the advantage of having an education. You should try it
    > sometime.
    >


    So your beliefs are based on old information and theories, therefore
    are not willing to accept any new findings. You should try opening
    up your mind sometime.

    That is all.


  12. #12
    Ext User(The Meerkat) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    cosmichobo wrote:
    > Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...


    The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    *alone* - sheesh.

  13. #13
    Ext User(snot) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    The Meerkat wrote:
    > cosmichobo wrote:
    >> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    >> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    >> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    >> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...

    >
    > The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    > *alone* - sheesh.


    It would have been funnier with Steve Irwin...

  14. #14
    Ext User(TG'sFM) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park


    snot wrote:
    > The Meerkat wrote:
    > > cosmichobo wrote:
    > >> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > >> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > >> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > >> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...

    > >
    > > The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    > > *alone* - sheesh.

    >
    > It would have been funnier with Steve Irwin...


    Er, Steve is contracted to the Canberra Raiders for the next two years.


  15. #15
    Ext User(snot) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    TG'sFM wrote:
    > snot wrote:
    >> The Meerkat wrote:
    >>> cosmichobo wrote:
    >>>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    >>>> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    >>>> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    >>>> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...
    >>> The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    >>> *alone* - sheesh.

    >> It would have been funnier with Steve Irwin...

    >
    > Er, Steve is contracted to the Canberra Raiders for the next two years.
    >


    Did somebody rattle your cage again

  16. #16
    Ext User(TG'sFM) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park


    snot wrote:
    > TG'sFM wrote:
    > > snot wrote:
    > >> The Meerkat wrote:
    > >>> cosmichobo wrote:
    > >>>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > >>>> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > >>>> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > >>>> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...
    > >>> The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    > >>> *alone* - sheesh.
    > >> It would have been funnier with Steve Irwin...

    > >
    > > Er, Steve is contracted to the Canberra Raiders for the next two years.
    > >

    >
    > Did somebody rattle your cage again


    Oh the ironing. The expression is "rattle your chain", not "rattle
    your cage". It's not much fun when the shoes on the other finger is it?


  17. #17
    Ext User(Ian Galbraith) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:44:34 +1000, snot wrote:

    > The Meerkat wrote:
    >> cosmichobo wrote:
    >>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    >>> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    >>> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    >>> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...


    >> The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    >> *alone* - sheesh.


    > It would have been funnier with Steve Irwin...


    The guy is a sort of Steve Irwin, he's been in dangerous animal docos
    before.


    --
    "Read less, more TV" - House

  18. #18
    Ext User(Highlandish) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    Quoth The Raven; snot <snot.me@gmail.com> in
    <4kt334Fd9pf4U2@individual.net>
    > The Meerkat wrote:
    >> cosmichobo wrote:
    >>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY
    >>> do we have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is
    >>> this an Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the
    >>> Aussie screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...

    >>
    >> The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    >> *alone* - sheesh.

    >
    > It would have been funnier with Steve Irwin...


    wuch me stick me thum up this raptors bum and reely piss im orf! cricky!

    --
    Remove the _CURSING to reply to me

    If I save time, when do I get it back ?



  19. #19
    Ext User(snot) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park

    TG'sFM wrote:
    > snot wrote:
    >> TG'sFM wrote:
    >>> snot wrote:
    >>>> The Meerkat wrote:
    >>>>> cosmichobo wrote:
    >>>>>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    >>>>>> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    >>>>>> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    >>>>>> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...
    >>>>> The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    >>>>> *alone* - sheesh.
    >>>> It would have been funnier with Steve Irwin...
    >>> Er, Steve is contracted to the Canberra Raiders for the next two years.
    >>>

    >> Did somebody rattle your cage again

    >
    > Oh the ironing. The expression is "rattle your chain", not "rattle
    > your cage". It's not much fun when the shoes on the other finger is it?
    >


    No, I meant cage

  20. #20
    Ext User(TG'sFM) Guest

    Re: Prehistoric Park


    snot wrote:
    > TG'sFM wrote:
    > > snot wrote:
    > >> TG'sFM wrote:
    > >>> snot wrote:
    > >>>> The Meerkat wrote:
    > >>>>> cosmichobo wrote:
    > >>>>>> Ok, so its the natural progression from "Walking with...", but WHY do we
    > >>>>>> have to have Charles fn Wooley doing a voice over??? And is this an
    > >>>>>> Aussie production? Or was Wooley's voice added for the Aussie
    > >>>>>> screening? Or... what?! I found it incredibly annoying...
    > >>>>> The dino chaser is a total tosser. He goes after dangerous animals
    > >>>>> *alone* - sheesh.
    > >>>> It would have been funnier with Steve Irwin...
    > >>> Er, Steve is contracted to the Canberra Raiders for the next two years.
    > >>>
    > >> Did somebody rattle your cage again

    > >
    > > Oh the ironing. The expression is "rattle your chain", not "rattle
    > > your cage". It's not much fun when the shoes on the other finger is it?
    > >

    >
    > No, I meant cage


    Yes, I know you meant cage. I was merely pointing out your error. If
    you even had a BASIC education, you'd know that "rattle your cage" is
    wrong, and "rattle your chain" is write. Hope that helps.


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Heads up Prehistoric Park & Natures Vampires
    By Ext User(universal_striker) in forum aus.tv
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 20-08-2006, 03:13 PM
  2. South Park 28-03-06
    By Ext User(Zappy) in forum aus.tv
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-04-2006, 02:13 PM
  3. Jurassic Park
    By Ext User(cosmichobo) in forum aus.tv
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 18-12-2005, 12:33 PM
  4. South Park
    By Iggy in forum aus.tv
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-12-2003, 06:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts