Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

  1. #1
    Ext User(annily) Guest

    Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    Can Nine think up any more ways to put useless video over the top of the
    cricket coverage?

    First, we had the stupid translucent pattern at the bottom of the
    screen, underneath the scoreline, and the addition of "LIVE" underneath
    the watermark. Now that's changed to "CRICKET LIVE", just in case we
    didn't know what sport we were watching.

  2. #2
    Ext User(Graham Cooper) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    On Feb 19, 2:40*pm, annily <ann...@annily.invalid> wrote:
    > Can Nine think up any more ways to put useless video over the top of the
    > cricket coverage?
    >
    > First, we had the stupid translucent pattern at the bottom of the
    > screen, underneath the scoreline, and the addition of "LIVE" underneath
    > the watermark. Now that's changed to "CRICKET LIVE", just in case we
    > didn't know what sport we were watching.



    That's not what sport you're watching, that's a rating how interesting
    the show is!

    Herc


  3. #3
    Ext User(annily) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    On 20.02.12 19:46, Graham Cooper wrote:
    > On Feb 19, 2:40 pm, annily<ann...@annily.invalid> wrote:
    >> Can Nine think up any more ways to put useless video over the top of the
    >> cricket coverage?
    >>
    >> First, we had the stupid translucent pattern at the bottom of the
    >> screen, underneath the scoreline, and the addition of "LIVE" underneath
    >> the watermark. Now that's changed to "CRICKET LIVE", just in case we
    >> didn't know what sport we were watching.

    >
    >
    > That's not what sport you're watching, that's a rating how interesting
    > the show is!
    >


    I assume that's meant to be a joke, but it misses the mark with me,
    since I don't know how "CRICKET LIVE" can be interpreted as a rating of
    how interesting it is.

    Incidentally, later in the game they reverted to just "LIVE" under the
    Nine logo.

  4. #4
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    annily wrote:
    > On 20.02.12 19:46, Graham Cooper wrote:
    >> On Feb 19, 2:40 pm, annily<ann...@annily.invalid> wrote:
    >>> Can Nine think up any more ways to put useless video over the top
    >>> of the cricket coverage?
    >>>
    >>> First, we had the stupid translucent pattern at the bottom of the
    >>> screen, underneath the scoreline, and the addition of "LIVE"
    >>> underneath the watermark. Now that's changed to "CRICKET LIVE",
    >>> just in case we didn't know what sport we were watching.

    >>
    >>
    >> That's not what sport you're watching, that's a rating how
    >> interesting the show is!
    >>

    >
    > I assume that's meant to be a joke, but it misses the mark with me,
    > since I don't know how "CRICKET LIVE" can be interpreted as a rating
    > of how interesting it is.
    >
    > Incidentally, later in the game they reverted to just "LIVE" under the
    > Nine logo.


    You need to be a delusional schizophrenic to get that joke.

    I don't get it either.



  5. #5
    Ext User(annily) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    On 21.02.12 19:16, Clocky wrote:
    > annily wrote:
    >> On 20.02.12 19:46, Graham Cooper wrote:
    >>> On Feb 19, 2:40 pm, annily<ann...@annily.invalid> wrote:
    >>>> Can Nine think up any more ways to put useless video over the top
    >>>> of the cricket coverage?
    >>>>
    >>>> First, we had the stupid translucent pattern at the bottom of the
    >>>> screen, underneath the scoreline, and the addition of "LIVE"
    >>>> underneath the watermark. Now that's changed to "CRICKET LIVE",
    >>>> just in case we didn't know what sport we were watching.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> That's not what sport you're watching, that's a rating how
    >>> interesting the show is!
    >>>

    >>
    >> I assume that's meant to be a joke, but it misses the mark with me,
    >> since I don't know how "CRICKET LIVE" can be interpreted as a rating
    >> of how interesting it is.
    >>
    >> Incidentally, later in the game they reverted to just "LIVE" under the
    >> Nine logo.

    >
    > You need to be a delusional schizophrenic to get that joke.
    >
    > I don't get it either.
    >
    >

    Nice to know it's not just me :) And I just noticed who the poster was,
    otherwise I probably wouldn't have bothered.

  6. #6
    Ext User(Graham Cooper) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    On Feb 21, 8:06*pm, annily <ann...@annily.invalid> wrote:
    > On 21.02.12 19:16, Clocky wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > > annily wrote:
    > >> On 20.02.12 19:46, Graham Cooper wrote:
    > >>> On Feb 19, 2:40 pm, annily<ann...@annily.invalid> * wrote:
    > >>>> Can Nine think up any more ways to put useless video over the top
    > >>>> of the cricket coverage?

    >
    > >>>> First, we had the stupid translucent pattern at the bottom of the
    > >>>> screen, underneath the scoreline, and the addition of "LIVE"
    > >>>> underneath the watermark. Now that's changed to "CRICKET LIVE",
    > >>>> just in case we didn't know what sport we were watching.

    >
    > >>> That's not what sport you're watching, that's a rating how
    > >>> interesting the show is!

    >
    > >> I assume that's meant to be a joke, but it misses the mark with me,
    > >> since I don't know how "CRICKET LIVE" can be interpreted as a rating
    > >> of how interesting it is.

    >
    > >> Incidentally, later in the game they reverted to just "LIVE" under the
    > >> Nine logo.

    >
    > > You need to be a delusional schizophrenic to get that joke.

    >
    > > I don't get it either.

    >
    > Nice to know it's not just me :) And I just noticed who the poster was,
    > otherwise I probably wouldn't have bothered.



    Jeez! 20 newsgroups all over usenet treat me like a God.

    and every post in my old home group I get shat on!

    OK suit yourselves! No Truman Genesis Adam for you aussie shitholes

    Herc

  7. #7
    Ext User(Brad) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    You keep saying that, and yet, here you still are.

  8. #8
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    Brad wrote:
    > You keep saying that, and yet, here you still are.


    Ofcourse, because thinking that he is revered in other groups is just
    another one of his delusions.





  9. #9
    Ext User(Graham Cooper) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    On Feb 23, 1:42*am, "Clocky" <notg...@happen.com> wrote:
    > Brad wrote:
    > > You keep saying that, and yet, here you still are.

    >
    > Ofcourse, because thinking that he is revered in other groups is just
    > another one of his delusions.



    Nope! You lead the hunt of Genesis Adam from aussie newsgroups
    Clocky!

    You threw shit at me 500 posts running over a year long period.

    I can't believe everyone here sucks up to such a low life mechanic
    idiot.

    Anyway, I don't tolerate pathetic fools like the once funny aus.tv

  10. #10
    Ext User(Brad) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    You keep saying that too, and yet, here you still are.

  11. #11
    Ext User(Graham Cooper) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    On Feb 23, 6:09*am, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote:
    > You keep saying that too, and yet, here you still are.


    AFTER 6 MONTH TIME OUT

    and you ALL IMMEDIATELY SHIT ALL OVER GENESIS ADAM AGAIN!

    you're all ****ing assholes aus.tv

  12. #12
    Ext User(Government Shill #2) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:30:02 -0800 (PST), Graham Cooper
    <grahamcooper7@gmail.com> wrote:

    >On Feb 23, 6:09*am, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote:
    >> You keep saying that too, and yet, here you still are.

    >
    >AFTER 6 MONTH TIME OUT
    >
    >and you ALL IMMEDIATELY SHIT ALL OVER GENESIS ADAM AGAIN!



    You're not "GENESIS ADAM".

    You are a nut. Get help. See a mental health professional.



    >you're all ****ing assholes aus.tv



    Donkey holes? Or are you a yank?

    Shill #2
    --
    America: [312] million wankers living in a country with no word for wanker.
    Jeremy Clarkson

  13. #13
    Ext User(BruceS) Guest

    Re: Nine's visual pollution on cricket

    On Feb 22, 11:34*pm, Government Shill #2 <gov.sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:30:02 -0800 (PST), Graham Cooper
    >
    > <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > >On Feb 23, 6:09*am, Brad <goog...@vk2qq.com> wrote:
    > >> You keep saying that too, and yet, here you still are.


    He says a lot of things. I wouldn't get too hung up on correlation
    with actions in the known universe.

    > >AFTER 6 MONTH TIME OUT

    >
    > >and you ALL IMMEDIATELY SHIT ALL OVER GENESIS ADAM AGAIN!

    >
    > You're not "GENESIS ADAM".
    >
    > You are a nut. Get help. See a mental health professional.
    >
    > >you're all ****ing assholes aus.tv

    >
    > Donkey holes? Or are you a yank?


    Hey, back off! We have more than our fair share of psychologically
    challenged people here, and don't need you trying to pass yours off as
    ours.

    So Graham, are any of the groups in which you are revered visible to
    other people?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •