eyo technlogies For your PC needs
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: CD RW

  1. #1
    Ext User(HMSDOC) Guest

    CD RW

    Could someone make a suggestion regarding a specific model/brand of CD RW that
    they have been happy with.

    Howard

  2. #2
    Ext User(Shep©) Guest

    Re: CD RW

    On 30 Sep 2003 19:04:24 GMT, In this world we created hmsdoc@aol.com
    (HMSDOC) wrote :

    >Could someone make a suggestion regarding a specific model/brand of CD RW that
    >they have been happy with.
    >
    >Howard


    Lite-on.Any model.I have the 24X10X40.Tried Ricoh and TEAC.Both died
    very quickly and can't copy what the Lite-on can.
    HTH :)



    --
    Free Windows/PC help,
    It's a G not a J in jmx to reply :)
    http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html
    Free songs download,
    http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/17/sheppard.html

  3. #3
    Ext User(ToolPackinMama) Guest

    Re: CD RW

    "Shep©" wrote:
    >
    > On 30 Sep 2003 19:04:24 GMT, In this world we created hmsdoc@aol.com
    > (HMSDOC) wrote :
    >
    > >Could someone make a suggestion regarding a specific model/brand of CD RW that
    > >they have been happy with.
    > >
    > >Howard

    >
    > Lite-on.Any model.


    I agree.

  4. #4
    Ext User(Larc) Guest

    Re: CD RW

    On 30 Sep 2003 19:04:24 GMT, HMSDOC pondered exceedingly, then took quill in
    hand and carefully composed...

    | Could someone make a suggestion regarding a specific model/brand of CD RW that
    | they have been happy with.

    I agree with Lite-On. I replaced a 16/10/32 Plextor with a 52/24/52 Lite-On
    and have yet to have the first problem with it. Even better, it was less than
    $45 shipped from Newegg! :-)

    Larc



    §§§ - Please raise temperature of mail to reply by e-mail - §§§

  5. #5
    Ext User(user@domain.invalid) Guest

    Re: CD RW



    HMSDOC wrote:
    > Could someone make a suggestion regarding a specific model/brand of CD RW that
    > they have been happy with.
    >
    > Howard


    LG (Lucky Goldstar I believe) is another brand that I have had excellent
    luck with. I have two different models and both have never made a coaster.

    Ken


  6. #6
    Ext User(Shep©) Guest

    Re: CD RW

    On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:08:25 GMT, In this world we created
    user@domain.invalid wrote :

    >
    >
    >HMSDOC wrote:
    >> Could someone make a suggestion regarding a specific model/brand of CD RW that
    >> they have been happy with.
    >>
    >> Howard

    >
    >LG (Lucky Goldstar I believe) is another brand that I have had excellent
    >luck with. I have two different models and both have never made a coaster.
    >
    >Ken


    I agree insomuch as my old standard CD drive is an LG and near 4 years
    old and still going strong.If that's anything to go by then their
    CDR/W drives should be good :)



    --
    Free Windows/PC help,
    It's a G not a J in jmx to reply :)
    http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html
    Free songs download,
    http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/nomessiahsmusic.htm

  7. #7
    Ext User(JOE) Guest

    Re: CD RW

    Lite-On. My 52x24x52x came with Nero.
    It features Nero Express which makes burning CDs a snap.

    "Larc" <larc_rnc@warmmail.com> wrote in message
    news:hrtjnv42ot13l4dq701sa4fohr3alo5hi7@4ax.com...
    > On 30 Sep 2003 19:04:24 GMT, HMSDOC pondered exceedingly, then took quill

    in
    > hand and carefully composed...
    >
    > | Could someone make a suggestion regarding a specific model/brand of CD

    RW that
    > | they have been happy with.
    >
    > I agree with Lite-On. I replaced a 16/10/32 Plextor with a 52/24/52

    Lite-On
    > and have yet to have the first problem with it. Even better, it was less

    than
    > $45 shipped from Newegg! :-)
    >
    > Larc
    >
    >
    >
    > §§§ - Please raise temperature of mail to reply by e-mail - §§§




  8. #8
    Ext User(HMSDOC) Guest

    Re: CD RW

    I was planning on the Lite-On but the recent reviews on neoseeker.com of the
    latest Lite-On drive was less than stellar.

    Howard

  9. #9
    Ext User(Jim Strand) Guest

    Re: CD RW

    On 30 Sep 2003 23:49:48 GMT, hmsdoc@aol.com (HMSDOC) wrote:

    >I was planning on the Lite-On but the recent reviews on neoseeker.com of the
    >latest Lite-On drive was less than stellar.
    >
    >Howard


    I've used Lite-On drives ever since learning about them here several
    years ago. Seldom was a Lite-On the fastest nor the quietest in the
    reviews. But users found them to be rock solid and very well priced
    compared to their competition. Considering whatever unit you purchase
    will be obsolete before you install it that makes reliability and
    pricing more prominent than the other features. At least for me.



    ***************************************
    delete "nospam" for e-mail reply
    ***************************************

  10. #10
    Ext User(mcheu) Guest

    Re: CD RW

    On 30 Sep 2003 23:49:48 GMT, hmsdoc@aol.com (HMSDOC) wrote::

    >I was planning on the Lite-On but the recent reviews on neoseeker.com of the
    >latest Lite-On drive was less than stellar.
    >
    >Howard


    I'm not sure if the issue is the same one I'm thinking of, but the
    issue with media compatibility was basically fixed by updating to a
    newer or older firmware. It seems that there was one particular
    firmware version out there that had some compatibility problems with
    some brands of CDR media. I think this only involved 40x drives and
    up.

    Of course, my own recommendation would be an LG drive. Pricewise,
    they're on par with LiteON's drives, as well as performance. The
    thing I like best is that the LG drives do seem to have a better parts
    fit, and are much quieter.

    You can sometimes get a LiteOn at a signficant discount, as it seems
    to be the drive that's commonly rebadged and sold (+rebate) at
    electronics superstores.


    ----------------------------------------
    Thanks,

    MCheu

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts