Habib Interview.

[David Hardie]

This just goes to show the weakness of chequebook journalism.

In the end it was an interview with not a lot of substance, nothing that
really suprised, most of which had filtered out in in other media in one
form or another.

In the end I have to say that Ch Nein got ripped off and the Jim Carey
interview was more informative.

Now *that* is justice.

D.

[w_j_wolfe20o3@yahoo.com]

David Hardie wrote:
> This just goes to show the weakness of chequebook journalism.
>
> In the end it was an interview with not a lot of substance, nothing
that
> really suprised, most of which had filtered out in in other media in
one
> form or another.

Can you remember the last time sixty seconds did a genuinely
professional serious interview that actually revealed anythiong of
substance? It's just a one hour version of a crap affair, it's chewing
gum for the brain.
>
> In the end I have to say that Ch Nein got ripped off and the Jim
Carey
> interview was more informative.

Nope, they got what they wanted, something to promote as an "exclusive"
and so a possibility of bumping the ratings up a couple of points.