porno türk porno rokettube
Page 6 of 24 FirstFirst ... 234567891016 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 474

Thread: A question of physics>>

  1. #101
    Ext User(Noddy) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 29/09/13 1:22 PM, lindsay wrote:

    > Hey Alligator, the only one who looks like a goose 'round here is you.
    > Why? Because you know Noddy's killfiled you, yet you're STILL replying!
    >
    > :-D


    He lives for it. For him the chance of commenting without fear of
    reprisal is just too great to pass up.

    Jonz likes to do it too. All great idiots live for it.



    --
    --
    Regards,
    Noddy.

  2. #102
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <l27sea$83e$1@dont-email.me>, me@wardengineering.com.au says...
    > On 29/09/13 4:16 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >
    > > Nothing like the same language. Dutch is much more faithful to the
    > > original Germanic language then high German is.

    >
    > It's in the same suburb :)
    >
    > > That's why you will often get Dutch speakers understanding a fair bit of
    > > German but not so the other way around.

    >
    > Why do the Dutch have reputations for being arrogant ****s?
    >
    > > It's not a question of awareness when it's simply not true, the Dutch
    > > had in fact a strong anti-Nazi sentiment. The Dutch also had a very
    > > active resistance movement during occupation.
    > > Even now anti-German sentiment relating back to the war is high.

    >
    > Just about every occupied country was similar. But that doesn't mean
    > they didn't have a pro German movement either.
    >
    > From the Wiki article on "Collaboration with the Axis Powers":
    >
    > Netherlands
    >
    > SS Recruiting Poster for the Netherlands, urging Dutch people to "join
    > the fight against Bolshevism"
    > Thousands of Dutch volunteers joined the 11th SS Volunteer
    > Panzergrenadier Division Nordland (created in February 1943).
    > The division participated in fighting against the Soviet army and was
    > crushed in the Battle of Berlin in April?May 1945.
    > This was also the case for the 5th SS Panzergrenadier Division Wiking.
    > It was involved in several major battles on the Eastern Front.
    > SS-Freiwilligen Legion Niederlande, manned by Dutch volunteers and
    > German officers, battled the Soviet army from 1941.
    > In December 1943, it gained brigade status after fighting on the front
    > around Leningrad. It was at Leningrad that the first
    > European volunteer, a Dutchman, earned the Knight's Cross of the Iron
    > Cross: Gerardus Mooyman. In December 1944, it was
    > transformed into the 23rd SS Volunteer Panzergrenadier Division
    > Nederland and fought in Courland and Pomerania.[6]
    > It found its end scattered across Germany.
    > SS-Freiwilligen-Panzergrenadier-Regiment "de Ruyter" fought at the Oder
    > and surrendered on 3 May 1945 to the Americans. 48.
    > SS-Freiwilligen-Panzergrenadier-Regiment "General Seyffardt" however
    > was split up into two groups. The first of these fought with Kampfgruppe
    > Vieweger and went under in the fighting near Halbe.
    > The few remaining survivors were captured by the Soviets. The other half
    > of "General Seyffart" fought with Korpsgruppe Tettau
    > and surrendered to the western Allies. During the war famous actor and
    > singer Johannes Heesters made his career in Nazi-Germany,
    > befriending high-ranking Nazis such as Joseph Goebbels and living in
    > houses stolen from wealthy Jews.
    >
    > Clearly there was *plenty* of Pro Nazi activity. Despite your propaganda
    > to the contrary.
    >
    > > I like the way you spout anti-Dutch sentiment which is 100% incorrect
    > > both historically and factually, proving my initial point in the process.

    >
    > You had a point? That'd be a first.
    >
    > > Thanks for that.

    >
    > You're welcome, but in your usual ridiculous mouth frothing you've
    > totally missed the point. You can call me a"German" if you like, but
    > *you* were born in a country that is of Germanic stock making you closer
    > to being a ****ing German than I could ever hope to be, you ****ing idiot:)
    >

    I bet if a truckload of big hairy bikers (their Harleys wouldn't get them there
    obviously) surrounded your house you'd suck right up to them on your Honda step
    through.
    It's the same apparently with any occupation.

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  3. #103
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <l263ps$4qt$1@dont-email.me>, xenolith@optusnet.com.au says...
    > On 28/09/13 3:54 PM, Clocky wrote:
    > > Jason James wrote:
    > >> Xeno Lith wrote:
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> >>
    > >>> Noddy is the premier shit stirrer in this newsgroup. Only need to look
    > >>> at the number and content of his posts to see that!
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> One thing he is good at, is mechanics of many types of vehicle
    > >> including Dragsters at speed pulling an unrequested RH turn..
    > >>

    > >
    > > Not even. His drag engines blow up.
    > >
    > > All he is good at is bullshitting and pilfering Google pages.
    > >
    > > He's not even a mechanic, just a lowly engine re-ringer and an
    > > incompetent one at that.
    > >
    > >

    > No wonder he knows bugger all about steering and suspensions then! ;-)
    >

    Just like you, old leaf spring and king pin man :)

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  4. #104
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <l25p7c$qlh$1@dont-email.me>, xenolith@optusnet.com.au says...
    > On 28/09/13 2:22 PM, Albm&ctd wrote:
    > > In article <l24039$n2m$1@dont-email.me>, xenolith@optusnet.com.au says...
    > >> On 27/09/13 10:24 PM, Noddy wrote:
    > >>> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.
    > >>>
    > >>> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are completely
    > >>> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.
    > >>
    > >> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with respect to
    > >> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't even
    > >> offer to logically counter it.
    > >>>

    > > Don't know what this is about, but did they have power steering and front
    > > wheel drive back in your day, old man?
    > >
    > > Al
    > >

    > Just exactly when is/was "my day"?
    >
    >

    3rd September 1955 on an overcast thursday afternoon

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  5. #105
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <5246b318$0$2901$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.co m>,
    dwalford@internode.on.net says...
    > On 28/09/2013 12:38 PM, Clocky wrote:
    > > D Walford wrote:
    > >> On 28/09/2013 2:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
    > >>> Noddy wrote:
    > >>>> On 27/09/13 11:10 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    > >>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with
    > >>>>> respect to
    > >>>>> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't
    > >>>>> even
    > >>>>> offer to logically counter it.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> You're clearly not the brightest texta in the packet and will never
    > >>>> figure it out for yourself, so I'll give you a hint.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> If you're waiting for me to engage in a serious conversation with you
    > >>>> then you are going to be waiting for a ****ing *hell* of a long time. I
    > >>>> don't like you, I think you're a ****ing lying **** and I have no
    > >>>> intention of *ever* engaging you in serious conversation.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> All you will ever get from me is insult and/or ridicule, so persist
    > >>>> with
    > >>>> that if you like or just simply give up and **** off.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> Your call.
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>
    > >>> Stop being so angry. Sheez.
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> That's a bit rich coming from you who seems determined to shit stir for
    > >> some unknown reason

    > >
    > > Pointing out the pure bullshit, hypocrisy and vitriolic bullying in
    > > certain individuals isn't "shit stirring".
    > >
    > >

    > Pot kettle, Noddy and I disagree on many subjects especially politics
    > but our discussions don't resort to childish insults so you are reaping
    > what you are sewing.
    >
    >

    sowing: Place (seeds) in or on the ground for future growth.
    Nod's into basket weaving to keep all his rusty XP parts together, not sewing.
    Although I must admit to knitting bones just like him. Does that mean we are
    related?

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  6. #106
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <52471f01$0$11119$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, notgonn@happen.com
    says...
    >
    > What if a car had been coming in the other direction?
    >

    You mean a real car?

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  7. #107
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <l26a49$v8i$2@dont-email.me>, me@wardengineering.com.au says...
    > Feel free to cite the part where I said I lost control. I mean, you
    > don't want to be seen to be a liar, right?
    >

    Officer, I got sideways, rolled twice, went through a fence, back on wheels on
    the road, knocked down several guide posts.. but then lost control due to a
    small stick and hit this eucalypt. The koala was run over by someone else...
    honest... oh and if they are *protected* they should be wearing something more
    protective than a cheap fur coat.

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  8. #108
    Ext User(Blue Heeler) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Albm&ctd wrote:

    > >

    > Just like you, old leaf spring and king pin man :)
    >
    >


    Nuffin wrong with King and link suspension - easily fixed and
    maintained by a home mechanic without the need of too many special
    tools.



    I pulled the injection pump out of the truck yesterday and tomorrow
    I'll take it to the repairer who will charge me several hundred dollars
    to replace the leaking diaphram and recalibrate it.

    I used to do my own inline pumps, on the kitchen table and it used to
    take about 2 hours to change out all the wearing parts and recalibrate.
    And the only "special tool"you needed was a burette.

    Not all progress is good progress.

  9. #109
    Ext User(D Walford) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 29/09/2013 1:47 PM, Albm&ctd wrote:
    > In article <5246b318$0$2901$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.co m>,
    > dwalford@internode.on.net says...
    >> On 28/09/2013 12:38 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>> D Walford wrote:
    >>>> On 28/09/2013 2:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>> Noddy wrote:
    >>>>>> On 27/09/13 11:10 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with
    >>>>>>> respect to
    >>>>>>> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't
    >>>>>>> even
    >>>>>>> offer to logically counter it.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> You're clearly not the brightest texta in the packet and will never
    >>>>>> figure it out for yourself, so I'll give you a hint.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> If you're waiting for me to engage in a serious conversation with you
    >>>>>> then you are going to be waiting for a ****ing *hell* of a long time. I
    >>>>>> don't like you, I think you're a ****ing lying **** and I have no
    >>>>>> intention of *ever* engaging you in serious conversation.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> All you will ever get from me is insult and/or ridicule, so persist
    >>>>>> with
    >>>>>> that if you like or just simply give up and **** off.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Your call.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Stop being so angry. Sheez.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> That's a bit rich coming from you who seems determined to shit stir for
    >>>> some unknown reason
    >>>
    >>> Pointing out the pure bullshit, hypocrisy and vitriolic bullying in
    >>> certain individuals isn't "shit stirring".
    >>>
    >>>

    >> Pot kettle, Noddy and I disagree on many subjects especially politics
    >> but our discussions don't resort to childish insults so you are reaping
    >> what you are sewing.
    >>
    >>

    > sowing: Place (seeds) in or on the ground for future growth.
    > Nod's into basket weaving to keep all his rusty XP parts together, not sewing.
    > Although I must admit to knitting bones just like him. Does that mean we are
    > related?
    >


    Sorry Mr Spelling Policeman.
    You could be related, does your wife use a 5tonne excavator to do the
    gardening:-)



    --
    Daryl

  10. #110
    Ext User(D Walford) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 29/09/2013 2:11 PM, Albm&ctd wrote:
    > In article <52471f01$0$11119$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, notgonn@happen.com
    > says...
    >>
    >> What if a car had been coming in the other direction?
    >>

    > You mean a real car?
    >

    No, one of those cars in the Coles Insurance ads:-)


    --
    Daryl

  11. #111
    Ext User(Xeno Lith) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 29/09/13 1:51 PM, Albm&ctd wrote:
    > In article <l25p7c$qlh$1@dont-email.me>, xenolith@optusnet.com.au says...
    >> On 28/09/13 2:22 PM, Albm&ctd wrote:
    >>> In article <l24039$n2m$1@dont-email.me>, xenolith@optusnet.com.au says...
    >>>> On 27/09/13 10:24 PM, Noddy wrote:
    >>>>> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are completely
    >>>>> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.
    >>>>
    >>>> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with respect to
    >>>> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't even
    >>>> offer to logically counter it.
    >>>>>
    >>> Don't know what this is about, but did they have power steering and front
    >>> wheel drive back in your day, old man?
    >>>
    >>> Al
    >>>

    >> Just exactly when is/was "my day"?
    >>
    >>

    > 3rd September 1955 on an overcast thursday afternoon
    >
    > Al
    >

    Bugger! I missed it!

    --

    Xeno

  12. #112
    Ext User(Xeno Lith) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 29/09/13 2:11 PM, Albm&ctd wrote:
    > In article <52471f01$0$11119$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, notgonn@happen.com
    > says...
    >>
    >> What if a car had been coming in the other direction?
    >>

    > You mean a real car?
    >
    > Al
    >

    Yep, same as the imaginary Getz he was driving!

    --

    Xeno

  13. #113
    Ext User(Jason James) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Noddy wrote:
    > On 29/09/13 4:16 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >
    >> Nothing like the same language. Dutch is much more faithful to the
    >> original Germanic language then high German is.

    >
    > It's in the same suburb :)
    >
    >> That's why you will often get Dutch speakers understanding a fair bit of
    >> German but not so the other way around.

    >
    > Why do the Dutch have reputations for being arrogant ****s?
    >
    >> It's not a question of awareness when it's simply not true, the Dutch
    >> had in fact a strong anti-Nazi sentiment. The Dutch also had a very
    >> active resistance movement during occupation.
    >> Even now anti-German sentiment relating back to the war is high.

    >
    > Just about every occupied country was similar. But that doesn't mean
    > they didn't have a pro German movement either.
    >
    > From the Wiki article on "Collaboration with the Axis Powers":
    >
    > Netherlands
    >
    > SS Recruiting Poster for the Netherlands, urging Dutch people to "join
    > the fight against Bolshevism"
    > Thousands of Dutch volunteers joined the 11th SS Volunteer
    > Panzergrenadier Division Nordland (created in February 1943).
    > The division participated in fighting against the Soviet army and was
    > crushed in the Battle of Berlin in April–May 1945.
    > This was also the case for the 5th SS Panzergrenadier Division Wiking.
    > It was involved in several major battles on the Eastern Front.
    > SS-Freiwilligen Legion Niederlande, manned by Dutch volunteers and
    > German officers, battled the Soviet army from 1941.
    > In December 1943, it gained brigade status after fighting on the front
    > around Leningrad. It was at Leningrad that the first
    > European volunteer, a Dutchman, earned the Knight's Cross of the Iron
    > Cross: Gerardus Mooyman. In December 1944, it was
    > transformed into the 23rd SS Volunteer Panzergrenadier Division
    > Nederland and fought in Courland and Pomerania.[6]
    > It found its end scattered across Germany.
    > SS-Freiwilligen-Panzergrenadier-Regiment "de Ruyter" fought at the Oder
    > and surrendered on 3 May 1945 to the Americans. 48.
    > SS-Freiwilligen-Panzergrenadier-Regiment "General Seyffardt" however
    > was split up into two groups. The first of these fought with Kampfgruppe
    > Vieweger and went under in the fighting near Halbe.
    > The few remaining survivors were captured by the Soviets. The other half
    > of "General Seyffart" fought with Korpsgruppe Tettau
    > and surrendered to the western Allies. During the war famous actor and
    > singer Johannes Heesters made his career in Nazi-Germany,
    > befriending high-ranking Nazis such as Joseph Goebbels and living in
    > houses stolen from wealthy Jews.
    >
    > Clearly there was *plenty* of Pro Nazi activity. Despite your propaganda
    > to the contrary.
    >
    >> I like the way you spout anti-Dutch sentiment which is 100% incorrect
    >> both historically and factually, proving my initial point in the process.

    >
    > You had a point? That'd be a first.
    >
    >> Thanks for that.

    >
    > You're welcome, but in your usual ridiculous mouth frothing you've
    > totally missed the point. You can call me a"German" if you like, but
    > *you* were born in a country that is of Germanic stock making you closer
    > to being a ****ing German than I could ever hope to be, you ****ing
    > idiot :)


    You can feel the lurve in the room here, Barry.

    Barry White>> "Never, never, goin' to give you up" [and so on>> :-]

    Jason




  14. #114
    Ext User(F Murtz) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Clocky wrote:
    > D Walford wrote:
    >> On 28/09/2013 12:33 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>> D Walford wrote:
    >>>> On 28/09/2013 9:32 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>> D Walford wrote:
    >>>>>> On 28/09/2013 2:44 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>>>> Noddy wrote:
    >>>>>>>> On 27/09/13 8:57 PM, Clocky wrote:
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> He's got a valid point on this occasion however.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> Considering that he's a professional bullshit artist, you are
    >>>>>>>> completely
    >>>>>>>> wrong. He never has a valid point ever.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>> You simply can't ****ing drive.
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>> How the **** would you know dickhead?
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> By what you posted yourself you twat.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> If you drive 10 different cars down the same hill at the same
    >>>>>> speed in
    >>>>>> the same way and one out of the 10 experiences fade then its the
    >>>>>> fault
    >>>>>> of the car not the driver,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Errr, no.
    >>>>
    >>>> Errr yes, if I was driving an old Valiant I would expect serious brake
    >>>> fade but driving a relatively modern car like a Getz I wouldn't expect
    >>>> it especially if every other car I had driven in the same conditions
    >>>> didn't experience fade.
    >>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I would only blame the driver if the car
    >>>>>> actually crashed when they previously knew that the car they were
    >>>>>> driving was prone to fade.
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If you don't know how a car is going to behave you drive accordingly,
    >>>>> and you certainly select a low gear when descending no matter what you
    >>>>> are driving anyway.
    >>>>
    >>>> Its a very reasonable expectation that a modern car won't suffer from
    >>>> excessive brake fade when driven normally.
    >>>>>
    >>>
    >>> It's a ****ing shopping trolley hurtling down a ****ing mountain, what
    >>> do you think is going to happen?

    >>
    >> Hurtling?
    >> You making shit up again, from what I read he was just driving normally.
    >>>
    >>>>> Any driver should drive to conditions (which includes the car, the
    >>>>> environment and experience with the car) and not by any assumption.
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> True but if fade is only experienced in one out of 10 cars in the same
    >>>> circumstances then it is mostly the fault of the car, IMO it only
    >>>> becomes the fault of the driver if they allow it to get so bad that
    >>>> they
    >>>> loose control.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> He did loose control, and the driver put himself in that position.

    >>
    >> He did say he got a bit close to the car in front but no mention of a
    >> collision so he may have come close to loosing control but not quite.

    >
    >
    > He had to go around another car into the oncoming lane to avoid a
    > collision FFS.


    Changing the posting and adding extra elements do not further your
    arguments, the original statement said nothing about going into an
    oncoming lane.


    >
    > What if a car had been coming in the other direction?
    >
    >>>
    >>>>> But you know this and are just defending the FIGJAM who can't drive in
    >>>>> your usual role.
    >>>>
    >>>> What's wrong, your clogs too tight again.
    >>>
    >>> Schmacko time again?

    >>
    >> Very tight clogs are spoiling the blood flow to your brain so badly that
    >> you are behaving like a small child, FFS grow up.

    >
    > Yeah, a real mature comment that one.
    > How about you use your brain and think about what you are defending for
    > a change?



  15. #115
    Ext User(Noddy) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    On 29/09/13 3:39 PM, F Murtz wrote:

    > Changing the posting and adding extra elements do not further your
    > arguments, the original statement said nothing about going into an
    > oncoming lane.


    No, but then it never suits his argument to stick strictly to what was
    written. You can't make a mountain out of a mole hill if you do.


    --
    --
    Regards,
    Noddy.

  16. #116
    Ext User(Albm&ctd) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    In article <5247ae9f$0$11106$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>,
    dwalford@internode.on.net says...
    > On 29/09/2013 1:47 PM, Albm&ctd wrote:
    > > In article <5246b318$0$2901$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.co m>,
    > > dwalford@internode.on.net says...
    > >> On 28/09/2013 12:38 PM, Clocky wrote:
    > >>> D Walford wrote:
    > >>>> On 28/09/2013 2:45 AM, Clocky wrote:
    > >>>>> Noddy wrote:
    > >>>>>> On 27/09/13 11:10 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>>
    > >>>>>>> Where's your response to my explanation of torque steer with
    > >>>>>>> respect to
    > >>>>>>> power steering? You completely dissed that valid point. You didn't
    > >>>>>>> even
    > >>>>>>> offer to logically counter it.
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>> You're clearly not the brightest texta in the packet and will never
    > >>>>>> figure it out for yourself, so I'll give you a hint.
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>> If you're waiting for me to engage in a serious conversation with you
    > >>>>>> then you are going to be waiting for a ****ing *hell* of a long time. I
    > >>>>>> don't like you, I think you're a ****ing lying **** and I have no
    > >>>>>> intention of *ever* engaging you in serious conversation.
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>> All you will ever get from me is insult and/or ridicule, so persist
    > >>>>>> with
    > >>>>>> that if you like or just simply give up and **** off.
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>> Your call.
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>>
    > >>>>>
    > >>>>> Stop being so angry. Sheez.
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>> That's a bit rich coming from you who seems determined to shit stir for
    > >>>> some unknown reason
    > >>>
    > >>> Pointing out the pure bullshit, hypocrisy and vitriolic bullying in
    > >>> certain individuals isn't "shit stirring".
    > >>>
    > >>>
    > >> Pot kettle, Noddy and I disagree on many subjects especially politics
    > >> but our discussions don't resort to childish insults so you are reaping
    > >> what you are sewing.
    > >>
    > >>

    > > sowing: Place (seeds) in or on the ground for future growth.
    > > Nod's into basket weaving to keep all his rusty XP parts together, not sewing.
    > > Although I must admit to knitting bones just like him. Does that mean we are
    > > related?
    > >

    >
    > Sorry Mr Spelling Policeman.
    > You could be related, does your wife use a 5tonne excavator to do the
    > gardening:-)
    >

    No!

    Al
    --
    I don't take sides.
    It's more fun to insult everyone.

  17. #117
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Blue Heeler wrote:
    > Albm&ctd wrote:
    >
    >>>

    >> Just like you, old leaf spring and king pin man :)
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Nuffin wrong with King and link suspension - easily fixed and
    > maintained by a home mechanic without the need of too many special
    > tools.
    >
    >
    >
    > I pulled the injection pump out of the truck yesterday and tomorrow
    > I'll take it to the repairer who will charge me several hundred dollars
    > to replace the leaking diaphram and recalibrate it.
    >
    > I used to do my own inline pumps, on the kitchen table and it used to
    > take about 2 hours to change out all the wearing parts and recalibrate.
    > And the only "special tool"you needed was a burette.
    >
    > Not all progress is good progress.
    >


    True enough.

  18. #118
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Noddy wrote:
    > On 29/09/13 4:20 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >
    >> Since he can't drive to conditions he shouldn't be on the road.

    >
    > I find it quite remarkable that you two dick pullers can work out an
    > entire scenario based on a couple of sentences. You are both incredibly
    > wasted talents.
    >
    >
    >


    You volunteered the info, dopey!

  19. #119
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    lindsay wrote:
    > On 29/09/2013 12:58 PM, Xeno Lith wrote:
    >
    >> The Getz comment you made was ill advised and you've suddenly realised
    >> it make YOU look like a goose, hence the rapid backpedalling! ;-)

    >
    > Hey Alligator, the only one who looks like a goose 'round here is you.
    > Why? Because you know Noddy's killfiled you, yet you're STILL replying!
    >


    Noddy can't work out how to make a Facebook page private, what makes you
    think he can work out how to killfile someone?


  20. #120
    Ext User(Clocky) Guest

    Re: A question of physics>>

    Jason James wrote:
    > Noddy wrote:
    >> On 29/09/13 4:16 AM, Clocky wrote:
    >>
    >>> Nothing like the same language. Dutch is much more faithful to the
    >>> original Germanic language then high German is.

    >>
    >> It's in the same suburb :)
    >>
    >>> That's why you will often get Dutch speakers understanding a fair bit of
    >>> German but not so the other way around.

    >>
    >> Why do the Dutch have reputations for being arrogant ****s?
    >>
    >>> It's not a question of awareness when it's simply not true, the Dutch
    >>> had in fact a strong anti-Nazi sentiment. The Dutch also had a very
    >>> active resistance movement during occupation.
    >>> Even now anti-German sentiment relating back to the war is high.

    >>
    >> Just about every occupied country was similar. But that doesn't mean
    >> they didn't have a pro German movement either.
    >>
    >> From the Wiki article on "Collaboration with the Axis Powers":
    >>
    >> Netherlands
    >>
    >> SS Recruiting Poster for the Netherlands, urging Dutch people to "join
    >> the fight against Bolshevism"
    >> Thousands of Dutch volunteers joined the 11th SS Volunteer
    >> Panzergrenadier Division Nordland (created in February 1943).
    >> The division participated in fighting against the Soviet army and was
    >> crushed in the Battle of Berlin in April–May 1945.
    >> This was also the case for the 5th SS Panzergrenadier Division Wiking.
    >> It was involved in several major battles on the Eastern Front.
    >> SS-Freiwilligen Legion Niederlande, manned by Dutch volunteers and
    >> German officers, battled the Soviet army from 1941.
    >> In December 1943, it gained brigade status after fighting on the front
    >> around Leningrad. It was at Leningrad that the first
    >> European volunteer, a Dutchman, earned the Knight's Cross of the Iron
    >> Cross: Gerardus Mooyman. In December 1944, it was
    >> transformed into the 23rd SS Volunteer Panzergrenadier Division
    >> Nederland and fought in Courland and Pomerania.[6]
    >> It found its end scattered across Germany.
    >> SS-Freiwilligen-Panzergrenadier-Regiment "de Ruyter" fought at the Oder
    >> and surrendered on 3 May 1945 to the Americans. 48.
    >> SS-Freiwilligen-Panzergrenadier-Regiment "General Seyffardt" however
    >> was split up into two groups. The first of these fought with Kampfgruppe
    >> Vieweger and went under in the fighting near Halbe.
    >> The few remaining survivors were captured by the Soviets. The other half
    >> of "General Seyffart" fought with Korpsgruppe Tettau
    >> and surrendered to the western Allies. During the war famous actor and
    >> singer Johannes Heesters made his career in Nazi-Germany,
    >> befriending high-ranking Nazis such as Joseph Goebbels and living in
    >> houses stolen from wealthy Jews.
    >>
    >> Clearly there was *plenty* of Pro Nazi activity. Despite your propaganda
    >> to the contrary.
    >>
    >>> I like the way you spout anti-Dutch sentiment which is 100% incorrect
    >>> both historically and factually, proving my initial point in the
    >>> process.

    >>
    >> You had a point? That'd be a first.
    >>
    >>> Thanks for that.

    >>
    >> You're welcome, but in your usual ridiculous mouth frothing you've
    >> totally missed the point. You can call me a"German" if you like, but
    >> *you* were born in a country that is of Germanic stock making you closer
    >> to being a ****ing German than I could ever hope to be, you ****ing
    >> idiot :)

    >
    > You can feel the lurve in the room here, Barry.
    >
    > Barry White>> "Never, never, goin' to give you up" [and so on>> :-]
    >
    > Jason
    >
    >
    >


    Just for you Jason...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •