porno türk porno rokettube
Page 3 of 24 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 474

Thread: A question of physics>>

  1. #41
    Ext User(D Walford) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 28/09/2013 2:44 AM, Clocky wrote:
    > Noddy wrote:
    >> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>
    >>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.

    >>
    >> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are completely
    >> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.
    >>
    >>> You simply can't ****ing drive.

    >>
    >> How the **** would you know dickhead?
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > By what you posted yourself you twat.
    >


    If you drive 10 different cars down the same hill at the same speed in
    the same way and one out of the 10 experiences fade then its the fault
    of the car not the driver, I would only blame the driver if the car
    actually crashed when they previously knew that the car they were
    driving was prone to fade.

    --
    Daryl

  2. #42
    Ext User(D Walford) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 28/09/2013 2:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
    > Noddy wrote:
    >> On 27/09/13 11:10 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >>> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with respect to
    >>> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't even
    >>> offer to logically counter it.

    >>
    >> You're clearly not the brightest texta in the packet and will never
    >> figure it out for yourself, so I'll give you a hint.
    >>
    >> If you're waiting for me to engage in a serious conversation with you
    >> then you are going to be waiting for a ****ing *hell* of a long time. I
    >> don't like you, I think you're a ****ing lying **** and I have no
    >> intention of *ever* engaging you in serious conversation.
    >>
    >> All you will ever get from me is insult and/or ridicule, so persist with
    >> that if you like or just simply give up and **** off.
    >>
    >> Your call.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Stop being so angry. Sheez.



    That's a bit rich coming from you who seems determined to shit stir for
    some unknown reason, you seem to want to take over from Mr Multiple
    Personality Disorder.

    --
    Daryl

  3. #43
    Ext User(D Walford) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 28/09/2013 9:32 AM, Clocky wrote:
    > D Walford wrote:
    >> On 28/09/2013 2:44 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>> Noddy wrote:
    >>>> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.
    >>>>
    >>>> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are
    >>>> completely
    >>>> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.
    >>>>
    >>>>> You simply can't ****ing drive.
    >>>>
    >>>> How the **** would you know dickhead?
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> By what you posted yourself you twat.
    >>>

    >>
    >> If you drive 10 different cars down the same hill at the same speed in
    >> the same way and one out of the 10 experiences fade then its the fault
    >> of the car not the driver,

    >
    > Errr, no.


    Errr yes, if I was driving an old Valiant I would expect serious brake
    fade but driving a relatively modern car like a Getz I wouldn't expect
    it especially if every other car I had driven in the same conditions
    didn't experience fade.

    >
    > I would only blame the driver if the car
    >> actually crashed when they previously knew that the car they were
    >> driving was prone to fade.
    >>

    >
    > If you don't know how a car is going to behave you drive accordingly,
    > and you certainly select a low gear when descending no matter what you
    > are driving anyway.


    Its a very reasonable expectation that a modern car won't suffer from
    excessive brake fade when driven normally.
    >
    > Any driver should drive to conditions (which includes the car, the
    > environment and experience with the car) and not by any assumption.
    >


    True but if fade is only experienced in one out of 10 cars in the same
    circumstances then it is mostly the fault of the car, IMO it only
    becomes the fault of the driver if they allow it to get so bad that they
    loose control.

    > But you know this and are just defending the FIGJAM who can't drive in
    > your usual role.


    What's wrong, your clogs too tight again.
    --
    Daryl

  4. #44
    Ext User(John_H) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Buzz^| wrote:
    >
    >The RMX250 I have,
    >being a 2 stroke needs special care when descending the mountains around
    >here.


    Lucky you don't have 2-stroke car! :)

    Premix 2-strokes (which doesn't include yours) starve for lubrication
    under prolonged engine braking.

    Saab (which were a recent topic of discussion) had automatic free
    wheeling on their transmissions to get around the problem, as did some
    other 2-stroke cars.... Making them less than the ideal choice for
    mountainous terrains.

    --
    John H

  5. #45
    Ext User(jonz) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 9/27/2013 11:22 PM, Noddy wrote:
    > On 27/09/13 11:10 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with respect to
    >> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't even
    >> offer to logically counter it.

    >
    > You're clearly not the brightest texta in the packet and will never
    > figure it out for yourself, so I'll give you a hint.
    >
    > If you're waiting for me to engage in a serious conversation with you
    > then you are going to be waiting for a ****ing *hell* of a long time. I
    > don't like you, I think you're a ****ing lying **** and I have no
    > intention of *ever* engaging you in serious conversation.
    >
    > All you will ever get from me is insult and/or ridicule, so persist with
    > that if you like or just simply give up and **** off.
    >
    > Your call.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Translation:

    I have no idea what the answer may be :(..........So,
    i`ll resort to my old pal, Abuse.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >



    --
    “Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea- massive,
    difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
    boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it”

  6. #46
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    D Walford wrote:
    > On 28/09/2013 2:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >> Noddy wrote:
    >>> On 27/09/13 11:10 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with respect to
    >>>> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't even
    >>>> offer to logically counter it.
    >>>
    >>> You're clearly not the brightest texta in the packet and will never
    >>> figure it out for yourself, so I'll give you a hint.
    >>>
    >>> If you're waiting for me to engage in a serious conversation with you
    >>> then you are going to be waiting for a ****ing *hell* of a long time. I
    >>> don't like you, I think you're a ****ing lying **** and I have no
    >>> intention of *ever* engaging you in serious conversation.
    >>>
    >>> All you will ever get from me is insult and/or ridicule, so persist with
    >>> that if you like or just simply give up and **** off.
    >>>
    >>> Your call.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >> Stop being so angry. Sheez.

    >
    >
    > That's a bit rich coming from you who seems determined to shit stir for
    > some unknown reason


    Pointing out the pure bullshit, hypocrisy and vitriolic bullying in
    certain individuals isn't "shit stirring".



  7. #47
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    D Walford wrote:
    > On 28/09/2013 9:32 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >> D Walford wrote:
    >>> On 28/09/2013 2:44 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>> Noddy wrote:
    >>>>> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are
    >>>>> completely
    >>>>> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> You simply can't ****ing drive.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> How the **** would you know dickhead?
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> By what you posted yourself you twat.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> If you drive 10 different cars down the same hill at the same speed in
    >>> the same way and one out of the 10 experiences fade then its the fault
    >>> of the car not the driver,

    >>
    >> Errr, no.

    >
    > Errr yes, if I was driving an old Valiant I would expect serious brake
    > fade but driving a relatively modern car like a Getz I wouldn't expect
    > it especially if every other car I had driven in the same conditions
    > didn't experience fade.
    >
    >>
    >> I would only blame the driver if the car
    >>> actually crashed when they previously knew that the car they were
    >>> driving was prone to fade.
    >>>

    >>
    >> If you don't know how a car is going to behave you drive accordingly,
    >> and you certainly select a low gear when descending no matter what you
    >> are driving anyway.

    >
    > Its a very reasonable expectation that a modern car won't suffer from
    > excessive brake fade when driven normally.
    >>


    It's a ****ing shopping trolley hurtling down a ****ing mountain, what
    do you think is going to happen?

    >> Any driver should drive to conditions (which includes the car, the
    >> environment and experience with the car) and not by any assumption.
    >>

    >
    > True but if fade is only experienced in one out of 10 cars in the same
    > circumstances then it is mostly the fault of the car, IMO it only
    > becomes the fault of the driver if they allow it to get so bad that they
    > loose control.
    >


    He did loose control, and the driver put himself in that position.

    >> But you know this and are just defending the FIGJAM who can't drive in
    >> your usual role.

    >
    > What's wrong, your clogs too tight again.


    Schmacko time again?

  8. #48
    Ext User(Xeno Lith) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 28/09/13 12:33 PM, Clocky wrote:
    > D Walford wrote:
    >> On 28/09/2013 9:32 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>> D Walford wrote:
    >>>> On 28/09/2013 2:44 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>> Noddy wrote:
    >>>>>> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are
    >>>>>> completely
    >>>>>> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> You simply can't ****ing drive.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> How the **** would you know dickhead?
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> By what you posted yourself you twat.
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> If you drive 10 different cars down the same hill at the same speed in
    >>>> the same way and one out of the 10 experiences fade then its the fault
    >>>> of the car not the driver,
    >>>
    >>> Errr, no.

    >>
    >> Errr yes, if I was driving an old Valiant I would expect serious brake
    >> fade but driving a relatively modern car like a Getz I wouldn't expect
    >> it especially if every other car I had driven in the same conditions
    >> didn't experience fade.
    >>

    I never go down hills with an auto in drive or a manual in 4th or 5th if
    I suspect there is a requirement for braking - even moderate braking.
    You never know what's around that next bend - even if you know the road.
    Best to keep the brakes ready for any eventuality.
    >>>
    >>> I would only blame the driver if the car
    >>>> actually crashed when they previously knew that the car they were
    >>>> driving was prone to fade.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> If you don't know how a car is going to behave you drive accordingly,
    >>> and you certainly select a low gear when descending no matter what you
    >>> are driving anyway.


    That's entirely the problem! Noddy is a FIGJAM and he always knows better!
    >>
    >> Its a very reasonable expectation that a modern car won't suffer from
    >> excessive brake fade when driven normally.
    >>>

    What about modern "cheap & crappy" cars like the Getz?
    >
    > It's a ****ing shopping trolley hurtling down a ****ing mountain, what
    > do you think is going to happen?


    And not a very high quality shopping trolley either! ;-)
    >
    >>> Any driver should drive to conditions (which includes the car, the
    >>> environment and experience with the car) and not by any assumption.
    >>>

    >>
    >> True but if fade is only experienced in one out of 10 cars in the same
    >> circumstances then it is mostly the fault of the car, IMO it only
    >> becomes the fault of the driver if they allow it to get so bad that they
    >> loose control.
    >>

    >
    > He did loose control, and the driver put himself in that position.


    He wasn't taught how to drive using the gears, that was his problem. You
    should always drive using the gears rather than the brakes when
    descending hills in ANY CAR!
    >
    >>> But you know this and are just defending the FIGJAM who can't drive in
    >>> your usual role.

    >>
    >> What's wrong, your clogs too tight again.

    >
    > Schmacko time again?



    --

    Xeno

  9. #49
    Ext User(Xeno Lith) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 28/09/13 2:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
    > Noddy wrote:
    >> On 27/09/13 11:10 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >>> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with respect to
    >>> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't even
    >>> offer to logically counter it.

    >>
    >> You're clearly not the brightest texta in the packet and will never
    >> figure it out for yourself, so I'll give you a hint.
    >>
    >> If you're waiting for me to engage in a serious conversation with you
    >> then you are going to be waiting for a ****ing *hell* of a long time. I
    >> don't like you, I think you're a ****ing lying **** and I have no
    >> intention of *ever* engaging you in serious conversation.
    >>
    >> All you will ever get from me is insult and/or ridicule, so persist with
    >> that if you like or just simply give up and **** off.
    >>
    >> Your call.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Stop being so angry. Sheez.


    An anger management course would be of benefit for Noddy! If, and only
    if, he got through such a course, then all the rest of the aus.cars
    posters would benefit greatly.

    --

    Xeno

  10. #50
    Ext User(jonz) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 9/28/2013 12:44 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    > On 28/09/13 12:33 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >> D Walford wrote:
    >>> On 28/09/2013 9:32 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>> D Walford wrote:
    >>>>> On 28/09/2013 2:44 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>>> Noddy wrote:
    >>>>>>> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are
    >>>>>>> completely
    >>>>>>> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> You simply can't ****ing drive.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> How the **** would you know dickhead?
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> By what you posted yourself you twat.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If you drive 10 different cars down the same hill at the same speed in
    >>>>> the same way and one out of the 10 experiences fade then its the fault
    >>>>> of the car not the driver,
    >>>>
    >>>> Errr, no.
    >>>
    >>> Errr yes, if I was driving an old Valiant I would expect serious brake
    >>> fade but driving a relatively modern car like a Getz I wouldn't expect
    >>> it especially if every other car I had driven in the same conditions
    >>> didn't experience fade.
    >>>

    > I never go down hills with an auto in drive or a manual in 4th or 5th if
    > I suspect there is a requirement for braking - even moderate braking.
    > You never know what's around that next bend - even if you know the road.
    > Best to keep the brakes ready for any eventuality.
    >>>>
    >>>> I would only blame the driver if the car
    >>>>> actually crashed when they previously knew that the car they were
    >>>>> driving was prone to fade.
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> If you don't know how a car is going to behave you drive accordingly,
    >>>> and you certainly select a low gear when descending no matter what you
    >>>> are driving anyway.

    >
    > That's entirely the problem! Noddy is a FIGJAM and he always knows better!
    >>>
    >>> Its a very reasonable expectation that a modern car won't suffer from
    >>> excessive brake fade when driven normally.
    >>>>

    > What about modern "cheap & crappy" cars like the Getz?
    >>
    >> It's a ****ing shopping trolley hurtling down a ****ing mountain, what
    >> do you think is going to happen?

    >
    > And not a very high quality shopping trolley either! ;-)
    >>
    >>>> Any driver should drive to conditions (which includes the car, the
    >>>> environment and experience with the car) and not by any assumption.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> True but if fade is only experienced in one out of 10 cars in the same
    >>> circumstances then it is mostly the fault of the car, IMO it only
    >>> becomes the fault of the driver if they allow it to get so bad that they
    >>> loose control.
    >>>

    >>
    >> He did loose control, and the driver put himself in that position.

    >
    > He wasn't taught how to drive using the gears, that was his problem. You
    > should always drive using the gears rather than the brakes when
    > descending hills in ANY CAR!

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Especially the ah, "hill" in question...Plenty of FIGJAMS have come
    _very_ unstuck there..... Lots of signage at the top as a
    indication/warning of whats coming....But they hurl themselves off the
    top like ****in' Lemmings.....Some pple should ride the bus.




    >>
    >>>> But you know this and are just defending the FIGJAM who can't drive in
    >>>> your usual role.
    >>>
    >>> What's wrong, your clogs too tight again.

    >>
    >> Schmacko time again?

    >
    >



    --
    “Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea- massive,
    difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
    boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it”

  11. #51
    Ext User(Xeno Lith) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 28/09/13 12:38 PM, Clocky wrote:
    > D Walford wrote:
    >> On 28/09/2013 2:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>> Noddy wrote:
    >>>> On 27/09/13 11:10 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with
    >>>>> respect to
    >>>>> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't
    >>>>> even
    >>>>> offer to logically counter it.
    >>>>
    >>>> You're clearly not the brightest texta in the packet and will never
    >>>> figure it out for yourself, so I'll give you a hint.
    >>>>
    >>>> If you're waiting for me to engage in a serious conversation with you
    >>>> then you are going to be waiting for a ****ing *hell* of a long time. I
    >>>> don't like you, I think you're a ****ing lying **** and I have no
    >>>> intention of *ever* engaging you in serious conversation.
    >>>>
    >>>> All you will ever get from me is insult and/or ridicule, so persist
    >>>> with
    >>>> that if you like or just simply give up and **** off.
    >>>>
    >>>> Your call.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> Stop being so angry. Sheez.

    >>
    >>
    >> That's a bit rich coming from you who seems determined to shit stir for
    >> some unknown reason

    >
    > Pointing out the pure bullshit, hypocrisy and vitriolic bullying in
    > certain individuals isn't "shit stirring".
    >
    >

    Noddy is the premier shit stirrer in this newsgroup. Only need to look
    at the number and content of his posts to see that!

    --

    Xeno

  12. #52
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <l23tbk$8aj$1@dont-email.me>, me@wardengineering.com.au says...
    > On 27/09/13 8:55 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >
    > > His penchant for wanting to gas people as well as his bigheaded
    > > pigheaded ignorance and arrogance is because he is part Kraut.

    >
    > And with the Dutch being wannabee Germans, what the **** does that make
    > you? :)
    >

    Maybe a dyke fingerer and windmill licker?

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  13. #53
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <l24039$n2m$1@dont-email.me>, xenolith@optusnet.com.au says...
    > On 27/09/13 10:24 PM, Noddy wrote:
    > > On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    > >
    > >> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.

    > >
    > > Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are completely
    > > wrong. He never has a valid point ever.

    >
    > Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with respect to
    > power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't even
    > offer to logically counter it.
    > >

    Don't know what this is about, but did they have power steering and front
    wheel drive back in your day, old man?

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  14. #54
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <5245b61a$0$2780$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.co m>,
    notgonn@happen.com says...
    > Stop being so angry. Sheez.
    >

    Lately Nod's acting like his computer crashed and took out his porn collection.

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  15. #55
    Ext User(Jason James) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Xeno Lith wrote:


    >>

    > Noddy is the premier shit stirrer in this newsgroup. Only need to look
    > at the number and content of his posts to see that!



    One thing he is good at, is mechanics of many types of vehicle
    including Dragsters at speed pulling an unrequested RH turn..

    The rest is mainly banter :-)

    Jason







  16. #56
    Ext User(Xeno Lith) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 28/09/13 2:22 PM, Albm&ctd wrote:
    > In article <l24039$n2m$1@dont-email.me>, xenolith@optusnet.com.au says...
    >> On 27/09/13 10:24 PM, Noddy wrote:
    >>> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.
    >>>
    >>> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are completely
    >>> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.

    >>
    >> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with respect to
    >> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't even
    >> offer to logically counter it.
    >>>

    > Don't know what this is about, but did they have power steering and front
    > wheel drive back in your day, old man?
    >
    > Al
    >

    Just exactly when is/was "my day"?

    --

    Xeno

  17. #57
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Noddy wrote:
    > On 27/09/13 8:55 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >
    >> His penchant for wanting to gas people as well as his bigheaded
    >> pigheaded ignorance and arrogance is because he is part Kraut.

    >
    > And with the Dutch being wannabee Germans, what the **** does that make
    > you? :)
    >
    >
    >


    A Dutchman with all the shitty (iow your) German genetics removed.







  18. #58
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Jason James wrote:
    > Xeno Lith wrote:
    >
    >
    > >>

    >> Noddy is the premier shit stirrer in this newsgroup. Only need to look
    >> at the number and content of his posts to see that!

    >
    >
    > One thing he is good at, is mechanics of many types of vehicle
    > including Dragsters at speed pulling an unrequested RH turn..
    >


    Not even. His drag engines blow up.

    All he is good at is bullshitting and pilfering Google pages.

    He's not even a mechanic, just a lowly engine re-ringer and an
    incompetent one at that.



  19. #59
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Albm&ctd wrote:
    > In article <5245b61a$0$2780$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.co m>,
    > notgonn@happen.com says...
    >> Stop being so angry. Sheez.
    >>

    > Lately Nod's acting like his computer crashed and took out his porn collection.
    >
    > Al
    >


    Worse then that, it's like his willy dropper off.

  20. #60
    Ext User(jonz) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 9/28/2013 3:55 PM, Clocky wrote:
    > Albm&ctd wrote:
    >> In article <5245b61a$0$2780$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.co m>,
    >> notgonn@happen.com says...
    >>> Stop being so angry. Sheez.
    >>>

    >> Lately Nod's acting like his computer crashed and took out his porn
    >> collection.
    >>
    >> Al
    >>

    >
    > Worse then that, it's like his willy dropper off.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    If'n he ever had one.


    --
    “Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea- massive,
    difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
    boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it”

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •