porno türk porno rokettube
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Rudd's NBN

  1. #21
    Ext User(Rod Speed) Guest

    Re: Rudd's NBN



    "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:vo9239tbdsv87ptdh6ch97rd9ge86iccrb@4ax.com...
    > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:53:31 +1000, "Rod Speed"
    > <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >>
    >>
    >>"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >>news:223t29dcsj328j8tk90j5nlq5n42cvubgg@4ax.com. ..
    >>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:41:08 +1000, "Rod Speed"
    >>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >>>>news:3vts29949iotjfc0me0keq6a20mo8k5kp9@4ax.co m...
    >>>>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:09:13 +1000, "Damian"
    >>>>> <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> How odd that those who have had FTTP for YEARS now already haven't
    >>>>>>> done
    >>>>>>> that.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>Get a list of countries with FTTP and see how they are doing, silly
    >>>>>>head.
    >>>>>>And no country have had FTTP for "YEARS", not quite there yet.
    >>>>>>Go and read, how well the countries with highest internet speed(Japan,
    >>>>>>S.Korea, Hong Kong) are doing.
    >>>>
    >>>>> New Zealand after putting in what "we" call FTTN is replacing
    >>>>> it with what "we" call FTTP only after a few years (5)

    >>
    >>>> Wrong, as always.

    >>
    >>> Nope

    >>
    >>Yep. The sheep shaggers never had anything
    >>like what Turdbull is going for FTTN wise.
    >>
    >>> http://billbennett.co.nz/2013/02/25/...ow-to-do-fttp/

    >>
    >>Says nothing like your mindless silly shit about their previous
    >>steaming turd being anything like Turdbull's FTTN.
    >>
    >>And their FTTP is nothing like our NBN, it only covers 75%, nothing like
    >>ours.
    >>
    >>>>> what "we" call FTTN will be profanely more expensive

    >>
    >>>> Wrong, as always.

    >>
    >>> Not this time

    >>
    >>Yep, its cheaper than FTTP.
    >>
    >>> FTTN will be a "tack on" to the existing NBN

    >>
    >>Wrong, as always.
    >>
    >>> with buggered Copper

    >>
    >>Wrong, as always. The copper is fine.
    >>
    >>>>> as it will only be a inferior SECOND network.

    >>
    >>>> Wrong, as always.

    >>
    >>> Rubbish to complete existing contracts and then
    >>> start rolling out FTTN is a competing network

    >>
    >>Wrong, as always.
    >>
    >>>>> Cost wise it's best to stop what's being done

    >>
    >>>>Wrong, as always with the wireless stuff and satellite stuff.

    >>
    >>> Stop it in a orderly manner.

    >>
    >>That's what Turdbull is doing.
    >>
    >>> "wireless stuff and satellite stuff" is only a last resort internet
    >>> connection to areas that is too expensive for fibre

    >>
    >>Wrong, as always. Its nothing like that with the wireless stuff.
    >>
    >>>>> or finnish the task

    >>
    >>>> The coalition aint that stupid.

    >>
    >>> Nope they made a deal with Murdoch

    >>
    >>Just another bare faced lie.
    >>
    >>If they had done they would have gone for their original
    >>scheme of pulling the plug on the NBN and flogging it
    >>off with no FTTN which is just as big a problem for that
    >>arsehole Murdoch as FTTP.


    > Again New Zealand has had FTTN for only a few years


    Again, what they have had is nothing
    like what Turdbull proposes we have.

    > and a Nation no longer than distance of Wollongong to Newcastle and a
    > population less than half Sydneys is putting $1.5 billion to UPGRADE to
    > FTTP


    You've ****ed that up completely too.

    > They are finding FTTN useless and don't cut it


    That is a bare faced lie.

    > http://www.itwire.com/business-it-ne...r-fttp-players


    Says nothing like your bare faced lie.

    And other places were originally going to have FTTP and
    have changed their mind and are going for FTTN too.


  2. #22
    Ext User(Rod Speed) Guest

    Re: Rudd's NBN



    "Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:5dh2391giscgjgvhk6mpnlg1u8ablrdm23@4ax.com...
    > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:41:58 +1000, "SG1" <Lost.it@theraces.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >>
    >>"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >>news:vo9239tbdsv87ptdh6ch97rd9ge86iccrb@4ax.com. ..
    >>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:53:31 +1000, "Rod Speed"
    >>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >>>>news:223t29dcsj328j8tk90j5nlq5n42cvubgg@4ax.co m...
    >>>>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:41:08 +1000, "Rod Speed"
    >>>>> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
    >>>>>>news:3vts29949iotjfc0me0keq6a20mo8k5kp9@4ax. com...
    >>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:09:13 +1000, "Damian"
    >>>>>>> <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> How odd that those who have had FTTP for YEARS now already haven't
    >>>>>>>>> done
    >>>>>>>>> that.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>Get a list of countries with FTTP and see how they are doing, silly
    >>>>>>>>head.
    >>>>>>>>And no country have had FTTP for "YEARS", not quite there yet.
    >>>>>>>>Go and read, how well the countries with highest internet
    >>>>>>>>speed(Japan,
    >>>>>>>>S.Korea, Hong Kong) are doing.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> New Zealand after putting in what "we" call FTTN is replacing
    >>>>>>> it with what "we" call FTTP only after a few years (5)
    >>>>
    >>>>>> Wrong, as always.
    >>>>
    >>>>> Nope
    >>>>
    >>>>Yep. The sheep shaggers never had anything
    >>>>like what Turdbull is going for FTTN wise.
    >>>>
    >>>>> http://billbennett.co.nz/2013/02/25/...ow-to-do-fttp/
    >>>>
    >>>>Says nothing like your mindless silly shit about their previous
    >>>>steaming turd being anything like Turdbull's FTTN.
    >>>>
    >>>>And their FTTP is nothing like our NBN, it only covers 75%, nothing like
    >>>>ours.
    >>>>
    >>>>>>> what "we" call FTTN will be profanely more expensive
    >>>>
    >>>>>> Wrong, as always.
    >>>>
    >>>>> Not this time
    >>>>
    >>>>Yep, its cheaper than FTTP.
    >>>>
    >>>>> FTTN will be a "tack on" to the existing NBN
    >>>>
    >>>>Wrong, as always.
    >>>>
    >>>>> with buggered Copper
    >>>>
    >>>>Wrong, as always. The copper is fine.
    >>>>
    >>>>>>> as it will only be a inferior SECOND network.
    >>>>
    >>>>>> Wrong, as always.
    >>>>
    >>>>> Rubbish to complete existing contracts and then
    >>>>> start rolling out FTTN is a competing network
    >>>>
    >>>>Wrong, as always.
    >>>>
    >>>>>>> Cost wise it's best to stop what's being done
    >>>>
    >>>>>>Wrong, as always with the wireless stuff and satellite stuff.
    >>>>
    >>>>> Stop it in a orderly manner.
    >>>>
    >>>>That's what Turdbull is doing.
    >>>>
    >>>>> "wireless stuff and satellite stuff" is only a last resort internet
    >>>>> connection to areas that is too expensive for fibre
    >>>>
    >>>>Wrong, as always. Its nothing like that with the wireless stuff.
    >>>>
    >>>>>>> or finnish the task
    >>>>
    >>>>>> The coalition aint that stupid.
    >>>>
    >>>>> Nope they made a deal with Murdoch
    >>>>
    >>>>Just another bare faced lie.
    >>>>
    >>>>If they had done they would have gone for their original
    >>>>scheme of pulling the plug on the NBN and flogging it
    >>>>off with no FTTN which is just as big a problem for that
    >>>>arsehole Murdoch as FTTP.
    >>>
    >>> Again New Zealand has had FTTN for only a few years and a Nation no
    >>> longer than distance of Wollongong to Newcastle and a population less
    >>> than half Sydneys is putting $1.5 billion to UPGRADE to FTTP
    >>> They are finding FTTN useless and don't cut it
    >>> http://www.itwire.com/business-it-ne...r-fttp-players


    >>Twisted and salty you can drop the propaganda now. Just to inform you the
    >>election is over and you lost.


    > Not propaganda


    Still pig ignorant lies.

    > Voting wise I put Greens Labor and Coalition last
    > I never vote 1 above the line (it's a corrupt scam)


    > So have no agenda other than what is true


    You wouldn't now what was true if it bit you on your lard arse.

    > You don't want FTTN completed after
    > eight years of tax payers putting it in?


    Nope, because there are much better
    things to spend that sort of money on.

    > You think a second competing network FTTN now makes sense?


    It isnt a second competing network, that's just another bare faced lie.

    > Might of eight years ago!


    It didn't even then.

    > Even stopping any further completion of the
    > NBN is better than now putting in FTTN.


    Yes.

    > The Liberal member in our area Macarthur
    > has assured us we would still get it?


    Just another lying politician.

    > Personally don't want it in my street particularly
    > the 2 metre high "salvo bin" stuck in "every street"!


    Just another bare faced lie.

    > Not many people in my street even have a Telstra
    > phone (I belive 3 out of the 30 homes do at present)


    Irrelevant. Its just a pimple on the arse of the country.

    > I will just join the masses, presently 70% of Australia and
    > growing to totally drop copper wire connections to the home


    Just another bare faced lie.

    > its crap anyhow


    Just another bare faced lie.

    > Mobile Data is getting cheaper


    But is MUCH more expensive than DSL.

    > and better.


    But is MUCH worse than DSL.

    > But no where as it should be with an NBN


    Its gone, none of the fools you voted for are relevant anymore.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •